Combination chemotherapy with mitoguazon, ifosfamide, MTX, etoposide (MIME) and G-CSF can efficiently mobilize PBPC in patients with Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Many centers use CY and G-CSF to mobilize PBPC. In this study we explored whether a standard chemotherapy regimen consisting of mitoguazon, ifosfamide, MTX and etoposide (MIME) combined with G-CSF was capable of mobilizing PBPC in lymphoma patients. Twelve patients with Hodgkin's disease (HD) and 38 patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) were mobilized with MIME/G-CSF. Most patients were heavily treated with different chemotherapy regimens receiving a median of 11 cycles (range 3 to 20) of chemotherapy prior to mobilization. It was found that the optimal time of PBPC harvest was at days 12 and 13 after initiating the mobilization regimen. The median number of collected CD34+ cells per kg body weight was 7.1 x 10(6) (range 0.5-26.2). More than 2.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg were achieved in 69% of the patients after one apheresis. When additional cycles of apheresis were done, only 6% failed to harvest this number of CD34+ cells. There was a statistically significant inverse correlation between the number of prior chemotherapy cycles and CD34+ cell yield (P = 0.003). No such association was found between CD34+ cell yield and prior radiotherapy. When MIME/G-CSF was compared with Dexa-BEAM/G-CSF, it was found that MIME/G-CSF tended to be more efficient in mobilizing PBPC in spite of being less myelotoxic. All patients transplanted with MIME/G-CSF mobilized PBPC had fast and sustained engraftment. These results demonstrate that an ordinary salvage chemotherapy regimen, such as MIME combined with G-CSF can be successfully used to mobilize PBPC.     

Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in children using G-CSF after carboplatin containing myelosuppressive chemotherapy

PURPOSE: Peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) apheresis provides an alternative to autologous marrow harvest as a source of hematologic stem cells for transplantation in children with solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eight children with metastatic or recurrent solid tumors underwent 27 apheresis procedures. Recovery from myelosuppressive chemotherapy occurred without continuous daily growth factor support prior to mobilization. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) at 16 microgs/kg/day was used to increase stem cells in the peripheral circulation. CD 34 positive cells, mononuclear cells (MNC), and CFU-GM were measured in the apheresis products. Prior chemotherapy was examined as a clinical factor that affected PBSC yield. RESULTS: A significant correlation was found between CD 34+/kg and CFU-GM/kg of the products (r = 0.758, P < 0.001). Patients receiving cumulative doses of carboplatin over 1,600 mg/m2 produced adequate MNC (1 x 10(8)/kg) but yielded significantly less CD 34+ cells or CFU-GM than those patients receiving less carboplatin. Prior doses of etoposide and ifosfamide did not effect PBSC yield. CONCLUSIONS: The mobilization technique was well tolerated, and the products obtained produced trilineage engraftment in the patients that underwent peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Peripheral blood stem cell apheresis in children can be optimized by selection of appropriate candidates and mobilization with G-CSF after an absence of hematopoietic growth factor support.     

2-Hydroxyisonicotinate dehydrogenase isolated from Mycobacterium sp. INA1

The objective of this study was to identify factors associated with poor mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) or delayed platelet engraftment after high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with lymphoma. Fifty-eight patients with Hodgkin's disease or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma underwent PBPC transplantation as the "best available therapy" at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (New York, NY) between 1993 and 1995. PBPCs were mobilized with either granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone (n = 19) or G-CSF following combination chemotherapy (n = 39). Forty-eight of these patients underwent a PBPC transplant, receiving a conditioning regimen containing cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and either total body irradiation, total lymphoid irradiation, or carmustine. A median number of 4.6 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg were obtained with a median of three leukapheresis procedures. Mobilization of PBPCs using chemotherapy plus G-CSF was superior to G-CSF alone (6.7 x 10(6) versus 1.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg; P = 0.0002). Poorer mobilization of progenitor cells was observed in patients who had previously received stem cell-toxic chemotherapy, including (a) nitrogen mustard, procarbazine, melphalan, carmustine or > 7.5 g of cytarabine chemotherapy premobilization (2.0 x 10(6) versus 6.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg; P = 0.005), or (b) > or = 11 cycles of any previous chemotherapy (2.6 x 10(6) versus 6.7 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg; P = 0.02). Platelet recovery to > 20,000/microliter was delayed in patients who received < 2.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells (median, 13 versus 22 days; P = 0.06). Patients who received > or = 11 cycles of chemotherapy prior to PBPC mobilization tended to have delayed platelet recovery to > 20,000/microliter and to require more platelet transfusions than less extensively pretreated patients (median, 13.5 versus 23.5 days; P = 0.15; median number of platelet transfusion episodes, 13 versus 9; P = 0.17). These data suggest that current strategies to mobilize PBPCs may be suboptimal in patients who have received either stem cell-toxic chemotherapy or > or = 11 cycles of chemotherapy prior to PBPC mobilization. Alternative approaches, such as ex vivo expansion or the use of other growth factors in addition to G-CSF, may improve mobilization of progenitor cells for PBPC transplantation.     

