行政诉讼中既判力存在的三个争议及解决

我国现行司法解释对行政诉讼中的既判力问题做出了规定,但在司法实践中,对该解释出现了诸多不同的理解。解决行政诉讼中既判力的争议,需要认真分析司法解释条文背后的既判力理论。充分保障当事人程序权利的裁定应当具有既判力。判决主文具有羁束后诉的效力,但如果被诉具体行政行为仅在其他裁判文书中的事实与证据部分进行了认定,而并未在判决主文之列,则不具有既判力。民事裁判和刑事裁判对具体行政行为不具有既判力。

The Three Disputes and Solution of Res Judicata in Administrative Litigation

The problem of res judicata in administrative litigation has been regulated in current judicial interpretation in China, but there are different understanding in judicial practice. To solve the disputes of res judicata in administrative litigation, which need to analyze res judicata beyond the terms of judicial interpretation. The verdicts of safeguarding the procedural rights fully have res judicata. The text of judgment has the force of restricting later proceedings, if the alleged specific administrative behaviors are affirmed only in the parts of facts and proofs of other texts of judgment and verdict, but not in the text of judgment, which has no res judicata. Civil and criminal judgment and verdict have no res judicata on specific administrative behaviors.