Ejection fraction by radionuclide ventriculography and contrast left ventriculogram. A tale of two techniques. SAVE Investigators. Survival and Ventricular Enlargement

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the abilities of two methods to measure ejection fraction (EF)-radionuclide ventriculography (RVG) and contrast left ventriculography (Cath-EFa) to predict cardiovascular events. BACKGROUND: Both RVG and Cath-EFa are commonly used methods to measure left ventricular performance and assess prognosis. Their comparative abilities to predict clinical events have not been reported. METHODS: Both RVG EF and Cath-EFa were measured within 16 days of myocardial infarction (MI) in 688 patients. The results were divided into terciles. Prognosis by terciles was assessed for each technique. A multivariate analysis was performed to determine which EF measurement was a better predictor of prognosis. RESULTS: Average RVG-EF was 32%+/-7, while Cath-EFa was 42%+/-10. Both RVG and Cath-EFa were poorly correlated (R=0.42). Event rate declined across terciles with increasing EF for both techniques (events in lowest to highest tercile of Cath-EFa 40.7%, 25.9%, 11.6%, p < 0.001; and RVG-EF 39.9%, 26.1%, 15.6%, p < 0.001). There was concordance of terciles in 303 of 688 patients (44%). When patients in the highest RVG terciles were in the highest Cath-EFa tercile, the event rate was 7%. However, when patients in the highest RVG terciles were in the lowest Cath-EFa tercile, the event rate was 19%. Both Cath-EFa (p < 0.001) and RVG-EF (p < 0.001) were independent predictors of cardiovascular events. CONCLUSIONS: Ejection fraction measured by RVG or during catheterization is a valuable tool in the risk stratification of postinfarct patients. When disagreement is present between clinical impression and measurement by either method, the use of an alternative measurement is warranted and complementary.     

Initial experience using an intraluminal shunt during revascularization of the beating heart

BACKGROUND: For decades, surgeons have relied on extracorporeal circulation and induced cardiac asystole to provide a bloodless, motionless field in which to construct coronary bypass grafts. However, the technique of coronary grafting without heart-lung support is now being revitalized. The current resurgence of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting and the advent of less invasive incisions make it imperative that technical advances be applied to maximize the safety of these procedures. METHODS: This report describes an inexpensive intraluminal shunt that maintains coronary perfusion, prevents ischemia, reduces backbleeding, and molds the suture line to prevent accidental missuturing of the posterior coronary wall. RESULTS: In 63 patients, saphenous grafts were placed to the left anterior descending (49), diagonal (9), and right coronary artery (27) without extracorporeal circulation using an intraluminal shunt. There were no deaths (0% mortality) and one perioperative infarction (1.5%). Complication and graft patency rates were comparable with those obtained by conventional techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Temporary intraluminal shunting greatly facilitates the surgeons' operative environment by permitting safe and precise construction of coronary artery grafts on the beating heart in a bloodless field. Intraluminal shunting may have future implications on the ability to perform safe and reproducible grafting on the beating heart through minimally invasive or endoscopic approaches.     

Female sex is associated with increased mortality and morbidity early, but not late, after coronary artery bypass grafting

OBJECTIVE: To describe mortality and morbidity during a period of 2 years after coronary artery bypass grafting in relation to gender. DESIGN: Prospective follow-up study. SETTING: Two regional cardiothoracic centres which performed all the coronary artery bypass operations in western Sweden at the time. SUBJECTS: A total of 2129 (1727 (81%) men and 402 (19%) women) consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery between June 1988 and June 1991 without concomitant procedures. RESULTS: Females were older and more frequently had a history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, renal dysfunction and obesity. In a multivariate analysis, taking account of age, history of cardiovascular diseases and renal dysfunction, female sex appeared as a significant independent predictor of mortality during the 30 days after coronary artery bypass grafting (P < 0.05), but not thereafter. Various postoperative complications including neurological deficit, hydro- and pneumo-thorax, perioperative myocardial damage and the need for assist devices and prolonged reperfusion were more common in females than males. CONCLUSION: Females run an increased risk of early death and the development of postoperative complications after coronary artery bypass surgery as compared with males. Late mortality does not appear to be influenced by gender and the long-term benefit of the coronary artery bypass graft operation is similar in men and women.     

