首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

电位滴定法测定钒电池电解液中硫酸根
引用本文:刘月菊,宋明明,邸卫利,姜雪莲,李茜,丁琳.电位滴定法测定钒电池电解液中硫酸根[J].冶金分析,2019,39(4):75-79.
作者姓名:刘月菊  宋明明  邸卫利  姜雪莲  李茜  丁琳
作者单位:大连博融新材料有限公司,辽宁大连 116450
摘    要:钒电池电解液的酸根组成和浓度会严重影响电池的效率,需要准确地测定各种酸根的浓度,以便及时地进行调节。重量法是测定硫酸根的经典方法,但操作步骤繁琐、耗时较长,不能满足过程控制调整的要求。实验采用EDTA络合钒,再以NaOH标准滴定溶液利用酸碱滴定法测定溶液中总氢离子浓度,根据样品中不同价态钒的浓度通过计算即可得到样品中硫酸根浓度,实现了电位滴定法对含钒电解液中硫酸根离子的检测。实验对EDTA加入量、EDTA加入形式进行优化。分别按照实验方法和重量法测定1个钒电池电解液中硫酸根,两种方法无显著性差异;按照实验方法对两个钒电池电解液样品中硫酸根进行加标回收试验,回收率为98.9%~100.0%;按照实验方法测定3个钒电池电解液样品中硫酸根,结果的相对标准偏差(RSD,n=5)为0.13%~1.2%。分别使用实验方法和重量法测定含有不同价态钒的3个钒电池电解液中硫酸根,结果相吻合。

关 键 词:钒电池电解液  硫酸根  电位滴定  EDTA络合  酸碱滴定法  
收稿时间:2018-12-18

Determination of sulfate in vanadium battery electrolyte by potentiometric titration
LIU Yue-ju,SONG Ming-ming,DI Wei-li,JIANG Xue-lian,LI Qian,DING Lin.Determination of sulfate in vanadium battery electrolyte by potentiometric titration[J].Metallurgical Analysis,2019,39(4):75-79.
Authors:LIU Yue-ju  SONG Ming-ming  DI Wei-li  JIANG Xue-lian  LI Qian  DING Lin
Affiliation:Dalian Bolong New Materials Co., Ltd., Dalian 116450, China
Abstract:The composition and concentration of acid radicals in vanadium battery electrolyte can greatly influence on the battery efficiency. The concentrations of various acid radicals should be accurately determined for real-time adjustment. The gravimetry is the classic method for the determination of sulfate, but the operation is tedious and time-consuming, which cannot meet the adjustment requirements of process control. After complexing of vanadium with EDTA, the content of total hydrogen ions in solution was determined by acid-base titration using NaOH standard titration solution. According to the concentration of vanadium with different valences, the concentration of sulfate in sample could be calculated, thus realizing the determination of sulfate in vanadium electrolyte by potentiometric titration. The dosage and addition method of EDTA were optimized in experiments. The content of sulfate in one sample of vanadium battery electrolyte was determined according to the experimental method and gravimetry. There was no significant difference between two methods. The recovery test of sulfate in two samples of vanadium battery electrolyte was conducted according to the experimental method. The recoveries were between 98.9% and 100.0%. The concentration of sulfate in three samples of vanadium battery electrolyte was determined according to the experimental method. The relative standard deviations (RSD, n=5) of results were in range of 0.13%-1.2%. The concentration of sulfate in three samples of vanadium battery electrolyte with different valences of vanadium was determined according to the experimental method and gravimetry, respectively. The found results were consistent between two methods.
Keywords:vanadium battery electrolyte  sulfate  potentiometric titration  EDTA complexing  acid-base titration  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《冶金分析》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《冶金分析》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号