首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

不同等级金牡丹乌龙茶品质和矿质元素差异分析
引用本文:张奇,张荧,晏紫,叶江华,庞晓敏,李奇松,雷卫星,贾小丽.不同等级金牡丹乌龙茶品质和矿质元素差异分析[J].食品工业科技,2022,43(24):288-295.
作者姓名:张奇  张荧  晏紫  叶江华  庞晓敏  李奇松  雷卫星  贾小丽
作者单位:1.武夷学院茶与食品学院,福建南平 3543002.福建农林大学园艺学院,福建福州 3500023.武夷学院信息技术与实验室管理中心,福建南平 3543004.武夷学院生态与资源工程学院,福建南平 354300
基金项目:武夷学院“高级引进人才科研启动项目”(YJ201909);福建省自然科学基金项目(2020J05214);福建省一流本科专业(茶学)建设(SJZY2019004);福建省中青年教师教育科研项目(科技类)(JAT190786,JAT200664)。
摘    要:以不同等级金牡丹乌龙茶为试材,测定了不同等级金牡丹乌龙茶的感官审评得分、品质指标(茶多酚、咖啡碱、8种儿茶素、可溶性糖、游离氨基酸、茶氨酸、水浸出物和总黄酮)和8种矿质元素含量。等级越高的金牡丹乌龙茶水浸出物含量越高,特等奖水浸出物含量比一等奖和优质奖分别高1.07%和1.75%,且差异均达到显著水平(P<0.05)。咖啡碱、可溶性糖和总黄酮含量均为低等级显著高于高等级(P<0.05)。三个等级的茶多酚含量之间没有显著差异(P>0.05)。特等奖的酚氨比要显著低于一等奖和优质奖(P<0.05)。优质奖的茶氨酸含量要显著低于特等奖和一等奖(P<0.05)。线性回归分析表明,游离氨基酸和总黄酮与审评得分呈显著线性负相关(P<0.05),可溶性糖与审评得分呈极显著线性负相关(P<0.01),而水浸出物与审评得分呈极显著线性正相关(P<0.01)。不同等级金牡丹乌龙茶除Mn和Fe外,大多数矿质元素之间不存在显著差异(P>0.05)。限制性主坐标分析表明,品质指标结合限制性主坐标分析可以很好的区分金牡丹乌龙茶等级差异,R值达1.00。但矿质元素结合限制性主坐标分析并不能很好的区分不同等级金牡丹乌龙茶的品质差异。研究结果为金牡丹乌龙茶品质鉴定提供相关参考依据。

关 键 词:金牡丹乌龙茶    等级差异    品质指标    矿质元素    感官品质    相关性分析
收稿时间:2022-02-21

Analysis on the Difference of Quality and Mineral Elements Among Jinmudan Oolong Tea
ZHANG Qi,ZHANG Ying,YAN Zi,YE Jianghua,PANG Xiaomin,LI Qisong,LEI Weixing,JIA Xiaoli.Analysis on the Difference of Quality and Mineral Elements Among Jinmudan Oolong Tea[J].Science and Technology of Food Industry,2022,43(24):288-295.
Authors:ZHANG Qi  ZHANG Ying  YAN Zi  YE Jianghua  PANG Xiaomin  LI Qisong  LEI Weixing  JIA Xiaoli
Affiliation:1.College of Tea and Food Science, Wuyi University, Nanping 354300, China2.College of Horticulture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China3.Information Technology and Laboratory Management Center, Wuyi University, Nanping 354300, China4.College of Ecology and Resource Engineering, Wuyi University, Nanping 354300, China
Abstract:The sensory evaluation scores, quality indexes (tea polyphenols, caffeine, 8 catechins, soluble sugars, free amino acids, theanine, water extracts and total flavonoids) and 8 mineral elements of different grades of Jinmudan Oolong tea were determined. The results showed that the higher the grade, the higher the water extract content of Jinmudan Oolong tea, and the water extract content of Grand Prize was 1.07% and 1.75% higher than that of first prize and quality prize, respectively, and the differences all reached a significant level (P<0.05). Caffeine, soluble sugar and total flavonoid contents were all significantly higher for low-grade Jinmudan Oolong tea than high-grade (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in tea polyphenol content among the three levels (P>0.05). The ratio of phenol to ammonia was significantly lower in the grand prize than in the first prize and the quality prize (P<0.05). The theanine content was significantly lower in the quality award than in the grand prize and the first prize (P<0.05). Linear regression analysis showed that free amino acids and total flavonoids were significantly negatively correlated with the evaluation score (P<0.05), soluble sugar was significantly negatively correlated with the evaluation score (P<0.01), while water extracts was significantly positively correlated with the evaluation score (P<0.01). There was no significant difference between most mineral elements of different grades of Jinmudan Oolong tea, except for Mn and Fe (P>0.05). The restricted principal coordinates analysis showed that the quality indexes combined with restricted principal coordinates analysis could well distinguish the grade differences of Jinmudan Oolong tea with an R value of 1.00. However, the mineral elements combined with restricted principal coordinates analysis did not well distinguish the quality differences of different grades of Jinmudan Oolong tea. These results could provide a certain reference for the quality judgment of Jinmudan Oolong tea.
Keywords:
点击此处可从《食品工业科技》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《食品工业科技》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号