Dye screening and signal-to-noise ratio for retrogradely transported voltage-sensitive dyes

The efficacy and tolerability of fluvoxamine (100-300 mg/day) and clomipramine (100-250 mg/day) were compared in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study of 79 patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) without coexisting major depression. After a 2-week placebo lead-in period, patients were randomized to fluvoxamine (37 patients) or clomipramine (42 patients) for 10 weeks. Efficacy was evaluated with the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), the National Institute of Mental Health Obsessive-Compulsive scale, and Patient and Clinical Global Improvement scales. Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression scores and somatic symptoms were also assessed. Seventy-eight percent of fluvoxamine patients and 64% of clomipramine patients completed the study. At the end of treatment, 56% of fluvoxamine patients were classified as responders (> or = 25% decrease in Y-BOCS score), compared with 54% of clomipramine patients. Both groups showed steady improvement throughout the study; no statistically significant differences were observed between the groups for any efficacy variable at any time. A similar percentage of patients in both groups withdrew because of adverse events. No serious adverse events related to drug occurred with either drug. Insomnia, nervousness, and dyspepsia were more statistically frequent with fluvoxamine; dry mouth and postural hypotension were more frequent with clomipramine. In this study, fluvoxamine and clomipramine were equally effective in reducing OCD symptoms over a 10-week treatment period but displayed different side effect profiles.     

Cognitive and behavioral therapies alone versus in combination with fluvoxamine in the treatment of obsessive compulsive disorder

The purpose of this treatment package design study was to investigate the differential efficacy of cognitive therapy or exposure in vivo with response prevention for obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) versus the sequential combination with fluvoxamine. Patients with OCD (N = 117) were randomized to one of the following five conditions: a) cognitive therapy for weeks 1 to 16, b) exposure in vivo with response prevention for weeks 1 to 16, c) fluvoxamine for weeks 1 to 16 plus cognitive therapy in weeks 9 to 16, d) fluvoxamine for weeks 1 to 16 plus exposure in vivo with response prevention in weeks 9 to 16, or e) waiting list control condition for weeks 1 to 8 only. Assessments took place before treatment (pretest) and after 8 (midtest), and 16 weeks (posttest). In the first 8 weeks, six treatment sessions were delivered. During weeks 9 to 16, another 10 sessions were given. Thirty-one patients dropped out. Outcome was assessed by patient-, therapist- and assessor-ratings of the Anxiety Discomfort Scale, the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale, and the Padua Inventory-Revised. In contrast with the four treatments, after 8 weeks the waiting list control condition did not result in a significant decrease of symptoms. After 16 weeks of treatment, all four treatment packages were effective on these OCD ratings, but they did not differ among each other in effectiveness. In OCD, the sequential combination of fluvoxamine with cognitive therapy or exposure in vivo with response prevention is not superior to either cognitive therapy or exposure in vivo alone.     

Fluvoxamine in the treatment of binge-eating disorder: a multicenter placebo-controlled, double-blind trial

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of fluvoxamine in the treatment of binge-eating disorder. Binge-eating disorder is a newly described eating disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of binge eating but without purging behaviors. Uncontrolled reports have suggested that serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) may be effective in treating this disorder. METHOD: Eighty-five outpatients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of binge-eating disorder were randomly assigned to receive either fluvoxamine (N=42) or placebo (N=43) in a 9-week, parallel-group, double-blind, flexible dose (50-300 mg) study at three centers. The primary outcome measures were frequency of binge eating, expressed as log ([binges/week]+1), and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale ratings. Secondary measures included the level of response (based on the percentage change in frequency of binges), body mass index, and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score. Except for the level of response, the outcome measures were analyzed by random regression methods; the treatment-by-time interaction was the measure of treatment effect. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, fluvoxamine was associated with a significantly greater rate of reduction in the frequency of binges, rate of reduction in CGI severity scores, rate of increase in CGI improvement scores, level of response for patients who completed the 9-week study, and rate of reduction in body mass index. There was no significant difference between placebo and fluvoxamine groups in the rate of decrease in Hamilton depression scale scores. A significantly greater proportion of patients receiving fluvoxamine than those receiving placebo discontinued treatment because of an adverse medical event. CONCLUSIONS: In this placebo-controlled trial, fluvoxamine was found to be effective according to most outcome measures in the acute treatment of binge-eating disorder.     

