Unstable bladder and Sj?gren syndrome. Clinical case

PURPOSE: A 53-year-old female patient was treated with combined radiochemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) because of adenocarcinoma of the lung. She died after the 2nd day of the first course on fatal myocardial infarction. The histological evaluation of the heart revealed no severe chronic fibrosis. In our opinion the myocardial infarction was partly 5-fluorouracil-related in this case. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Published case reports on this theme were reviewed and discussed. RESULTS: The review of the literature showed a 5-FU associated cardiotoxicity in 98 cases. Most of the patients were without evidence of pre-existing myocardial disorders. The discussion about the reasons of the 5-FU-associated cardiotoxicity is still going on. Cardiotoxicity will rise up in 1.1% to 4.5% of the patients treated with 5-FU. Patients with a history of cardiac disease were at significantly increased risk for 5-FU-induced cardiotoxicity. CONCLUSION: In high-risk-patients 5-FU should not be given without electrocardiographic monitoring. The continuous infusion is better than a bolus treatment.     

Cardiotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil in combination with folinic acid in patients with gastrointestinal cancer

BACKGROUND: Cardiotoxicity related to the widely used cytotoxic compound 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is rare compared with the frequency observed with the use of anthracyclines. More effective protocols incorporating active biomodulatory compounds like folinic acid (FA) or combination chemotherapy change type and severity of toxicity as well. The objective of the current study was to assess cardiotoxicity of the combination 5-FU and folinic acid. METHODS: The authors' multicenter experience with 390 patients treated for advanced gastrointestinal cancer with intermediate-dose folinic acid and 5-FU was reviewed. RESULTS: The overall risk of cardiotoxicity was 3%, which is not significantly higher than that reported with 5-FU alone. Eight of 53 patients with a history of cardiac disease reported cardiac symptoms (15.1%), compared with 5 of 337 patients (1.5%) with a no history of cardiac disease. Median time to symptoms was 3 days (range, 2-6). Nine patients had symptoms resembling myocardial ischemia, one patient died due to assumed myocardial infarction related closely to fluorouracil treatment, four patients had supraventricular arrhythmia, and one patient had congestive heart failure. A history of cardiac disease was the only risk factor associated with cardiotoxicity. Relapses were frequent on reinstitution of therapy despite cardiac symptoms in the preceding cycle. Therapeutically or prophylactically administered nitrates had no significant effect. CONCLUSION: Physicians should be aware of the cardiotoxic properties of active fluorouracil treatment. The combination of 5-FU and leucovorin does not differ from single-agent therapy in frequency or type of cardiotoxicity. Close monitoring of patients is mandatory, especially for those patients at high risk for cardiac side effects. Treatment should be discontinued if coronary symptoms develop, because neither effective treatment nor prophylaxis exists for such symptoms.     

Comparison between short or long exposure to 5-fluorouracil in human gastric and colon cancer cell lines: biochemical mechanism of resistance

Recent preclinical and clinical data indicate that the main mechanisms of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) cytotoxicity depend on the mode of administration. To gather further insight into the major causes of acquired 5-FU resistance, drug-sensitive human gastric (M2), colon (HT29) and breast (MCF7) cancer cell lines were repeatedly exposed to a fixed concentration of 5-FU given either for 1 or 24 h. Although equieffective doses (IC50) of 5-FU were used, resistance to a 1 h exposure of 5-FU developed faster in all models than to a 24 h exposure. Cell lines with acquired resistance to a 1 h application of 5-FU were only partly cross-resistant to a 24 h exposure, whereas lines with resistance to protracted application of 5-FU displayed significant cross-resistance to the 1 h schedule. Resistance to methotrexate was only seen in cell lines with acquired resistance to 24 h of 5-FU. All 5-FU-resistant cell lines showed reduced incorporation of 5-FU into cellular RNA. Furthermore, elevations of thymidylate synthase were seen in all cell lines with resistance to 24 h of 5-FU but also in one cell line with resistance to a bolus schedule. No alterations in folylpolyglutamate synthase developed in the resistant cell lines. These data support the concept that the main mechanisms of 5-FU cytotoxicity depend on the mode of application. Incorporation of fluorouridine triphosphate into RNA appears to be the most important mechanism of action for 5-FU bolus schedules, whereas inhibition of thymidylate synthase becomes more important as the infusion time is prolonged. These data could have implications on the interaction of 5-FU given at different schedules with various other cytostatic agents.     

