首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

不同方法制备的栀子果油的理化性质比较
引用本文:李昊阳,王飞运,刘华敏,汪学徳,秦广雍.不同方法制备的栀子果油的理化性质比较[J].现代食品科技,2016,32(9):209-215.
作者姓名:李昊阳  王飞运  刘华敏  汪学徳  秦广雍
作者单位:(1.河南工业大学粮油食品学院,河南郑州 450001),(1.河南工业大学粮油食品学院,河南郑州 450001),(1.河南工业大学粮油食品学院,河南郑州 450001)(2.郑州大学物理工程学院,河南郑州 450001),(1.河南工业大学粮油食品学院,河南郑州 450001),(2.郑州大学物理工程学院,河南郑州 450001)
基金项目:公益性(农业)研究项目(201303072);现代农业产业技术体系专项资金(CARS15-1-10)
摘    要:本实验利用正己烷萃取技术、超临界CO2萃取技术和亚临界低温萃取技术三种方法制备得到了三种栀子果油,并对其主要理化指标、脂肪酸组成、植物甾醇含量、谷维素含量、维生素E含量及氧化酸败时间进行比较分析,以研究不同萃取方法对栀子果油品质的影响。结果表明三种栀子果油的过氧化值为9.38~17.30 mmol/kg,酸值为4.06~14.28 mg KOH/g,皂化值为186.07~198.91 mg KOH/g,碘值为116.43?10-2~130.16?10-2 g I2/g。气相色谱法测定其脂肪酸组成以油酸和亚油酸等不饱和脂肪酸为主,相对含量占76.04~78.00%。栀子果油中植物甾醇和维生素E的含量分别是0.85~3.48%和17.06?10-2~29.80?10-2 mg/g,谷维素含量极少。其中超临界栀子果油的色泽最好,溶剂残留量最少,但酸价最高;正己烷栀子果油中甾醇含量最高,氧化稳定性相对较好;亚临界栀子果油的酸值最低,维生素E含量最高。本文为栀子果油制备方法的选择和精炼提供了理论依据,具有一定的应用意义。

关 键 词:栀子果油  正己烷萃取  亚临界低温萃取  超临界CO2萃取
收稿时间:2015/7/16 0:00:00

Comparison of the Physicochemical Characteristics of Gardenia Fruit Oils Obtained by Various Methods
LI Hao-yang,WANG Fei-yun,LIU Hua-min,WANG Xue-de and QIN Guang-yong.Comparison of the Physicochemical Characteristics of Gardenia Fruit Oils Obtained by Various Methods[J].Modern Food Science & Technology,2016,32(9):209-215.
Authors:LI Hao-yang  WANG Fei-yun  LIU Hua-min  WANG Xue-de and QIN Guang-yong
Affiliation:(1.College of Food Science and Technology, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China),(1.College of Food Science and Technology, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China),(1.College of Food Science and Technology, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China)(2.College of Physical Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China),(1.College of Food Science and Technology, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China) and (2.College of Physical Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)
Abstract:Three types of oil samples were obtained from gardenia fruit using n-hexane extraction, subcritical low-temperature butane extraction, and supercritical carbon dioxide extraction, respectively. The effect of the three extraction methods on the oil quality was investigated by comparing the main physicochemical indices, fatty acid composition, phytosterol content, oryzanol content, vitamin E content, and oxidative rancidity time. The results showed that the peroxide values, acid values, saponification values, and iodine values of the three gardenia fruit oils ranged between 9.38~17.30 mmol/kg, 4.06~14.28 mg KOH/g, 186.07~198.91 mgKOH/g, and 116.43~130.16 g I2/100 g, respectively. The results of gas chromatography (GC) suggested that the main fatty acids present in the samples were linoleic acid, oleic acid, and other unsaturated fatty acids, and their relative contents accounted for 76.04~78.00% of the total content of phytocompounds present in the oils. The contents of phytosterol and vitamin E in gardenia fruit oils ranged between 0.85~3.48% and 17.06~29.80 mg/100 g, respectively. The gardenia fruit oil obtained using supercritical carbon dioxide extraction showed the best color quality and the lowest amount of solvent residue, but the highest acid value. The oil extracted by n-hexane had the highest phytosterol content and a relatively good antioxidant activity. The oil obtained from subcritical butane-extraction had the lowest acid value and the highest content of vitamin E. This study reveals a theoretical basis for the selection of extraction and refining methods of gardenia fruit oils, and shows a certain value on application.
Keywords:gardenia fruit oil  hexane extraction  subcritical low-temperature extraction  supercritical carbon dioxide extraction  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《现代食品科技》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《现代食品科技》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号