A national study of postoperative mortality associated with coronary artery bypass grafting in Israel. ISCAB Consortium. Israel Coronary Artery Bypass Study

BACKGROUND: Investigation of observed differences in outcomes among medical centers is of major interest to the medical community and the public and has a substantial impact on efforts to improve the quality of medical care. METHODS: This study analyzed data from consecutive patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting at 14 medical centers. Data included demographic and clinical information, comorbidity, cardiac catheterization results, and 30-day postoperative vitality status. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify variables associated with mortality. An outlier hospital was defined as one having an observed mortality outside the 95% confidence interval boundaries around the expected mortality rate calculated, given the patient risk factors. RESULTS: The overall crude 30-day mortality rate for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting among the 4,835 patients in this study was 3.1%. The rate varied among centers, ranging from 0.85% to 7.05%. Predictors of 30-day mortality included advanced age, female sex, diabetes mellitus, poor left ventricular function, high creatinine level, high priority of operation, and three-vessel disease (with or without left main coronary artery disease). After adjustment for risk factors, two hospitals were defined as outliers. CONCLUSIONS: The observed disparity in early mortality among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting is not due solely to differences in case mix.     

Arterial graft patency in coronary artery bypass grafting: what do we really know?

BACKGROUND: With increasing use of beating heart techniques for bypass of the left anterior descending coronary artery with the left internal mammary artery (LIMA), appropriate concerns have been raised of whether graft patency by these techniques compares favorably with conventional, arrested heart techniques. METHODS: All published articles that examine outcome efficacy of the LIMA graft to the left anterior descending coronary artery were reviewed. Because angiography has been considered the "gold standard," only those studies that included angiographic follow-up were analyzed. RESULTS: From 1972 through 1998, there have been 37 peer-reviewed publications that examined outcomes of LIMA grafting in conventional coronary bypass grafting, of which 27 contained angiographic follow-up data. The completeness of angiographic follow-up was variable, but early graft patency (< or =1 month) in studied patients ranged between 94% and 99%. Late graft patency (up to 15 years) ranged from 51% to 98%. Five recent series of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting that contained LIMA graft patency data show early graft patency rates between 91% and 99%. CONCLUSIONS: Meaningful comparison of LIMA graft patency between arrested heart, conventional coronary artery bypass grafting, and minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting is difficult; however, early graft patency by both techniques can confidently be stated as being 90% or greater.     

Myocardial damage after minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart

BACKGROUND: In conventional coronary artery bypass grafting, the rate of perioperative myocardial infarction is reported in the 2% to 6% range; however, significantly higher rates are observed if sensitive myocardial marker proteins are used to detect perioperative myocardial damage. For minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting, few data are available concerning myocardial marker protein release. METHODS: Fifteen consecutive patients (11 male, 4 female; mean age, 59.6 +/- 8.5 years) received minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting procedures via minithoracotomy on the beating heart. Electrocardiography and transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography as well as determination of creatine kinase-MB mass concentration and cardiac troponin I level were used for ischemic monitoring. RESULTS: One patient had a perioperative myocardial infarction according to standard criteria and died despite mechanical circulatory support. Determination of cardiac troponin I level showed small but definitive ischemic damage in 4 of 9 patients (44%) who presented transient ischemic signs intraoperatively or postoperatively. In 2 of these 4 patients pathologic findings could be detected on angiographic restudies. CONCLUSIONS: Subclinical myocardial injury is a common event in minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart. Cardiac troponin I could serve as an adequate diagnostic tool for diagnosis of perioperative myocardial infarction in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting.     

Quality assessment indicators of cardiac surgeons' work; the validity of mortality rates

OBJECTIVE: To determine the possibility of comparing the mortality rates of patients operated by different heart surgeons with each other. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical information, operation data and follow-up data on 783 patients who had undergone cardiac valve replacement, were collected from the clinical records. Aortic valve replacement had been performed in 446 patients (1979-1986) and mitral valve replacement in 337 patients (1980-1990). RESULTS: The one-year mortality rate was higher among patients operated on by heart surgeon A than among patients operated on by the other heart surgeons from the same team, viz. 16.4% and 9.5%, respectively, an absolute difference of 6.9%. The 95% confidence interval of the difference was 1.7-12.9. However, it was also found that the risk profiles of these patients of surgeon A differed from those of the other patients. After multivariate correction for this difference in risk profile, the difference in mortality was no longer statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The differences in mortality observed in our study could not be attributed to difference in quality of the heart surgeons, but were related with the risk profiles of the patients operated by one of them. Thorough analysis with correction for risks is necessary for the assessment of the quality of care, if the conclusions are not to be misleading.     

