首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


A scientometric review of research in hydrogen storage materials
Affiliation:1. Postgraduate Program in Materials Science and Engineering (PPGCEM), Materials Engineering Department (DEMa), Federal University of Sao Carlos (UFSCar), Rod. Washington Luiz, KM 235, 13565-905, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil;2. Center for Technological Information in Materials (NIT-Materiais), Materials Engineering Department (DEMa), Federal University of Sao Carlos (UFSCar), Rod. Washington Luiz, KM 235, 13565-905, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil;3. Information Science Department (DCI), Federal University of Sao Carlos (UFSCar), Rod. Washington Luiz, KM 235, 13565-905, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil;1. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Electrochemical Energy Storage Technologies, College of Materials Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China;2. Materials Genome Institute & State Key Laboratory of Advanced Special Steels & Shanghai Key Laboratory of Advanced Ferrometallurgy & School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072, China;3. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Advanced Metallic Materials, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China;4. Key Laboratory of Preparation and Applications of Environmental Friendly Material of the Ministry of Education, Jilin Normal University, Changchun 130103, China;1. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Arak University, Arak 3815688349, Iran;2. Faculty of Chemical and Material Engineering, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, 3619995161, Iran;3. Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Arak University, Arak, P.O. Box: 3815688349, Iran;1. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Advanced Energy Storage Materials, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510641, People’s Republic of China;2. China-Australia Joint Laboratory for Energy & Environmental Materials, Key Laboratory of Fuel Cell Technology of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, 510641, People’s Republic of China;3. Advanced Manufacturing Technology Research Centre, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China;4. Hong Kong Polytechnic University Shenzhen Research Institute, Shenzhen, 518057, People’s Republic of China
Abstract:Hydrogen is a promising sustainable energy carrier for the future due to its high energetic content and no emissions, other than water vapor. However, its full deployment still requires technological advances in the renewable and cost-effective production of hydrogen, cost reduction of fuel cells and especially in the storage of hydrogen in a lightweight, compact and safe manner. One way to achieve this is by using materials in which hydrogen bonds chemically, or by adsorption. Different kinds of Hydrogen Storage Materials have been investigated, such as Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs), Simple Hydrides (including Magnesium Hydride, MgH2), AB5 Alloys, AB2 Alloys, Carbon Nanotubes, Graphene, Borohydrides, Alanates and Ammonia Borane. Billions have been invested in Storage Materials research, resulting in tens of thousands of papers. Thus, it is challenging to track how much effort has been devoted to each materials class, by which countries, and how the field has evolved over the years. Quantitative Science and Technology Indicators, produced by applying Bibliometrics and Text Mining to scientific papers, can aid in achieving this task. In this work, we evaluated the evolution and distribution of Hydrogen Storage Materials research using this methodology. Papers in the 2000–2015 period were collected from Web of Science and processed in VantagePoint® bibliometric software. A thesaurus was elaborated relating keywords and short phrases to specific Hydrogen Storage Materials classes. The number of publications in Hydrogen Storage Materials grew markedly from 2003 to 2010, reducing the pace of growth afterwards until a plateau was reached in 2015. The most researched materials were MOFs, Simple Hydrides and Carbon-based materials. There were three typical trends in materials classes: emerging materials, developed after 2003, such as MOFs and Borohydrides; classical materials with continuous growth during the entire period, such as Simple Hydrides; and stagnant or declining materials, such as Carbon Nanotubes and AB5 Alloys. The main publishing countries were China, countries from the European Union (EU) and the USA, followed by Japan. There is a division between countries with continued growth in recent years, such as China, and those with stagnant production after 2010, such as the EU, the USA and Japan. The results of this work, compared to a previous study in storage materials patenting by our group, and the recent launch of commercial hydrogen cars and trains and stationary hydrogen production and fuel cell solutions, indicates that although the Hydrogen Energy field as a whole is transitioning from lab and prototype stages to commercial deployment, materials-based hydrogen storage still has base technological challenges to be overcome, and therefore still needs more scientific research before large scale commercialization can be realized. The developed thesaurus is made available for refinement and future works.
Keywords:Hydrogen Storage  Technological forecasting  Bibliometrics  Scientometrics  Science and technology indicators
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号