Therapy for acute myocardial infarction in older persons

OBJECTIVE: To review the early management of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in older adults. METHODS: Recently published studies relevant to the early management of AMI were systematically reviewed. When possible, the impact of older age on complication rates and clinical outcomes was evaluated. RESULTS: In general, AMI therapies that are effective in younger patients are also effective in older patients. Conversely, older age is associated with an increased risk of complications from therapy, implying that careful patient selection is required to optimize outcomes while minimizing risks. The principal limitation of currently available data is that relatively few patients older than the age of 80 have been enrolled in prospective randomized clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: Thrombolysis and primary angioplasty are effective in establishing reperfusion and improving clinical outcomes in older patients with AMI. In the absence of contraindications, aspirin and beta blockers should be considered standard therapy in AMI patients of all ages, whereas heparin, nitrates, and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors are indicated in selected subgroups. At the present time, calcium channel blockers, magnesium, and antiarrhythmic agents are not recommended for routine use in the AMI setting, and the role of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, low molecular weight heparin, and other newer agents await the results of ongoing clinical trials.     

Adjuvant therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarct

Besides the thrombolytic therapy several adjuvant therapeutic measures were identified which significantly improve the prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). These measures include the treatment by means of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), beta-blockers and ACE inhibitors. Early administration of ASA and beta-blockers are indicated in all patients with AMI who have no contraindications for this therapy. They are especially the patients with manifest heart failure or asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction who benefit from ACE inhibitors. The effectivity of routine administration of other medicaments such as anticoagulants, nitrates, calcium channel blockers and magnesium, have not been convincingly proved. However, some selected patients with AMI can benefit from these medicaments. Intravenous administration of heparin is unambiguously justified only in thrombolysis with t-PA. Thrombolyses with streptokinase, urokinase, and anistreplase are justified only at high risk of thromboembolic complications. Their prevention and therapy include also the necessity to restrict the administration of pelentan. The use of nitrates is indicated in patients with AMI in case of sustaining stenocardia, arterial hypertension and manifest heart left ventricular failure. Until the definitive standpoint is gained regarding the effect of magnesium in patients with AIM, its administration remains especially indicated in cases of arterial hypertension, tachycardiac disturbances of the heart rhythm and states of assumed or proved hypomagnesiemia. In AMI cases when magnesium is used in order to protect the patient from reperfusion lesion, it must be administered prior to the reperfusion therapy. An intensive research in the field of therapeutical measures in patients with AMI still continues. It is certain that it will soon bring further knowledge which will in turn improve the prognosis and quality of life of patients with AMI. (Tab. 4, Ref. 133.)     

Does PTCA in acute myocardial infarction affect mortality and reinfarction rates? A quantitative overview (meta-analysis) of the randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is often performed after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) either as an adjuvant to thrombolytic therapy or instead of thrombolysis. The effect of PTCA in AMI on mortality and reinfarction has remained unclear, with the available randomized trials indicating inconsistent results. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic overview (meta-analysis) of the randomized trials was conducted to assess the effect of PTCA in AMI on mortality and reinfarction rates. Data from 7 trials in which primary PTCA was evaluated and 16 trials in which PTCA after thrombolysis was studied were included in this overview, comprising a total of 8496 patient. The trials represented different approaches to the timing of PTCA after AMI. The trials of PTCA after thrombolytic therapy were also categorized according to the different protocols with respect to the routine or elective character of PTCA in the invasive group. A reduction in short-term (6 week) mortality (odds ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.33, 0.94) and in the combined outcome of short-term mortality and nonfatal reinfarction (odds ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.35, 0.80) was observed in the trials comparing primary PTCA with thrombolytic therapy. In contrast, in trials in which an approach of thrombolysis and PTCA was compared with thrombolytic therapy alone, there was no important difference in early mortality, with an apparent reduction in mortality between 6 and 52 weeks. The lower mortality between 6 and 52 weeks among 6-week survivors seemed to be restricted to the subgroup of trials in which PTCA was used as a routine strategy (odds ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39, 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Although the analyses of the various categories of trials suggest that primary PTCA may be more beneficial than thrombolytic therapy in AMI, these data should be interpreted cautiously unless confirmed by larger studies. In contrast, the addition of various other strategies of PTCA to thrombolytic therapy does not convincingly indicate a clinically different outcome than if a more conservative strategy is followed, in which PTCA is used only if clinically indicated. Some specific strategies, however, such as rescue PTCA in high-risk patients with occluded arteries, may be of benefit.     