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996: understanding the anti-kickback laws

This double-blind placebo-controlled study specifically tested the efficacy of fluvoxamine, at a dose of 100 mg a day, in reducing the risk of new episodes of depression. Out of 436 patients treated openly with fluvoxamine 283 patients fulfilled stringent criteria to define responders at 6 weeks. A total of 204 patients maintained their remission throughout a continuation treatment period of 18 weeks and then entered the prophylactic study. They were randomly assigned to receive either fluvoxamine 100 mg a day or placebo for 1 year. There were significantly fewer recurrences of new episodes of depression in the fluvoxamine group compared with the placebo group (p < 0.001). The significant advantage for fluvoxamine was also seen in the Kaplan-Meier analysis of time to recurrence (p < 0.001). The clear-cut efficacy of 100 mg of fluvoxamine and the good tolerability and side-effect profile demonstrated in this study support the view that fluvoxamine is particularly suitable for maintenance or prophylactic treatment.     

The fractal geometry of evolution

Many of the specific serotonin reuptake inhibitors appear to have some effect on noradrenergic function. Fluvoxamine is one of the newer agents and its specificity has not been fully assessed. Depressed patients participating in a study comparing the efficacy of fluvoxamine with imipramine and placebo collected 24 hour urine samples (N = 38) and had plasma samples drawn (N = 38) prior to and after 6 weeks of double blind treatment. Urine samples were analyzed for 24 hour output of MHPG, VMA, NMN, MN and HVA. Plasma samples were analyzed for NE levels. Imipramine treatment produced a reduction in urinary MHPG, an increase in the ratio of NMN to MHPG plus VMA, and a trend towards an increase in plasma NE which was significantly different than the effects seen in the fluvoxamine and placebo groups. There was an additional finding in the imipramine group of a significant correlation between percentage change in plasma NE and clinical improvement. Fluvoxamine treatment, on the other hand, produced no clear effect on any measure of noradrenergic function and the antidepressant efficacy of fluvoxamine was unrelated to any noradrenergic variable. These findings lend support to the hypothesis that fluvoxamine does not have significant effects on noradrenergic function.     

Impaired reactivity of rat aorta to phenylephrine and KCl after prolonged hypoxia: role of the endothelium

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of antiandrogen therapy on overall survival and response in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 244 patients with unresectable HCC were included in this multicentric double-blind trial. According to a two-by-two factorial design, patients were randomly assigned to receive one of the following treatments: pure antiandrogen plus placebo (A+P group, 60 patients); luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist plus placebo (LHRH+P group, 62 patients); pure antiandrogen plus LHRH agonist (A+LHRH group, 62 patients); or placebo plus placebo (P+P group, 60 patients). Pure antiandrogen consisted of Anandron (Roussel-Uclaf Laboratory, Romainville, France) administered orally (300 mg daily for 1 month, then 150 mg daily). LHRH consisted of goseriline acetate (3.6 mg) or triptoreline (3.75 mg) administered monthly by subcutaneous injection. Treatment was given until death. Response was evaluated every 8 weeks according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. RESULTS: Six patients were considered ineligible. One patient had a complete response (A+P arm) and three had a partial response (two in the LHRH+P arm and one in the A+LHRH arm). An overall log-rank test did not demonstrate any significant difference in survival among the four arms. Taking the factorial design into account, comparison of survival showed no significant difference between Anandron-containing regimens and others, or between LHRH-containing regimens and others. No serious side effects occurred for any regimen. CONCLUSION: This controlled study shows clearly the lack of efficacy of androgen treatment in unresectable HCC.     

