Effect of the tacticity of poly(methyl methacrylate) on the phase diagram of its ternary blends

Previously, isotactic and atactic poly(methyl methacrylates) (PMMAs) were found to be miscible with poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) and poly(hydroxy ether of bisphenol‐A) (phenoxy) because all the prepared films were transparent and showed composition‐dependent glass transition temperatures (T_g's). However, syndiotactic PMMA was immiscible with PVPh because most of the cast films had two T_g's. On the contrary, syndiotactic PMMA was still miscible with phenoxy. According to our preliminary results, PVPh and phenoxy are not miscible. Also to our knowledge, nobody has reported any results concerning the effect of the tacticity of PMMA on its ternary blend containing PVPh and phenoxy. The miscibility of a ternary blend consisting of PVPh, phenoxy, and tactic PMMA was thus investigated and reported in this article. Calorimetry was used as the principal tool to study miscibility. An approximate phase diagram of the ternary blends containing different tactic PMMA was established, probably for the first time, based on differential scanning calorimetry data. Immiscibility was found in most of the studied ternaries but a slight difference due to the effect of tacticity of PMMA was definitely observed. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 86: 2720–2726, 2002     

Effect of tacticity of poly(methyl methacrylate) on the miscibility with poly(vinyl pyrrolidone)

Isotactic, atactic, and syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylates) (PMMA) (designated iPMMA, aPMMA, and sPMMA) with approximately the same molecular weight were mixed separately with poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP) primarily in chloroform to make three polymer blend systems. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was used to study the miscibility of these blends. The results showed that the tacticity of PMMA has a definite impact on its miscibility with PVP. The aPMMA/PVP and sPMMA/PVP blends were found to be miscible because all the prepared films showed composition-dependent glass-transition temperatures (T_g). The glass-transition temperatures of the aPMMA/PVP blends are equal to or lower than weight average and can be qualitatively described by the Gordon–Taylor equation. The glass-transition temperatures of the other miscible blends (i.e., sPMMA/PVP blends) are mostly higher than weight average and can be approximately fitted by the simplified Kwei equation. The iPMMA/PVP blends were found to be immiscible or partially miscible based on the observation of two glass-transition temperatures. The immiscibility is probably attributable to a stronger interaction among isotactic MMA segments because its ordination and molecular packing contribute to form a rigid domain. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 81: 3190–3197, 2001     

Effect of tacticity of poly(methyl methacrylate) on the miscibility with poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)

Isotactic, atactic, and syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylates) (PMMAs) (designated as iPMMA, aPMMA, and sPMMA) with approximately the same molecular weight were mixed separately with poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (abbreviated as PSAN) containing 25 wt % of acrylonitrile in tetrahydrofuran to make three polymer blend systems. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was used to study the miscibility of these blends. The results showed that the tacticity of PMMA has a definite impact on its miscibility with PSAN. The aPMMA/PSAN and sPMMA/PSAN blends were found to be miscible because all the prepared films were transparent and showed composition dependent glass transition temperatures (T_gs). The glass transition temperatures of the two miscible blends were fitted well by the Fox equation, and no broadening of the glass transition regions was observed. The iPMMA/PSAN blends were found to be immiscible, because most of the cast films were translucent and had two glass transition temperatures. Through the use of a simple binary interaction model, the following comments can be drawn. The isotactic MMA segments seemed to interact differently with styrene and with acrylonitrile segments from atactic or syndiotactic MMA segments. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 74: 2894–2899, 1999     

Influence of the tacticity of poly(methyl methacrylate) on the miscibility with poly(vinyl chloride)

It can be concluded from the work of Schurer et al.¹⁰ that poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) is more miscible with syndiotactic than with isotactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA). By choosing different molar masses for the various tactic forms of PMMA it is possible to obtain blends with PVC with similar phase behaviour, i.e. in all cases a cloud-point curve with a minimum in the vicinity of 190°C. In this way a more quantitative statement about the influence of the tacticity of PMMA on its miscibility with PVC can be made. One of the principal differences between syndiotactic or atactic PMMA and isotactic PMMA is the higher flexibility of the latter. Using Flory's equation of state theory it will be shown that the effect of this difference is large enough to explain the difference in phase behaviour observed. Heats of mixing of low molar mass analogues were also measured and found to be negative.     

