首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

基于FAHP的军品包装外包商的选择
引用本文:李良春,关继成,刘仲权,鲁军,高飞,牛正一.基于FAHP的军品包装外包商的选择[J].包装工程,2016,37(1):56-60.
作者姓名:李良春  关继成  刘仲权  鲁军  高飞  牛正一
作者单位:军械技术研究所,石家庄,050003;军械工程学院,石家庄,050000;中国人民解放军66337部队,介休,032000
摘    要:目的确定军品包装外包商评价指标权重。方法尝试根据军品包装外包的特殊性,建立一个包含企业绩效、生产能力、研发能力、风险、资质认证和环境条件在内的指标评价体系,用模糊层次分析法FAHP法求出军品包装外包商的评价指标权重。结果综合权重较大的4项指标分别为企业信誉、质量、质量资格认证和生产状况。其中企业信誉所占权重最大,为0.168,其次是质量,综合权重为0.096,质量资格认证和生产状况均为0.08。结论企业信誉、质量、质量资格认证和生产状况等4项指标在选择军品包装外包商时应优先考虑。

关 键 词:军事外包  FAHP  外包商的选择与评价
收稿时间:2015/7/21 0:00:00
修稿时间:2016/1/10 0:00:00

Outsourcers Selection of Military Packaging Based on FAHP
LI Liang-chun,GUAN Ji-cheng,LIU Zhong-quan,LU Jun,GAO Fei and NIU Zheng-yi.Outsourcers Selection of Military Packaging Based on FAHP[J].Packaging Engineering,2016,37(1):56-60.
Authors:LI Liang-chun  GUAN Ji-cheng  LIU Zhong-quan  LU Jun  GAO Fei and NIU Zheng-yi
Abstract:The aim of this study was to determine the weight value of evaluation indicators of military packaging outsourcers. According to the particularity of military packaging outsourcing, an evaluation index system containing enterprise performance, productivity, R & D capabilities, risks, qualification and environment was established, and the weight value of evaluation indicators of military packaging outsourcers were calculated by FAHP. The four indicators with relatively high comprehensive weight were corporate reputation, quality, quality certification and production status, wherein the indicator with the largest comprehensive weight value (0.168) was corporate reputation, followed by quality with a comprehensive weight value of 0.096, and then quality certification and production conditions, both with a comprehensive weight value of 0.08. The four indicators of corporate reputation, quality, quality certification and production status should be given priority in the selection of military packaging outsourcers.
Keywords:
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《包装工程》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《包装工程》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号