| ISO/IEC、美日中氢能技术标准化体系比较与建议 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 施文博,蔡淳名,李德威,小野圭,张剑波. ISO/IEC、美日中氢能技术标准化体系比较与建议[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(12): 6275-6284. DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2022-1154 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 施文博 蔡淳名 李德威 小野圭 张剑波 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 清华大学车辆与运载学院,北京100084;清华大学车辆与运载学院,北京100084;北京理工大学北京电动汽车联合创新中心,北京100081 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家重点研发计划(2018YFE0202000) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 技术标准在技术进步、国际贸易中具有重要作用。全景式梳理、比较氢能技术标准化体系发展与现状，对于促进技术进步、规范国际贸易至关重要。本文综述了ISO/IEC、美国、日本和中国等5个主体氢能技术标准化体系：介绍了上述5个主体的氢能标准化机构，详细梳理了ISO/IEC氢能国际标准与美日中氢能国家标准/行业标准的层级结构比例，并按标准具体内容将其归类到8个技术类别中，分析了各主体在8个技术类别中的分布与特征。文中指出相比于美国和日本，中国氢能技术标准化体系存在行业标准数量较少、氢能产业联盟在行业标准制定中主导性弱和部分技术类别覆盖度低的不足。针对上述不足，文章对中国氢能技术标准体系提出两条发展建议：增加行业标准数量，以发挥其对标准体系补充、完善的作用，为此需赋予中国氢能产业联盟制定行业标准的权限；优化中国氢能技术标准分布，提高氢储运与加注以及氢能应用等技术类别的覆盖度，保障氢能产业从定点示范运营到城市群大规模推广的顺利升级。
|
| 关 键 词： | 氢能 标准化体系 技术标准 技术类别 技术分布 |
| 收稿时间： | 2022-06-22 |
ISO/IEC,American, Japanese and Chinese hydrogen technical standardization system: comparison and suggestions |
| |
| SHI Wenbo,TSAI Chunming,LI Dewei,ONO Kei,ZHANG Jianbo. ISO/IEC,American, Japanese and Chinese hydrogen technical standardization system: comparison and suggestions[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(12): 6275-6284. DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2022-1154 |
| |
| Authors: | SHI Wenbo TSAI Chunming LI Dewei ONO Kei ZHANG Jianbo |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1.School of Vehicle and Mobility, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
2.Beijing Co -innovation Center for Electric Vehicles, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Technical standards are the cornerstone of industrial upgrading and international trade. A comprehensive overview and comparison of the development and current status of hydrogen technical standardization is essential to regulate and promote technological progress and global trade. In this work, the development and current status of hydrogen technical standardization of ISO/IEC, America, Japan and China were reviewed. It introduced hydrogen technical standardization organizations, compared detailly the ratio, structure and specific content of ISO/IEC international standards and national/industry standards of America, Japan and China, classified them into 8 technical categories of hydrogen technical standard system and revealed their distribution as well as features. Compared with America and Japan, Chinese hydrogen technical standardization system had the defects of fewer number of industry standards, weak dominance of hydrogen energy industrial associations in standardization process and insufficient technical coverage of some technical categories. Based on the comparisons, 2 practical suggestions were proposed for the development of Chinese technical standardization system, including authoring industrial associations the right of formulate hydrogen technical industry standard and optimizing the distribution of Chinese hydrogen technical standards. |
| |
| Keywords: | hydrogen standardization system technical standard technical category technology distribution |
| 本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《化工进展》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《化工进展》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
