| 增塑剂A和莱茵塑分AP在胎面胶中的应用对比 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 倪淑杰,闫福江,郭鹤莹,丁全勇.增塑剂A和莱茵塑分AP在胎面胶中的应用对比[J].轮胎工业,2006,26(8):486-488. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 倪淑杰 闫福江 郭鹤莹 丁全勇 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 三角轮胎股份有限公司,山东,威海,264200 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 进行增塑剂A和莱茵塑分AP的组分分析并研究其在胎面胶中的应用效果。结果表明,增塑剂A中软脂酸含量较大,莱茵塑分AP中硬脂酸和油酸含量较大;莱茵塑分AP对胶料流动性和分散性改善效果优于增塑剂A;加入增塑剂A和莱茵塑分AP的胶料焦烧时间有所延长、硫化速度减慢,硫化胶的邵尔A型硬度和300%定伸应力略有提高,拉断伸长率稍有下降。
|
| 关 键 词： | 增塑剂 组分剖析 门尼粘度 硫化速度 物理性能 |
| 文章编号： | 1006-8170（2006）08-0486-03 |
| 收稿时间： | 2006-03-06 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006年3月6日 |
Comparison between plasticizer A and Aktiplast(R) AP applied in tread compound |
| |
| NI Shu-jie,YAN Fu-jiang,GUO He-ying and DING Quan-yong.Comparison between plasticizer A and Aktiplast(R) AP applied in tread compound[J].Tire Industry,2006,26(8):486-488. |
| |
| Authors: | NI Shu-jie YAN Fu-jiang GUO He-ying and DING Quan-yong |
| |
| Affiliation: | Triangle Tire Co. ,Ltd,Weihai 264200,China |
| |
| Abstract: | The composition of plasticizer A and Aktiplast AP was analyzed and their effectiveness in tread compound was investigated. The results showed that plasticizer A contained more palmicacid, and Aktiplast AP contained more stearic acid and oleic acid;in terms of improving compound flowability and dispersity,Aktiplast AP was better than plasticizer A;and the scorch time of compound extended and the curing rate decreased,and the Shore A hardness and modulus at 300% of vulcainzate increased a little, but the elongation at break somewhat decreased by adding plasticizer A or Aktiplast AP. |
| |
| Keywords: | plasticizer composition analysis Mooney viscosity curing rate physical properties |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《轮胎工业》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《轮胎工业》下载全文 |
|
