首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Detection and quantification of pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus in shellfish by using multiplex PCR and loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay
Affiliation:1. Department of Biological Engineering, Inha University, Incheon, Republic of Korea;2. West sea Fisheries Institute, National Institute of Fisheries Sciencet (NIFS), Incheon, Republic of Korea;3. Food Safety and Processing Research Division, National Institute of Fisheries Science (NIFS), Busan, Republic of Korea;1. Food Safety Testing Center, Beijing Entry–Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau of the People''s Republic of China, Beijing 100026, China;2. National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing 100190, China;3. Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing 102206, China
Abstract:Vibrio parahaemolyticus is a halophilic bacterium that commonly inhabits the marine and estuarine environments. This organism is also one of the leading causative pathogen of gastroenteritis often related to consumption of raw or undercooked seafood. In this study, molluscan shellfish (bloody clams and surf clams) and crustaceans (shrimps) were monitored in wet markets and hypermarkets. Two molecular methods were employed and compared to detect total and pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus in MPN enrichments: multiplex PCR and LAMP assay. The multiplex PCR was optimized to detect the total (toxR+), tdh+ and trh+ V. parahaemolyticus. On the other hand, the LAMP assay was employed to target the pathogenic strains only, the tdh+ and trh+, respectively. Out of 232 samples examined, 229 (98.7%) were positive for V. parahaemolyticus with counts ranging from 30 to >110, 000 MPN/g. Positive samples for tdh+ V. parahaemolyticus were obtained in 77 out of 232 (33.1%) samples ranging from 30 to >110, 000 MPN/g. Meanwhile, positive samples for trh+ were identified in 16 out of 232 (6.9%) samples examined ranging from 30 to 9600 MPN/g. Detection of samples with presence of tdh+ genes did not vary between methods, but a significant difference was observed when the LAMP assay was compared to PCR to detect trh+ V. parahaemolyticus. Therefore, on occasions where the density of the targeted genes is low, the LAMP assay serves as a better alternative. Nonetheless, this study constitutes an assessment of presence of total and potentially pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus in shellfishes for domestic consumption revealing the potential risk of contracting vibriosis if precautions and safety measures are not properly managed.
Keywords:Molluscan shellfish (bloody clams and surf clams)  Crustacean shellfish (shrimps)  Most probable number (MPN)  Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction (multiplex PCR)  Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP)
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号