首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

刚性尖头弹扩孔贯穿金属靶板理论模型的讨论
引用本文:肖云凯,方秦,吴昊,孔祥振.刚性尖头弹扩孔贯穿金属靶板理论模型的讨论[J].振动与冲击,2016,35(1):195-202.
作者姓名:肖云凯  方秦  吴昊  孔祥振
作者单位:解放军理工大学 国防工程学院 爆炸冲击防灾减灾国家重点实验室,南京210007
摘    要:针对延性扩孔破坏模式,讨论了刚性尖头弹贯穿韧性金属靶板的已有六个理论模型(F-W、C-L、JZG、WHM、S-W和JBL)对于靶板厚度和弹头形状的适用范围,统一了各模型参数的选取准则,分别给出了JZG模型尖锥头形和尖卵头形弹体半锥角和无量纲曲率半径(CRH)的适用范围。基于12组冲击速度为200~1600m/s,厚径比(靶体厚度与弹身直径之比H/d)为0.605~9.17的多种弹靶材料的穿甲实验,得出:对于尖锥头形弹体贯穿靶板后的残余速度,S-W和WHM、JZG、F-W模型分别对于较薄靶板、中等厚度靶板和较厚靶板的预测效果较好;而对于尖卵头形弹体,WHM和JBL模型预测效果较好。同时,各模型对于弹道极限预测效果的结论和残余速度一致。分析结论可为坦克、舰船等单、多层金属装甲防护结构设计与计算提供参考和依据。

关 键 词:刚性弹  金属靶板  延性扩孔  贯穿  空腔膨胀  

Discussions on the ductile hole expansion perforation models for the rigid sharp-nosed projectile perforating metallic plate
XIAO Yun-kai,FANG Qin,WU Hao,KONG Xiang-zhen.Discussions on the ductile hole expansion perforation models for the rigid sharp-nosed projectile perforating metallic plate[J].Journal of Vibration and Shock,2016,35(1):195-202.
Authors:XIAO Yun-kai  FANG Qin  WU Hao  KONG Xiang-zhen
Affiliation:State Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention & Mitigation of Explosion & Impact, College of National Defense Engineering, PLA University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210007
Abstract:Aiming at the failure mode of ductile hole expansion, this paper discussed the applicable scope of projectile nose shape and plate thickness of six theoretical(F-W, C-L, JZG, WHM, S-W, JBL) models for a rigid sharp-nosed projectile perforating ductile metallic plate. The criterion of parameters chosen in each model was unified. Additional, the applicable scope of half apex angle and CRH for sharp conical and ogive projectile in JZG model were proposed, respectively. Based on the 12 perforation tests, in which impact velocities were 200~1600 m/s and dimensionless plate thicknesses (the ratio of plate thickness and projectile diameter) were 0.605~9.17, it concluded that, as to the prediction of residual velocity of conical projectile after perforating the plate, S-W and WHM, JZG, F-W model is better for the thin, medium and thick plate thickness, respectively. As to the ogive projectile, WHM and JBL model is better. Meanwhile, the conclusions of prediction of ballistic limit velocity are consistent with the prediction of residual velocity. The conclusions can provide references for the design and calculations of single and multi-layered metallic armor protective structures of tanks and ships.
Keywords:rigid projectile                                                      metallic plate                                                      ductile hole expansion                                                      perforation                                                      cavity expansion
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《振动与冲击》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《振动与冲击》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号