首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

示例学习算法IBLE和ID3的比较研究
引用本文:钟鸣,陈文伟.示例学习算法IBLE和ID3的比较研究[J].计算机研究与发展,1993,30(1):32-38,8.
作者姓名:钟鸣  陈文伟
作者单位:解放军防化研究院计算中心,解放军防化研究院计算中心,国防科学技术大学系统工程与数学系 北京,102205,北京,102205,长沙,410073
摘    要:为了比较研究IBLE算法和ID_3算法的学习性能,本文用大量的质谱数据对两种算法做了学习实验。经过学习,IBLE 的平均预测率为93.96%。而ID_3为81.76%,而且IBLE 获得的知识在表示和内容上与专家知识具有较高一致性。文中对两种算法出现上述差异的原因进行了理论分析。

关 键 词:示例学习  ID3  IBLE  算法  质谱

Comparative Study of IBLE and ID_3 Algorithms for Learning From Examples
Zhong Ming Liu Xiaoxia Computing Centre of Chemical Defence Institute,Beijing, Chen Wenwei National University of Defence Technology,Changsha.Comparative Study of IBLE and ID_3 Algorithms for Learning From Examples[J].Journal of Computer Research and Development,1993,30(1):32-38,8.
Authors:Zhong Ming Liu Xiaoxia Computing Centre of Chemical Defence Institute  Beijing  Chen Wenwei National University of Defence Technology  Changsha
Affiliation:Zhong Ming Liu Xiaoxia Computing Centre of Chemical Defence Institute,Beijing,102205 Chen Wenwei National University of Defence Technology,Changsha,410073
Abstract:The learning performance of IBLE and ID_3 algorithms is compared and studied with a great number of mass spectra.The average predictive accuracy is 93.96% for IBLE and 81.76% for ID_3.The knowledge obtained by IBLE is quite identical with expert knowledge in the representation and contents.The reason for the above differences between IBLE and ID_3 is discussed in theory.
Keywords:learning from examples  knowledge acquisition  ID_3 algorithm  IBLE algorithm  mass spectra  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号