Processability enhancement of poly(lactic acid-co-ethylene terephthalate) by blending with poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate), poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate), and poly(butylene succinate)

Processability enhancement feasibility of an in-house synthesized poly(lactic acid-co-ethylene terephthalate), PLET, is investigated by blending with commercial poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate), EVA, poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate), PHBV, and poly(butylene succinate), PBS. The three blend systems are prepared by varying PLET contents, and their properties are characterized. DSC, SEM, and FTIR results indicate that PLET/EVA blends are immiscible, while the corresponding PLET/PBS and PLET/PHBV blends are miscible and partially miscible, respectively. DMA results show that the three blend systems have storage modulus comparable to those of commercial EVA, PHBV, and PBS, when PLET content is kept lower than 50, 25, and 25 wt%, respectively. PLET/EVA blends show higher thermal stability, compared to those of the other two blend systems. Results on degradability tests indicate that PLET/PBS blends show highest hydrolytic degradability, compared to the other two blends, as both blend constituents are associated in the hydrolytic degradation.     

Compatibility behavior in thermoplastic polymer blends containing poly(t-butylstyrene-co-acrylonitrile)

The phase behavior of a series of binary component polymer blends of poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) and poly(t-butylstyrene-co-acrylonitrile) (TBSAN) containing varying contents of acrylonitrile (AN) was examined to determine the influence of copolymer composition and PCL content on blend miscibility or immiscibility. Thermal measurements were extensively used to determine phase behavior, i.e., a single compositionally dependent glass transition temperature implies blend miscibility. Otherwise, immiscibility is assumed to dominant blend behavior. It was determined that TBSAN and PCL form miscible blends over a broad range of AN content, i.e., spanning from below 43.2 mol % (19.8 wt %) to about 66.4 mol % (39.6 wt %), a range considerably different from that found in poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) copolymers. TBSAN-containing blends were found to be immiscible when the AN content is less than about 43 mol % or greater than about 67 mol %. Small-angle light-scattering and polarized light microscopy was used to probe the substantial morphological changes in the miscible blends. Little change was observed in the immiscible blends. These results clarify the phase separation observed in these blend systems. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

A new class of transparent polymeric materials. III. Miscible blends of poly(N-methylmaleimide-alt-isobutene) with poly(acrylonitrile-co-styrene) and the properties of the blends

The blend miscibility of poly(N-methylmaleimide-alt-isobutene) [poly-(MeMI-IB)] with poly(acrylonitrile-co-styrene) (SAN) was investigated by means of measurement of the glass transition temperature of the blends. Poly(MeMI-IB) was found to be miscible with SAN of a specific range of acrylonitrile (AN) contents in the copolymer to produce transparent moldings. The refractive index changed from 1.58 to 1.53 and the dispersion decreased with increasing the amount of poly(MeMI-IB) in the blends. The stress optical coefficient of poly(MeMI-IB) was found to be reduced by the blending of SAN. The glass transition temperature, flexural modulus, and surface hardness of the blends increased with an increase in the amount of poly(MeMI-IB) in the blend. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 63: 925–929, 1997     

Viscoelastic properties of blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) having various acrylonitrile contents

Dynamic viscoelastic properties of blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) with various AN contents were measured to evaluate the influence of SAN composition, consequently χ parameter, upon the melt rheology. PMMA/SAN blends were miscible and exhibited a terminal flow region characterized by Newtonian flow, when the acrylonitrile (AN) content of SAN ranges from 10 to 27 wt %. Whereas, PMMA/SAN blends were immiscible and exhibited a long time relaxation, when the AN content in SAN is less than several wt % or greater than 30 wt %. Correspondingly, melt rheology of the blends was characterized by the plots of storage modulus G′ against loss modulus G″. Log G′ versus log G″ plots exhibited a straight line of slope 2 for the miscible blends, but did not show a straight line for the immiscible blends because of their long time relaxation mechanism. The plateau modulus, determined as the storage modulus G′ in the plateau zone at the frequency where tan δ is at maximum, varied linearly with the AN content of SAN irrespective of blend miscibility. This result indicates that the additivity rule holds well for the entanglement molecular weights in miscible PMMA/SAN blends. However, the entanglement molecular weights in immiscible blends should have “apparent” values, because the above method to determine the plateau modulus is not applicable for the immiscible blends. Effect of χ parameter on the plateau modulus of the miscible blends could not be found. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Effect of tacticity of poly(methyl methacrylate) on the miscibility with poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)