Extracorporeal blood purification in the management of patients with hepatic failure

The current phase III studies of chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer include 60% to 85% of patients with the liver as a site of metastatic disease. Within the past 10 years, various modulatory combinations of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with agents such as leucovorin, interferon, N-(phosphonacetyl)-L-aspartate (PALA), and methotrexate have produced higher response rates than 5-FU alone. A major seven-arm study, conducted by the Southwestern Oncology Group and reported in 1995, suggested that single-agent, continuous-infusion 5-FU demonstrated the most encouraging results. Nine of 12 reported randomized studies comparing the combination of 5-FU and leucovorin with 5-FU alone report significant increases in response rates; two studies reported significant increases in survival. The meta-analysis project involving 1381 patients confirmed the increase in response rate with the combination (23%) vs. 5-FU alone (11%) but did not demonstrate any significant difference in median survival. The current issues involving 5-FU administration largely concentrate on the best approach (modulation vs. scheduling) and comprehensive evaluation of end points (quality of life, survival, and pharmacoeconomics). The current literature examining quality-of-life issues suggests that 5-FU and low-dose leucovorin produce the best overall improvement in symptoms. Others argue that continuous-infusion scheduling is also associated with a very good quality of life (although the increased cost and morbidity of continuous-infusion administration has to be factored into this consideration). An important phase III study is currently being conducted by the National Cancer Institute of Canada comparing immediate vs. delayed (until symptomatic) chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Of the new approaches to therapy, perhaps the most immediately applicable are the new thymidylate synthase inhibitors (in particular, Tomudex, which produces a response rate equivalent to that of 5-FU plus leucovorin with less toxicity and a more convenient schedule).     

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase but not thymidylate synthase expression is associated with resistance to 5-fluorouracil in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In planning adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer, it is of critical importance to optimize the treatment by identifying subsets of patients that will respond or not to chemotherapy. Thymidylate synthase (TS) and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) are key enzymes involved in the biochemical functions of the antimetabolite 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). In searching for the factors determining the 5-FU sensitivity of colorectal cancer, TS and DPD were analyzed in relation to the inhibitory effect of 5-FU on cell proliferation in a series of human colorectal cancer cell lines. METHODOLOGY: TS and DPD protein expressions were quantified in 5 human colorectal cancer cell lines, using TS binding assay and Western blotting, respectively. Cellular growth inhibition was assessed by MTT assay after 48 hours of continuous exposure to 5-FU or cisplatin (CDDP). RESULTS: TS protein expression was detected in all but one of the cell lines studied and varied within a 17-fold range, while DPD protein expression was detectable in only one cell line (CaR1). CaR1, which expressed the highest level of DPD and no detectable TS, showed remarkable resistance to 5-FU. The other colorectal cancer cell lines with undetectable DPD expression were sensitive to 5-FU. There was no correlation between TS expression and 5-FU sensitivity. All of the cell lines studied showed similar sensitivity to CDDP. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that DPD, but not TS, expression predicts 5-FU sensitivity in colorectal cancer cell lines.     

