Estimating Reference Evapotranspiration with Minimum Data in Florida |
| |
Authors: | Christopher J. Martinez Mayank Thepadia |
| |
Affiliation: | 1Assistant Professor, Dept. of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Univ. of Florida, P.O. Box 110570, Gainesville, FL 32611 (corresponding author). E-mail: chrisjm@ufl.edu 2Graduate Assistant, Dept. of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Univ. of Florida, P.O. Box 110570, Gainesville, FL 32611.
|
| |
Abstract: | ![]() Reference evapotranspiration estimation methods that require minimal data are necessary when climatic data sets are incomplete, inaccurate, or unavailable. This study was conducted to evaluate temperature-based reference evapotranspiration methods in Florida. Using reference evapotranspiration estimates using satellite-derived radiation as the standard for comparison, the “reduced-set” Penman-Monteith, Hargreaves, and Turc equations were evaluated using monthly temperature data from 72 weather stations in Florida. The reduced-set Penman-Monteith equation requires maximum and minimum temperature only and uses recommended methods to estimate radiation, humidity, and wind speed. The reduced-set Penman-Monteith and Hargreaves equations were found to overestimate reference evapotranspiration while the Turc equation neither overestimated nor underestimated. The reduced-set Penman-Monteith equation showed greatest error in coastal stations while the Hargreaves equation showed greatest error at inland and island locations. In the absence of regionally calibrated methods the Turc equation is recommended for estimating reference evapotranspiration using measured maximum and minimum temperature and estimated radiation in Florida. |
| |
Keywords: | Evapotranspiration Florida Approximation methods Hydrologic data |
|
|