Isotactic, atactic, and syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylates) (PMMAs) (designated as iPMMA, aPMMA, and sPMMA) with approximately the same molecular weight were mixed separately with poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (abbreviated as PSAN) containing 25 wt % of acrylonitrile in tetrahydrofuran to make three polymer blend systems. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was used to study the miscibility of these blends. The results showed that the tacticity of PMMA has a definite impact on its miscibility with PSAN. The aPMMA/PSAN and sPMMA/PSAN blends were found to be miscible because all the prepared films were transparent and showed composition dependent glass transition temperatures (T_gs). The glass transition temperatures of the two miscible blends were fitted well by the Fox equation, and no broadening of the glass transition regions was observed. The iPMMA/PSAN blends were found to be immiscible, because most of the cast films were translucent and had two glass transition temperatures. Through the use of a simple binary interaction model, the following comments can be drawn. The isotactic MMA segments seemed to interact differently with styrene and with acrylonitrile segments from atactic or syndiotactic MMA segments. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 74: 2894–2899, 1999     

Miscibility, thermal characterization and crystallization of poly(l-lactide) and poly(tetramethylene adipate-co-terephthalate) blend membranes

Binary blend membranes of biodegradable poly(l-lactide) (PLLA) with poly(tetramethylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PTAT) copolymer were prepared by solution casting via air evaporation. The miscibility of PLLA/PTAT blends was studied by dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) and thermal mechanical analysis (TMA) in a tensile mode. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurement was carried out. The surface microstructure and tensile properties of the blend membranes were examined using atomic force microscopy (AFM) and tensile tester. It was concluded that PLLA/PTAT blends should be partially miscible for all ranges of compositions. Higher roughness and porosity were observed for the blend containing 50% PTAT, suggesting more phase separation occurred. The DSC analysis showed that the fusion enthalpy and crystallinity (X_c) of the PLLA-rich phase decreased with increasing PTAT content. Solidification process strongly suggested that the crystallization rate was accelerated by blending with 25% PTAT content, which served as the nucleation agent. Furthermore, the crystallization rate coefficient (CRC) depended on the blending miscibility and cooling rate in the non-isothermal crystallization process. Besides, PTAT addition could be proved to enhance the thermal stability and elongation of resulting blend membranes, even superior to those properties of poly(lactic acid-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA).     

Blends of poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide)/ poly(styrene-co-methacrylic acid)/ poly(ethyl methacrylate-co-4-vinylpyridine)

Summary The miscibility of poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) (PPO) with poly(styrene-co-acrylic acid) (SAA) or poly(styrene-co-methacrylic acid) (SMA) containing respectively up to 22 mol % of acrylic or methacrylic acid was studied by Differential Scanning Calorimetry and viscosimetry. All PPO/SAA or PPO/SMA blends containing 60% or less by weight of PPO were miscible and showed only one glass transition temperature (Tg). Above 60% of PPO, two Tg's were however observed for the blends in which the acid content in the SAA or SMA reaches 20% or 12% by mole respectively; the higher Tg is slightly lower than the one of pure PPO, while the lower one corresponds to a miscible blend of lower content of PPO.A DSC study showed that depending on the blend ratio, two or three glass transition temperatures were observed when a copolymer of ethyl methacrylate containing 8 mol % of 4-vinylpyridine (EM4VP-8) was added to miscible PPO/SMA-12 blends. The PPO dissolution in the SMA-12 copolymer was affected by the specific interactions that occurred between this latter copolymer and the EM4VP-8.     

Miscibility behavior of blends of poly(alkyl methacrylate)s with poly(p-methylstyrene-co-methacrylonitrile)

The miscibility behavior of various poly(p-methylstyrene-co-methacrylonitrile) (pMSMAN)/poly(alkyl methacrylate)s blends was studied using differential scanning calorimetry. pMSMAN is miscible with poly(methyl methacrylate), poly(ethyl methacrylate), poly(n-propyl methacrylate), poly(isopropyl methacrylate), and poly(n-butyl methacrylate) over certain copolymer composition ranges, but is immiscible with poly(isobutyl methacrylate) and poly(n-amyl methacrylate). The width of the miscibility window decreases with increasing size of the pendant ester group of the poly(alkyl methacrylate), and is wider than that of the corresponding poly(p-methylstyrene-co-acrylonitrile) blend system. Various segmental interaction parameters are calculated using a binary interaction model. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Miscibility studies of binary and ternary mixtures of tactic poly(methyl methacrylates) with poly(vinylidene chloride‐co‐acrylonitrile)

