首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

不同电法勘探方法在探测采空区等地质体中的比较
引用本文:刘英,姜文龙,陶飞.不同电法勘探方法在探测采空区等地质体中的比较[J].山东煤炭科技,2009(5):80-82.
作者姓名:刘英  姜文龙  陶飞
作者单位:中国矿业大学资源学院,江苏,徐州,210008
摘    要:电法勘探在探测小煤窑采空区、富水陷落柱等方面常用的方法有高密度电法、瞬变电磁法以及可控源音频大地电磁法,但是三种方法都有各自的优缺点,该文对三种方法在理论上的优缺点进行比较,从而得出针对不同地质条件应选择的合适的勘探方法,为电法勘探的实际应用提供借鉴和参考。

关 键 词:瞬变电磁法  可控源音频大地电磁法  高密度电法  优缺点  采空区  陷落柱

Comparison of different methods of electrical prospecting in detecting geological anomalies such as goal
Liu Ying,Jiang Wen-long,Tao Fei.Comparison of different methods of electrical prospecting in detecting geological anomalies such as goal[J].Shandong Coal Science and Technology,2009(5):80-82.
Authors:Liu Ying  Jiang Wen-long  Tao Fei
Abstract:When use the electrical prospecting to detect the mined-out area of the coal mine,water-rich areas such as the fall of column,the usual methods are high-density electrical prospecting,TEM and CSAMT,but three methods have their own advantages and shortcomings,this article will compare the three methods in theory,so as to reach a conclusion that in different geological conditions should choose the appropriate methods of exploration.Then provide reference for the practical application.
Keywords:TEM CSAMT High-density electrical prospecting advantage and disadvantages mined-out area Collapse Column
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号