Successful collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia following early consolidation therapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-supported high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone

We evaluated the feasibility of collecting peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) following two cycles of induction chemotherapy with idarubicin, cytarabine and etoposide (ICE), and one cycle of consolidation therapy with high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone (HAM). Thirty-six patients of the multicentre treatment trial AML HD93 were enrolled in this study, and a sufficient number of PBPC was harvested in 30 (83%). Individual peak concentrations of CD34+ cells in the blood varied (range 13.1-291.5/microl; median 20.0/microl). To reach the target quantity of 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, between one and six (median two) leukaphereses (LP) were performed. The LP products contained between 0.2 x 10(6) and 18.9 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (median 1.2 x 10(6)/kg). Multivariate analysis showed that the white blood cell count prior to HAM and the time interval from the start of HAM therapy to reach an unsupported platelet count > 20 x 10(9)/l were predictive for the peak value of CD34+ cells in the blood during the G-CSF stimulated haematological recovery. In 16 patients an intraindividual comparison was made between bone marrow (BM) and PBPC grafts. Compared to BM grafts, PBPC grafts contained 14-fold more MNC, 5-fold more CD34+ cells and 36-fold more CFU-GM. A CD34+ subset analysis showed that blood-derived CD34+ cells had a more immature phenotype as indicated by a lower mean fluorescence intensity for HLA-DR and CD38. In addition, the proportion of CD34+/Thy-1+ cells tended to be greater in the PBPC grafts. The data indicate that sufficient PBPC can be collected in the majority of patients with AML following intensive double induction and first consolidation therapy with high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone.     

Effect of protective colloids on the induction of polymorphic changes in indomethacin agglomerates after solvent evaporation from o/w emulsions

BACKGROUND: It was previously reported that the combination of granulocyte-macrophage-colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and granulocyte-CSF (G-CSF) for 4 days mobilized more primitive CD34+ subsets than did either G-CSF or GM-CSF alone. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The studies determine the optimal number of days of growth factor dosing for mobilization and collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells, by increasing the days of administration of GM-CSF and/or G-CSF or employing the sequential administration of GM-CSF followed by G-CSF. Sixty normal subjects were given injections of G-CSF or GM-CSF alone; GM-CSF and G-CSF concurrently for 4, 5, or 6 days; or a sequential regimen of GM-CSF for 3 or 4 days followed by G-CSF for 2 or 3 days. A 10-L apheresis was performed 24 hours after the last dose. RESULTS: The three most efficacious mobilization regimens consisted of sequential GM-CSF for 3 days followed by G-CSF for either 2 or 3 days and G-CSF alone for 5 days. Each of these regimens resulted in the collection of significantly greater numbers of CD34+ cells by apheresis than any of the 4-day dosing regimens with G-CSF and/or GM-CSF (sequential GM-CSF/G-CSF: 3 days/2 days = 3.58 +/- 0.53 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg; GM-CSF/G-CSF: 3 days/3 days = 4.45 +/- 1.08 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg; G-CSF: 5 days = 3.58 +/- 0.97 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg; all p<0.05 vs. G-CSF and/or GM-CSF for 4 days). Clonogenic assays generally paralleled the level of CD34+ cells. Regimens containing GM-CSF resulted in a higher percentage of the cells from primitive CD34+/CD38-/HLA-DR+ subset than G-CSF alone. CONCLUSION: Compared with 4-day dosing regimens with G-CSF and/or GM-CSF, mobilization of CD34+ cells in normal subjects using sequential GM-CSF for 3 days followed by G-CSF for 2 or 3 days or using G-CSF alone for 5 days increased the number CD34+ cells that can be collected by a single 10-L apheresis 24 hours after the last dose of cytokine.     

Collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells after the administration of cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor: an analysis of 497 patients

BACKGROUND: There is great interpatient variability in the number of peripheral blood stem cells collected, as measured by CD34+ cell content, after the administration of chemotherapy and a growth factor. The ability to predict patients who fail to yield adequate quantities of CD34+ cells would be of value. However, very few reports include large numbers of patients treated in an identical fashion. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Between 1991 and 1995, 497 consecutive patients with a variety of malignant diseases received cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2), etoposide (600 mg/m2), and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (6 micrograms/kg/day) for mobilization and collection of a target dose > or = 2.5 x 10(8) CD34+ cells per kg. Multivariate analyses were performed to determine the factors associated with failure to achieve this target harvest. RESULTS: A median of 14.71 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg (range, 0.08-137.55) was harvested with a median of 2 (range, 1-11) apheresis procedures. Ninety-one percent of patients yielded > or = 2.5 x 10(5) CD34+ cells per kg. Patients with Stage II-III breast cancer, who had pretreatment platelet counts > or = 150 x 10(9) per L and patients who underwent < or = 1 prior chemotherapy regimen had improved CD34+ cell yields. However, most patients with adverse risk factors yielded > or = 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg. CONCLUSION: A regimen of cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor led to the successful collection of adequate numbers of CD34+ cells in most patients without excessive toxicity. These observations confirm previous reports that intense prior therapy adversely affects the quantity of CD34+ cells harvested. Pretreatment and posttreatment variables did not predict with any certainty the small fraction of patients who fail to yield > or = 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg via multiple apheresis procedures.     

Mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells by disease-specific chemotherapy in patients with soft tissue sarcoma

We investigated peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization by disease-specific chemotherapy in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Nine patients, five females and four males, aged 12-51 years, pretreated by one to nine courses of cytotoxic chemotherapy, underwent STS-specific mobilization followed by G-CSF at 5 microg/kg/day. PBPC were collected by 19 conventional-volume aphereses (8-12 l) with one to four procedures in individual patients. Leukaphereses started on median day 15 (range 13-18) from the first day of mobilization chemotherapy at medians of 25.8 x 10(3) WBC/microl (6.8-46.9), 3.5 x 10(3) MNC/microl (1.1-8.8), 122 x 10(3) platelets/microl (72-293) and 30.7 CD34+ cells/microl (6.7-207.8). Cumulative harvests resulted in medians of 4.6 x 10(8) MNC/kg (3.0-6.4), 2.9 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (1.1-11.1) and 12.0 x 10(4) CFU-GM/kg (2.0-37.8). Eight patients underwent high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by PBPC rescue. Seven patients recovered hematopoiesis at medians of 12 days (8-15) for ANC >0.5 x 10(3)/microl and 14 days (8-27) for platelets >20 x 10(3)/microl. One patient, who received 1.6 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, exhibited delayed ANC recovery on day +37 and failed to recover platelets until hospital discharge on day +55. We conclude that in patients with metastatic STS, who are pretreated by standard chemotherapy, PBPC can be mobilized by a further course of STS-specific chemotherapy plus G-CSF. One to four conventional-volume aphereses result in PBPC autografts that can serve as hematopoietic rescue for patients scheduled for HDCT.     