Isotactic, atactic, and syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylates) (i, a, and s PMMAs) were mixed with poly(vinylidene chloride‐co‐acrylonitrile) (Saran F) separately in tetrahydrofuran to make three polymer blend systems. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was used mainly to study the miscibility of these blends. iPMMA and aPMMA were found to be miscible with Saran F based on the transparency and a single glass transition temperature (T_g) of the films. However, sPMMA was immiscible with Saran F because of the observation of two T_gs and opacity in most compositions of the blend. aPMMA is known to be miscible with sPMMA. Therefore aPMMA is both miscible with Saran F and sPMMA but Saran F and sPMMA are immiscible. Preliminary results of the effect of adding of aPMMA to immiscible sPMMA and Saran F mixtures were also reported. First, binary mixtures of atactic and syndiotactic PMMAs were also prepared and confirmed to be miscible. Elevation of T_g of the aPMMA/sPMMA blend above weight average was observed probably due to stereocomplexation occurred between aPMMA and sPMMA. Then ternary blends of atactic and syndiotactic PMMAs and Saran F in the weight ratios of about 3/1/4, 2/2/4, and 1/3/4 were also measured calorimetrically. A single T_g was observed for these three compositions different from two T_gs detected in the sPMMA/Saran F (50.0/50.0, i.e., 4/4) blend. Obviously, the composition of Saran was fixed in the ternary blends. When the other half of the blends was changing from pure sPMMA to sPMMA and aPMMA mixture, the blends became miscible because of the addition of aPMMA. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 75: 1313–1321, 2000     

Elongational viscosity for miscible and immiscible polymer blends. I. PMMA and AS with similar elongational viscosity

The effects of miscibility and blend ratio on uniaxial elongational viscosity of polymer blends were studied by preparing miscible and immiscible samples at the same composition by using poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and poly(acrylonitrile-co-styrene) (AS). Miscible polymer blend samples for the elongational viscosity measurement were prepared by using three steps: solvent blends, cast film, and hot press. A phase diagram of blend samples was made by visual observation of cloudiness. Immiscible blend samples were prepared by maintaining the prepared miscible samples at 200°C, which is higher than cloud points using a LCST (lower critical solution temperature) phase diagram. The phase structure of immiscible blends was observed by an optical microscope. The elongational viscosity of all samples was measured at 145°C, which is lower than the cloud-point temperature at all blend ratios. The elongational viscosity of PMMA and AS was similar to each other. The strain-hardening property of miscible blends in the elongational viscosity was only slightly influenced by the blend ratio, and this was also the case with immiscible blends. The strain-hardening property was only slightly influenced, whether it was miscible or immiscible at each blend ratio. Polydispersity in molecular weight for blend samples was not changed by GPC (gel permeation chromatography) analysis. Almost no change in the polydispersity of the molecular weight for blends and the similarity of elongational viscosity between PMMA and AS resulted in little influence of the blend ratio and miscibility on the strain-hardening property. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 73: 757–766, 1999     

Preparation and characterization of poly(methyl methacrylate) beads

The phase behavior of Poly(ethylene terephthalate)/Poly(ethylene‐2,6‐naphthalate)/Poly(ethylene terephthalate‐co‐ethylene‐2,6‐naphthalate) (PET/PEN/P(ET‐co‐EN)) ternary blends in molten state was evaluated from differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and NMR results as well as optical microscopic observations. Copolymer of ethylene terephthalate and ethylene‐2,6‐naphthalate was prepared by a condensation polymerization, which was a random copolymer with an intrinsic viscosity (IV) of 0.3 dL/g. The phase diagram of the ternary blends revealed that the miscibility of ternary blends in molten state was dependent on the fraction of P(ET‐co‐EN) in the blends and holding time of the blends at high temperatures above 280°C. With increase in the holding time, the fraction of copolymer in the blends necessary to induce the immiscible to miscible transition decreased. For the blends with longer holding time at 280°C, the phase diagram in molten state was irreversible against the temperature, although a reversibility was found for the blends with short holding time of 1 min at 280°C. The irreversibility of phase behavior was not explained simply by the increase of copolymer content produced during heat treatment. Complex irreversible physical and chemical interactions between components and change of phase structure of the blend in the molten state might influence on the irreversibility. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Miscibility of poly(methoxymethyl methacrylate) and poly(methylthiomethyl methacrylate) with poly(vinylidene fluoride)