A second phase III multicenter placebo controlled study of 2 dosages of modified release tamsulosin in patients with symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia. United States 93-01 Study Group

PURPOSE: In a double-blind, phase III clinical trial we evaluate the safety and efficacy of 0.4 and 0.8 mg. tamsulosin daily for the treatment of patients with symptoms of moderate to severe benign prostatic hyperplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients meeting the basic requirements of the study underwent a 4-week single-blind placebo evaluation period. A total of 735 patients were randomized to double-blind therapy with tamsulosin or placebo. Treatment duration was 13 weeks. Efficacy and safety were evaluated at 5 visits during the double-blind treatment period. RESULTS: When efficacy data between baseline and end point were compared there was a significant reduction in total American Urological Association symptom score (25%) in each tamsulosin group compared with placebo (p = 0.01) and the percentage of patients with a 30% or more reduction in peak urinary flow rate was significantly greater in the tamsulosin versus placebo group (p <0.05). Improvements in American Urological Association symptom scores and maximum flow rate occurred at 1 week of treatment. None of the patients experienced a first dose effect. There were no significant changes in blood pressure on standing at any visit during the study except for a decrease in systolic blood pressure of 20 mm. Hg or more between the 0.8 mg. dose and placebo groups at visit 4 (p = 0.036). Positive orthostatic tests were significantly more frequent in the 0.8 mg. group compared with placebo at visit 4 (p = 0.012). The treatment groups did not differ significantly in incidence of electrocardiogram abnormalities at each post-baseline visit and at end point. CONCLUSIONS: Tamsulosin was safe and effective, and clinically and statistically superior to placebo in relieving symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia in men with moderate to severe symptoms at baseline. There was no evidence of a first dose effect and no clinically significant orthostatic hypertension. In addition, response to treatment was rapid.     

Comparison of electromotive drug administration with ketorolac or with placebo in patients with pain from rheumatic disease: a double-masked study

This study was undertaken to assess the efficacy of ketorolac compared with placebo when delivered by electromotive drug administration (EMDA) in patients with pain from rheumatic disease. In EMDA, or iontophoresis, a low-intensity electric current is applied over the skin to deliver medication into body tissues. Although EMDA has been used to treat patients with various diseases, controlled studies are lacking in patients with rheumatic disease. This double-masked study included 60 patients (43 women and 17 men) aged 31 to 80 years with the following conditions: 12, epicondylitis; 30, scapulohumeral periarthritis; 10, gonalgia; and 8, metatarsalgia. They were divided randomly by a physician into 2 groups of 30 patients each for 5 sessions of active treatment (30 mg of ketorolac) or placebo (5 mL of normal saline). Treatment took place every other day for 20 minutes. Immediately before and after the five treatment sessions and 7 days after treatment ended, both patient and physician measured the degree of pain using a categoric scale (no pain, slight pain, intermediate pain, strong pain, and very strong pain) and evaluated pain intensity using the Scott and Huskisson Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Seven days after treatment ended, both physician and patient judged the result of treatment using a second categoric scale (no improvement or intermediate, good, or very good result). Both ketorolac and placebo provided immediate, significant pain relief when delivered by EMDA, but only those patients receiving ketorolac experienced a further reduction in pain 7 days after treatment; those receiving placebo experienced a slight increase in pain. VAS values differed significantly between the two groups. Poor results (no improvement) were significantly higher in the placebo-treated group, while good results were significantly higher in the ketorolac-treated group. No patient reported any adverse effects during treatment. This study demonstrates that ketorolac relieves pain when delivered by EMDA and offers longer-lasting pain relief than does placebo.     

