首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

基于句子对齐的汉语句法结构推导的计算模型
引用本文:王厚峰,王波.基于句子对齐的汉语句法结构推导的计算模型[J].软件学报,2007,18(3):538-546.
作者姓名:王厚峰  王波
作者单位:北京大学,信息科学技术学院,计算语言学研究所,北京,100871
摘    要:基于句子的相似性,提出了无指导的汉语句法结构推导方法.基本思想是:首先,在汉语句子库的基础上,通过句对之间的对齐,得到交替的相同片断和相异片断.然后,根据相同片断优先或相异片断优先策略,选取相应的对齐片断作为句子成分候选,并对可能因片断交叉而导致边界摩擦的候选进行歧义消解.最后,通过逐步归约句子成分,推导出汉语句法结构树.为了避免对齐过程中词的稀疏问题,还对部分具有明显规律的词事先作了归类处理.分别以词、词性以及词联合词性作为句子基本构成单元,评测了推导的句法结果.测试结果表明:对于3种构成单元,相异片断

关 键 词:句子对齐  无指导学习  边界摩擦  相同优先  相异优先  汉语句法结构推导
收稿时间:2006-01-26
修稿时间:2006-04-12

A Computational Model for Chinese Syntactic Structure Induction Based on Sentence Alignment
WANG Hou-Feng and WANG Bo.A Computational Model for Chinese Syntactic Structure Induction Based on Sentence Alignment[J].Journal of Software,2007,18(3):538-546.
Authors:WANG Hou-Feng and WANG Bo
Affiliation:Institute of Computational Linguistics, School of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871 China
Abstract:This paper introduces an unsupervised learning framework of Chinese syntactic structure based sentences similarity. First, all sentence pairs in the Chinese sentence corpus are aligned, and each pair is partitioned into similarity segmentations and different ones which alternately occur, Then, aligned similarity segmentations or different ones are selected as potential constituent candidates based on the strategy of similarity priority or of difference priority respectively. As the boundary friction may be introduced in the later step, its disambiguation is further carried out. Finally, by inducing sentence constituents, the syntactic structures are learned. In order to reduce word sparseness in the process, some words are replaced by classes in advance. Three forms of the sentence units, such as the sequence of words, the sequence of POS (part of speech)-tags and the sequence of words with POS-tag, are examined and the learned syntactic structures are evaluated respectively. The results show that different priority strategy achieves a better performance than the similarity one, and the Fs are above 46% for all three forms, with the best one being 49.52%, which is better than those having been reported.
Keywords:sentence alignment  unsupervised learning  boundary friction  similarity priority  difference priority  Chinese syntactic structure induction
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《软件学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《软件学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号