首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

两种复合软管生产过程的环境影响评价
引用本文:林铭香,林勤保,黄玮彬.两种复合软管生产过程的环境影响评价[J].包装工程,2021,42(3):121-127.
作者姓名:林铭香  林勤保  黄玮彬
作者单位:暨南大学 包装工程研究所,广东 珠海 519070;暨南大学 包装工程研究所,广东 珠海 519070;暨南大学 包装工程研究所,广东 珠海 519070
基金项目:林铭香(1982—),女,暨南大学在职硕士生,主攻口腔护理产品的包装材料和包装设计。
摘    要:目的分别研究用于牙膏包装铝塑复合软管和全塑复合软管的4个生产单元对环境的影响,为此类型包装材料对环境影响的评估以及工艺改进提供参考。方法采用生命周期评价方法定性定量地分析其对能耗和环境的影响,通过eFootprint软件,在线完成全生命周期评价,包括建模、计算分析和数据质量评估。结果2种产品对初级能源消耗、气候变化和生态毒性的影响较大,其主要影响均来自复合空白带的生产,以及盖子、管肩和内衬的注塑成型。每个铝塑复合软管和全塑复合软管分别消耗2.53,2.18 MJ的初级能源,排放123,70.5 g影响气候变化的气体,释放0.012,0.005生态毒性物质。结论在所研究的系统边界内,铝塑复合软管对能源的消耗和对环境的影响均比全塑复合软管高。

关 键 词:牙膏  包装  铝塑复合软管  全塑复合软管  生命周期评价  能耗  环境影响
收稿时间:2020/4/15 0:00:00

Environmental Impact Assessment of Two Kinds of Laminate Tube in Production
LIN Ming-xiang,LIN Qin-bao,HUANG Wei-bin.Environmental Impact Assessment of Two Kinds of Laminate Tube in Production[J].Packaging Engineering,2021,42(3):121-127.
Authors:LIN Ming-xiang  LIN Qin-bao  HUANG Wei-bin
Affiliation:Packaging Engineering Institute, Jinan University, Zhuhai 519070, China
Abstract:The work aims to study the environmental impact of four production units of aluminum barrier laminated (ABL) tube and plastic barrier laminate (PBL) tube respectively, to provide references for the environmental impact assessment and process improvement of such packaging materials. The life cycle assessment (LCA) method was used to qualitatively and quantitatively analyze its impact on energy consumption and the environment. Through the eFootprint software, all life cycle assessments were completed online, including modeling, computational analysis and data quality assessment. According to LCA evaluation results, the two products had great impact on primary energy demand, climate change and eco-toxicity. The main impact came from production of composite blank web, injection molding of cap, shoulder and insert. Each ABL tube and PBL tube consumed 2.53, 2.18 MJ of primary energy, emitted 123, 70.5 g of gases that affected climate change, and released 0.012, 0.005 eco-toxic substances respectively. The conclusion is that within the boundary of the system studied, aluminum barrier laminate tube has higher impact on energy consumption and environment than plastic barrier laminated tube.
Keywords:toothpaste  packaging  aluminum barrier laminate tube  plastic barrier laminate tube  life cycle assessment  energy consumption  environmental impacts
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《包装工程》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《包装工程》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号