A controlled, prospective, 1-year trial of citalopram in the treatment of panic disorder

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of citalopram in the long-term treatment of adult outpatients with panic disorder with or without agoraphobia. METHOD: Patients in this double-blind, parallel-group trial were assigned to 1 of 3 fixed dosage ranges of citalopram (10 or 15 mg/day, 20 or 30 mg/day, or 40 or 60 mg/day), 1 dosage range of clomipramine (60 or 90 mg/day), or placebo. After the completed 8-week acute treatment period, the eligible patients could continue the treatment for up to 1 year. Of the 475 patients who were randomly assigned for the short-term trial, 279 agreed to continue double-blind treatment at their assigned doses. The primary efficacy measure used was the Clinical Anxiety Scale panic attack item, and the response was defined as no panic attacks (score of 0 or 1). The other key measures used were the Physician's Global Improvement Scale, the Patient's Global Improvement Scale, and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A). RESULTS: In all drug-treated groups, except the group receiving the lowest citalopram dose, the treatment outcome was generally better than with placebo. As determined by a life table analysis of response, the probability of response during the 12 months was significantly greater with all treatment regimens than with placebo (p < .05), with citalopram 20 or 30 mg/day demonstrating the best response. Panic attacks tended to disappear in all patients remaining in the study until the end of follow-up. Analysis of the difference in the number of patients in different treatment groups remaining in the study (perhaps the best measure of long-term efficacy) also demonstrated that the patients treated with citalopram in dosage ranges of 20 or 30 mg/day and 40 or 60 mg/day had better response than placebo-treated patients (p < .0002 and p < .004, respectively). HAM-A and Global Improvement Scale scores also showed that patients treated with active drug showed greater improvement than placebo-treated patients. All treatment groups showed no new or exceptional adverse event clusters. CONCLUSION: Citalopram in the dosage range of 20 to 60 mg/day is effective, well tolerated, and safe in the long-term treatment of patients who have panic disorder.     

A 1 year double-blind placebo-controlled fixed dose study of sertraline in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder

The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy, over a 1 year treatment period, of three dose levels of sertraline and placebo in the treatment of non-depressed adult out-patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Following 1 week of single-blind placebo washout, patients (n = 325) from 11 sites following identical protocols were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with one of three fixed doses of sertraline (50, 100 or 200 mg) or placebo. At the end of 12 weeks, treatment responders (including placebo patients) were offered an additional 40 weeks of double-blind treatment at their assigned doses. Efficacy measures were the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale, the NIMH Global Obsessive Compulsive Scale, Clinical Global Impressions of Severity of Illness and Global Improvement and the Maudsley Obsessive Compulsive Inventory. Patients in the pooled sertraline group showed greater improvement than placebo-treated patients on all efficacy measures, based on the endpoint analyses. Moreover, pairwise comparisons at endpoint revealed a significant effect on all three investigator-rated scales in patients receiving 50 or 200 mg of sertraline; in the 100 mg group, there was a significant effect on the NIMH Global Obsessive Compulsive Scale only. Patients completing 3 months of sertraline treatment exhibited excellent toleration and sustained improvement during an additional 40 weeks of therapy. Results support the safety, efficacy and tolerability of daily doses of 50-200 mg of sertraline in the long-term treatment of patients with OCD.     

Sociocultural influences and care of dying children in Japan and the United States

