| 刍议中国电子烟监管 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 埃里克&#,费尔德曼,柴月. 刍议中国电子烟监管[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2015, 21(6): 76-85. DOI: 10.16472/j.chinatobacco.2015.277 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 埃里克&# 费尔德曼 柴月 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1 宾夕法尼亚大学法学院, 美国宾夕法尼亚州费城 19104; |
| |
| 摘 要： | 中国电子烟产业迅猛发展、市场需求日趋增长、科学研究相对有限、政府监管长期失位,业已累积诸多问题并引发国内外广泛关切。加强对电子烟的监管十分必要而迫切。美国和日本不同的监管选择本质上是各自制度环境的反映,各有利弊、值得参考。监管理论及中国法律与制度环境支持将电子烟纳入药品或烟草制品进行监管,但均无可避免地涉及政策权衡与取舍。决策者必须清醒认识、切实注意到其中问题与挑战,提前研究设计合理措施予以回应。就当下而言,规制电子烟广告、完善产品质量标准、更新烟草控制措施以及重视中国高吸烟率环境,是决策者须尽快关注和解决的议题。
|
| 关 键 词： | 中国 电子烟 监管 国际经验 启示 |
| 收稿时间： | 2015-06-16 |
A preliminary discussion on E-cigarette regulation in China |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1 University of Pennsylvania Law School, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA;2 School of Law, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China |
| |
| Abstract: | The explosion in the growth of China's e-cigarette production, its popularity among consumers, unclear impact on both individual and public health, and a basically regulatory inaction have accumulated serious problems and drawn rising concerns domestically and internationally. Thus it is already very necessary and urgent to strengthen the regulation over e-cigarette in China. The U.S. and Japan's regulatory choices are particularly instructive and have profound implications for Chinese regulators; however, neither has the two routes been free of controversy. Regulatory theory and the Chinese legal and institutional environment suggest two approaches, to regulate e-cigarettes as pharmaceuticals or tobacco products, both of which inevitably involve policy weighing and trade-offs. Policymakers should be fully aware of these implications and avoid the disadvantages with designed mechanisms. As a first step, regulating e-cigarette advertisement, improving quality standards, updating tobacco control policy and paying attention to the high-smoking-rate environment in China are significant issues should be focused and worked out by policymakers as soon as possible. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《中国烟草学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《中国烟草学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