High expression of thymidylate synthase is associated with the drug resistance of gastric carcinoma to high dose 5-fluorouracil-based systemic chemotherapy

BACKGROUND: In the past 4 years, the weekly 24-hour infusion of high dose 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin in the treatment of patients with advanced gastric carcinoma has been prospectively studied at the authors' institution. This has enabled them to explore the possibility that the level of expression of thymidylate synthase (TS), the target enzyme of 5-FU, is related to the drug sensitivity of gastric carcinoma to 5-FU-based chemotherapy. METHODS: To be eligible for this study, patients were required to have received high dose 5-FU and leucovorin chemotherapy (weekly 24-hour infusions of 5-FU, 2,600 mg/m2, and leucovorin, 300 mg/m2) and to have had adequate prechemotherapy gastric carcinoma tissues for immunohistochemical study. TS106 monoclonal antibody was used to detect the expression of TS. A visual scoring system, which ranged from 0 to 3+, was adopted by 2 independent pathologists to semiquantitate the intensity of TS expression. RESULTS: Between 1993 and 1996, a total of 30 patients, 18 men and 12 women, with a median age of 61.5 years, were enrolled. Of these patients, 16 (53.3%) and 14 (46.7%) had high and low expression of TS, respectively. Two of the 16 patients (12.5%) with high expression of TS and 13 of the 14 patients (92.9%) with low expression of TS responded to chemotherapy (P < 0.001, chi-square test). The median overall survival was 10 months for patients with low TS expression and 4 months for patients with high TS expression (P < 0.01, log rank test). CONCLUSIONS: The data from this study suggest that the expression of TS, as determined by immunohistochemistry, is a relatively reliable indicator of whether 5-FU should be used in the treatment of patients with gastric carcinoma.     

Transcription and activity of 5-fluorouracil converting enzymes in fluoropyrimidine resistance in colon cancer in vitro

Cellular resistance to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is not completely understood. Since 5-FU shares the pyrimidine pathway with the physiological pyrimidines, we investigated the relationship between fluoropyrimidine metabolism, nucleic acid uptake and cytotoxicity of 5-FU in eight colon tumour cell lines including 5-FU-resistant subclones. The cytotoxicity of 5-FU was increased up to 423-fold when the anabolites 5-fluorouridine (FUrd), 5-fluorodeoxyuridine (FdUrd), and 5-fluorodeoxyuridine monophosphate (FdUMP) were compared with the parent drug in vitro. The enzymes uridine phosphorylase and thymidine phosphorylase were predictive for the cytotoxicity of 5-FU in 5/7 cell lines. Inhibition of uridine phosphorylase and thymidine phosphorylase by antisense strategies effectively antagonised 5-FU, abolishing 84% and 79% of its toxicity. The importance of thymidine phosphorylase was supported by a highly restricted enzyme activity in 5-FU-resistant cells. In 5-FU naive cells, a stimulating effect of 5-FU on thymidylate synthase mRNA and ribonucleotide reductase mRNA expression was observed. In these cells, antisense oligonucleotides to ribonucleotide reductase significantly reduced cell growth. Downregulation of ribonucleotide reductase mRNA in 5-FU-resistant subclones suggests different mechanisms in primary and secondary resistance to 5-FU. Most of the intracellular 5-FU was selectively incorporated into RNA (range: 45-91%) and generally spared DNA (range: 0.2-11%). In synthesising our data, we conclude that drug resistance could be overwhelmed through bypassing limiting steps in the activation of 5-FU. In the majority of colonic tumours, the activity of uridine phosphorylase and thymidine phosphorylase may have prognostic relevance for the cytotoxicity of 5-FU in vitro.     