Depression is a common cause of sexual dysfunction, but also antidepressant medication is often associated with sexual side effects. This article includes two related studies. The first double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted in men with lifelong rapid ejaculation and aimed to assess putative differences between the major selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) (fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, and sertraline) with regard to their ejaculation-delaying effect. Sixty men with an intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) of 1 minute or less were randomly assigned to receive fluoxetine 20 mg/day, fluvoxamine 100 mg/day, paroxetine 20 mg/day, sertraline 50 mg/day, or placebo for 6 weeks. During the 1-month baseline and 6-week treatment periods, the men measured their IELT at home using a stopwatch. The trial was completed by 51 men. During the 6-week treatment period, the geometric mean IELT in the placebo group was constant at approximately 20 seconds. Analysis of variance revealed a between-groups difference in the evolution of IELT delay (p = 0.0004); in the paroxetine, fluoxetine, and sertraline groups there was a gradual increase to about 110 seconds, whereas in the fluvoxamine group, IELT was increased to only approximately 40 seconds. The paroxetine, fluoxetine, and sertraline groups differed significantly (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.017, respectively) from placebo but the fluvoxamine group did not (p = 0.38). Compared with baseline, paroxetine exerted the strongest delay in ejaculation, followed by fluoxetine and sertraline. There was no clinically relevant delay in ejaculation with fluvoxamine. In men with lifelong rapid ejaculation, paroxetine delayed ejaculation most strongly, whereas fluvoxamine delayed ejaculation the least. The second double-blind, placebo-controlled study was carried out in men with lifelong rapid ejaculation (IELT < or = 1 minute) and in men with lifelong less-rapid ejaculation (IELT > 1 minute) to investigate whether data about SSRI-induced delayed ejaculation in men with rapid ejaculation may be extrapolated to men with less-rapid ejaculation. After measurement of IELT at home (using a stopwatch) during a 1-month baseline assessment, 32 men with an IELT of 1 minute or less (group 1) or more than 1 minute (group 2) were randomly assigned to receive paroxetine 20 mg/day or placebo for 6 weeks in a double-blind manner. Patients continued to measure their IELTs at home during the 6 weeks of the study. At baseline, 24 patients consistently had IELTs of one minute or less (group 1), and eight patients had IELTs of more than 1 minute (group 2). The geometric mean IELT was 14 seconds in group 1 and 83 seconds in group 2. Twelve patients in group 1 and five in group 2 were randomized to the paroxetine 20 mg/day. The percentage increase in the geometric mean IELT compared with baseline in patients treated with paroxetine was 420% (95% confidence interval [CI], 216-758%) in group 1 and 480% (95% CI, 177-1,118%) in group 2 (p = 0.81). After 6 weeks of treatment with paroxetine, the geometric mean IELT was 92 seconds in group 1 and 602 seconds in group 2 (p < 0.001). Therefore, the paroxetine-induced percentage increase in IELT seems to be independent of the baseline IELT. This suggests that ejaculation-delaying side effects of some SSRIs investigated in men with lifelong rapid ejaculation may be generalized to men with less-rapid ejaculation.     

The use of 5,6 benzo-[alpha]-pyrone (coumarin) and heating by microwaves in the treatment of chronic lymphedema of the legs

Sixty patients with leg lymphedema from a variety of etiologies were divided into randomized two groups, matched by Grade, duration, age, sex, and cause of lymphedema. Using a double-blind format, one group received 5,6 benzo-[alpha]-pyrone (coumarin 1,2 benzopyrone, 400 mg/day) for six months; the other received a placebo. For the next six months, both groups received a standardized regimen of heat (using microwaves) coupled with compression garments. Benzopyrone produced approximately 20% reduction in the volume (p = 10(-4)) and improvement in circumferences and tonometry (p = 10(-5) and 10(-7)). Symptoms (feelings of swelling, pain, heaviness and loss of mobility) were also significantly improved (p = 0.03 to 10(-7)). During the second six months, when microwave heat therapy was added to drug therapy, the patients who had previously received the placebo showed significant improvement (p = 0.03 to 10(-9)) in signs and symptoms of lymphedema. Some, but not all, of the group that was receiving benzopyrones were also significantly improved by heat therapy (p = 0.8 to 0.002). Taking benzopyrones for 12 months plus heat treatment for six months was significantly better, for some criteria, than the placebo plus heat therapy (p = 0.7 to 0.04). On the other hand, heat plus either placebo or benzopyrone was often significantly better than either the active or inactive drug without heat (p = 0.8 to 10(-9)).     

