首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

挤扩支盘桩与直孔桩的对比试验研究
引用本文:邓友生,龚维明. 挤扩支盘桩与直孔桩的对比试验研究[J]. 建筑结构, 2005, 35(7): 37-38,56
作者姓名:邓友生  龚维明
作者单位:东南大学土木工程学院,南京,210096;湖南理工学院土建系,岳阳,414000;东南大学土木工程学院,南京,210096
摘    要:针对挤扩支盘桩相对于普通等截面直孔灌注桩具有较高承载力和较低沉降量的特性,采用自平衡静载荷试验方法,对浙江嘉兴某工程同场地中的挤扩支盘桩与普通等截面直孔灌注桩进行承载力和沉降的对比试验研究。工程试验结果表明,在同等工程地质条件下,采用挤扩支盘桩能提高承载力,减少沉降和缩短桩长,具有良好的经济效益。

关 键 词:挤扩支盘桩  自平衡法  承载力  沉降  对比试验

Comparative Experimental Study on Piles with Branches and Plates and Column Piles
Deng Yousheng. Comparative Experimental Study on Piles with Branches and Plates and Column Piles[J]. Building Structure, 2005, 35(7): 37-38,56
Authors:Deng Yousheng
Affiliation:Deng Yousheng~
Abstract:Comparing with column bored pile, pile with branches and plate is a new type of pile with higher bearing capacity and lower settlement. Field comparative tests related to bearing capacity and settlement of both piles with branches and plates and column piles at the same sites in Jiaxing city were studied through self-balanced method under static pressure. The result testifies that piles with branches and plates can obtain better economic benefit under the same geological conditions, such as increasing pile bearing capacity and reducing settlement and pile length.
Keywords:pile with branches and plates  self-balanced method  bearing capacity  settlement  comparative test
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号