Does the "Thunderbirds syndrome" still exist

Rationing of resources within both the private and public health care systems is a fact of life. The Thunderbirds TV series encapsulated an idealistic philosophy that life should be saved independent of the pecuniary cost. Doctors, in particular, are trapped between their role as advocates for the patient within the "Thunderbirds" philosophy and as citizens with a responsibility to use resources wisely. This dichotomy is challenged by point of care rationing, which can conflict with clinical responsibilities, undermines the patient-doctor relationship and is often undertaken in a clandestine manner. This form of controlling health costs is difficult to justify from an ethical perspective, particularly when other forms of health care rationing and expenditure are frequently modulated by political expediency and inadequate economic modelling. Indeed, focusing on improving quality and disease prevention, rather than reducing marginal costs can often control the long-term growth in health expenditure. Doctors have a responsibility to ensure that rationing decisions are made but these should be made as part of a transparent, evidence-based and democratic process away from the point of care. While the resources to implement the "Thunderbirds Syndrome" have never been available, the philosophy must remain at the heart of patient-doctor relationship.