Intraoperative echocardiography is indicated in high-risk coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative echocardiography is a valuable monitoring and diagnostic technology used in cardiac surgery. This reports our clinical study of the usefulness of intraoperative echocardiography to both surgeons and anesthesiologists for high-risk coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: From March to November 1995, 82 consecutive high-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting were studied in a four-stage protocol to determine the efficacy of intraoperative echocardiography in management planning. Alterations in surgical and anesthetic/hemodynamic management initiated by intraoperative echocardiography findings were documented in addition to perioperative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Intraoperative echocardiography initiated at least one major surgical management alteration in 27 patients (33%) and at least one major anesthetic/hemodynamic change in 42 (51%). Mortality and the rate of myocardial infarction in this consecutive high-risk study population using intraoperative echocardiography and in a similar group of patients without the use of intraoperative echocardiography was 1.2% versus 3.8% (not significant) and 1.2% versus 3.5% (not significant), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that when all of the isolated diagnostic and monitoring applications of perioperative echocardiography are routinely and systematically performed together, it is a safe and viable tool that significantly affects the decision-making process in the intraoperative care of high-risk patients undergoing primary isolated coronary artery bypass grafting and may contribute to the optimal care of these patients.     

Paradigms and expectations: the nature of research and diagnostics

OBJECTIVES: Our purpose was to evaluate the long-term benefit of myocardial viability assessment for stratifying risk and selecting patients with low ejection fraction for coronary artery bypass grafting and to determine the relation between the severity of anginal symptoms, the amount of ischemic myocardium, and clinical outcome. METHODS: We studied 93 consecutive patients with severe coronary artery disease and low ejection fraction (median, 25%) who underwent positron emission tomography to delineate the extent of perfusion-metabolism mismatch (reflecting hibernating myocardium) for potential myocardial revascularization. Median follow-up was 4 years (range, 0 to 6.2 years). RESULTS: Fifty patients received medical therapy, and 43 patients underwent bypass grafting. In Cox survival models, heart failure class, prior myocardial infarction, and positron emission tomographic mismatch were the best predictors of survival. Patients with positron emission tomographic mismatch receiving bypass grafting had improved 4-year survival compared with those on medical therapy (75% versus 30%; P =.007) and a significant improvement in angina and heart failure symptoms. In patients without positron emission tomographic mismatch, bypass grafting tended to improve survival and symptoms only in those patients with severe angina (100% versus 60%; P =.085), whereas no survival advantage was apparent in patients with minimal or no anginal symptoms (63% versus 52%; P =.462). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with low ejection fraction and evidence of viable myocardium by positron emission tomography have improved survival and symptoms with coronary bypass grafting compared with medical therapy. In patients without evidence of viability, survival and symptom improvement with bypass grafting are apparent only among those patients with severe angina.     

Intra-arterial blood pressure during exercise and left ventricular indices in normotension and borderline and mild hypertension

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a sex-related difference in outcome is present among patients who undergo percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) for unstable angina. DESIGN: We retrospectively analyzed the results after PTCA was performed between January 1981 and June 1993 in a series of 2,073 men and 941 women with unstable angina and rest pain. RESULTS: The success rates of PTCA were similar for women and men (87.9% and 87.2%, respectively), as were the in-hospital mortality rates (4.1% and 3.2%, respectively) and the need for emergency coronary artery bypass operation (3.1% and 3.5%, respectively). Fewer women than men had Q-wave myocardial infarction (0.5% versus 1.6%; P = 0.02). During the follow-up period (mean, 4 years), no significant differences were noted between women and men in overall survival (81% and 85% at 6 years, respectively) or survival free of Q-wave myocardial infarction (81% and 83% at 6 years, respectively) with use of the Kaplan-Meier method. Women were less likely than men to have had coronary artery bypass grafting (19% versus 22% at 6 years; P = 0.02), and the occurrence of severe angina was higher in women than in men (52% versus 44% at 6 years; P = 0.001). A subgroup analysis of patients who had myocardial infarction within 7 days preceding PTCA showed a similar pattern of results. CONCLUSION: After PTCA performed for unstable angina and rest pain, survival rates were excellent in both women and men, and no difference was observed in subsequent myocardial infarction rates. During follow-up, however, women were more likely to have severe angina and were less likely to have had coronary artery bypass grafting. Concerns about possible sex-related complications should not dissuade physicians from performing PTCA when clinically indicated for unstable angina and rest pain.     