Fluoride therapy in prevention of rheumatoid arthritis induced bone loss

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of sodium fluoride (40 mg/day) in preventing rheumatoid arthritis (RA) induced bone loss, which may lead to osteoporosis. METHODS: We conducted an 18 month, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial in 38 patients with RA. The primary outcome measure was the difference in the percentage change between groups in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) from baseline values after 18 months of therapy. The secondary outcome measures were the differences in the percentage change between groups in femoral neck, Ward's triangle, trochanter, and total body BMD from baseline after 18 months of therapy. RESULTS: There was a significant percentage difference (SD) between groups of 6.2% (7.3%) (p = 0.0005) in lumbar spine BMD after 18 months of treatment in favor of the fluoride group. The fluoride group experienced a 5.2% (8.4%) (p = 0.0125) increase, whereas the placebo group showed a 1.0% (4.8%) (p = 0.8015) decrease in lumbar spine BMD after treatment. No significant differences were found for the femoral neck, Ward's triangle, trochanter, and total body BMD in terms of the percentage changes from baseline within each treatment group or in the differences in the degree of change between groups after therapy. Lumbar spine BMD increased in about 80% of patients treated with fluoride (responders) compared to 44% of patients treated with placebo. CONCLUSION: The results showed that fluoride therapy was well tolerated and increased vertebral bone mass in patients with RA.     

Studies on the effect of short-term oral dihydroergotamine and troxerutin in patients with varicose veins

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and pharmacologic effects of dihydroergotamine and troxerutin on varicose veins. METHODS: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled parallel-group study was conducted in 53 patients with primary varicose veins. Patients received either a fixed combination of 3 mg dihydroergotamine and 300 mg troxerutin three times a day or placebo for 3 weeks. Symptomatic improvement was assessed by a self-assessment score, venocontracting effects on a varicose vein were quantified by the venous compliance technique (VCT), and changes in venous dysfunction were measured by digital photoplethysmography (DPPG). RESULTS: A significant reduction (p < 0.01) of subjective symptoms was observed in both groups. Results from VCT and DPPG after the therapy with dihydroergotamine and troxerutin or placebo were not significantly different (p > 0.05) from pretreatment values. Furthermore, no significant intergroup difference was observed when the before- and after-therapy differences of values of the self-assessment scores (VCT and DPPG) were compared. CONCLUSION: In our study, 3 weeks of treatment with a fixed drug combination of 3 mg dihydroergotamine plus 300 mg troxerutin three times a day had no measurable effect compared with placebo on any of the evaluated end points.     

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of carvedilol on the prevention of nitrate tolerance in patients with chronic heart failure

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to evaluate the effect of carvedilol on nitrate tolerance in patients with chronic heart failure. BACKGROUND: The attenuation of cyclic guanosine 5'-monophosphate (cGMP) production due to inactivation of guanylate cyclase by increased superoxide has been reported as a mechanism of nitrate tolerance. Carvedilol has been known to combine alpha/beta-blockade with antioxidant properties. METHODS: To evaluate the effect of carvedilol on nitrate tolerance, 40 patients with chronic heart failure were randomized to four groups that received either carvedilol (2.5 mg once a day [carvedilol group, n=10]), metoprolol (30 mg once a day [metoprolol group, n=10]), doxazosin (0.5 mg once a day [doxazosin group, n=10]) or placebo (placebo group, n=10). Vasodilatory response to nitroglycerin (NTG) was assessed with forearm plethysmography by measuring the change in forearm blood flow (FBF) before and 5 min after sublingual administration of 0.3 mg NTG, and at the same time blood samples were taken from veins on the opposite side to measure platelet cGMP. Plethysmography and blood sampling were obtained serially at baseline (day 0); 3 days after carvedilol, metoprolol, doxazosin or placebo administration (day 3); and 3 days after application of a 10-mg/24-h NTG tape concomitantly with carvedilol, metoprolol, doxazosin or placebo (day 6). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the response of FBF (%FBF) and cGMP (%cGMP) to sublingual NTG on day 0 and day 3 among the four groups. On day 6, %FBF and %cGMP were significantly lower in the metoprolol, doxazosin and placebo groups than on day 0 and day 3, but these parameters in the carvedilol group were maintained. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicated that carvedilol may prevent nitrate tolerance in patients with chronic heart failure during continuous therapy with NTG.     