Histological changes associated with long-term urethral stents

Many activities of magnesium have justified randomized controlled trials of its role in acute myocardial infarction (AMI), which have shown reduction of short term mortality by 25% to over 50%. The Fourth International Study of Infarct Survival (ISIS-4) megastudy failed to confirm these findings, and, based on analysis of pooled findings, it was concluded that magnesium has no place in treatment of AMI. The fixed effects statistical model employed in ISIS-4 for evaluation of pooled data is inappropriate because the studies were not homogeneous. Among the differences between the earlier studies and the megatrial, the most significant was the time at which magnesium infusions were started relative to the time of reperfusion. Animal studies have shown that magnesium is protective only if present before or at the time of reperfusion. Unlike in earlier trials, in which magnesium infusions were started soon after the ischemic event or simultaneously with a lytic agent, in ISIS-4 magnesium treatment was withheld until after iatrogenic or spontaneous reperfusion occurred. This can explain poor therapeutic results in ISIS-4, but not the hypotension and bradycardia encountered in a minority of patients in that study. Dosage difference alone cannot explain this, even though the amounts given in the small studies were 40% to 25% less than that in ISIS-4, because the dose used in the Second Leicester Intravenous Magnesium Intervention Trial (LIMIT-2) was only slightly lower than that used in ISIS-4. Administration of high dose magnesium with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (which spares magnesium) or the vasodilating oral nitrate in arms of ISIS-4 may have contributed to adverse effects of hypermagnesemia. Also, the very low mortality rate of controls in ISIS-4 suggests that the patients may have been at relatively low risk, and it is in high risk patients that magnesium has been shown to be most effective. A large scale study of magnesium in such patients is being started.     

Hospital course of acute myocardial infarction: significance of the therapeutic procedures of early reperfusion

Reperfusion therapy has contributed to decreased morbidity and mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Implementation of thrombolytic therapy; primary angioplasty and emergency coronary artery by-pass surgery have proved to be effective in well designed controlled clinical trials. There is little information, however, about the impact of reperfusion therapy in the general clinical population that is usually seen in the coronary care unit. In this paper we have compared the clinical course, morbidity and mortality of patients attended for a first AMI in 2 different periods. Group I comprised 431 patients seen during the period 1981-1986 and group II bad 113 patients seen during the period 1992-1993. Age, gender distribution and AMI location were similar in both groups. Patients in group I had a significantly higher incidence of tobacco use and previous angina pectoris. In group I, 4% of patients received streptokinase, 0.9% of patients had emergency by-pass surgery and none had primary angioplasty, whereas in group II, 29% of patients received trombolytics, 6.5% had primary angioplasty and 6.5% had by-pass surgery. Heart failure Killip class II-III occurred in 35% of patients in group I and in 13% of patients in group II (p < 0.05). Intrahospital mortality was 19.6% in group I and 11.5% in Group II (p < 0.045). There were no differences in the incidence of cardiogenic shock in both groups. Multivariate analysis showed that age and heart failure were significant independent predictors of mortality in both periods. Thus, there has been a significant change in the therapeutic approach to AMI patients in recent years. Widespread utilization of reperfusion therapy appears to be associated with decrease in morbidity and mortality in a general population of patients with a first AMI.     

ISIS 4: clinical controversy regarding magnesium infusion, thrombolytic therapy, and acute myocardial infarction

Magnesium (Mg) infusions over 24 hours were given to patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at least 2 hours after thrombolysis. Patients showed no benefit and even some increased risk in contrast to reduction in mortality obtained by Mg therapy in smaller trials. Results of all of the studies were pooled and statistically analyzed, according to a fixed-effects model that is inappropriate for studies of different protocols. The panel concluded that further study of Mg in AMI is not needed. This conclusion has been questioned.     

Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction-outcome optimization methods

Early reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been shown to reduce the extent of myocardial necrosis and to improve short and long term prognosis. Gender, smoking, age and site of infarct location may be regarded as prognostic factors for the outcome of AMI and of thrombolytic therapy with streptokinase (STK). The aim of this study was to identify factors, which are related to the results of thrombolytic therapy by STK in AMI. 156 patients (122 males and 34 females) treated with STK were retrospectively analyzed: they were subdivided into 3 groups according to the presumed success of thrombolytic therapy based on the accepted clinical and angiographic TIMI flow criteria. Group 1 = successful (88 patients), group 2 = probably successful (20 patients) and group 3 = failed thrombolysis (48 patients). Multiple regression analysis showed that Killip class (p = 0.0005), time from pain onset to thrombolysis initiation (p = 0.02) and the time of the day in which thrombolysis began (p = 0.037) are independent major predictive factors for successful thrombolytic therapy by STK in AMI. Gender, age, smoking and some risk factors are not of similar predictive power. These results may guide us in the optimization of thrombolytic therapy by STK in AMI, different dose regimens for different times of day and probably preference for primary PTCA in the early morning hours.     

Ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death in acute myocardial infarct in the era of thrombolytics

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains an actual problem. There is a very close relationship between ventricular arrhythmias and SCD in AMI. Malignant ventricular arrhythmias, such as ventricular fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia are the major causes of SCD in coincidence with AMI. Frequent and complex ventricular arrhythmias are also important predictors of the risk of SCD in coincidence with and after AMI. In this article the authors emphasize the importance of the complexity of pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for the genesis of ventricular arrhythmias in coincidence with AMI. The necessity of taking into account the current knowledge about pathophysiology in prevention and therapy of separate forms of ventricular arrhythmias is also emphasized. The incidence and time course of ventricular arrhythmias and SCD in coincidence with AIM in prethrombolytic and thrombolytic periods is described. The importance of separate forms of ventricular arrhythmias in coincidence with AMI with regard to short and long-term prognoses is described. There are discussed also the possible mechanisms of thrombolytic and adjuvant therapies that affect the incidence and frequency of ventricular arrhythmias. The authors recommend the optimal therapy for each form of ventricular arrhythmia and the following management of patients with AMI. In the prevention and therapy of ventricular arrhythmias in the setting of AMI the authors emphasize the importance of early recanalization and prevention of re-occlusion of the infarction-related coronary artery. Great importance is attributed also to other adjuvant measures directed to the restriction of the size of infarction, myocardium protection, prevention and attenuation of remodelling of the left ventricle and thereby to the prevention of heart failure and attenuation of adverse effects of the sympathetic nervous system. An early administration of beta-blockers which favourable effect in and after AMI was documented with conclusive evidence is considered as one of the most important measures in prevention and therapy of malignant ventricular arrhythmias and SCD. The occurrence of malignant ventricular arrhythmias in the setting of heart failure and/or 24-48 hours after AMI should be an indication for aggressive management directed to arrhythmia (programmed ventricular stimulation, electrophysiologically guided pharmacologic or nonpharmacologic therapy) as well as to underlying coronary heart disease (coronary angiography and revascularization).     

Pharmacologic profile of survivors of acute myocardial infarction at United States academic hospitals

Optimal drug therapy for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is well described in the medical literature. However, data on the actual pharmacologic management of patients surviving AMI at academic hospitals is unavailable. The purpose of this study was to document treatment profiles in 500 patients surviving AMI at 12 academic hospitals in the United States. These profiles were compared with established guidelines and were evaluated for trends. Overall, thrombolytics (streptokinase > or = tissue-type plasminogen activator) were administered in 29% of the patients, with a greater proportion of patients receiving beta-blockers than calcium channel antagonists in the initial 72 hours (61% vs 40%; p < 0.005) and at discharge (51% vs 35%; p < 0.005). Further, women were less likely than men to receive thrombolytic therapy (odds ratio [OR] = 0.61; confidence interval [CI], 0.54 to 0.69) or beta-blocker therapy within the first 72 hours (OR = 0.61; CI, 0.55 to 0.67) or at hospital discharge (OR = 0.53; CI, 0.48 to 0.58). Overall, improvements could still be made in the number of patients who receive thrombolytic and acute and chronic beta-blocker therapies after AMI, particularly in women. Changes in treatment profiles may be a reflection of the publication of large clinical trials.     

