首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

熔融制样-X射线荧光光谱测定不锈钢渣中10种组分
引用本文:张祥,陆晓明,金德龙,何伟.熔融制样-X射线荧光光谱测定不锈钢渣中10种组分[J].冶金分析,2016,36(1):40-44.
作者姓名:张祥  陆晓明  金德龙  何伟
作者单位:宝钢中央研究院分析测试研究中心,上海 201900
摘    要:采用玻璃片熔融方法制样,建立了X射线荧光光谱(XRF)分析不锈钢渣中氧化铝、二氧化硅、氧化钙、氧化镁、三氧化二铁、氧化锰、三氧化二铬、二氧化钛、氧化镍和五氧化二磷的快速检测方法。以四硼酸锂-偏硼酸锂(质量比1∶1)为熔剂,稀释比1∶24,在1 100 ℃下,静置5 min,摇摆20 min熔融,制得均匀不锈钢渣玻璃片。选用炉渣标准样品、三氧化二铬高纯试剂及镍标准溶液合成系列不锈钢渣校准样品,经X射线荧光光谱仪测定并绘制校准曲线,采用谱线重叠干扰校正系数和基体效应校正系数有效地消除了光谱干扰和基体效应。采用高纯氧化物和标准溶液配制不锈钢渣合成样品,采用实验方法对合成样品及生产样品进行分析,测定值与参考值或湿法测定值一致;精密度试验结果显示,各组分测定结果的相对标准偏差(RSD, n=9)为0.34%~9.4%。

关 键 词:熔融制样  X射线荧光光谱  不锈钢渣  重叠校正  基体校正  主次组分  
收稿时间:2015-04-17

Determination of ten components in stainless steel slag by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry
ZHANG Xiang,LU Xiao-ming,JIN De-long,HE Wei.Determination of ten components in stainless steel slag by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry[J].Metallurgical Analysis,2016,36(1):40-44.
Authors:ZHANG Xiang  LU Xiao-ming  JIN De-long  HE Wei
Affiliation:Analysis and Test Research Center, Baosteel Research Institute, Shanghai 201900, China
Abstract:The sample was prepared by fusion method. The rapid determination method of aluminum oxide, silicon dioxide, calcium oxide, magnesium oxide, ferric oxide, manganese oxide, chromium oxide, titanium dioxide, nickel oxide and phosphorus pentoxide in stainless steel slag by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF) was established. The Li2B4O7-LiBO2 (mass ratio of 1∶1) was used as mixed flux. The dilution ratio was 1∶24. The uniform glass sheets of stainless steel slag were prepared by fusion at 1 100 ℃ for 5 min (standing) and 20 min (swing). The series stainless steel slag calibration samples were synthesized with furnace slag standard sample, Cr2O3 high-purity reagent and Ni standard solution. The synthetic samples were determined by XRF to plot the calibration curve. The spectral interference and matrix effect were effectively eliminated by using spectral +overlapping interference coefficient and theoretical alpha coefficient. The stainless steel slag synthetic samples(synthetized by high purity oxides and standard solution) and production samples were analyzed according to the experimental method. The found results were consistent with the reference values or those obtained by wet method. The precision test results indicated that the relative standard deviations (RSD, n=9) were between 0.34% and 9.4%.
Keywords:fusion sample preparation  X-ray fluorescence spectrometry  stainless steel slag  overlapping lines correction  matrix correction  major and minor component  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《冶金分析》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《冶金分析》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号