A dose-dependent increase in mortality with vesnarinone among patients with severe heart failure. Vesnarinone Trial Investigators

BACKGROUND: Vesnarinone, an inotropic drug, was shown in a short-term placebo-controlled trial to improve survival markedly in patients with severe heart failure when given at a dose of 60 mg per day, but there was a trend toward an adverse effect on survival when the dose was 120 mg per day. In a longer-term study, we evaluated the effects of daily doses of 60 mg or 30 mg of vesnarinone, as compared with placebo, on mortality and morbidity. METHODS: We enrolled 3833 patients who had symptoms of New York Heart Association class III or IV heart failure and a left ventricular ejection fraction of 30 percent or less despite optimal treatment. The mean follow-up was 286 days. RESULTS: There were significantly fewer deaths in the placebo group (242 deaths, or 18.9 percent) than in the 60-mg vesnarinone group (292 deaths, or 22.9 percent) and longer survival (P=0.02). The increase in mortality with vesnarinone was attributed to an increase in sudden death, presumed to be due to arrhythmia. The quality of life had improved significantly more in the 60-mg vesnarinone group than in the placebo group at 8 weeks (P<0.001) and 16 weeks (P=0.003) after randomization. Trends in mortality and in measures of the quality of life in the 30-mg vesnarinone group were similar to those in the 60-mg group but not significantly different from those in the placebo group. Agranulocytosis occurred in 1.2 percent of the patients given 60 mg of vesnarinone per day and 0.2 percent of those given 30 mg of vesnarinone. CONCLUSIONS: Vesnarinone is associated with a dose-dependent increase in mortality among patients with severe heart failure, an increase that is probably related to an increase in deaths due to arrhythmia. A short-term benefit in terms of the quality of life raises issues about the appropriate therapeutic goal in treating heart failure.     

Therapeutic efficacy of multiple intravenous infusions of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha monoclonal antibody combined with low-dose weekly methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and safety of multiple infusions of a chimeric monoclonal anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha antibody (cA2) (infliximab; Remicade, Centocor, Malvern, PA) given alone or in combination with low-dose methotrexate (MTX) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. METHODS: In a 26-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial, 101 patients with active RA exhibiting an incomplete response or flare of disease activity while receiving low-dose MTX were randomized to 1 of 7 groups of 14-15 patients each. The patients received either intravenous cA2 at 1, 3, or 10 mg/kg, with or without MTX 7.5 mg/week, or intravenous placebo plus MTX 7.5 mg/week at weeks 0, 2, 6, 10, and 14 and were followed up through week 26. RESULTS: Approximately 60% of patients receiving cA2 at 3 or 10 mg/kg with or without MTX achieved the 20% Paulus criteria for response to treatment, for a median duration of 10.4 to >18.1 weeks (P < 0.001 versus placebo). Patients receiving cA2 at 1 mg/kg without MTX became unresponsive to repeated infusions of cA2 (median duration 2.6 weeks; P=0.126 versus placebo). However, coadministration of cA2 at 1 mg/kg with MTX appeared to be synergistic, prolonging the duration of the 20% response in >60% of patients to a median of 16.5 weeks (P < 0.001 versus placebo; P=0.006 versus no MTX) and the 50% response to 12.2 weeks (P < 0.001 versus placebo; P=0.002 versus no MTX). Patients receiving placebo infusions plus suboptimal low-dose MTX continued to have active disease, with a Paulus response lasting a median of 0 weeks. A 70-90% reduction in the swollen joint count, tender joint count, and C-reactive protein level was maintained for the entire 26 weeks in patients receiving 10 mg/kg of cA2 with MTX. In general, treatment was well tolerated and stable blood levels of cA2 were achieved in all groups, except for the group receiving 1 mg/kg of cA2 alone, at which dosage antibodies to cA2 were observed in approximately 50% of the patients. CONCLUSION: Multiple infusions of cA2 were effective and well tolerated, with the best results occurring at 3 and 10 mg/kg either alone or in combination with MTX in approximately 60% of patients with active RA despite therapy with low-dose MTX. When cA2 at 1 mg/kg was given with low-dose MTX, synergy was observed. The results of the trial provide a strategy for further evaluation of the efficacy and safety of longer-term treatment with cA2.     

