首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

D-S理论中证据损耗分析及改进方法
引用本文:徐凌宇,张博锋,徐炜民,徐怀宇,郭非凡.D-S理论中证据损耗分析及改进方法[J].软件学报,2004,15(1):69-75.
作者姓名:徐凌宇  张博锋  徐炜民  徐怀宇  郭非凡
作者单位:1. 上海大学,计算机科学与工程学院,上海,200072
2. 加州大学,洛杉矶分校,计算机系,洛杉矶,90095,美国
3. 哈佛大学,贝斯医学中心,波士顿,02215,美国
基金项目:Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No.60203011 (国家自然科学基金)
摘    要:分析了传统D-S理论在证据组合过程中的误差、抗干扰能力弱以及与人类思维相悖的原因;认为主要是由于部分定义和规则的局限性引发了组合过程中的证据损耗;提出了一种扩展的定义和组合规则,发现并解决了完全兼容证据组合过程中的证据损耗,有效地化解了冲突;理论分析和实验结果支持了方法的合理性与可行性.

关 键 词:信息融合  Dempster-Shafer  证据理论  组合规则  兼容  冲突  证据损耗
文章编号:1000-9825/2004/15(01)0069
收稿时间:2003/6/12 0:00:00
修稿时间:2003年6月12日

Evidence Ullage Analysis in D-S Theory and Development
XU Ling-Yu,ZHANG Bo-Feng,XU Wei-Min,XU Huai-Yu and GUO Fei-Fan.Evidence Ullage Analysis in D-S Theory and Development[J].Journal of Software,2004,15(1):69-75.
Authors:XU Ling-Yu  ZHANG Bo-Feng  XU Wei-Min  XU Huai-Yu and GUO Fei-Fan
Abstract:In this paper, it is found that there are errors in D-S combination rules even though the evidences are unconflict. The error, unanti-jamming and opposition during the evidence combination in traditional D-S theory are studied. An effort has been made to prove that the evidence ullage is caused by ill-suited definitions and ill-suited rules in the combination process. In this paper, new generic definitions and combination rules are also proposed. The evidence ullage in the compatible evidence combination process in terms of the definitions and rules is found and then solved. The experimental results show that the methodology developed here can not only solve the conflicts efficiently, but also produce reasonable results.
Keywords:information fusion  Dempster-Shafer  evidence theory  combination rule  unconflict  conflict  evidence ullage
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《软件学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《软件学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号