首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

紫外光下4种抗氧化剂在猪油中的抗氧化效果
引用本文:刘品华, 冯亚娟, 谢景文, 王齐仙, 张天爽. 紫外光下4种抗氧化剂在猪油中的抗氧化效果[J]. 食品工业科技, 2018, 39(24): 51-56,61. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2018.24.009
作者姓名:刘品华  冯亚娟  谢景文  王齐仙  张天爽
作者单位:曲靖师范学院化学与环境科学学院, 云南曲靖 655011
基金项目:云南省科技计划项目(2013FD047)。上海师范大学资源化学省部共建教育部重点实验室
摘    要:旨在研究光照对油脂抗氧化剂抗氧化效果的影响。分别研究在254、365 nm波长光照射下,猪油中添加丁基羟基茴香醚(BHA)、2,6-二叔丁基-4-甲基苯酚(BHT)、特丁基对苯二酚(TBHQ)、没食子酸丙酯(PG)对其过氧化值、酸价、丙二醛值、共轭二烯类值、共轭三烯类值的影响。结果表明,与空白相比,在254 nm光照下,4种抗氧化剂抑制猪油过氧化值、酸价、丙二醛值、共轭二烯类值、共轭三烯类值的效果差异不显著(p>0.05);在365 nm光照下,BHA、BHT、PG抑制猪油过氧化值、酸价、共轭二烯类值、共轭三烯类值效果差异性不显著(p>0.05),抑制丙二醛效果差异极显著(p<0.01)。TBHQ抑制猪油酸价、共轭三烯类值效果差异不显著(p>0.05),抑制过氧化值、共轭二烯类值差异显著(p<0.05),抑制丙二醛效果差异性极显著(p<0.01)。由此说明,在254、365 nm光照射下,BHA、BHT、PG基本没有抗氧化效果,TBHQ的效果也不够理想。

关 键 词:紫外光  抗氧化剂  猪油  过氧化值  酸价  丙二醛
收稿时间:2018-01-01

Antioxidation Effect of 4 Antioxidants in Lard under UV Light
LIU Pin-hua, FENG Ya-juan, XIE Jing-wen, WANG Qi-xian, ZHANG Tian-shuang. Antioxidation Effect of 4 Antioxidants in Lard under UV Light[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2018, 39(24): 51-56,61. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2018.24.009
Authors:LIU Pin-hua  FENG Ya-juan  XIE Jing-wen  WANG Qi-xian  ZHANG Tian-shuang
Affiliation:College of Chemistry and Environmental Science, Qujing Normal University, Qujing 655011, China
Abstract:To investigate the antioxidant effects of 4 antioxidants on oil under UV light. The effect of acid value,peroxide,malondialdehyde-value,conjugated diene and conjugated trienes compounds in lard by using butylated hydroxyanisole(BHA),2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol(BHT),tert-Butylhydroquinone(TBHQ)and Propyl gallate(PG)under 254,365 nm were studied. The results showed that,compared with the blank test sample,the differences of acid value,peroxide,malondialdehyde-value,conjugated diene and conjugated trienes compounds at 254 nm light between BHA,BHT,PG were not significant(p>0.05).The differences of acid value,peroxide,conjugated diene and conjugated trienes compounds at 365 nm light between 4 antioxidants and blank test sample were not significant(p>0.05),difference of malondialdehyde value was extremely significant(p<0.01).As for acid value,the differences of conjugated diene and conjugated trienes compounds between TBHQ and blank test sample were not significant(p>0.05),the peroxide and conjugated trienes were significant(p<0.05),difference of malondialdehyde value was extremely significant(p<0.01). It was concluded that BHA,BHT and PG had no antioxidant effect under 254,365 nm UV Light irradiation,and TBHQ was also not ideal.
Keywords:ultraviolet light  antioxidant  lard  peroxidation value  acid value  malondialdehyde
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《食品工业科技》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《食品工业科技》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号