| 干旱区两种微气象学法测定农田蒸散发的比较研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张 鑫,佟 玲,李思恩,康绍忠.干旱区两种微气象学法测定农田蒸散发的比较研究[J].水利学报,2011,42(12). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张 鑫 佟 玲 李思恩 康绍忠 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国农业大学中国农业水问题研究中心,北京,100083 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金重点项目(50939005);国家自然科学基金项目(50809072); 国家高技术研究发展计划(863)课题(2006AA100203;2006AA100217) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 利用涡度相关系统（EC）和波文比系统（BREB）监测干旱区农田蒸散发变化，从时间步长、天气条件、生育期以及灌溉的影响四方面人手，对比研究了两种方法在测定农田蒸散发方面的差异，并从仪器测量精度以及大气湍流稳定状况两个方面着重分析了引起这两种观测方法产生差异的原因。结果表明：R0-G测定的不确定性及温湿度探头精度是引起两种方法测定差异的主要原因。受BREB传感器精度的限制，灌水后该法测定农田蒸散发偏低。受大气湍流稳定度的影响，晴天条件下两种方法测定蒸散发差异较小，阴天条件下差异较大。相对于EC而言，全生育期BREB高估总蒸散发约6．1％；在生育前期BREB测定蒸散发偏高，生育后期测定蒸散发偏低。
|
| 关 键 词： | 波文比法 涡度相关法 蒸散发 大气稳定度 |
Comparison of two micrometeorological methods for evaluating field evapotranspiration in the oasis of Northwest China |
| |
| ZHANG Xin,TONG Ling,LI Si-en and KANG Shao-zhong.Comparison of two micrometeorological methods for evaluating field evapotranspiration in the oasis of Northwest China[J].Journal of Hydraulic Engineering,2011,42(12). |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Xin TONG Ling LI Si-en and KANG Shao-zhong |
| |
| Affiliation: | ZHANG Xin,TONG Ling,LI Si-en,KANG Shao-zhong(China Agricultural University,Beijing 100083,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Measuring field evapotranspiration(ET) accurately is of great importance in investigating the hydrologic process,developing hydrological models and improving the water use efficiency. Bowen ratio-energy balance method(BREB) and Eddy covariance method(EC) were used to monitor the process of field evapotranspiration in the oasis of Northwest China. Probably there is discrepancy between ET value evaluated by these two methods when time scale,weather condition and growth stages are different. This paper examine... |
| |
| Keywords: | Bowen ratio-energy balance method Eddy covariance method evapotranspiration atmospheric stability |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《水利学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《水利学报》下载全文 |
