首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

利益相关者的水资源配置博弈
引用本文:付湘,陆帆,胡铁松.利益相关者的水资源配置博弈[J].水利学报,2016,47(1):38-43.
作者姓名:付湘  陆帆  胡铁松
作者单位:武汉大学 水资源与水电工程科学国家重点实验室, 湖北 武汉 430072;武汉大学 水资源安全保障湖北省协同创新中心, 湖北 武汉 430072,武汉大学 水资源与水电工程科学国家重点实验室, 湖北 武汉 430072,武汉大学 水资源与水电工程科学国家重点实验室, 湖北 武汉 430072
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(51179130,51479142)
摘    要:水资源的准公共产品属性及其在开发利用中存在的外部性使河流自然流态受到严重的扰动,本文基于非合作博弈博弈论,建立主从关系的用户博弈模型分析河流水资源分配,基于个体效益不能达到帕累托最优状态,采用合作博弈方法,建立水资源用户合作博弈模型。合作博弈增加了总效益,但使得上游用户的效益比非合作时减少,有必要对上游用户进行效益补偿:引入微观经济学的无差异曲线与合作联盟形成的条件构建合作效益分配的可行解集,并提出基于边际贡献的效益分配方法在可行解集中挑选唯一的效益分配解。研究结果表明,合作博弈总效益大于非合作博弈的总效益,达到帕累托最优状态;通过合作效益分配,处于先动优势的上游用户的分配效益大于非合作的效益,有利于行动占先者加入合作联盟。

关 键 词:博弈论  主从关系  无差异曲线  帕累托最优  合作效益分配
收稿时间:2015/1/21 0:00:00

Game theory in water resources allocation for stakeholders
FU Xiang,LU Fan and HU Tiesong.Game theory in water resources allocation for stakeholders[J].Journal of Hydraulic Engineering,2016,47(1):38-43.
Authors:FU Xiang  LU Fan and HU Tiesong
Affiliation:State Key Laboratory of Water Resource and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China;Hubei Provincial Collaborative Innovation Center for Water Resources Security, Wuhan 430072, China,State Key Laboratory of Water Resource and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China and State Key Laboratory of Water Resource and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
Abstract:The natural river flows are seriously disturbed because of the quasi public goods attributes and externality of water resources. Based on game theory, non-cooperative model with leader-follower relationship is established to analyze the water resources allocation. Because the individual benefit can not reach Pareto optimal state, cooperative model is provided for more beneficial to all stakeholders. Cooperative game increases the total benefits,but reduces leader's payoff. It is necessary to allocate benefits from cooperation to leader. The feasible solution set of benefits allocation is constructed by introducing indifference curve of the microeconomics and formation condition of coalition. A fair and efficient allocation is determined using the marginal contribution method from the feasible solution set. The results show that the total benefits of cooperative game are more than benefits from non cooperative game and achieve Pareto optimum. The leader benefit from cooperation is more than non cooperation benefit, which is advantageous for the leader to form coalitions.
Keywords:game theory  leader-follower relationship  indifference curve  Pareto optimum  allocation of cooperation benefits
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《水利学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《水利学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号