Paclitaxel with mitoxantrone, fluorouracil, and high-dose leucovorin in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer: a phase II trial

PURPOSE: Paclitaxel is a highly active single agent in the treatment of breast cancer. However, its optimal incorporation into combination regimens awaits definition. In this phase II study, we added paclitaxel, administered by 1-hour infusion, to a previously described combination regimen that included mitoxantrone, fluorouracil (5-FU), and high-dose leucovorin (NFL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-six patients with metastatic breast cancer received the following regimen as first- or second-line treatment: paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 by 1-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion on day 1, mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 by i.v. bolus on day 1, 5-FU 350 mg2/m by i.v. bolus on days 1, 2, and 3, and leucovorin 300 mg i.v. over 30 to 60 minutes immediately preceding 5-FU on days 1, 2, and 3. Courses were administered at 3-week intervals for a total of eight courses in responding patients. RESULTS: Twenty-three of 45 assessable patients (51%) had major responses. Previous chemotherapy, and in particular previous treatment with doxorubicin, did not affect response rate. The median response duration was 7.5 months. Myelosuppression was moderately severe, with 76% of courses resulting in grade 3 or 4 leukopenia. Hospitalization for treatment of fever during neutropenia was required in 13% of courses, and two patients died as a result of sepsis. Two patients developed severe congestive heart failure after a large cumulative anthracycline dose. CONCLUSION: This combination regimen was active as first- or second-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer, although its activity compared with other combination regimens or with paclitaxel alone is unclear. Myelosuppression was more severe than anticipated based on previous results with the NFL regimen or with paclitaxel administered at this dose and schedule as a single agent. The infrequent development of cardiotoxicity in these patients suggests that the paclitaxel/mitoxantrone combination may not share the problems previously reported with the paclitaxel/doxorubicin combination.     

Open, randomized, multicenter trial of raltitrexed versus fluorouracil plus high-dose leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Tomudex Colorectal Cancer Study Group

PURPOSE: To compare raltitrexed (Tomudex; Zeneca Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Macclesfield, United Kingdom) a direct, specific thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibitor with fluorouracil (5-FU) plus high-dose leucovorin (LV) as first-line treatment for advanced colorectal cancer (ACC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 495 patients were randomized to raltitrexed (3 mg/m2) once every 3 weeks or 5-FU (400 mg/m2) plus LV (200 mg/m2) daily for 5 days every 4 weeks. RESULTS: The randomized groups were well balanced demographically. With a minimum 17-month follow-up, median survival was comparable between groups (10.9 months raltitrexed v 12.3 months 5-FU/LV; hazards ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93 to 1.42; P=.197), although time to progression was statistically significantly shorter in the raltitrexed group. Overall objective responses were comparable (19% raltitrexed v 18% 5-FU/LV), with more than 50% of patients in each group having stable disease. Significantly less World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3 and 4 stomatitis (2% v 16%, P < .001) and a reduced incidence of leukopenia (6% v 13%) and diarrhea (10% v 19%) occurred in the raltitrexed group (particularly at cycle 1 ). This resulted in fewer dose reductions at cycle 2 (4% raltitrexed v 28% 5-FU/LV) and early quality-of-life (QoL) benefits for raltitrexed patients. Reversible, clinically insignificant increases in transaminases were reported in 13% of raltitrexed patients. Palliative benefits of weight gain, improved performance status, and reduced disease-related symptoms were evident in both groups. CONCLUSION: Raltitrexed is confirmed as an effective option in the first-line palliative management of ACC, with comparable efficacy to and tolerability advantages (in terms of reduced incidence of stomatitis, diarrhea, and leukopenia) over 5-FU/LV. Raltitrexed has the added convenience of an every 3 weeks dosing schedule.     

Serum ferritin as a component of the insulin resistance syndrome

Six human cancer cell lines exhibiting a large range of sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) were evaluated for thymidylate synthase (TS) and p53 gene expression, TS and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity, as well as cell cycle parameters, S-phase fraction (SPF), bromodeoxyuridine labelling index (LI) and S-phase duration (SPD). All these parameters were investigated for 7 days in asynchronously growing cell populations and compared with the cell sensitivity to 5-FU. No significant correlation was found between S-phase parameters and TS gene expression and/or activity. TS activity was higher in proliferating cells; however, it was not significantly higher in rapidly growing cell lines with short SPD. Neither TS gene expression nor activity was found to correlate with 5-FU sensitivity. On the another hand, a statistically significant correlation (P < 0.0001) was observed between LI and SPD and 5-FU sensitivity. The present results suggest that cell cycle parameters such as SPD and/or LI could be better parameters for 5-FU sensitivity prediction than TS gene expression and/or activity. This could be especially informative in cases of concomitant radio-chemotherapy as S-phase parameters are already proposed for hyperfractionated radiotherapy planning.     

Comparison of 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine with 5-fluorouracil and their role in the treatment of colorectal cancer

Despite more than 30 years of intensive studies on new drugs against advanced colorectal cancer, the fluoropyrimidines remain the drugs of choice for systemic treatment and for hepatic artery infusion (HAI). This overview describes new developments in advanced colorectal cancer chemotherapy, providing a rationale for more effective use of the fluoropyrimidines, with biochemical modulation, scheduling or by revealing biochemical mechanisms of action that correlate with antitumour activity. In human colorectal cancer cell lines and various animal tumour model systems 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (FdUrd) is more effective than 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Comparably, FdUrd's modulation by leucovorin (LV) is more potent than 5-FU. In animal studies it is shown that intermittent high-bolus administration of FdUrd generates better antitumour activity, compared with equal toxic doses or any other schedule of 5-FU. These effects are related to prolonged-thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibition and the prevention of TS induction, rather than RNA incorporation. Preclinical studies with modulators such as N-phosphonacetyl-L-aspartate (PALA), WR-2721, mitomycin C and platinum derivatives provide a rationale for clinical use in the future. The first choice systemic chemotherapy of patients with advanced colorectal cancer remains 5-FU combined with LV. Some improvement in therapeutic efficacy has been achieved with locoregional HAI. In randomised studies HAI FdUrd improves the quality of life and survival as compared with optimal systemic therapy. Chronomodulation decreases toxicity, allowing dose intensification, while modulators such as LV or dexamethasone increase survival of patients treated with HAI FdUrd to 86% after 1 year. In conclusion, the clinical use of FdUrd has not been fully explored. Intermittent high-dose FdUrd, chronomodulation together with the use of modulators or drugs focused on prolonged TS inhibition, should be studied in large randomised studies.     

Chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: an overview

Approximately 50% of patients with colorectal cancer develop locally recurrent or distant metastatic disease during the course of their illness and eventually die. Since the 1950s the mainstay of treatment for patients in need of palliative therapy has been and continues to be the fluoropyrimidines. When 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was first introduced into the clinic it was used as a single agent given by rapid intravenous injection. Results with this drug have been disappointing, with response rates consistently low, usually of brief duration, and with little or no impact on survival. During the 1970s and 1980s, multidrug regimens were evaluated with little or no improvement in outcome. More recently, our understanding of the metabolism, pharmacology, and the mechanisms of action as well as the potential mechanisms of resistance to 5-FU has led to its more rational use. This knowledge has resulted in the design of treatment programs with improved therapeutic effects by changing its route of administration, combining it with biochemical modulators and using it in conjunction with other chemotherapeutic agents. These strategies have created new optimism for improved results with less toxicity. More potent inhibitors of thymidylate synthase (TS) such as tomudex and trimetrexate have been developed and are currently being evaluated in the clinic either alone or in combination with 5-FU. Semisynthetic topoisomerase inhibitors such as irinotecan have shown encouraging results as first-line therapy, in combination with 5-FU or as salvage therapy.     

Oxaliplatin: a review of preclinical and clinical studies

Of the new generation platinum compounds that have been evaluated, those with the 1,2-diaminocyclohexane carrier ligand-including oxaliplatin--have been focused upon in recent years. Molecular biology studies and the National Cancer Institute in vitro cytotoxic screening showed that diaminocyclohexane platinums such as oxaliplatin belong to a distinct cytotoxic family, differing from cisplatin and carboplatin, with specific intracellular target(s), mechanism(s) of action and/or mechanism(s) of resistance. In phase I trials, the dose-limiting toxicity of oxaliplatin was characterized by transient acute dysesthesias and cumulative distal neurotoxicity, which was reversible within a few months after treatment discontinuation. Moreover, oxaliplatin did not display any, auditory, renal and hematologic dose-limiting toxicity at the recommended dose of 130 mg/m2 q three weeks or 85 mg/m2 q two weeks given as a two-hour i.v. infusion. Clinical phase II experiences on the antitumoral activity of oxaliplatin have been conducted in hundreds of patients with advanced colorectal cancers (ACRC). Single agent activity reported as objective response rate in ACRC patients is 10% and 20% overall in ACRC patients with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) pretreated/refractory and previously untreated ACRC, respectively. Synergistic cytotoxic effects in preclinical studies with thymidylate synthase inhibitors, cisplatin/carboplatin and topoisomerase I inhibitors, and the absence of hematologic dose-limiting toxicity have made oxaliplatin an attractive compound for combinations. Phase II trials combining oxaliplatin with 5-FU and folinic acid ACRC patients previously treated/refractory to 5-FU showed overall response rates ranging from 21% to 58%, and survivals ranging from 12 to 17 months. In patients with previously untreated ACRC, combinations of oxaliplatin with 5-FU and folinic acid showed response rates ranging from 34% to 67% and median survivals ranging from 15 to 19 months. Two randomized trials totaling 620 previously untreated patients with ACRC, comparing 5-FU and folinic acid to the same regimen with oxaliplatin, have shown a 34% overall response rate in the oxaliplatin group versus 12% in the 5-FU/folinic acid group for the first trial; and 51.2% vs. 22.6% in the second one. These statistically significant differences were confirmed in time to progression advantage for the oxaliplatin arm (8.7 vs. 6.1 months, and 8.7 vs. 6.1 months, respectively). A small but consistent number of histological complete responses have been reported in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with the combination of oxaliplatin with 5-FU/folinic acid, and secondary metastasectomy is increasingly done by oncologists familiar with the combination. Based on preclinical and clinical reports showing additive or synergistic effects between oxaliplatin and several anticancer drugs including cisplatin, irinotecan, topotecan, and paclitaxel, clinical trials of combinations with other compounds have been performed or are still ongoing in tumor types in which oxaliplatin alone showed antitumoral activity such as ovarian, non-small-cell lung, breast cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Its single agent and combination therapy data in ovarian cancer confirm its non-cross resistance with cisplatin/carboplatin. While the role of oxaliplatin in medical oncology is yet to be fully defined, it appears to be an important new anticancer agent.     

5-Fluorouracil-resistant colonic tumors are highly responsive to sodium butyrate/interleukin-2 bitherapy in rats

Advanced colorectal cancer is generally refractory to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy. This is linked to the emergence of resistant cell populations, probably due to a selection process. The identification of molecular markers and the improvement of alternative therapies thus remain important. We have used as an experimental model a rat colon cancer cell line (PROb), which exhibits features similar to those of the human situation. 5-FU treatment of rats bearing PROb tumors enhanced their survival but did not lead to cure. A PROb 5-FU-resistant subline (PRObR1) was obtained by continuous in vitro exposure to 5-FU. Resistance to 5-FU was accompanied by a 2-fold increase in thymidylate synthase activity and a substantially higher incorporation of thymidine in the presence of 5-FU, compared with parental PROb cells. Unexpectedly, in syngeneic rats, PRObR1 tumors exhibited delayed growth when compared with parental PROb tumors. This was ascribed to an increased sensitivity of PRObR1 cells to host immune response since no growth delay was observed in immunocompromised nude mice and since there was no detectable difference in proliferation rates between PROb and PRObR1 cells. 5-FU treatment was inefficient in prolonging the survival of rats bearing PRObR1 tumors. In contrast, an immunotherapeutic protocol combining sodium butyrate and recombinant interleukin-2 (NaBut/rIL-2) cured 80% of the rats bearing established PRObR1 tumors. Our results suggest that NaBut/rIL-2 treatment is efficient against 5-FU-chemoresistant rat colon cancer.     

Anosognosia and procedural learning in Alzheimer''s disease

Biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by folinic acid (FA) increases the response rate in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer compared to 5-FU alone. Phase II trials also demonstrated increased efficacy when interferon was added to 5-FU. In two consecutive trials, 76 patients were treated on days 1-5 with FA 200 mg/m2 plus interferon 5 x 10(6) U/m2 and 5-FU 350 mg/m2 as intravenous bolus injection (n = 33, regimen A) or 5-FU 500 mg/m2 as 2-hour infusion (n = 43, regimen B), repeated every 3 weeks with individual 5-FU dose escalation in steps of 50 (regimen A) or 100 mg/m2 (regimen B). In regimen A 5-FU dose reduction to 300 mg/m2 due to toxicity was necessary in 49% of the patients; in regimen B a 5-FU dose of 600 mg/m2 or above was tolerated by 70% of the patients. Dose-limiting toxicity was severe mucositis and/or diarrhea. Objective responses were observed in 5 of 33 patients (15%) in regimen A (3-28%, 95% confidence interval) and 7 of 41 patients (17%) in regimen B (5-29%, 95% confidence interval). Median time to progression was 4.7 and 4.8 months, and median survival 9.9 and 11.4 months for regimens A and B, respectively. Prolonged 5-FU administration over 2 h allows the administration of a higher 5-FU dose compared to bolus injection with no apparent improvement in antineoplastic efficacy. The addition of interferon to the combination of 5-FU plus FA in this dose and schedule does not seem to improve the response rate but appears to increase treatment toxicity.     

Primary chemoradiation therapy with fluorouracil and cisplatin for cancer of the anus: results in 35 consecutive patients

PURPOSE: This prospective phase II study was designed to test the activity and toxicity of a regimen of fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin (CDDP) in combination with radiation therapy in the treatment of epidermoid cancer of the anal canal. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-five consecutive patients with untreated epidermoid cancer of the anal canal were candidates for chemoradiation therapy (CRT). Staging of cancer was as follows: T1, 26%; T2, 60%; T3, 14%; and N1, 2,3, 26%. No patient had distant metastases. The treatment protocol consisted of two to three cycles of chemotherapy starting on days 1 and 21 and concurrent radiotherapy at a daily dose of 1.8 Gy up to a total dose of 36 to 38 Gy in 4 weeks, delivered to the anal region, perineum, middle and lower pelvis, and inguinal and external iliac nodes. Radiotherapy was then delivered to the anoperineal region and metastatic inguinal nodes to a total dose of 18 to 24 Gy in 10 fractions. Chemotherapy consisted of 24-hour intravenous (IV) infusion of 5-FU 750 mg/m2 on days 1 to 4 and CDDP 100 mg/m2 by 60-minute IV infusion on day 1. RESULTS: All patients received two cycles of chemotherapy; the second was delayed in three patients because of leukopenia that was evident in 11 (31%). In eight patients, a third cycle was added. They all experienced nausea or vomiting; one patient showed signs of cardiotoxicity and one developed proctitis, dermatitis, and diarrhea (grade 3). Complete regression (CR) was assessed in 33 patients (94%); nine patients with metastatic lymph nodes also had CR. Two patients had a partial response (PR); both underwent abdominoperineal resection, which was not curative in one. Two patients (6%) had a local recurrence; in one, this was associated with hepatic metastases. One of these patients underwent surgery and is alive after about 4 years, while the other is undergoing chemotherapy. After a median follow-up duration of 37 months, 94% of patients are alive without evidence of disease and 86% are colostomy-free. CONCLUSION: This regimen is well tolerated; its toxicity does not exceed that observed with the combination of 5-FU and mitomycin (MMC). Compared with our previous experience based on the classic CRT (5-FU, MMC, and radiation), the objective response rate observed with this new combination was similar. However, the local recurrence rate, observed in patients treated with the new regimen, was lower (6% v 24%). According to more recent data from the literature, primary CRT is the elective indication in epidermoid cancer of the anus and replacement of MMC with CDDP seems an effective and logical evolution.     

Sex difference in immunostaining of RET in the adult mouse kidney

1. Primary and secondary resistance to the widely used antimetabolite 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) are common phenomena in cancer chemotherapy. Because 5-FU still remains the agent of choice in the treatment of, for example, colorectal cancer, circumvention of resistance is of vital importance. 2. Resistance to fluoropyrimidines is a multifactorial event, which includes transport mechanisms, metabolism, molecular mechanisms, protection from apoptosis, and resistance via cell cycle kinetics. To date, the prediction of primary resistance to 5-FU in the clinic is limited to few studies focusing mainly on the key enzyme thymidylate synthase. To gain a deeper insight into the key events responsible for 5-FU resistance in vivo, the evaluation of additional parameters such as other (fluoro)pyrimidine converting enzymes, the mutational status of regulators of apoptosis, and tumour angiogenesis is currently under investigation. 3. Most studies on the circumvention of fluoropyrimidine resistance refer to preclinical investigations and were rarely confirmed in clinical trials. Although our understanding of resistance to 5-FU leaves many open questions, the fundamental insights accomplished during the last years provide a rational understanding to exceed the bounds of the actual therapeutic schedules.     

Dissent over standards in adjuvant management of colon carcinoma

Since 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus levamisole substantially reduces the recurrence rate and improves survival in adjuvantly treated patients with curative resected stage III colon cancer this combination has been considered the standard therapy. Shortly thereafter folinic acid modulated 5-FU-therapy also demonstrated adjuvant efficacy compared to surgery alone. Therefore various schedules of folinic acid modulated 5-FU-therapy were compared with the standard regimen (5-FU/levamisole). Randomized multicentric studies revealed: In three of four studies 5-FU/FA is superior to 5-FU/levamisole. Treatment duration of 6 months for 5-FU/FA is similar to 12 months 5-FU/Levamisole. No benefit is obtained for 5-FU/FA by additional levamisole. The effect of regional (portal vein or intraperitoneal) treatment is controversial discussed, but combination of the treatment with systemic chemotherapy versus 5-FU/levamisole demonstrated slightly increased therapeutic efficacy. Immunotherapy with autologous tumor cell-BCG or monoclonal antibody treatment improved survival and is currently investigated in studies with conventional systemic treatment and combined chemoimmunotherapy. Beside treatment in studies patients with colon cancer stage III should be offered adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-FU/FA. Further improvements and adjuvant treatment protocols for stage II carcinoma have to be investigated in studies.     

5-fluorouracil and low-dose leucovorin as surgical adjuvant therapy from viewpoint of long-term outcome

Biochemical modulation of 5-FU by leucovorin (LV) has been demonstrated to increase the therapeutic effect compared to single agent 5-FU in the treatment of patients (pts) with advanced colorectal cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the 5-FU + LV combination as adjuvant therapy following surgery in pts with Dukes' B, C colon cancer. Pts were entered in a stratified clinical trial comparing two different combination chemotherapeutic regimens to single agent 5-FU, given orally as a control. This report summarized the result of treatment in 61 pts who were 5-FU oral alone and 32 pts who were 5-FU (375 mg/m2) and low-dose LV (20 mg/m2) intravenously for 5 days with 5-FU oral intake. 5-FU with LV regimen was associated with an improved survival compared with the single agent 5-FU oral intake (p < 0.05). 5-FU with LV regimen resulted in less recurrence in liver and lung compared with single-agent 5-FU oral intake.