Randomized comparison of progenitor-cell mobilization using chemotherapy, stem-cell factor, and filgrastim or chemotherapy plus filgrastim alone in patients with ovarian cancer

PURPOSE: This was the first randomized study to investigate the efficacy of peripheral-blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization using stem-cell factor (SCF) in combination with filgrastim (G-CSF) following chemotherapy compared with filgrastim alone following chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients with ovarian cancer were treated with cyclophosphamide and randomized to receive filgrastim 5 microg/kg alone or filgrastim 5 microg/kg plus SCF. The dose of SCF was cohort-dependent (5, 10, 15, and 20 microg/kg), with 12 patients in each cohort, nine of whom received SCF plus filgrastim and the remaining three patients who received filgrastim alone. On recovery from the WBC nadir, patients underwent a single apheresis. RESULTS: SCF in combination with filgrastim following chemotherapy enhanced the mobilization of progenitor cells compared with that produced by filgrastim alone following chemotherapy. This enhancement was dose-dependent for colony-forming unit-granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM), burst-forming unit-erythrocyte (BFU-E), and CD34+ cells in both the peripheral blood and apheresis product. In the apheresis product, threefold to fivefold increases in median CD34+ and progenitor cell yields were obtained in patients treated with SCF 20 microg/kg plus filgrastim compared with yields obtained in patients treated with filgrastim alone. Peripheral blood values of CFU-GM, BFU-E, and CD34+ cells per milliliter remained above defined threshold levels longer with higher doses of SCF. The higher doses of SCF offer a greater window of opportunity in which to perform the apheresis to achieve high yields. CONCLUSION: SCF (15 or 20 microg/kg) in combination with filgrastim following chemotherapy is an effective way of increasing progenitor cell yields compared with filgrastim alone following chemotherapy.     

Purification and functional analysis of the DnaK homologue from Prevotella intermedia OMZ 326

Large-volume leukapheresis (LVL), defined as the processing of at least three blood volumes in a single session for peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collection, was performed in 32 small children weighing < or = 25 kg, aged 10 months to 8 years, with a variety of malignancies. Harvesting of PBPC was started after 4 days of cytokine (G-CSF, 12 micrograms/kg s.c.) alone. Procedures were performed using a continuous flow blood cell separator (COBE Spectra). The automated program of lymphocytapheresis was modified to achieve a collection rate of 0.9 ml/min. The extracorporeal line was primed with a unit of a packed red blood cells before the procedure. Acid citrate dextrose (ACD) was used as anticoagulant with an ACD inlet ratio of 1:14 and an ACD infusion rate of 1.1 ml/min/L of total blood volume. The inlet flow ranged between 6 and 35 ml/min (median 20 ml/min). A total of 37 apheresis procedures were performed (median 1, range 1-3). In 84% of patients, a single apheresis yields the minimum number of PBPC cells required for transplantation. No consistent side effects were observed, and LVL was well tolerated by children. A median of 7.7 x 10(8) kg MNC, 5.4 x 10(6)/kg CD34+, and 6.2 x 10(4)/kg CFU-GM per apheresis were harvested. Patients with neuroblastoma had a significantly lower yield than other patients. To date, 27 patients have been transplanted after myeloablative treatment, and rapid and sustained engraftment was achieved in all cases. The number of CD34+ cells infused was highly correlated with engraftment kinetics. LVL can be safely and easily performed in small children, allowing adequate PBPC collection for transplantation with rapid hematologic recovery.     

Hematopoietic progenitor cell collection and neoplastic cell contamination in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) or G-CSF alone for mobilization

BACKGROUND: We compared hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) collection and neoplastic cell contamination in breast cancer patients given cyclophosphamide (CTX) plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) or G-CSF alone for mobilization. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 57 stage II-III breast cancer patients, CD34+ cells, colony-forming units-granulocyte macrophage (CFU-GM), early HPC and breast cancer cells were counted in HPC collections obtained after CTX plus G-CSF (n = 27) or G-CSF-alone mobilization (n = 30). RESULTS: The CD34+ cell collection was about two-fold greater after CTX plus G-CSF mobilization (11.0 +/- 7.9 vs. 5.8 +/- 3.5 x 10(6)/kg, P < 0.001). Similarly, the total number of CFU-GM, CD34+CD38- cells and of week-5 cobblestone area forming cells (CAFC) collected was significantly higher in patients mobilized with CTX plus G-CSF. Breast cancer cells were found in the apheresis products of 22% of patients mobilized with CTX plus G-CSF and in 10% of patients mobilized with G-CSF alone (P = 0.36). Of seven patients who failed G-CSF-alone mobilization and eventually underwent chemotherapy plus G-CSF mobilization, none had cytokeratin-positive cells after G-CSF mobilization, whereas four out of seven had cytokeratin-positive cells after chemotherapy plus G-CSF (P = 0.07 by chi 2 test). CONCLUSION: The CTX plus G-CSF mobilization protocol was associated with a significantly higher HPC collection. However, this benefit was not accompanied by a reduction in the incidence of tumor-contaminated HPC graft.     

Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in advanced ovarian cancer

High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic support has been expected to improve the survival of advanced ovarian cancer patients in recent years. An essential component of such treatment has been the ability to collect and reinfuse a large number of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) following high dose therapy. This study was designed to determine which clinical and hematological factors would be better indicators to collect the proper volume of PBSCs. Thirteen patients received a total of 24 courses of induction chemotherapy and 69 of apheresis. We usually mobilized stem cells using CEP chemotherapy (cisplatin 50-70 mg/m2, epirubicin 50 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 1.5 g/m2) with G-CSF and CEE regimen (cyclophosphamide 2.0 g/m2, epirubicin 50 mg/m2, and etoposide 50 mg/m2) as a salvage for mobilization. We obtained an average 5 x 10(6)/kg of CD34+ cells for 3 days as one course. The number of CD34+ cells collected significantly depended on the platelets and reticulocytes on the first day of apheresis, but not a nadir of WBCs. It is concluded that apheresis should be started on recovery of WBCs to 5,000-10,000/microliters, of immature granulocytes to > or = 10% and of reticulocytes to > or = 20%. This study confirmed the feasibility of collecting enough PBSCs to use standard chemotherapy of ovarian cancer patients.     

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) dose-dependent efficacy in peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in patients who had failed initial mobilization with chemotherapy and G-CSF

For 10 consecutive patients in our unit who did not show a significant rise in blood progenitor cells within 14 days following chemotherapy and G-CSF, we increased the G-CSF dose from 5 to 10 microg/kg/day (n = 9) or from 10 to 15 microg/kg/day (n = 1). As a result, there were significant increases in total yield as well as yield per apheresis of mononuclear cells, CD34+ cells and CFU-GM (P < 0.025, <0.01 and <0.005, respectively). After G-CSF dose escalation, six of the 10 patients had sufficient CD34+ cells for performing transplantation. These results demonstrate a dose-dependent response of progenitor cell mobilization by G-CSF when used in combination with chemotherapy. Moreover, increasing the dose of G-CSF as late as the third week of mobilization may still provide sufficient cell yield even with patients who did not show a significant mobilization with conventional doses of G-CSF.     

Peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization using stem cell factor in combination with filgrastim in breast cancer patients

The safety and optimal dose and schedule of stem cell factor (SCF) administered in combination with filgrastim for the mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) was determined in 215 patients with high-risk breast cancer. Patients received either filgrastim alone (10 microg/kg/d for 7 days) or the combination of 10 microg/kg/d filgrastim and 5 to 30 microg/kg/d SCF for either 7, 10, or 13 days. SCF patients were premedicated with antiallergy prophylaxis. Leukapheresis was performed on the final 3 days of cytokine therapy and, after high-dose chemotherapy and infusion of PBPCs, patients received 10 microg/kg/d filgrastim until absolute neutrophil count recovery. The median number of CD34+ cells collected was greater for patients receiving the combination of filgrastim and SCF, at doses greater than 10 microg/kg/d, than for those receiving filgrastim alone (7.7 v 3.2 x 10(6)/kg, P < .05). There were significantly (P < .05) more CD34+ cells harvested for the 20 microg/kg/d SCF (median, 7.9 x 10(6)/kg) and 25 microg/kg/d SCF (median, 13.6 x 10(6)/kg) 7-day combination groups than for the filgrastim alone patients (median, 3.2 x 10(6)/kg). The duration of administration of SCF and filgrastim (7, 10, or 13 days) did not significantly affect CD34+ cell yield. Treatment groups mobilized with filgrastim alone or with the cytokine combination had similar hematopoietic engraftment and overall survival after PBPC infusion. In conclusion, the results of this study indicate that SCF therapy enhances CD34+ cell yield and is associated with manageable levels of toxicity when combined with filgrastim for PBPC mobilization. The combination of 20 microg/kg/d SCF and 10 microg/kg/d filgrastim with daily apheresis beginning on day 5 was selected as the optimal dose and schedule for the mobilization of PBPCs.     

