| 基于AHP-Fuzzy法的采空区危险性评价 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘涛. 基于AHP-Fuzzy法的采空区危险性评价[J]. 有色金属(矿山部分), 2016, 68(5): 49-52 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘涛 |
| |
| 作者单位： | （西北矿冶研究院，甘肃 白银730900） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 根据采空区围岩的岩石条件、空区形态和采矿影响3个方面,选取了8个评价指标对厂坝铅锌矿的4个采空区进行了危险性排序。由于采空区的稳定性受到多种因素的影响,且影响因素之间存在诸多模糊信息,为了优先充填危险性较大的空区,为残矿回收构建安全环境,采用AHP-Fuzzy法对采空区的危险性进行了评价。计算结果表明,空区1的相对危险度为0.906 6,危险性最大,故先对空区1进行充填。
|
| 关 键 词： | 层次分析模糊评价法 采空区 危险性评价 |
| 收稿时间： | 2016-02-24 |
| 修稿时间： | 2016-03-01 |
The Evaluation of Goaf Danger Based on AHP-Fuzzy Method |
| |
| LIU Tao. The Evaluation of Goaf Danger Based on AHP-Fuzzy Method[J]. , 2016, 68(5): 49-52 |
| |
| Authors: | LIU Tao |
| |
| Affiliation: | (Northwest Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Baiyin Gansu 730900, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | According to the rock conditions and area morphology and mining impacts, eight evaluations are selected to sort the risk of four goafs in Changba Mine. Due to the stability of goaf affected by many factors and the influence of many factors that exist between fuzzy information, AHP-Fuzzy method is used to evaluate the dangerous of goaf. The results show that the relative risk of goaf 1 is 0.9066 which is the biggest danger factor, so the goaf 1 is filled firstly. |
| |
| Keywords: | AHP-Fuzzy method goaf danger evaluation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《有色金属(矿山部分)》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《有色金属(矿山部分)》下载全文 |
|