Reexamination of the miscibility of stereoregular poly(methyl methacrylate) with poly(vinyl phenol)

Previously, isotactic, atactic, and syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylates) (PMMAs) (designated as iPMMA, aPMMA, and sPMMA) were mixed with poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) separately in tetrahydrofuran (THF) to make three polymer blend systems. According to calorimetry data, iPMMA was found to be miscible with PVPh; however, partial miscibility or immiscibility was found between aPMMA (or sPMMA) and PVPh. According to the article by C. J. T. Landry and D. M. Teegarden, Macromolecules, 1991, 24, 4310, THF is the reason for causing aPMMA and PVPh to phase separate, but 2‐butanone instead produces miscible blends. Therefore, in this article these three polymer systems were investigated again using 2‐butanone as solvent. Films were prepared under specific conditions to minimize the effect of aggregation in PMMA. The formation of hydrogen bonding between PMMA and PVPh and the attendant changes in the aggregation of PMMA segments were determined in the solid states by means of FTIR. Based on the results of calorimetry, iPMMA and aPMMA were found to be miscible with PVPh. For iPMMA/PVPh blends, different degrees of hydrogen bonding were observed based on DSC data and FTIR spectra when compared to previous study. An elevation of the glass transition temperatures (T_gs) of aPMMA/PVPh blends above weight average was detected and the T_g values were fitted well by the Kwei equation. But partial miscibility was still found between sPMMA and PVPh on account of the observation of two T_gs in most compositions. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 83: 1425–1431, 2002     

Binary and ternary polymer blends containing poly(vinylidene chloride‐co‐acrylonitrile)

Poly(vinylidene chloride‐co‐acrylonitrile) (Saran F), poly(hydroxy ether of bisphenol A) (phenoxy), poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (PSAN), and poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) all have the same characteristic: miscibility with atactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (aPMMA). However, the miscibility of Saran F with the other polymer (phenoxy, PSAN, or PVPh) is not guaranteed and was thus investigated. Saran F was found to be miscible only with PSAN but not miscible with phenoxy and PVPh. Because Saran F and PVPh are not miscible, although they are both miscible with aPMMA, aPMMA can thus be used as a potential cosolvent to homogenize PVPh/Saran F. The second part of this report focused on the miscibility of a ternary blend consisting of Saran F, PVPh, and aPMMA to investigate the cosolvent effect of aPMMA. Factors affecting the miscibility were studied. The established phase diagram indicated that the ternary blends with high PVPh/Saran F weight ratio were found to be mostly immiscible. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 91: 3068–3073, 2004     

Effect of tacticity of poly(methyl methacrylate) on interfacial region with silica in polymer nanocomposite

The effect of tacticity on the interfacial region between poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and silica in a PMMA/silica nanocomposite was investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The glass transition temperature (T_g) values of the syndiotactic (st-) and atactic (at-) PMMA/silica nanocomposites are higher than those of the neat PMMA. Conversely, the T_g of the isotactic (it-) PMMA/silica nanocomposite is slightly higher than that of the neat it-PMMA. DSC and XRD results suggest that the restriction of the PMMA chain mobility in the silica nanoparticle interfacial region heightens as the syndiotactic content increases. FT-IR results show that this phenomenon is caused by the interaction between the carbonyl group of PMMA and the silanol group on the silicon dioxide surface. Therefore, it can be concluded that the syndiotactic-rich PMMA has a significantly different molecular mobility from that of the neat PMMA in the interfacial region with silica nanoparticle surface than isotactic-rich PMMA.     

