| 中国和美国钢结构抗震局部稳定规定比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘刚.中国和美国钢结构抗震局部稳定规定比较[J].钢结构,2011,26(3):42-45. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘刚 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中南电力设计院; |
| |
| 摘 要： | 钢结构强度高,构件细长且纤薄,故而构件的稳定问题显得较为突出.很多情况下,钢结构并非由强度控制其构件的选择,因此,合理地选择构件,满足规范规定的宽厚比稳定构造要求,对于钢结构设计尤为重要.对美国规范和中国规范中钢结构抗震局部稳定进行分析和比较,以期对工程设计人员有所帮助.
|
| 关 键 词： | 局部稳定 比较 AISC 341-05 AISC 360-05 GB 50011-2001(2008) |
LOCAL STABILITY COMPARISON OF SEISMIC PROVISIONS BETWEEN CHINESE AND AMERICAN STANDARD |
| |
| Liu Gang.LOCAL STABILITY COMPARISON OF SEISMIC PROVISIONS BETWEEN CHINESE AND AMERICAN STANDARD[J].Steel Construction,2011,26(3):42-45. |
| |
| Authors: | Liu Gang |
| |
| Affiliation: | Liu Gang(Central Southern China Electric Power Design Institute,Wuhan 430071,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Usually,because of the high strength of steel,the steel member is slender and the steel plate is very thin,the stability design of steel member is very important.In most case,the member selection is not decided by steel strength.How to meet the width-thickness ratio regulation of design code is significant for steel structure design.The local stability of seismic provisions between American Standards and Chinese Standards is analysed and compared which can be benefit to designers. |
| |
| Keywords: | local stability comparison AISC 341-05 AISC 360-05 GB 50011 —2001(2008) |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
