首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

基于机组同调性的电力系统动态安全域改进解析法
引用本文:刘怀东,唐晓玲,高天亮,郝慧贞.基于机组同调性的电力系统动态安全域改进解析法[J].电工技术学报,2008,23(4):112-118.
作者姓名:刘怀东  唐晓玲  高天亮  郝慧贞
作者单位:1. 天津大学电力系统仿真控制教育部重点实验室,天津,300072
2. 烟台东方电子股份有限公司,烟台,264000
摘    要:大量仿真结果表明实用解析法求得的动态安全域(DSR)边界超平面系数的误差与机组同调性间有强相关性,据此提出基于机组同调性求解DSR的改进解析法.在实用解析法基础上将系统节点分为临界机组、剩余机组和负荷节点群,仅计算几个临界注入点,就可估算各组节点DSR边界超平面系数的修正量.IEEE 10机39节点系统和118节点系统的仿真结果最大误差分别小于4%和0.7%,计算时间分别为拟合法的7.5%和1.3%,表明所提方法速度快、误差小且合理可行.

关 键 词:动态安全域  解析法  同调性  失稳模态  拟合法
修稿时间:2007年3月27日

An Improved Analytical Method for Determining Dynamic Security Region of Electrical Power Systems Based on Generator Coherency
Liu Huaidong,Tang Xiaoling,Gao Tianliang,Hao Huizhen.An Improved Analytical Method for Determining Dynamic Security Region of Electrical Power Systems Based on Generator Coherency[J].Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society,2008,23(4):112-118.
Authors:Liu Huaidong  Tang Xiaoling  Gao Tianliang  Hao Huizhen
Affiliation:1.Key Laboratory of Power System Simulation and Control of Ministry of Education Tianjin University Tianjin 300072 China 2.Yantai Dongfang Electronics Information Industry Group Co. Ltd Yantai 264000 China
Abstract:The dynamic security region (DSR) can provide plenty of security information and have good prospect in application. The simulation approach determines DSR by a lot of numerical simulation work, while the analytical method is rapid but the error of the results is relatively high. Lots of observation show that the errors of DSR boundary hyper-plane coefficients determined through analytic method are correlative highly to generator coherency. A new improved analytical method based on generator coherency is presented. Based on the results of the analytical method, the system nodes are divided into critical generator nodes, remnants generator nodes and loads. By adding only a few new critical points the deflection of each group is solved. The improved analytical method reduces the errors obviously and preserves the speediness feature. The errors can also be controllable by adjusting the increased number of the critical points. Test results on the New England 10-generator 39-bus test system show that when the time taken is 7.5% of the simulation approach, the maximum error of the test points is less than 4%, while simulation on the New England 118-bus test system shows that when the time taken is about 1.3% of the simulation approach, the maximum error of the test points is less than 0.7%.
Keywords:Dynamic security region  analytical method  coherency  instability mode  simulation approach
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号