Polymer blends of stereoregular poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(styrene‐co‐p‐hydroxystyrene)

Isotactic, atactic, and syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylates) (PMMAs) (designated as iPMMA, aPMMA, and sPMMA) were mixed with poly(styrene‐co‐p‐hydroxystyrene) (abbreviated as PHS) containing 15 mol % of hydroxystyrene separately in 2‐butanone to make three polymer blend systems. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy were used to study the miscibility of these blends. The three polymer blends were found to be miscible, because all the prepared films were transparent and there was a single glass transition temperature (T_g) for each composition of the polymers. T_g elevation (above the additivity rule) is observed in all the three PMMA/PHS blends mainly because of hydrogen bonding. If less effective hydrogen bonding based on the FTIR evidence is assumed to infer less exothermic mixing, sPMMA may not be miscible with PHS over a broader range of conditions as iPMMA and aPMMA. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 73: 431–440, 1999     

Vibrational spectra and structure of stereoregular poly(methyl methacrylates) and of the stereocomplex

Infra-red and Raman spectra of films and solutions of syndiotactic and isotactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and of the stereocomplex of PMMA were measured. Vibrational bands sensitive to conformational transitions were determined. Differences of band intensities in spectra of stereoregular PMMA and of the stereocomplex indicate changes of populations of conformational forms of polymer chains accompanying stereocomplex formation. For syndiotactic PMMA in the stereocomplex, the extended chain conformation predominates.     

Miscible blends containing bacterial poly(3‐hydroxyvalerate) and poly(p‐vinyl phenol)

The miscibility of poly(3‐hydroxyvalerate) (PHV)/poly(p‐vinyl phenol) (PVPh) blends has been studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The blends are miscible as shown by the existence of a single glass transition temperature (T_g) and a depression of the equilibrium melting temperature of PHV in each blend. The interaction parameter was found to be −1.2 based on the analysis of melting point depression data using the Nishi–Wang equation. Hydrogen‐bonding interactions exist between the carbonyl groups of PHV and the hydroxyl groups of PVPh as evidenced by FTIR spectra. The crystallization of PHV is significantly hindered by the addition of PVPh. The addition of 50 wt % PVPh can totally prevent PHV from cold crystallization. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 74: 383–388, 1999     

Solvent effects on the miscibility of poly(methyl methacrylate)/poly(bisphenol a carbonate) blends

Blends of atactic or syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (designated as aPMMA or sPMMA) and poly(bisphenol A carbonate) (PC) were prepared from solution casting. Tetrahydrofuran (THF) and chloroform were used as solvent. Experimental results indicated that the as‐cast blends from THF were quite different from the chloroform‐cast ones. After film preparation, THF‐cast blends did not show any visible phase separation. However, chloroform‐cast blends formed a phase‐separated structure. The as‐cast PC from either solvent was not completely amorphous, and had a melting point at 239–242°C, indicating a certain degree of crystallinity. In contrast, the quenched samples of aPMMA/PC blends prepared from the two solvents behaved virtually the same. They both showed aPMMA dissolves better in PC, but PC solubility in aPMMA is very little. Using sPMMA instead of aPMMA to blend with PC, different results were obtained. The quenched sPMMA/PC blends cast from THF showed only one T_g. However, immiscibility (i.e., two T_gs) was found in the same blend system when cast from chloroform. THF was believed to cause the observation of single T_g due to the following kinetic reason. sPMMA and PC were still trapped together even after THF removal in a homogeneous, but nonequilibrium state below the glass transition. Therefore, the quenched sPMMA/PC blends were not truly thermodynamically miscible. From the results of aPMMA or sPMMA with PC, increasing syndiotacticity seemed to improve the miscibility between PMMA and PC. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 80: 2842–2850, 2001     

负载钛-三异丁基铝体系催化1-丁烯聚合 Ⅱ.聚1-丁烯的结构与性能

负载钛－Ａｌ（ｉ－Ｂｕ）３催化合成的聚１－丁烯，经溶剂萃取分离和１３Ｃ－ＮＭＲ测试表明为全同立构和无规立构的混合物，全同立构含量约６７％，熔点为９７℃。ＰＢｔ生胶的拉伸强度９．７ＭＰａ，断裂伸长率４９０％，永久变形小于１００％，邵尔Ａ型硬度８７，是一种热塑性弹性体材料     

