首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

当量定价机制下发电商的产量决策分析与比较
引用本文:李玉平,李晓刚,言茂松.当量定价机制下发电商的产量决策分析与比较[J].电力自动化设备,2006,26(9):12-15.
作者姓名:李玉平  李晓刚  言茂松
作者单位:1. 上海大学,经济系,上海,201800
2. 华东电力培训中心,上海,200438
3. 上海大学,自动化系,上海,200072
摘    要:分析了当量定价机制下发电商的最优产量决策,比较了当量电价、统一出清和按报价支付3种定价机制对发电商的产量决策的激励作用。指出在统一出清和按报价支付定价机制下,发电商会通过持留行为滥用市场力,而在当量电价下,尤其在缺电情况下,发电商的最优产量决策仍然是申报其最大可用容量,而不是持留发电容量。当量定价方法激励发电商申报全部容量的机制,可以保证电力市场的充裕容量,从而实现了电价乃至市场的稳健性。

关 键 词:电力市场  报价策略  持留  统一出清电价  当量电价
文章编号:1006-6047(2006)09-0012-04
收稿时间:2005-10-30
修稿时间:2005-12-09

Capacity decision of power supplier with electricity value equivalent pricing method
LI Yu-ping,LI Xiao-gang,YAN Mao-song.Capacity decision of power supplier with electricity value equivalent pricing method[J].Electric Power Automation Equipment,2006,26(9):12-15.
Authors:LI Yu-ping  LI Xiao-gang  YAN Mao-song
Affiliation:1. Department of Economics, Shanghai University, Shanghai 201800, China; 2. East China Electric Power Training Center,Shanghai 200438,China; 3. Department of Automation,Shanghai University,Shanghai 200072,China
Abstract:A study on optimal capacity decision of power suppliers with EVE(Electricity Value Equivalent) method is presented.Incentive mechanisms of pay-as-bid pricing method,uniform clearing pricing method and EVE pricing method are compared.With the uniform clearing pricing method and the pay-as-bid pricing method,the power supplier abuses market power by withholding action,but with the EVE pricing method,especially when there is no sufficient electricity,the optimal capacity decision of the power supplier is to submit his maximum available capacity without any withholding capacity.With the EVE pricing method,the abundant capacity of the power market can be ensured,thus stable and robust market and price are realized.
Keywords:electricity market  bidding strategy  withholding  uniform clearing pricing method  electricity value equivalent
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《电力自动化设备》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《电力自动化设备》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号