Noninvasive measurement of tissue magnesium and correlation with cardiac levels

BACKGROUND: Intracellular magnesium ([Mg]i) plays an important role in the regulation of myocardial metabolism, contractility, and the maintenance of transsarcolemmal and intracellular ionic gradients. An understanding of the role of magnesium in the clinical setting, however, is hampered by the lack of an assay of intracellular tissue magnesium levels. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used energy-dispersive x-ray analysis to measure [Mg]i in sublingual epithelial cells and to correlate the level with those in atrial biopsy specimens from the same patients during cardiopulmonary bypass. Levels were also measured in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients before and after intravenous magnesium sulfate administration and compared with those from intensive care unit (ICU) patients and healthy individuals. A strong correlation between sublingual epithelial cell (mean, 32.1 +/- 0.3 mEq/L) and atrial tissue (mean, 32.1 +/- 0.3 mEq/L) [Mg]i was present in 18 cardiac surgery patients (r = .68, P < .002). Epithelial and atrial [Mg]i levels were lower than in healthy individuals (33.7 +/- 0.5 mEq/L, P < .01) studied at that time and correlated poorly with serum magnesium. Mean [Mg]i in 22 AMI patients was 30.7 +/- 0.4 mEq/L, which was significantly lower than in 21 ICU patients and 15 healthy individuals (35.0 +/- 0.5 mEq/L and 34.5 +/- 0.7 mEq/L, respectively, P < .001). Intravenous magnesium sulfate was administered to most of the AMI patients (mean dose, 36 +/- 6 mmol). [Mg]i rose significantly in the AMI patients over the first 24 hours, and the magnitude of the increase was greater in those who received higher doses of intravenous magnesium sulfate. CONCLUSIONS: Sublingual epithelial cell [Mg]i correlates well with atrial [Mg]i but not with serum magnesium. [Mg]i levels are low in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and those with AMI. Intravenous magnesium sulfate corrects low [Mg]i levels in AMI patients. Energy-dispersive x-ray analysis determination of sublingual cell [Mg]i may expedite the investigation of the role of magnesium deficiency in heart disease.     

Intravenous diltiazem in acute myocardial infarction. Diltiazem as adjunctive therapy to activase (DATA) trial

OBJECTIVES: This study was defined as a pilot investigation of the usefulness and safety of intravenous diltiazem as adjunctive therapy to tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction, followed by oral therapy for 4 weeks. BACKGROUND: Experimental studies have documented that calcium antagonists protect the myocardial cell against the damage caused by coronary artery occlusion and reperfusion, yet no benefits have been conclusively demonstrated in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in humans. METHODS: In this pilot study, 59 patients with an AMI treated with tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) were randomized, double blinded, to intravenous diltiazem or placebo for 48 h, followed by oral therapy for 4 weeks. The primary objective was to detect an effect on indices of regional left ventricular function and perfusion. Patients were also closely monitored for clinical events, coronary artery patency and indices of infarct size and of left ventricular function. RESULTS: Creatine kinase elevation, Q wave score, global and regional left ventricular function and coronary artery patency at 48 h were not significantly different between the diltiazem and placebo groups. A greater improvement observed in regional perfusion and function with diltiazem was likely explained by initial larger defects. Diltiazem, compared to placebo, reduced the rate of death, reinfarction or recurrent ischemia at 35 days from 41% to 13% (p=0.027) and prevented the need for an urgent intervention. The rate of death or myocardial infarction was reduced by 65% (p=0.15). These benefits could not be explained by differences in baseline characteristics such as age, site and extent of infarction, time of inclusion or concomitant therapy. Heart rate and blood pressure were reduced throughout the study with active diltiazem treatment. Side effects of diltiazem were bradycardia and hypotension that required transient or permanent discontinuation of the study drug in 27% of patients, vs. 17% of patients with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: A protective effect for clinical events related to early postinfarction ischemia and reinfarction was suggested in this study, with diltiazem administered intravenously with t-PA followed by oral therapy for 1 month, with no effect on coronary artery patency and left ventricular function and perfusion.     

