首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

EFF和乙醇对采后薄皮甜瓜果实贮藏品质及相关生理指标的影响
引用本文:白晓航,齐红岩,吕德卿.EFF和乙醇对采后薄皮甜瓜果实贮藏品质及相关生理指标的影响[J].食品科学,2014,35(14):262-267.
作者姓名:白晓航  齐红岩  吕德卿
作者单位:沈阳农业大学园艺学院,设施园艺省部共建教育部重点实验室,辽宁省设施园艺重点实验室,辽宁 沈阳 110866
基金项目:辽宁省重大攻关项目(2011215003);沈阳市科技计划项目(F12-277-1-26)
摘    要:考察促进保鲜配方(enhanced freshness formulation,EFF)和乙醇(ethanol,Eth)对采后薄皮甜瓜果实贮
藏效果的影响。以东北主栽不耐贮藏薄皮甜瓜‘金妃’为试材,分别采用2% EFF浸泡和0.5 mL/kg Eth蒸熏2 个方式
处理采后薄皮甜瓜,以不做任何处理为对照。在15 ℃恒温培养箱(相对湿度85%)中贮藏16 d,测定贮藏期间果实
品质特性及其相关生理指标。结果表明:两处理均显著抑制了贮藏期间甜瓜果实内源乙烯的释放量(P<0.05),
且EFF较Eth效果显著,推迟了果实内源乙烯高峰的出现。贮藏期间,两处理均延缓了薄皮甜瓜果实硬度下降速
率、水分损失速率及可溶性固形物的消耗;降低了果实腐烂率;保持了果实的感官品质。Eth蒸熏处理7 d之前效果
较好,而EFF浸泡处理的保鲜期更长。贮藏7 d后,两处理显著抑制了可溶性果胶含量的升高速率及原果胶含量的下
降速率(P<0.05);EFF处理中纤维素的下降速率明显低于Eth处理和对照;两处理均显著抑制了多聚半乳糖醛酸
酶和纤维素酶活性(P<0.05),但对β-葡萄糖苷酶活性影响无明显规律。综上,两处理均延缓了采后薄皮甜瓜果
实的软化速率,保持了果实品质,保鲜效果显著,且EFF浸泡的效果优于Eth蒸熏。

关 键 词:薄皮甜瓜  促进保鲜配方  乙醇  贮藏品质  

Comparative Effects of Enhanced Freshness Formulation and ethanol Treatments on Quality and Related Physiological Indexes of Postharvest Oriental Sweet Melons (Cucumis melo var. makuwa Makino) during Storage
BAI Xiao-hang,QI Hong-yan,Lü De-qing.Comparative Effects of Enhanced Freshness Formulation and ethanol Treatments on Quality and Related Physiological Indexes of Postharvest Oriental Sweet Melons (Cucumis melo var. makuwa Makino) during Storage[J].Food Science,2014,35(14):262-267.
Authors:BAI Xiao-hang  QI Hong-yan  Lü De-qing
Affiliation:Key Laboratory of Protected Horticulture of Liaoning Province, Key Laboratory of Protected Horticulture of Education Ministry and; Liaoning Province, College of Horticulture, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China
Abstract:universally planted in northeast China was selected as materials in this study. Harvested
melons were treated by soaking in 2% EFF and 0.5 mL/kg ethanol fumigation, respectively, and those without any treatment
were used as controls in this experiment. The materials were stored in incubators at 15 ℃ and a relative humidity (RH) of
85% for 16 days, during which quality attributes and related physiological indexes were measured. The results revealed
that both treatments had significant inhibition on released quantity of internal ethylene in melons during storage. EFF
soaking treatment had more obvious effect on postponing the peak time of internal ethylene release than ethanol fumigation
treatment. Both treatments delayed the descending rate of fruit firmness and the lossing rate of water content and soluble
solid content during storage. They also reduced fruit rotting rate and maintained fruit sensory quality. Before the 7th day,
ethanol fumigation had better effect while EFF soaking provided relatively longer freshness lifetime. After the 7th day, both
treatments had obviously inhibited the increase in soluble pectin content and the decrease in protopectin content (P < 0.05).
EFF treatment significantly slowed down the decrease in cellulose content than EFF treatment than that in ethanol treatment
and control. Both treatments significantly inhibited the activities of polygalacturonase and cellulase (P < 0.05), but had no
obvious effects on the activity of β-glucosidase. In conclusion, both treatments can reduce softening rate and maintain fruit
quality of postharvest oriental sweet melons. This study shows that both treatments are significantly effective in maintaining
the freshness of sweet melons and EFF soaking is better than ethanol fumigation.
Keywords:oriental sweet melon  enhanced freshness formulation  ethanol  storage quality  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《食品科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《食品科学》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号