On the poly(vinyl alcohol)–iodine complexes

The color development due to the complex formation of poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) with iodine increased with increasing syndiotacticity of PVA. Isotactic PVA showed no color development. The color development of syndiotacticity-rich PVA film decreased with increasing annealing temperature for films before complexization, whereas that of atactic (commercial) PVA increased with it. Lower temperatures, the elongation of complex film, and the presence of boric acid enhanced the absorbance at 600 nm due to I^?₅. The complexes are assumed to be made by incorporation of polyiodines into aggregates of syndiotactic sequences in PVA. The polarizability and electric conductivity of complex films are investigated. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Dissolution dynamics of some polymers: Solvent-polymer boundaries

A critical angle illumination microscopy technique was used to study the in situ dissolution dynamics of polystyrene, poly (α-methylstyrene) and the two tactic forms of poly (methyl methacrylate), (PMMA), in several solvents. The dissolution characteristics; of polymers were found to be greatly influenced by several factors: type of polymer, processing condition of the sample, type of solvent, and tacticity, Polystyrene was found to exhibit extensive swelling in several solvents while atactic PMMA exhibited extensive cracking on dissolution. Isotactic PMMA, which has a glass temperature of about 70°C lower than the atactic PMMA, showed swelling behavior similar to atactic polystyrene, while the α-methylstyrene showed the cracking phenomena exhibited by atactic PMMA.     

Crystallization kinetics and morphology of poly(butylene succinate)/poly(vinyl phenol) blend

Biodegradable crystalline poly(butylene succinate) (PBSU) can form miscible polymer blends with amorphous poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh). The isothermal crystallization kinetics and morphology of neat and blended PBSU with PVPh were studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), optical microscopy (OM), wide angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD), and small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) in this work. The overall isothermal crystallization kinetics of neat and blended PBSU was studied with DSC in the crystallization temperature range of 80-88 °C and analyzed by applying the Avrami equation. It was found that blending with PVPh did not change the crystallization mechanism of PBSU, but reduced the crystallization rate compared with that of neat PBSU at the same crystallization temperature. The crystallization rate decreased with increasing crystallization temperature, while the crystallization mechanism did not change for both neat and blended PBSU irrespective of the crystallization temperature. The spherulitic morphology and growth were observed with hot stage OM in a wide crystallization temperature range of 75-100 °C. The spherulitic morphology of PBSU was influenced apparently by the crystallization temperature and the addition of PVPh. The linear spherulitic growth rate was measured and analyzed by the secondary nucleation theory. Through the Lauritzen-Hoffman equation, some parameters of neat and blended PBSU were derived and compared with each other including the nucleation parameter (K_g), the lateral surface free energy (σ), the end-surface free energy (σ_e), and the work of chain folding (q). Blending with PVPh decreased all the aforementioned parameters compared with those of neat PBSU; however, the decrease extent was limited. WAXD result showed that the crystal structure of PBSU was not modified after blending with PVPh. SAXS result showed that the long period of blended PBSU increased, possibly indicating that the amorphous PVPh might reside mainly in the interlamellar region of PBSU.     

Concerning the miscibility of poly(vinyl phenol) blends — FTi.r. study

The results of a Fourier transform infrared study of poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) blends containing a number of chemically and structurally dissimilar polymers are presented. These polymers include the polyesters poly(ε-caprolactone) and poly(?-propiolactone); poly(vinyl alkyl ethers) where the alkyl groups are methyl, ethyl and isobutyl respectively; poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(vinyl pyrrolidone). All of these PVPh blends, with the exception of that containing poly(vinyl isobutyl ether), exhibit infrared spectral features consistent with a significant degree of mixing. Intermolecular hydrogen bonding interactions involving the PVPh hydroxyl group and either the carbonyl or ether oxygen moieties of the other polymers in the blend are identified. The relative strengths of these intermolecular interactions are discussed together with ramifications pertinent to the overall subject of polymer miscibility.     