Effect of early versus delayed postoperative injection of 5-fluorouracil plus interferon-alpha on colonic healing

Although considerable information is available regarding the prognosis after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in Western populations, little is known about the fate of Japanese subjects after AMI. The purpose of this study was to assess short-term mortality and factors influencing it after AMI in Japan. From April 1993 to December 1995, 1,014 patients with AMI from 41 hospitals in Yamagata Prefecture were registered by cardiologists for the prospective survey. Among patients who died within 28 days after the onset of AMI, immediate causes of death were examined and the clinical profiles of these subjects were compared with those of patients that survived. Early death occurred in 184 patients (short-term mortality 18%). Patients who died were significantly older than survivors (76.1+/-9.4 vs 67.6+/-11.8 years, p<0.01). They were also more likely to be women (50% vs 31%, p<0.01), to have had hypertension (64% vs 54%, p<0.05), diabetes mellitus (29% vs 20%, p<0.02), prior MI (17% vs 12%, p<0.05), or Killip class III or IV disease (63% vs 15%, p<0.01), and were significantly less likely to be current smokers (26% vs 45%, p<0.01) or to have been treated with reperfusion therapy (27% vs 63%, p<0.01). Multivariate logistic analysis demonstrated that independent predictors of early death were Killip class III or IV and advanced age. Reperfusion therapy was a negative predictor of death. Patients who died had arrived at hospital earlier than patients who survived. Mortality as a result of heart failure, cardiac rupture, or arrhythmia fell exponentially after the onset of AMI. Thus, the predictors of short-term mortality were similar to those reported in Western populations. More deaths occurred just after the onset of disease, suggesting that early therapy is important in reducing short-term mortality.     

Evaluation of drug treatment of myocardial infarction in public hospitals of Andalusia. GAUME (Andalusian Group for performance of Studies on Drug Utilization)

BACKGROUND: The management of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has changed over the last decade. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacologic treatment of AMI in the clinical practice, with special emphasis in thrombolytic therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective drug utilization survey, collecting data from 26 hospitals belonging to the Andalusian Health Service, Spain, during one month period. Pharmacologic treatment in the first 24 h was obtained. RESULTS: Out of 379 patients recruited, 52.8% received thrombolytic therapy, although another 19% could have obtained some benefit from that therapy. Alteplase was the most frequently used thrombolytic (65.5%). The regimen prescribed was mainly that followed in GUSTO Study (45.8%) or double bolus (43.5%). In a high percentage of patients the thrombolytic selection was not made according to the results of the literature. Women and patients older than 75 years were less likely to receive thrombolytic therapy. There was a high utilization of aspirin (89.7%), nitrates (84.4%) and heparin (83.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Thrombolytic therapy was prescribed in a higher percentage of patients than is reported in other trials. In spite of that, thrombolytics should have been used in more patients. As alteplase does not have a definitive benefit over streptokinase, protocol is needed when selecting a thrombolytic agent.     

Seroprevalence of hepatitis E virus among United Nations Mission in Haiti (UNMIH) peacekeepers, 1995

In the management of unstable angina and non-Q-wave acute myocardial infarction (AMI), there is considerable debate regarding the use of invasive strategy versus conservative strategy. The Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) III B trial found similar clinical outcomes for the 2 strategies, but the Veterans Administration Non-Q-Wave Infarction Strategies in-Hospital trial found a higher mortality with the invasive strategy. Both these trials were conducted before platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition and coronary stenting, both of which improve clinical outcome. Thus, there is a need to reexamine the question of which management strategy is optimal in the current era of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition and new coronary interventions. The Treat Angina with Aggrastat and determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy (TACTICS-TIMI 18) trial is an international, multicenter, randomized trial that is evaluating the clinical efficacy of early invasive and early conservative treatment strategies in patients with unstable angina or non-Q-wave AMI treated with tirofiban, heparin, and aspirin. Patients are randomized to an invasive strategy, involving cardiac catheterization within 4 to 48 hours and revascularization with angioplasty or bypass surgery if feasible, versus a conservative strategy, where patients are referred for catheterization only for recurrent pain at rest or provokable ischemia. The primary end point is death, MI, or rehospitalization for acute coronary syndromes through a 6-month follow-up. The trial is also testing the "troponin hypothesis," that baseline troponins T and I will be useful in selecting an optimal management strategy.     