Summary The miscibility behaviour of poly(methoxymethyl methacrylate) (PMOMA) and poly(methylthiomethyl methacrylate) (PMTMA) with poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) was examined by differential scanning calorimetry. PMOMA/PVDF blend system was judged to be miscible on the bases of the presence of a single, composition-dependent glass transition for the blend and a pronounced melting point depression of the PVDF component. Furthermore, lower critical solution temperature (LCST) behaviour was observed for all PMOMA/PVDF blends. PMTMA/PVDF blends were found to be immiscible. Based on the melting point depression of PVDF in PMOMA/PVDF blends, the interaction parameter B was found to be -14.5 J/cm³.     

Miscibility in blends of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) and poly(?-caprolactone) induced by melt blending in the presence of supercritical CO2

Blends of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) and poly(?-caprolactone) (PCL) have been produced by melt blending in the presence of supercritical CO₂. Infrared spectroscopy has shown that supercritical CO₂ can induce melting in PHBV at temperatures below the melting point. The miscibility of the PCL-PHBV blend system produced by both mechanical and supercritical means has been characterised by a combination of differential scanning calorimetry and dynamic mechanical thermal analysis. It has been shown that PHBV-PCL blends produced using mechanical means were immiscible, whereas the same blends produced using supercritical methods were found to be miscible as evidenced by a decrease in the glass transition temperature of the PHBV component. The development of miscibility is discussed in terms of enhanced interdiffusion resulting from the action of supercritical CO₂. In addition, the infrared spectrum of the blends produced using supercritical CO₂ showed negligible levels of the degradation product crotonic acid. Whereas in the samples produced using mechanical blending without supercritical CO₂, there was a significant increase in the level of crotonic acid, which was interpreted as evidence of degradation.     

Separation of water/ethanol mixture through poly(acrylonitrile-co-acrylic acid)/poly(ethylene oxide) membranes by pervaporation

The separation of water/ethanol mixtures was investigated by poly(acrylonitrile-co-acrylic acid) and by poly(acrylonitrile-co-acrylic acid)/poly(ethylene oxide) blend membranes. The flux increased with the content of acrylic acid in copolymers and the selectivity remained constant. The marked increase of the selectivity was observed for blend membranes of a certain blend ratio, suggesting that the two polymers are partially miscible. Poly(ethylene oxide) in blends was thought to act as a plasticizer as well as a preferentially water absorbing and diffusing component. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Miscibility of poly(p-vinyl phenol) with polymethacrylates

Summary Poly(p-vinyl phenol) is miscible with poly(methyl methacrylate), poly(ethyl methacrylate), poly(n-propyl methacrylate), poly(isopropyl methacrylate), and poly(tetrahydrofurfuryl methacrylate), but is immiscible with poly(n-butyl methacrylate). Except for poly(p-vinyl phenol)/ poly(methyl methacrylate) blends, the other miscible blends show pronounced positive deviations in their glass transition temperatures. The T_g-composition curves of the five miscible blend systems can be described by the Gordon-Taylor and the Kwei equations.     

New miscible blends composed of polysulfone and poly(1-vinylpyrrolidone-co-acrylonitrile) copolymers and their phase behavior

The miscibility of polysulfone, PSf, blend with poly(1-vinylpyrrolidone), PVP, and that of PSf blend with poly(1-vinylpyrrolidone-co-acrylonitrile) copolymers, P(VP-AN), containing various amount of VP were explored. Even though PSf did not formed miscible blends with PVP when both components had high molecular weight, it formed miscible blend with PVP by decreasing molecular weight of PVP. PSf also formed homogeneous mixtures with P(VP-AN) containing AN from 2 to 16 wt%. These miscible blends underwent phase separation on heating caused by LCST-type (lower critical solution temperature-type) phase behavior. The phase separation temperature of miscible blends first increases with AN content, goes through a maximum centered at about 8 wt% AN. Interaction energies of binary pairs involved in blends were evaluated from the observed phase boundaries using the lattice-fluid theory. The decline of the contact angle between water and blend film by increasing P(VP-AN) content in blend indicated that the hydrophobic properties of PSf could be improved by blending with P(VP-AN) copolymers.     