High-dose etoposide with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells: efficacy and toxicity at three dose levels

High-dose etoposide (2.0-2.4 g m(-2)) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is an effective strategy to mobilize peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs), although in some patients this is associated with significant toxicity. Sixty-three patients with malignancy were enrolled into this non-randomized sequential study. The majority (55/63, 87%) had received at least two prior regimens of chemotherapy, and seven patients had previously failed to mobilize following high-dose cyclophosphamide with G-CSF. Consecutive patient groups received etoposide at three dose levels [2.0 g m(-2) (n = 22), 1.8 g m(-2) (n = 20) and 1.6 g m(-2) (n = 21)] followed by daily G-CSF. Subsequent leukaphereses were assayed for CD34+ cell content, with a target total collection of 2.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells kg(-1). Toxicity was assessed by the development of significant mucositis, the requirement for parenteral antibiotics or blood component support and rehospitalization incidence. Ten patients (16%) had less than the minimum target yield collected. Median collections in the three groups were 4.7 (2 g m(-2)), 5.7 (1.8 g m(-2)) and 6.5 (1.6 g m(-2)) x 10(6) CD34+ cells kg(-1). Five of the seven patients who had previously failed cyclophosphamide mobilization achieved more than the target yield. Rehospitalization incidence was significantly lower in patients receiving 1.6 g m(-2) etoposide than in those receiving 2.0 g m(-2) (P = 0.03). These data suggest that high-dose etoposide with G-CSF is an efficient mobilization regimen in the majority of heavily pretreated patients, including those who have previously failed on high-dose cyclophosphamide with G-CSF. An etoposide dose of 1.6 g m(-2) appears to be as effective as higher doses but less toxic.     

Large-volume leukaphereses may be more efficient than standard-volume leukaphereses for collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells

To overcome the need for multiple leukaphereses to collect enough PBPC for autologous transplantation, large-volume leukaphereses (LVL) are used to process multiple blood volumes per session. We compared the efficiency of CD34+ cell collection by LVL (n = 63; median blood volumes processed 11.1) with that of standard-volume leukaphereses (SVL) (n = 38; median blood volumes processed 1.9). To achieve this in patients with different peripheral blood concentrations of CD34+ cells, we analyzed the ratio of CD34+ cells collected per unit of blood volume processed, divided by the number of CD34+ cells in total blood volume at the beginning of apheresis. For LVL, 30% (9%-323%) of circulating CD34+ cells were collected per blood volume compared with 42% (7%-144%) for SVL (p = 0.02). However, in LVL patients, peripheral blood CD34+ cells/L decreased a median of 54% during LVL (similar data for SVL not available). The number of CD34+ cells collected per blood volume processed after 4 and 8 blood volumes and at the end of LVL were 0.32 (0.01-2.05), 0.24 (0.01-1.68), and 0.22 (0.01-2.40) x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, respectively (p = 0.0007), despite the 54% decrease in peripheral blood CD34+ cells/L throughout LVL. A median 66% decrease in the platelet count was also observed during LVL. Thus, LVL may be more efficient than SVL for PBPC collection, allowing, in most patients, the collection in one LVL of sufficient PBPC to support autologous transplantation.     

Structures of the van der Waals Isomers of Halosulfuric Acids: Microwave Spectra of HX-SO3 (X = F, Cl, Br)

