Comparison of the performance of a direct-contact bubble reactor and an indirectly heated tubular reactor for solar-aided methane dry reforming employing molten salt |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Chemical Process & Energy Resources Institute (C.P.E.R.I.), Center for Research and Technology Hellas (CE.R.T.H.), P.O. Box 60361, 57001 Thermi, Thessaloniki, Greece;2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, P.O. Box 484, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece;3. Department of Automation Engineering, Alexander Technological Educational Institute of Thessaloniki, P.O. Box 141, 57400 Thessaloniki, Greece;1. CIEMAT-Plataforma Solar de Almería, Crta. de Senés, km. 4.5, E04200 Tabernas, Almería, Spain;2. Universidad de Almería, Ctra. Sacramento s/n, E04120 La Cañada de San Urbano, Almería, Spain;1. School of Automobile Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology at Weihai, 2, West Wenhua Road, Weihai 264209, PR China;2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tulsa, 800, South Tucker Road, OK 74104, USA |
| |
Abstract: | A theoretical approach is presented for the comparison of two different atmospheric pressure reactors—a direct-contact bubble reactor (DCBR) and an indirectly heated tubular reactor (IHTR)—to evaluate the reactor performance in terms of heat transfer and available catalytic active surface area. The model considers the catalytic endothermic reactions of methane dry reforming that proceeds in both reactors by employing molten salts at elevated temperatures (700–900 °C) in the absence of catalyst deactivation effects. The methane conversion process is simulated for a single reactor using both a reaction kinetics model and a heat transfer model. A well-tested reaction kinetics model, which showed an acceptable agreement with the empirical observations, was implemented to describe the methane dry reforming. In DCBR, the heat is internally transferred by direct contact with the three phases of the system: the reactant gas bubbles, the heat carrier molten salts and the solid catalyst (Ni-Al2O3). In contrast, the supplied heat in the conventional shell-and-tube heat exchanger of the IHTR is transferred across an intervening wall. The results suggest a combination system of DCBR and IHTR would be a suitable configuration for process intensification associated with higher thermal efficiency and cost reduction. |
| |
Keywords: | Dry reforming Direct contact bubble reactor Tubular reactor Heat transfer Simulation |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|