The acute coronary ischemic syndromes--the central role of thrombosis

The postulate that thrombotic coronary occlusion was the underlying pathophysiologic event in the acute coronary ischemic syndromes was developed over the years 1912-60. This concept prompted the development of anticoagulant and thrombolytic therapies and the use of acetylsalicylic acid in such patients. A central role for coronary thrombus came to be questioned in the 1970s and the use of anticoagulants dramatically decreased and thrombolytic therapy was little used. Coronary angiographic studies among patients during the early hours of evolving myocardial infarction re-established the etiologic role of coronary thrombosis in the acute coronary ischemic syndromes, and were supplemented by careful autopsy studies. The concepts of meta-analysis lead to more accurate interpretations of earlier randomized, controlled trials of anticoagulant, antiplatelet and thrombolytic therapies. Large clinical trials have provided confirmatory evidence and have established the benefits of antiplatelet and thrombolytic agents in the acute ischemic syndromes. The benefit of long term anticoagulation following myocardial infarction has been demonstrated, although the benefit during the acute in-hospital phase of myocardial infarction is still uncertain. Currently, clinical trials are evaluating new antithrombins, antiplatelet agents, and thrombolytic agents and regimens among patients with unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction, and undergoing angioplasty for complex coronary lesions.     

Early angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor therapy after experimental myocardial infarction prevents left ventricular dilation by reducing infarct expansion: a possible mechanism of clinical benefits

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of early angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor therapy after myocardial infarction on infarct expansion in an experimental rat model. BACKGROUND: ACE inhibitor therapy within 24 h of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) reduces mortality by unknown mechanism(s). METHODS: Rats underwent permanent coronary artery occlusion. A treated group received enalapril (1.9+/-0.2 mg/kg) daily in drinking water beginning 2 h after coronary artery occlusion, a time too late to reduce infarct size. Rats were sacrificed 2 days or 2 weeks after myocardial infarction. Hearts were arrested and fixed at a constant pressure, then sectioned and photographed for morphometric analysis. RESULTS: Infarcts in the control group expanded between 2 days and 2 weeks after myocardial infarction (expansion index 0.7+/-0.1 versus 2.5+/-0.4, P< 0.05). However, infarct expansion remained unchanged in the enalapril group between 2 days and 2 weeks after myocardial infarction (expansion index 0.8+/-0.1 versus 1.3+/-0.1, NS). Two weeks after myocardial infarction, the enalapril group had fewer expanded infarcts than the control group (expansion index 1.3+/-0.1 versus 2.5+/-0.4, P< 0.05). While left ventricular volume increased in the control group between 2 days and 2 weeks after myocardial infarction (0.17+/-0.01 ml versus 0.36+/-0.03 ml, P< 0.05), it remained constant in the enalapril group (0.22+/-0.02 ml versus 0.25+/-0.03 ml, NS). Two weeks after myocardial infarction, the left ventricles were larger in the control group than in the enalapril group (0.36+/-0.03 ml versus 0.25+/-0.03 ml, P< 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with enalapril initiated 2 h after AMI prevented left ventricular dilation by limiting infarct expansion. This may explain the mechanism by which ACE inhibitor therapy started within 24 h of an AMI improves survival 5-6 weeks after infarction.     

Early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction by either electrocardiogram or a logistic regression model: portability of a predictive instrument of acute cardiac ischemia to a small rural coronary care unit

OBJECTIVE: To test the ability of a logistic regression model (LRM) that predicts acute cardiac ischemia to make an early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI); the ability of the LRM to predict AMI was also compared with the presenting electrocardiogram (ECG). SETTING: A small rural Irish coronary care unit. METHODS: Clinical and ECG data required by the LRM to predict acute coronary ischemia were recorded in 600 consecutive patients admitted with suspected AMI. Estimates of the LRM were ranked into equal deciles in declining probability of acute cardiac ischemia (pACI), and presenting ECGs were placed into one of seven categories. RESULTS: At presentation 50% of AMI patients were in the two LRM deciles with the highest pACI, and 49% of AMI patients had ECGs with greater than 2 mm ST elevation associated with reciprocal changes. ECG categories had a 76% sensitivity for the early diagnosis of AMI and the LRM had an 84% sensitivity. The specificity, accuracy and positive predictive value for the ECG categories were 92%, 84% and 85%, respectively. The specificity, accuracy and positive predictive value of the LRM were 84%, 84% and 75%, respectively. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the LRM and ECG categories were almost identical (91% and 90%, respectively). CONCLUSION: AMI can be diagnosed early with comparable accuracy either by placing presenting ECGs into one of seven categories, or by the LRM. The best method and 'cut-off' point for the diagnosis of AMI varies according to clinical circumstances. Categorizing ECGs requires more skill in ECG interpretation, but takes less time. The previously reported performances of the LRM were replicated, confirming portability of its use into different clinical settings and patient populations.     

Thrombolytic therapy for unstable angina

Thrombolytic therapy for unstable angina has not gained acceptance as a primary treatment for unstable angina (UA) despite the evidence showing a reduction in mortality when these agents are given for myocardial infarction. The purpose of this review is to examine the clinical value of thrombolytic therapy for UA. The multiple lines of evidence supporting intracoronary thrombus formation as a key mechanism in the pathogenesis of UA are reviewed. Studies examining the effect of thrombolytic therapy on angiographic endpoints have shown little effect on the extent of luminal narrowing, but do reveal a decrease in angiographically detected thrombus. Twelve randomized, controlled trials of thrombolytic agents in 611 UA patients with predefined clinical endpoints have been published. These trials varied widely in design and adjunctive therapy both in treated and control grops. Review of these trials show a tendency to fewer clinical events such as death, infarction, and need for revascularization in treated patients, with a corresponding increase in bleeding complications. Clinical efficacy of thrombolytic therapy cannot be excluded by the available data, perhaps in part because of insufficient numbers of patients treated. Determination of the net clinical value of thrombolytic therapy must await larger and more definitive trials.     

Lipid peroxidation and changes in cytochrome c oxidase and xanthine oxidase activity in organophosphorus anticholinesterase induced myopathy

The data gained from clinical studies in the past years have indicated that the thrombolytic therapy (TL) has favourable effect on patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). It is aimed at reperfusion in the ischaemic area, a decrease in the extent of infarction site and a decrease in mortality. TL administered within the initial hours after the onset of AMI leads to better results than when administered after several hours. Currently, TL is not limited by age. The patients who were given streptokinase (SK) or anistreplase (APSAC) prior to more than 4 days, if necessary, urokinase or alteplase (rt-PA) should be given. There are differences in the opinions as to the optimal selection of thrombolytic drugs. However, all currently used drugs lead to a significant decrease in mortality due to AMI. The preferential use of accelerated administration of rt-PA in contrast to SK is justified in younger patients with extensive AMI of the anterior wall, in whom the therapy has begun within 4 hours since its onset. The occurrence of severe bleeding indicates that TL should be halted and coagulation factors should be replaced by freshly frozen plasma or fibrinogen concentrate, if necessary, transfusion of full blood should take place. If the severe bleeding occurs shortly after the administration of SK, the persisting plasminaemia can be arranged by antifibrinolytic drugs. An improvement in TL results can be achieved by adjuvant antithrombotic therapy. At the same time, in addition to acetylsalicylic acid, the patient treated with rt-PA should be given heparin. Heparin administration is not necessary in patients treated with SK or APSAC. However, heparin is indicated in patients at risk due to systemic embolization in congestive heart disease, extensive infarction or atrial fibrillation. (Tab. 1, Ref. 28.)