The effects of different doses of filgrastim on yields of CD34+ peripheral blood stem cells were evaluated in patients with breast cancer. 55 were randomized to receive filgrastim 10, 20, 30 or 40 microg/kg/d with more CD34+ cells/kg/apheresis harvested after the three highest dose levels. 35 additional patients were randomized to receive 10 or 30 microg/ kg. The median number of CD34+ cells collected after 10 microg/ kg (n = 31) was 0.7 x 10(6)/kg/apheresis (range 0.1-4.4) as compared to 1.2 (range 0.1-6.8) after 30 microg/kg (n = 32) (P = 0.04). Among patients randomized to 10 v 30 microg/kg, more (50%) achieved > or = 5.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg and less aphereses were required to achieve > or = 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg after the higher dose (P = 0.04). In multivariate analyses, patients receiving 10 microg/kg (n = 31) had lower yields of CD34+ cells (P = 0.026) and had a 3.3-fold increase in the probability of not achieving > or = 5.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg as compared to patients receiving 20-40 microg/kg (n = 59). Patients who had received radiation had a 2.9-fold probability of not achieving > or = 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. These data suggest that, in patients with good marrow reserves, doses of filgrastim > 10 microg/kg/d mobilized more CD34+ cells and may be useful when high numbers of CD34+ cells are desired.     

Mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells with high-dose cyclophosphamide (4 or 7 g/m2) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with multiple myeloma

High-dose cyclophosphamide (HD-CY) has been shown to decrease the tumor mass in multiple myeloma (MM) patients and to be effective in the mobilization of PBPC. By administering hematopoietic growth factor the quantity of progenitor cells in the peripheral blood increased and the hematological toxicity of CY could be reduced. Thirty-two patients with stage II and stage III MM were treated to mobilize and harvest a sufficient amount of PBPC for autologous transplantation. Sixteen patients received 4 g/m2 CY and 16 patients 7 g/m2 CY in divided doses of 1 g/m2 every 2 h. Both patient groups were comparable for disease stages as well as previous therapies. Twenty-four hours after chemotherapy 300 micrograms GCSF were administered subcutaneously once daily until the last day of leukapheresis. Administration of 7 g/m2 HD-CY resulted in statistically significantly higher peak values for CD34+ progenitor cells (47.86/microliters vs 18.75/microliters, P = 0.0198) in the peripheral blood. PBPC autografts containing > 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg BW could be obtained at the first attempt from 14 of 16 patients treated with 7 g/m2 CY as compared to 10 of 16 patients treated with 4 g/m2 CY (P = 0.11). The analysis of potentially malignant CD19+ B cells showed a highly significant lower mean CD19+ cell content/kg BW per leukapheresis in the 7 g/m2 compared to the 4 g/m2 CY group (0.75 vs 1.81 x 10(6), P = 0.001). WHO grade IV treatment-related non-hematologic toxicity was not observed. We prefer the 7 g/m2 CY dosage followed by cytokine administration for the mobilization of PBPC in advanced state MM patients pretreated with alkylating agents.     

Efficiency of high-dose FEC chemotherapy for the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells into peripheral blood

The best regimen for mobilizing hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) into peripheral blood is not yet defined. The efficiency of FEC chemotherapy in the treatment of breast cancer is well established and the effects of FEC on HSC mobilization have been characterized. We tested the feasibility and the toxicity of a high-dose FEC regimen which may improve the mobilizing capacity of conventional FEC. Twenty patients with poor prognosis breast cancer received high-dose FEC and filgrastim 5 micrograms/kg. Three leukaphereses were performed on each patient for 3 consecutive days. Total numbers of CFU-GM and CD34+ cells were assessed, and a retrospective analysis was made. The numbers of CFU-GM/kg and CD34+ cells/kg collected (mean +/- standard error) were respectively 12.2 x 10(5) (+/- 2.4) and 14.6 x 10(6) (+/- 2.5). Extra-hematologic toxicity was negligible. Hematologic recovery after CTCb high-dose chemotherapy and HSC infusion was rapid. High-dose FEC is efficient for collecting HSC in peripheral blood. Extra-hematologic toxicity is weak and hematologic recovery after autograft is normal. Increased dosage of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide could allow a single leukapheresis collection of sufficient HSC from peripheral blood.     