Effect of tacticity of poly(methyl methacrylate) on the miscibility with poly(vinyl pyrrolidone)

Isotactic, atactic, and syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylates) (PMMA) (designated iPMMA, aPMMA, and sPMMA) with approximately the same molecular weight were mixed separately with poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP) primarily in chloroform to make three polymer blend systems. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was used to study the miscibility of these blends. The results showed that the tacticity of PMMA has a definite impact on its miscibility with PVP. The aPMMA/PVP and sPMMA/PVP blends were found to be miscible because all the prepared films showed composition-dependent glass-transition temperatures (T_g). The glass-transition temperatures of the aPMMA/PVP blends are equal to or lower than weight average and can be qualitatively described by the Gordon–Taylor equation. The glass-transition temperatures of the other miscible blends (i.e., sPMMA/PVP blends) are mostly higher than weight average and can be approximately fitted by the simplified Kwei equation. The iPMMA/PVP blends were found to be immiscible or partially miscible based on the observation of two glass-transition temperatures. The immiscibility is probably attributable to a stronger interaction among isotactic MMA segments because its ordination and molecular packing contribute to form a rigid domain. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 81: 3190–3197, 2001     

Miscibility of blends of epoxidized natural rubber and poly(ethylene-co-acrylic acid)

The blends of epoxidized natural rubber (50 mol %) (ENR) and poly(ethylene-co-acrylic acid) (PEA) (6 wt %) are demonstrated to be partially miscible up to 50% by weight of PEA and completely miscible beyond this proportion. The miscibility has been confirmed by a DSC study which exhibits a single second-order transition (T_g) for the 30 : 70 and 50 : 50 (ENR : PEA) blends. For the 70 : 30 (ENR : PEA) blend, the T_g's shift toward an intermediate value but do not merge to form a single T_g, making the blend partially miscible. The miscibility has been assigned to the esterification reaction between – OH groups formed in situ during melt blending of ENR and – COOH groups of PEA. The occurrence of such reactions have been confirmed by UV and IR spectroscopic studies. The existence of a single phase of the blends beyond 50 wt % of PEA has been shown by SEM studies. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Crystallization behaviour of cellulose acetate butylate/poly(butylene succinate)‐co‐(butylene carbonate) blends

The kinetics of the isothermal crystallization process from the melt of pure poly(butylene succinate)‐co‐(butylene carbonate) (PBS‐co‐BC) and its blends with cellulose acetate butylate (CAB) (10–30 wt%) was studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and the well‐known Avrami equation. In the blends, the overall crystallization rate of PBS‐co‐BC became slower with increasing CAB content. The equilibrium melting temperature ( ) of PBS‐co‐BC decreased with increasing CAB content, which was similar to that with other miscible crystalline/amorphous polymer blends. The slower crystallization kinetics of PBS‐co‐BC in the blends was explicable in terms of a diluent effect of the CAB component. By application of Turnbull–Fisher kinetic theory for polymer–diluent blend systems, the surface free energy (σ_e) of pure PBS‐co‐BC and of the blends was obtained, indicating that the blend with CAB resulted in a decrease in the surface free energy of folding of PBS‐co‐BC lamellar crystals. Copyright © 2006 Society of Chemical Industry     

Binary and ternary polymer blends containing poly(vinylidene chloride‐co‐acrylonitrile)

Poly(vinylidene chloride‐co‐acrylonitrile) (Saran F), poly(hydroxy ether of bisphenol A) (phenoxy), poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (PSAN), and poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) all have the same characteristic: miscibility with atactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (aPMMA). However, the miscibility of Saran F with the other polymer (phenoxy, PSAN, or PVPh) is not guaranteed and was thus investigated. Saran F was found to be miscible only with PSAN but not miscible with phenoxy and PVPh. Because Saran F and PVPh are not miscible, although they are both miscible with aPMMA, aPMMA can thus be used as a potential cosolvent to homogenize PVPh/Saran F. The second part of this report focused on the miscibility of a ternary blend consisting of Saran F, PVPh, and aPMMA to investigate the cosolvent effect of aPMMA. Factors affecting the miscibility were studied. The established phase diagram indicated that the ternary blends with high PVPh/Saran F weight ratio were found to be mostly immiscible. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 91: 3068–3073, 2004