首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

冲击荷载作用下钢结构表面涂层的接触损伤
引用本文:郝贠洪,田旭乐,韩燕,宣姣羽,马思晗.冲击荷载作用下钢结构表面涂层的接触损伤[J].建筑材料学报,2020,23(3):707-712.
作者姓名:郝贠洪  田旭乐  韩燕  宣姣羽  马思晗
作者单位:内蒙古工业大学土木工程学院,内蒙古呼和浩特010051;内蒙古自治区土木工程结构与力学重点实验室,内蒙古呼和浩特010051;内蒙古自治区建筑检测鉴定与安全评估工程技术研究中心,内蒙古呼和浩特010051;内蒙古工业大学土木工程学院,内蒙古呼和浩特010051
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(11162011,51468049,11662012,11862022);内蒙古自治区自然科学基金资助项目(2018MS05047);内蒙古高校青年科技英才支持计划(NJYT 17 A09);内蒙古自治区草原英才资助项目;中国电力科学研究院项目(GCB51201602754)
摘    要:针对内蒙古中西部地区钢结构涂层长期遭受风沙颗粒冲击损伤的问题,采用自动球压冲击仪研究了钢结构聚氨酯涂层与氟碳涂层在冲击荷载下的损伤行为,并应用体式显微镜和超景深三维显微镜研究了钢结构涂层的冲击损伤形貌.结果表明:随着冲击高度的增加,钢结构涂层的冲击荷载峰值增大,二次冲击荷载峰值增大,二次冲击的时间间隔延长;氟碳涂层冲击荷载峰值与二次冲击荷载峰值均小于聚氨酯涂层,氟碳涂层抗冲击能力优于聚氨酯涂层;氟碳涂层的压痕尺寸的增长速率小于聚氨酯涂层,所承受的极限荷载值却大于聚氨酯涂层;冲击荷载下氟碳涂层未出现材料的堆积隆起,无明显的环向裂纹,径向裂纹较聚氨酯涂层少,裂纹宽度较细;相同冲击高度(34cm)下,氟碳涂层冲击压痕深度较聚氨酯涂层下降76%,压痕宽度明显小于聚氨酯涂层.

关 键 词:冲击荷载  聚氨酯涂层  氟碳涂层  冲击球压  损伤形貌
收稿时间:2018/11/7 0:00:00
修稿时间:2019/1/12 0:00:00

Contact Damage of Steel Structure Coatings under Impact Loading
HAO Yunhong,TIAN Xule,HAN Yan,XUAN Jiaoyu,MA Sihan.Contact Damage of Steel Structure Coatings under Impact Loading[J].Journal of Building Materials,2020,23(3):707-712.
Authors:HAO Yunhong  TIAN Xule  HAN Yan  XUAN Jiaoyu  MA Sihan
Affiliation:School of Civil Engineering, Inner Mongolia University of Technology, Hohhot 010051, China
Abstract:Aiming at the problem of impact damage of steel structure coating caused by wind blown sand particles in a long time in the central and western of Inner Mongolia, an automatic impact ball pressure instrument was used to study damage behaviors of steel structure coatings. The impact damage morphology of steel structure coatings was studied by body microscope and super depth of field three dimensional microscope. The research shows that with the increase of impact height, the peak value of impact load of steel structure coatings increases, the peak value of secondary impact load increases, and the time interval becomes longer. The peak value of impact load and secondary impact load of fluorocarbon coatings are lower than that of polyurethane coatings, and the impact resistance of fluorocarbon coatings is better than that of polyurethane coatings. The indentation size growth rate of fluorocarbon coatings is lower than that of polyurethane coatings, but the ultimate load of fluorocarbon coatings is higher than that of polyurethane coatings. Under impact loading, no accumulation of material is observed on the surface of fluorocarbon coatings. There are no obvious circumferential cracks, less radial cracks and finer crack width than that of polyurethane coatings. At the same impact height(34cm), the indentation depth of fluorocarbon coating is 76% lower than that of polyurethane coating, and the indentation width is much smaller than that of polyurethane coating.
Keywords:impact loading  polyurethane coating  fluorocarbon coating  impact ball compaction  damage morphology
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《建筑材料学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《建筑材料学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号