High-dose thiotepa and etoposide-based regimens with autologous hematopoietic support for high-risk or recurrent CNS tumors in children and adults

The prognosis in patients with primary brain tumors treated with surgery, radiotherapy and conventional chemotherapy remains poor. To improve outcome, combination high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) has been explored in children, but rarely in adults. This study was performed to determine the tolerability of three-drug combination high-dose thiotepa (T) and etoposide (E)-based regimens in pediatric and adult patients with high-risk or recurrent primary brain tumors. Thirty-one patients (13 children and 18 adults) with brain tumors were treated with high-dose chemotherapy: 19 with BCNU (B) and TE (BTE regimen), and 12 with carboplatin (C) and TE (CTE regimen). Patients received growth factors and hematopoietic support with marrow (n = 15), peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) (n = 11) or both (n = 5). The 100 day toxic mortality rate was 3% (1/31). Grade III/IV toxicities included mucositis (58%), hepatitis (39%) and diarrhea (42%). Five patients had seizures and two had transient encephalopathy (23%). All patients had neutropenic fever and all pediatric patients required hyperalimentation. Median time to engraftment with absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >0.5 x 10(9)/l was 11 days (range 8-37 days). Time to ANC engraftment was significantly longer (P = 0.0001) in patients receiving marrow (median 14 days, range 10-37) than for PBPC (median 9.5 days, range 8-10). Platelet engraftment >50 x 10(9)/l was 24 days (range 14-53 days) in children. In adults, platelet engraftment >20 x 10(9)/l was 12 days (range 9-65 days). In 11 patients supported with PBPC, there was a significant inverse correlation between CD34+ dose and days to ANC (rho = -0.87, P = 0.009) and platelet engraftment (rho = -0.85, P = 0.005), with CD34+ dose predicting time to engraftment following HDC. Overall, 30% of evaluable patients (7/24) had a complete response (CR) (n = 3) or partial response (PR) (n = 4). Median time to tumor progression (TTP) was 7 months, with an overall median survival of 12 months. These TE-based BCNU or carboplatin three-drug combination HDC regimens are safe and tolerable with promising response rates in both children and older adults.     

Recombinant human granulocyte and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF and GM-CSF) administered following cytotoxic chemotherapy have a similar ability to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells

The availability of hematopoietic growth factors has greatly facilitated the mobilization and collection of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). It was the aim of this double-blind study to compare the PBSC-mobilizing efficacy of recombinant human G-CSF and GM-CSF when administered post-chemotherapy. Twenty-six patients with relapsed Hodgkin's disease were included in the study. Their median age was 31 years (range, 22-59) and 14 patients were males and 12 were females. Patients were pretreated with a median of eight cycles of cytotoxic chemotherapy, while 18 patients had undergone extended field irradiation. The patients received dexamethasone 24 mg days 1-7, melphalan 30 mg/m2 day 3, BCNU 60 mg/m2 day 3, etoposide 75 mg/m2 days 4-7, Ara-C 100 mg/m2 twice daily days 4-7 (Dexa-BEAM). Twelve patients were randomized to receive 5/microg/kg/day G-CSF and 14 patients to receive 5 microg/kg/day GM-CSF, both administered subcutaneously starting on day 1 after the end of Dexa-BEAM. Primary endpoints of the study were the number of CD34+ cells harvested per kg body weight on the occasion of six consecutive leukaphereses and the time needed for hematological reconstitution following autografting. Twenty-one patients completed PBSC collection, and six patients of the G-CSF group and nine of the GM-CSF group were autografted. No difference was observed with respect to the median yield of CFU-GM and CD34+ cells: 32.5 x 10(4)/kg vs 31.3 x 10(4)/kg CFU-GM, and 7.6 x 10(6)/kg vs 5.6 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells, for G-CSF and GM-CSF, respectively (U test, P= 0.837 and 0.696). High-dose chemotherapy consisted of cyclophosphamide 1.7 g/m2 days 1-4, BCNU 150 mg/m2 days 1-4, etoposide 400 mg/m2 days 1-4. All patients transplanted with more than 5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg had a rapid platelet recovery (20 x 10(9)/l) between 6 and 11 days and neutrophil recovery (0.5 x 10(9)/1) between 9 and 16 days, while patients transplanted with less than 5 x 10(6)/kg had a delayed reconstitution, regardless of the kind of growth factor used for PBSC mobilization. In conclusion, our data indicate that in patients with Hodgkin's disease G-CSF and GM-CSF given after salvage chemotherapy appear to be not different in their ability to mobilize PBSC resulting in a similar time needed for hematological reconstitution when autografted following high-dose therapy.