|
|||||
|
|
| 钢坝闸与橡胶坝在河道治理中的应用比较 | |
| 引用本文： | 张锋. 钢坝闸与橡胶坝在河道治理中的应用比较[J]. 西北水电, 2011, 0(1): 27-29 |
| 作者姓名： | 张锋 |
| 作者单位： | 山东省临沂市水利勘测设计院,山东省临沂市,276000 |
| 摘 要： | 钢坝闸景观效果明显、安全可靠、操作运行方便快捷但造价较高,橡胶坝经济实用、抗震性能好但景观效果不够理想。文章分析比较二者工作原理及特点,结合临沂市陷泥河综合治理工程实例,根据河道具体情况对两方案进行对比,为读者对河道治理中拦河闸坝的选择提供参考。 |
| 关 键 词： | 钢坝闸 橡胶坝 河道治理 底横轴翻转闸门 挡水建筑物 |
Application comparison of steel dam gate and rubber dam in river harnessing |
|
| ZHANG Feng. Application comparison of steel dam gate and rubber dam in river harnessing[J]. Northwest Water Power, 2011, 0(1): 27-29 | |
| Authors: | ZHANG Feng |
| Affiliation: | ZHANG Feng (Linyi City Water Conservancy Survey and Design Institute of Shandong Province, Linyi 276000, China) |
| Abstract: | The steel dam gate is great in appearance, safe and reliable, easy and fast in operation, but high in cost. The rubber dam is economic and practical, with a good seismic performance, but the appearance is inadequate. This paper analyzes and compares the working principles and features of the two dams, and based on the comprehensive harnessing of the Xianni River in Linyi City and the details of the fiver channel, the two alternatives are compared, which provides references for selection of gate barrages in river harnessing. |
| Keywords: | steel dam gate rubber dam fiver harnessing flap gate with bottom horizontal axis, water retaining structure |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ | |