Solving anagrams as a function of word frequency, imagery and distribution of practice.

While previous research has consistently demonstrated that anagrams with solution-words of high frequency are easier to solve than anagrams with solution-words of low frequency, the results for solution-word imagery have been contradictory. Experiment I involved the use of four six-item lists which varied factorially on imagery and frequency and were equated for meaningfulness and total bigram-position frequency. Eighteen Ss attempted to solve these anagrams under conditions of distributed practice and 18 Ss under massed practice. Data for solution latency and number of solutions revealed that anagrams were easier to solve if the solution-words were of high imagery or high frequency (ps ps