| 基于场景的两种软件体系结构评估方法 * |
| |
| 引用本文： | 沈群力,刘杰.基于场景的两种软件体系结构评估方法 *[J].计算机应用研究,2008,25(10):3015-3017. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 沈群力 刘杰 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 上海商学院,上海,200235;复旦大学管理学院,上海,200433
2. 复旦大学管理学院,上海,200433 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 上海市政府重点学科建设基金资助项目(沪教委科( 2006) 47) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 基于场景的软件体系结构评估方法通过场景将系统的质量需求转换为风险承担者与系统的交互活动 ,通过低代价的事前评估活动降低软件的质量风险。 SAAM及 ATAM两种方法在具体的实际评估活动中,它们在场景的生成、风险承担者的商业动机的表述、软件体系结构的描述等方面存在着很大的不同,两种评估方法各有特长 ,其评估方法在具体的场景执行环节上具有不确定性 ,将定量的度量方法与定性场景结合是提高评估的有效途径。
|
| 关 键 词： | 场景 软件体系结构 软件体系结构分析法 体系结构权衡分析法 效用树 |
Two software architecture evaluation methods based on scenario |
| |
| SHEN Qun-li,LIU Jie.Two software architecture evaluation methods based on scenario[J].Application Research of Computers,2008,25(10):3015-3017. |
| |
| Authors: | SHEN Qun-li LIU Jie |
| |
| Affiliation: | ( 1. Shanghai Business School, Shanghai 200235, China; 2. School of Management, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Software architecture evaluation methods switch quality demand to interaction between risk-receivers and the system.Advancing evaluation could reduce quality risk when software was designed.SAAM and ATAM were two different evaluation methods which have their merits when applied in creating scenario,describing business motivation and software architecture and so on.Neither methods can't ensure certainty when applied in particular performance,so it is an effective way to combine quantitative methods and scenario qualitative evaluation. |
| |
| Keywords: | scenario software architecture software architecture analysis method architecture tradeoff analyis method utility tree |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《计算机应用研究》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《计算机应用研究》下载全文 |
|
