| 固化涂层中有机挥发物的顶空法和萃取法检测结果的一致性探讨 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 陈俊水,马腾洲,张铮,张琳. 固化涂层中有机挥发物的顶空法和萃取法检测结果的一致性探讨[J]. 上海涂料, 2014, 52(11): 45-48 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 陈俊水 马腾洲 张铮 张琳 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 上海出入境检验检疫局,上海,200135 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 通过顶空-气相色谱质谱法和加速溶剂萃取(ASE)-气相色谱质谱法对溶剂型涂料固化后残留的代表性有机挥发物进行检测,并对所得数据通过数理统计进行比对研究,结果表明:这两种方法没有明显的差别。
|
| 关 键 词： | 固化涂层 有机挥发物 顶空法 加速溶剂萃取法 气相色谱质谱法 |
Discussion on the Test Results Consistency of Headspace-GCMS and ASE-GCMS for the Volatile Organic Compounds in Cured Coating |
| |
| Chen Junshui,Ma Tengzhou,Zhang Zheng,Zhang Lin. Discussion on the Test Results Consistency of Headspace-GCMS and ASE-GCMS for the Volatile Organic Compounds in Cured Coating[J]. Shanghai Coatings, 2014, 52(11): 45-48 |
| |
| Authors: | Chen Junshui Ma Tengzhou Zhang Zheng Zhang Lin |
| |
| Affiliation: | Chen Junshui;Ma Tengzhou;Zhang Zheng;Zhang Lin;Shanghai Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau; |
| |
| Abstract: | The volatile organic compounds in cured coating were tested by using headspace-GCMS and ASE- GCMS. The test results were compared by mathematical statistics. There was no significant difference between the two methods. |
| |
| Keywords: | cured coating volatile organic compound headspace method ASE method GCMS |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
