首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

钢筋笼砌石与混凝土护坦水流特性对比试验研究
引用本文:田振华,张术彬,韩雷. 钢筋笼砌石与混凝土护坦水流特性对比试验研究[J]. 人民珠江, 2014, 0(5): 23-28
作者姓名:田振华  张术彬  韩雷
作者单位:黑龙江省水利科学研究院,黑龙江哈尔滨150080
基金项目:黑龙江省科技攻关项目(GC12A301)
摘    要:通过水工模型试验,研究了平原河道柔性钢筋笼砌石护坦及混凝土护坦2种结构下的消力池、海漫段的水流结构特性。从过流能力、过堰水流的水面线、水流形态、消力池及海漫段断面垂线流速、消能率等方面,对比分析了2种护坦型式下水力学要素的区别。试验结果表明:钢筋笼砌石柔性护坦较混凝土护坦而言,其过流能力略低于混凝土护坦,但从堰后水跃形态、水面线变化、消力池内垂向流速分布、消能率等方面均优于刚性混凝土护坦。采用柔性钢筋笼砌石护坦,可有效降低消力池内水流底层流速,从而可减缓水流对消力池底部的冲刷。

关 键 词:钢筋笼砌石  护坦  水流结构  消能率

Contrast study of flow characteristics,between the flexiable steel reinforcement masonry cage apron and concrete apron
Tian Zhen-hua,Zhang Shu-bin,Han Lei. Contrast study of flow characteristics,between the flexiable steel reinforcement masonry cage apron and concrete apron[J]. Pearl River, 2014, 0(5): 23-28
Authors:Tian Zhen-hua  Zhang Shu-bin  Han Lei
Affiliation:( Heilongjiang Provincial Hydraulic Research Institute, Harbin 150080, China)
Abstract:Through hydraulic model test, the flow characteristics in flat fiver with flexible apron which is made of steel reinforcement cage masory and concrete apron is respectively studied in this paper. Some hydraulic elements have been developed, which includes flow capacity , water profiles, hydraulic jump, velocity distribution in perpendicular direction and energy dissipation rate. The results indicate that compared with the concrete apron, the flexible steel reinforcement cage apron has a modicum advantage in flow capacity, but has disadvantage in morphology of hydraulic jump, changes of water profiles, the perpendicular velocity distribution and the energy dissipation rate. Applied in the flexible apron, it will reduce the bottom velocity in absorption basin, so it can retard the scouring to absorption basin bottom.
Keywords:steel reinforcement cage masonry  apron  flow structure  energy dissipation rate
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号