Miscibility studies of binary and ternary mixtures of tactic poly(methyl methacrylates) with poly(vinylidene chloride‐co‐acrylonitrile)

Isotactic, atactic, and syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylates) (i, a, and s PMMAs) were mixed with poly(vinylidene chloride‐co‐acrylonitrile) (Saran F) separately in tetrahydrofuran to make three polymer blend systems. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was used mainly to study the miscibility of these blends. iPMMA and aPMMA were found to be miscible with Saran F based on the transparency and a single glass transition temperature (T_g) of the films. However, sPMMA was immiscible with Saran F because of the observation of two T_gs and opacity in most compositions of the blend. aPMMA is known to be miscible with sPMMA. Therefore aPMMA is both miscible with Saran F and sPMMA but Saran F and sPMMA are immiscible. Preliminary results of the effect of adding of aPMMA to immiscible sPMMA and Saran F mixtures were also reported. First, binary mixtures of atactic and syndiotactic PMMAs were also prepared and confirmed to be miscible. Elevation of T_g of the aPMMA/sPMMA blend above weight average was observed probably due to stereocomplexation occurred between aPMMA and sPMMA. Then ternary blends of atactic and syndiotactic PMMAs and Saran F in the weight ratios of about 3/1/4, 2/2/4, and 1/3/4 were also measured calorimetrically. A single T_g was observed for these three compositions different from two T_gs detected in the sPMMA/Saran F (50.0/50.0, i.e., 4/4) blend. Obviously, the composition of Saran was fixed in the ternary blends. When the other half of the blends was changing from pure sPMMA to sPMMA and aPMMA mixture, the blends became miscible because of the addition of aPMMA. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 75: 1313–1321, 2000     

Poly(butylene succinate)/poly(vinyl phenol) blends. Part 1. Miscibility and crystallization

Miscibility has been investigated in blends of poly(butylene succinate) (PBSU) and poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) by differential scanning calorimetry in this work. PBSU is miscible with PVPh as shown by the existence of single composition dependent glass transition temperature over the entire composition range. In addition, the polymer–polymer interaction parameter, obtained from the melting depression of PBSU using the Nishi–Wang equation, is composition dependent, and its value is always negative. This indicates that PBSU/PVPh blends are thermodynamically miscible in the melt. Preliminary morphology study of PBSU/PVPh blends was also studied by optical microscopy (OM). OM experiments show the spherulites of PBSU become larger with the PVPh content, indicative of a decrease in the nucleation density, and the coarseness of PBSU spherulites increases too with increasing the PVPh content in the blends.     

Poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(methyl methacrylate) blends: Influence of tacticity of poly(methyl methacrylate) on blend structure and miscibility

The influence of different configurations of poly(methyl methacrylate) on the miscibility and superstructure of poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PEO/PMMA) blends was examined using small-angle X-ray scattering and differential scanning calorimetry. The blends prepared by solution casting were isothermally crystallized at 48°C. The miscibility, the melting behaviour, the glass transition temperature and the structural parameters of the blends were strongly dependent on the tacticity and blend composition. The small-angle X-ray intensity profiles were analysed using a recently developed methodology. For the poly(ethylene oxide)/atactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (PEO/APMMA) and poly(ethylene oxide)/syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (PEO/SPMMA) blends, the long period and the amorphous and transition region thicknesses increased with increase of PMMA content, whereas for the poly(ethylene oxide)/isotactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (PEO/IPMMA) blends they are independent of composition. The structural properties of the blends were attributed to the presence of non-crystallizable material in the interlamellar or interfibrillar regions, depending on PMMA tacticity. From the glass transition and melting temperatures, it has been supposed that one homogeneous amorphous phase is present in the case of PEO/APMMA and PEO/SPMMA blends and that the PEO/IPMMA amorphous system is phase-separated. The free-volume contribution to the energy of mixing for the various tactic PMMAs is hypothesized to be responsible for the difference in mixing behaviour.     

Tactic poly(crown ether)s with pendant benzocrown ethers

Summary Tactic and atactic poly(crown ether)s, poly(methacryloyloxymethylbenzo-15-crown-5), were synthesized by polymer reaction of the respective poly(methacrylic acid) with chloromethylbenzo-15-crown-5 and radical polymerization of methacryloyloxymethylbenzo-15-crown-5. By solvent extraction of alkali metal picrates with these poly(crown ether)s, the isotactic poly(crown ether) was found to be a little more selective for K⁺ and Rb⁺ than the syndiotactic and atactic ones.