| 基于模糊集和缺陷扣分法的GIS产品质量评价比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 胡圣武,王宏涛. 基于模糊集和缺陷扣分法的GIS产品质量评价比较[J]. 延边大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 0(2): 96-99 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 胡圣武 王宏涛 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 河南理工大学测量工程系,河南焦作454100 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 采用了模糊集和缺陷扣分两种方法,对GIS产品质量的评价进行了研究,并且对两种方法的理论、方法和特点进行比较分析,然后用实例进行具体的比较,认为模糊集方法比缺陷扣分法要优越,而且通过对得到的结果分析可知:对GIS产品质量评价应考虑模糊不确定性,才能真正揭示GIS产品的质量。
|
| 关 键 词： | 采用了模糊集和缺陷扣分两种方法 对GIS产品质量的评价进行了研究 并且对两种方法的理论、方法和特点进行比较分析 然后用实例进行具体的比较 认为模糊集方法比缺陷扣分法要优越 而且通过对得到的结果分析可知:对GIS产品质量评价应考虑模糊不确定性 才能真正揭示GIS产品的质量。 |
Comparison with GIS Product Quality Evaluation Methods Based Fuzzy Set and Defection Subtraction Score |
| |
| HU Sheng-wu,WANG Hong-tao. Comparison with GIS Product Quality Evaluation Methods Based Fuzzy Set and Defection Subtraction Score[J]. Journal of Yanbian University (Natural Science), 2006, 0(2): 96-99 |
| |
| Authors: | HU Sheng-wu WANG Hong-tao |
| |
| Affiliation: | Department of Surveying Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454100, Henan, China |
| |
| Abstract: | This paper researches on evaluation of GIS product quality; adopts fuzzy set method and defection sub-traction score method to compare with GIS product quality evaluation methods based fuzzy set and defection sub-traction scores, and mainly processes with three factors that are theory,approach and property, then gives an ex-ample to analyze the results. It is pointed out that fuzzy set method is superior to the defection subtraction scoremethod. It is found that it the fuzzy uncertainty must be considered to make clear GIS product quality when evalu-ating GIS product quality. |
| |
| Keywords: | GIS product quality evaluation fuzzy set defection subtraction method compare |
|
| 点击此处可从《延边大学学报(自然科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《延边大学学报(自然科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文 |