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of buspirone in combination with an SSRI in patients with treatment-refractory depression

BACKGROUND: Case reports and open studies have reported beneficial therapeutic effects of adding buspirone to a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) in the management of treatment-refractory depression. This is the first placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this combination. METHOD: One hundred nineteen patients (82 women, 37 men) who fulfilled criteria for a major depressive episode according to DSM-IV and who had failed to respond to a minimum of 4 weeks (mean = 211 days) of treatment with citalopram or paroxetine were randomly assigned to 4 weeks of treatment with an SSRI plus buspirone (N = 58) or an SSRI plus placebo (N = 61). In addition, 97 patients participated in an optional open-label poststudy treatment phase with the SSRI plus buspirone for 2 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the score on the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) scale. RESULTS: A total of 50.9% of patients in the buspirone group and 46.7% in the placebo group responded after 4 weeks of treatment. The difference in response rate was not statistically significant. No statistically significant differences were found in the frequency of adverse events. At the follow-up of the open SSRI plus buspirone treatment, 69.4% of patients had responded. CONCLUSION: Adding buspirone to an SSRI is a safe and well-tolerated drug regimen. This study failed to demonstrate any difference in efficacy between buspirone or placebo augmentation of an SSRI. It could be argued, however, that the study was inconclusive due to the unusually high placebo response.     

Compliance, tolerance and effectiveness of a short chemoprophylaxis regimen for the treatment of tuberculosis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate compliance, side effects and the efficacy of a short course of chemoprophylaxis for tuberculosis with isoniazid plus rifampin during 3 months, compared with the classic course of isoniazid for 9 months. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective, comparative, randomized and open study of patients with the suitable criteria for chemoprophylaxis, in accordance with the guidelines of the Centers for Disease Control of 1990. Patients were divided into 2 groups: the group of isoniazid plus rifampin, received isoniazid (300 mg per day) plus rifampin (600 mg per day) for 3 months, and the group of isoniazid, that received isoniazid at a dose of 300 mg per day for 9 months. RESULTS: 238 patients were included, of which 42 refused chemoprophylaxis. Of the remaining 196 patients, 98 were included in each group. Both groups were comparable at base level. The side effects, neither light nor severe showed significant differences. The appearance of adverse effects obliged the suspension of treatment in 7 patients in group isoniazid and of 9 patients in group isoniazid plus rifampin. Three patients in group isoniazid plus rifampin and 11 in group isoniazid stopped treatment (OR 4.14, 95% CI 1.02-19.45; p = 0.04). Efficacy was comparable in the two groups; only one case of tuberculosis was detected in a patient who gave up chemoprophylaxis at day 30. CONCLUSIONS: Tolerance in group isoniazid plus rifampin compared with group I was similar. Compliance was better in the short-term group with a lower percentage of abandonment. On comparing, both groups have shown similar efficacy in preventing the appearance of tuberculosis.     

Reduced immune response to hepatitis B vaccine in children with insulin dependent diabetes

The aim of this study was to determine whether fasting gastric volumes could be reduced by preoperative administration of cisapride. One hundred and twenty-one patients undergoing elective general anaesthesia were randomly allocated to receive either cisapride 20 mg plus diazepam 10 mg or placebo tablets plus diazepam 10 mg, two hours prior to induction. Immediately following induction blind gastric aspiration was performed using a 16Fr multiorificed orogastric tube. Gastric volume, pH, and cisapride blood concentration were measured at this time. Gastric volumes were significantly smaller in the cisapride group, 20.5 (SD 22.2) ml compared to placebo 28.2 (SD 26.0) ml but there was no significant difference with respect to pH. Some patients in both groups had large gastric volumes despite fasting. No significant adverse effects were noted with cisapride.