The risks of risk adjustment

CONTEXT: Risk adjustment is essential before comparing patient outcomes across hospitals. Hospital report cards around the country use different risk adjustment methods. OBJECTIVES: To examine the history and current practices of risk adjusting hospital death rates and consider the implications for using risk-adjusted mortality comparisons to assess quality. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: This article examines severity measures used in states and regions to produce comparisons of risk-adjusted hospital death rates. Detailed results are presented from a study comparing current commercial severity measures using a single database. It included adults admitted for acute myocardial infarction (n=11880), coronary artery bypass graft surgery (n=7765), pneumonia (n=18016), and stroke (n=9407). Logistic regressions within each condition predicted in-hospital death using severity scores. Odds ratios for in-hospital death were compared across pairs of severity measures. For each hospital, z scores compared actual and expected death rates. RESULTS: The severity measure called Disease Staging had the highest c statistic (which measures how well a severity measure discriminates between patients who lived and those who died) for acute myocardial infarction, 0.86; the measure called All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups had the highest for coronary artery bypass graft surgery, 0.83; and the measure, MedisGroups, had the highest for pneumonia, 0.85 and stroke, 0.87. Different severity measures predicted different probabilities of death for many patients. Severity measures frequently disagreed about which hospitals had particularly low or high z scores. Agreement in identifying low- and high-mortality hospitals between severity-adjusted and unadjusted death rates was often better than agreement between severity measures. CONCLUSIONS: Severity does not explain differences in death rates across hospitals. Different severity measures frequently produce different impressions about relative hospital performance. Severity-adjusted mortality rates alone are unlikely to isolate quality differences across hospitals.     

Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: port-access approach versus off-pump techniques

BACKGROUND: Within the past 5 years several surgical techniques have been developed for less invasive surgical treatment of coronary artery disease. The aim of this study was to define specific indications for the various minimally invasive coronary artery surgical procedures. METHODS: Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting through a minithoracotomy was performed in 67 patients. The left internal mammary artery was anastomosed on the beating heart with the use of a pressure or suction stabilizer without the use of extracorporeal circulation. In 58 other patients with multivessel disease, the off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting technique through a sternotomy was applied with a left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending artery and additional vein grafts without extracorporeal circulation. In a third group, Port-Access (Heartport Inc, Redwood City, CA) coronary artery bypass grafting was performed through a left minithoracotomy with the use of an endovascular extracorporeal circulation system and cardioplegic arrest. Angiographic follow-up was complete in 64% of the patients. RESULTS: There was minimal perioperative or postoperative mortality (0.5%). The medium surgical procedure time for all minimally invasive and off-pump procedures was 2.5 hours; it was 4.5 hours for Port-Access procedures. The median postoperative intensive care unit stay was 1.0 days, and the median hospitalization was 5.0 days. Overall graft patency was 97.3%; in 8 patients (4.1%) a stenosis either at or distal to the graft anastomosis was dilated with coronary angioplasty. CONCLUSIONS: For single-vessel disease of the left anterior descending artery, the minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting procedure can be performed safely without the use of extracorporeal circulation. In case of hemodynamic instability or anatomic variation, the Port-Access procedure can be applied without additional necessity for sternotomy. For multivessel disease, the off-pump bypass grafting procedure with sternotomy can be recommended depending on the coronary arteries involved. In case of necessary grafts to the lateral marginal or circumflex branches, Port-Access grafting can be recommended and may play an important role in the future for the development of fully endoscopic robot-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting.     

Minimally invasive treatment for coronary artery disease

Coronary artery disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. One advancement in the treatment of this disease is the minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) procedure, which is an alternative to the traditional open heart bypass procedure. The MIDCAB procedure is becoming a viable alternative to the traditional coronary artery bypass grafting procedure for a select group of patients. With further experience and follow-up, this procedure will offer lower hospital costs by decreasing lengths of stay and offering patients the optimal conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting without the complications of cardiopulmonary bypass.     

