首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

面向相互比较的装备体系建设贡献率评估
引用本文:陈立新,徐仲祥,王从容,黄德所,陈之宁.面向相互比较的装备体系建设贡献率评估[J].兵工学报,2022,43(5):1208-1214.
作者姓名:陈立新  徐仲祥  王从容  黄德所  陈之宁
作者单位:(1.北京信息系统研究所, 北京 100072; 2.北京特种机电研究所, 北京 100012; 3.陆军炮兵防空兵学院, 安徽 合肥 230031)
摘    要:为有效解决当前装备体系贡献率评估结果难以相互比较的难题,从装备体系建设与设计视角,选取装备额定条件下完成体系规定任务率作为装备体系贡献率的度量指标,将装备体系贡献率评估转化为装备体系设计中的装备完成体系规定任务率优化分配。运用求解优化模型的拉格朗日乘数法,得出所求条件极值的可能极值点,并作为装备体系内装备完成体系规定任务率的优化分配结果。针对装备体系内装备之间并联、串联和混联3种类型的关联协作关系,应用概率论和拉格朗日乘数法,分别构建和求解这3种类型的装备体系完成任务率函数和建设贡献率评估模型,实现了装备体系建设贡献率的统一度量和对比分析。算例结果验证了评估模型的有效性和可行性。

关 键 词:装备体系建设贡献率  贡献率评估  拉格朗日乘数法  相互比较  

Intercomparison-oriented Evaluation of Equipment's Contribution Rate to Armament System-of-Systems Construction
CHEN Lixin,XU Zhongxiang,WANG Congrong,HUANG Desuo,CHEN Zhining.Intercomparison-oriented Evaluation of Equipment's Contribution Rate to Armament System-of-Systems Construction[J].Acta Armamentarii,2022,43(5):1208-1214.
Authors:CHEN Lixin  XU Zhongxiang  WANG Congrong  HUANG Desuo  CHEN Zhining
Affiliation:(1.Beijing Information System Research Institute,Beijing 100072,China;2.Beijing Special Electromechanical Research Institute,Beijing 100012,China;3.PLA Army Academy of Artillery and Air Defense,Hefei 230031,Anhui,China)
Abstract:The evaluated results of equipment's contribution rate to armament system-of-systems construction(ECRASSC)are difficultly compared. In the armament system-of-systems construction and design,the completion rate of assigned tasks under the rated conditions of equipment is taken as the metrics for ECRASSC,and the evaluation of ECRASSC is translated into the optimal distribution of task completion rate in armament system-of-systems design. Lagrange multiplier method is used to solve the optimal model,the possible extreme point of the condition is obtained as the optimized result of completion rate of assigned tasks. In the light of the three type cooperative relationships of serial,parallel and hybrid configurations between armaments, the three type functions of task completion rate is established by using the probability theory and Lagrange multiplier method,and the three type ECRASSC evauation models are solved,realizing the unified metric and comparative analysis of ECRASSC between all armaments. The validity and feasibility of evaluation model is verified by a case study.
Keywords:equipment'scontributionratetoarmamentsystem-of-systemsconstruction                                                                                                                        evaluationofcontributionrate                                                                                                                        Lagrangemultipliermethod                                                                                                                        intercomparison
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《兵工学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《兵工学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号