In Situ analysis of CO2 laser irradiation on controlling progression of erosive lesions on dental enamel |
| |
Authors: | Taísa Penazzo Lepri Renata Siqueira Scatolin Vivian Colucci Adílis Kalina De Alexandria Lucianne Cople Maia Cecília Pedroso Turssi Silmara Aparecida Milori Corona |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeir?o Preto, University of S?o Paulo (USP) Avenida do Café, Brazil;2. Department of Pediatric and Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rua Prof., Brazil;3. Department of Restorative Dentistry, S?o Leopoldo Mandic Institute and Dental Research Center, Brazil |
| |
Abstract: | The present study aimed to evaluate in situ the effect of CO2 laser irradiation to control the progression of enamel erosive lesions. Fifty‐six slabs of bovine incisors enamel (5 × 3 × 2.5 mm3) were divided in four distinct areas: (1) sound (reference area), (2) initial erosion, (3) treatment (irradiated or nonirradiated with CO2 laser), (4) final erosion (after in situ phase). The initial erosive challenge was performed with 1% citric acid (pH = 2.3), for 5 min, 2×/day, for 2 days. The slabs were divided in two groups according to surface treatment: irradiated with CO2 laser (λ = 10.6 µm; 0.5 W) and nonirradiate. After a 2‐day lead‐in period, 14 volunteers wore an intraoral palatal appliance containing two slabs (irradiated and nonirradiated), in two intraoral phases of 5 days each. Following a cross‐over design during the first intraoral phase, half of the volunteers immersed the appliance in 100 mL of citric acid for 5 min, 3×/day, while other half of the volunteers used deionized water (control). The volunteers were crossed over in the second phase. Enamel wear was determined by an optical 3D profilometer. Three‐way ANOVA for repeated measures revealed that there was no significant interaction between erosive challenge and CO2 laser irradiation (P = 0.419). Erosive challenge significantly increased enamel wear (P = 0.001), regardless whether or not CO2 laser irradiation was performed. There was no difference in enamel wear between specimens CO2‐laser irradiated and non‐irradiated (P = 0.513). Under intraoral conditions, CO2 laser irradiation did not control the progression of erosive lesions in enamel caused by citric acid. Microsc. Res. Tech. 77:586–593, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
| |
Keywords: | enamel erosion citric acid CO2 laser |
|
|