Pulmonary function and respiratory symptoms in forest firefighters

As part of a national study of surgical departments is Israel, cardiac surgery patients undergoing open heart surgery between 1987 and 1989 were followed-up prospectively. Of these, 1,046 patients had coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and are the subject of this report. The six-months mortality after surgery was 12.9% among 202 women and 4.1% among 844 men. Female gender was an independent predictor of mortality even after controlling for the effect of 14 putative risk factors. The adjusted relative risk for mortality in women compared to men was 2.79 (1.5-5.2). In an attempt to understand this excessive mortality among women, a detailed analysis in one of the participating hospitals revealed differences associated with surgical technique by gender, such as proportion of patients with entirely venous grafting vs internal mammary artery grafts (IMA). Thirty percent of women vs 4.8% of men had entirely venous grafting. Adjusting the data for differences in the proportion of venous grafting has obliterated the difference in mortality between the genders in that hospital. We suggest that interventions to reduce mortality among women should involve a more careful choice of female candidates for CABG surgery, as well as introduction of modifications in the operating technique.     

Tracking the MEN1 gene

Combined carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 52 patients between January 1982 and September 1994. Forty-nine patients had stable or unstable angina and three had symptom-free coronary artery disease detected by stress testing. Thirty-one patients had triple-vessel disease and 17 had left main trunk or left main equivalent coronary artery disease. Five patients had symptom-free carotid artery disease, 12 had non-specific neurological symptoms, and 35 had transient ischaemic attacks. Carotid endarterectomy was performed first, followed by coronary artery bypass grafting. There were three postoperative deaths, two cardiac and one neurological, for a mortality rate of 5.8%. One patient suffered a permanent neurological deficit (1.9%). It is concluded that combined carotid endarterectomy/coronary artery bypass grafting can be performed in selected patients with acceptable neurological morbidity, although cardiac mortality was not eliminated by the combined approach.     

Influence of ejection fraction on hospital mortality, morbidity, and costs for CABG patients

BACKGROUND: Preoperative ejection fraction (EF) has been shown to adversely affect postoperative hospital mortality and morbidity for patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: To investigate influence of EF on isolated coronary artery bypass grafting outcomes (overall hospital mortality, hospital cardiac mortality, hospital morbidity, and hospital costs), data were reviewed from 1,354 consecutive patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting between January 1, 1990, and April 30, 1992, at a single nonprofit hospital. Overall hospital mortality was 4.06% (cardiac, 2.36%). Hospital morbidity was 14.25% (including mortality). Hospital costs (not charges) averaged $16,673 per patient. To explore the impact of preoperative EF, EF was stratified into regular intervals. Each interval was then compared with regard to hospital mortality, morbidity, and average costs. A new statistical tool, discharge analysis, was developed to analyze the cost data. This was necessary because previous efforts at cost analysis have used tools inappropriate for real world cost data. RESULTS: The statistical analysis showed that patients with EF of 0.40 or greater had the best outcomes (lowest mortality, morbidity, and cost). Once the EF is 0.40 or greater the EF does not carry further predictive value. At EF less than 0.40, patients with EF less than 0.30 have a poorer outcome than patients with EF of 0.30 to 0.39. CONCLUSIONS: (1) Ejection fraction is a valid predictor of mortality, morbidity and resource utilization based on statistical analysis. (2) Patients can be broadly grouped as having EF greater than 0.40, less than 0.30, or from 0.30 to 0.39 with regard to clinical and cost outcomes. (3) Postoperative length of stay is not predicted by risk-adjusted EF. (4) A new tool, discharge analysis, is presented to facilitate cost analysis.     

Elimination of cardiopulmonary bypass: a prime goal in reoperative coronary artery bypass surgery

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate morbidity and mortality in reoperative coronary artery bypass surgery using the New York State database. METHODS: Patients undergoing reoperative coronary artery bypass between January-1995 and December 1996 were included. Patients were operated using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB group, n = 184) or without cardiopulmonary bypass (non-CPB group, n = 105) by surgeon preference. Groups were compared for preoperative risk factors, postoperative mortality and major complications. RESULTS: Crude mortality was lower in the non-CPB group, despite a higher expected mortality, resulting in a risk-adjusted mortality of 1.3% versus 2.7% for the CPB group (NS). Of non-CPB patients, 91.4% were without complications, while only 72.1% of CPB patients (P < 0.0001) were complication-free. Major complications were significantly reduced in non-CPB patients compared to CPB patients: stroke 0% versus 3.8% (P < 0.04), cardiovascular complications 4.8% versus 15.8% (P < 0.005), other major complications 1.9% versus 10.4% (P < 0.007). Postoperative IABP support was needed in 1.9% of the non-CPB group patients and in 14.2% of the CPB group (P < 0.0007). CONCLUSIONS: The main object of reoperative CABG is to relieve symptoms, since the survival benefit of the procedure has not been demonstrated. Performance of reoperative coronary artery bypass surgery without cardiopulmonary bypass significantly reduces morbidity. We conclude that cardiopulmonary bypass should be avoided whenever possible in reoperative coronary bypass surgery.     

Early results of combined carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with severe coronary and carotid artery disease

The management of patients with carotid artery disease who require coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains controversial. Several published series from the USA (including one with prospective randomization) advocate a combined approach of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) followed immediately by coronary artery bypass surgery. However, experience of combined carotid endarterectomy and coronary bypass grafting has not been previously reported by a centre from the United Kingdom. Between 1986 and 1991 we performed this combined procedure on 18 patients who required myocardial revascularization and had co-existing severe (> 70%) carotid stenosis. Sixteen patients (89%) had angina and 11 patients (61%) had symptomatic carotid artery disease. The perioperative mortality was 5.5% and the ipsilateral perioperative stroke rate was 5.5%. These early results are encouraging and suggest that further evaluation of combined carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass surgery is warranted.     

Risk factors for postoperative morbidity

OBJECTIVE: Analysis of outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting has focused on risk factors for operative mortality. Nonfatal perioperative morbidity is far more costly and more common after operation. To identify the risk factors that lead to postoperative morbidity, we evaluated 938 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting at Albany Medical Center Hospital during 1993. METHODS: Multivariate statistical analysis was performed on preoperative patient variables to identify risk factors for either serious postoperative morbidity or increased hospital length of stay. Variables were considered both individually and in combination. For example, age was considered individually or in combination with other variables, including parameters of blood volume (i.e., age divided by red blood cell volume or Age/RBCVOL). Similar multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for hospital mortality. RESULTS: In order of decreasing importance, the following patient variables were significantly associated with increased length of stay by stepwise Cox regression analysis: Age/RBCVOL, history of congestive heart failure, hypertension, femoral-popliteal peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive lung disease, and renal dysfunction. The combination variable, Age/RBCVOL, was an important risk factor for both increased length of stay and serious postoperative morbidity. Variables that were significant independent predictors of increased mortality, such as preoperative shock, and redo operation, were not risk factors for either serious morbidity or increased length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that risk factors for postoperative morbidity are different from those for postoperative mortality. These results suggest that older patients with preoperative anemia and low blood volume who also have other comorbidities (congestive heart failure, stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or hypertension) are at increased risk for postoperative complications. This allows identification of a high-risk cohort of patients who are likely candidates for interventions to lessen postoperative morbidity.     

Does arterial revascularization decrease the risk of infarction after coronary artery bypass grafting?

BACKGROUND: This study sought to determine whether extensive arterial grafting reduces the prevalence and consequences of infarct after coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: Post-primary coronary artery bypass grafting infarcts and time-related events thereafter were identified by 99.9% complete follow-up of 9,600 patients (1971 to 1992). The contribution of arterial grafting to freedom from infarct was assessed by multivariable hazard function analysis to adjust for other risk factors. RESULTS: Unadjusted 1-month and 10-year freedom from infarction was 97% and 86%. By multivariable analysis, arterial grafting lowered the prevalence of periprocedural (p = 0.005), intermediate term (p = 0.007 and 0.006), and late infarction (arterial grafting to the left anterior descending coronary artery, p = 0.0006). Unadjusted survival after first infarct after coronary artery bypass grafting was 74% and 52% at 1 and 10 years; arterial grafting improved 10-year survival from 48% to 59% (p = 0.002). An additional benefit or cost of extending arterial grafting (n = 1,727) beyond a single one could not be identified (p > 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: Arterial conduits, particularly to the left anterior descending coronary artery, should be used for coronary artery bypass grafting to reduce early and late myocardial infarction and its consequences. However, use of more than a single arterial graft appears to confer no additional benefit.