The effects of sevoflurane, isoflurane, halothane, and enflurane on hemodynamic responses during an inhaled induction of anesthesia via a mask in humans

A rapid increase in isoflurane or desflurane concentration induces tachycardia and hypertension and increases-plasma catecholamine concentration. Little information is available as to whether sevoflurane, halothane, and enflurane induce similar responses during anesthesia induction via mask. Fifty ASA physical status I patients, aged 20-40 yr, and scheduled for elective minor surgery, received one of four volatile anesthetics: sevoflurane, isoflurane, halothane, or enflurane. Anesthesia was induced with thiamylal, followed by inhalation of 0.9 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) of the anesthetic in 100% oxygen via mask. The inspired concentration of anesthetic was increased by 0.9 MAC every 5 min to a maximum of 2.7 MAC. Heart rate (HR) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) were measured before and every minute for 15 min during anesthetic inhalation. In the sevoflurane and isoflurane groups, venous blood samples were drawn to determine the concentrations of plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine 3 min after each increase in anesthetic concentration. Sustained increments in HR were observed after increases in inspired isoflurane concentration to 1.8 MAC and 2.7 MAC (peak changes of 15 +/- 3 and 17 +/- 3 bpm, respectively). Isoflurane also increased SBP transiently after the inspired concentration was increased to 2.7 MAC (peak change of 10 +/- 4 mm Hg). Enflurane increased HR after the inspired concentration was increased to 2.7 MAC (peak change of 9 +/- 2 bpm). In contrast, changes in sevoflurane and halothane concentrations did not induce hyperdynamic responses. Plasma norepinephrine concentration in the isoflurane group was significantly higher than that in the sevoflurane group during 2.7 MAC (P = 0.022). We propose that there is a direct relationship between airway irritation of the anesthetic and immediate cardiovascular change during an inhaled induction of anesthesia.     

Spinal anesthesia for elective lumbar spine surgery

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a large series of elective lumbar spine surgical procedures by a single surgeon whose patients were all offered spinal anesthesia. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Tertiary-care teaching hospital. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The records of all elective lumbar spine procedures between 1984 and 1995 performed by one surgeon (GRB) were obtained, and 803 were identified. Of those 803 patients, 611 accepted spinal anesthesia. Data collected included patient demographics, details of the spinal and general anesthesia, perioperative complications, and impact of the spinal anesthetic options on the outcome of spinal anesthesia. General and spinal anesthesia patients were comparable for age, gender, height, and ASA physical status. Patients who received spinal anesthesia were significantly heavier than the general anesthesia patients. Among perioperative complications, nausea and deep venous thrombosis occurred significantly more often in the general than spinal anesthesia patients. Mild hypotension and decreased heart rate (HR) were the most common hemodynamic changes with spinal anesthesia, whereas hypertension and increased HR were the result of general anesthesia. Among spinal anesthetic drugs, plain bupivacaine was associated with the lowest incidence of supplemental local anesthetic use intraoperatively compared to hyperbaric bupivacaine or hyperbaric tetracaine. CONCLUSION: Spinal anesthesia is an effective alternative to general anesthesia for lumbar spine surgery and has a reduced rate of minor complications.     

The effect of epinephrine on small-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine spinal anesthesia: clinical implications for ambulatory surgery

The effect of adding epinephrine to small doses of spinal bupivacaine on the duration of sensory motor block has not been carefully investigated. Twelve volunteers underwent hyperbaric bupivacaine spinal anesthesia (7.5 mg) with and without epinephrine (0.2 mg) in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over fashion. Sensory block was assessed with pinprick, transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) equivalent to surgical stimulation (at umbilicus, pubis, knee, and ankle), and tolerance of a pneumatic thigh tourniquet. Motor block was assessed with isometric force dynamometry. Discharge criteria were defined as return of pinprick sensation to dermatome S2, ability to ambulate, and ability to urinate. Extent of sensory block to pinprick over time was unaffected by the addition of epinephrine. However, epinephrine prolonged tolerance of TES at the pubis, knee, and ankle (33-48 min, P < 0.05) and of thigh tourniquet (30 min, P < 0.01). Motor block was prolonged by epinephrine at the quadriceps and gastrocnemius muscles (by 23 and 51 min, respectively, P < 0.002). Achievement of discharge criteria was prolonged by 48 min by the addition of epinephrine (P < 0.01). Thus, epinephrine may prolong surgical anesthesia for lower abdominal and lower extremity surgery and delay time until patients achieve discharge criteria. Implications: Using a cross-over study design, 12 volunteers underwent bupivacaine spinal anesthesia with and without epinephrine. This study suggests that adding epinephrine to bupivacaine may prolong surgical anesthesia and also delay patients' discharge.     

Prospective study of the incidence of transient radicular irritation in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia

BACKGROUND: There is considerable controversy regarding the role of subarachnoid 5% hyperbaric lidocaine in the syndrome transient radicular irritation (TRI). This randomized, double-blinded, prospective study was designed to determine the incidence of TRI and identify factors possibly contributing to its development. METHODS: One hundred fifty-nine ASA physical status 1 or 2 patients undergoing outpatient knee arthroscopy or unilateral inguinal hernia repair were prospectively randomized to receive spinal anesthesia with 5% hyperbaric lidocaine with epinephrine (60 mg with 0.2 mg epinephrine for arthroscopy or 75 mg with 0.2 mg epinephrine for hernia repair), 2% isobaric lidocaine without epinephrine (60 mg for arthroscopy or 75 mg for hernia repair), or 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine without epinephrine (7.5 mg for arthroscopy or 9.0 mg for hernia repair) in a double-blinded fashion. On the 3rd postoperative day, patients were contacted by a blinded investigator and questioned regarding the incidence of postoperative complications including TRI, defined as back pain with radiation down one or both buttocks or legs occurring within 24 h after surgery. Postoperatively, time from injection to block resolution, ambulation, voiding, and ready for discharge were recorded by a postanesthesia care unit nurse blinded to the group assignment. RESULTS: The incidence of TRI was greater in patients receiving lidocaine than in those receiving bupivacaine (16% vs. 0%; P = 0.003). There was no difference in the incidence of TRI between the patients receiving 5% hyperbaric lidocaine with epinephrine and those receiving 2% isobaric lidocaine without epinephrine (16% vs. 16%; P = 0.98). The incidence of TRI was greater in patients undergoing arthroscopy than in those undergoing hernia repair (13% vs. 5%; P = 0.04). There was no difference in discharge times in patients receiving bupivacaine versus those receiving hyperbaric lidocaine with epinephrine (292 vs. 322 min; P = 0.61). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of TRI is greater with lidocaine than bupivacaine, decreasing the lidocaine concentration to 2% does not prevent TRI, and surgical position may be an important contributing factor. Discharge times at our institution are not different when equipotent doses of 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine or 5% hyperbaric lidocaine with 0.2 mg epinephrine are used in ambulatory patients undergoing spinal anesthesia.     

CSE vs. augmented epidural anesthesia for cesarean section. Spinal and epidural anesthesia with bupivacaine 0.5% "isobar" require augmentation

Incomplete anaesthesia is a major clinical problem both in single spinal and in single epidural anaesthesia. The clinical efficacy of epidural anaesthesia with augmentation (aEA) and combined epidural and spinal anesthesia (CSE) for cesarean section was investigated in a prospective randomized study on 45 patients. METHODS: Anaesthesia extending up to Th5 was aimed for. Depending on the patient's height, epidural anaesthesia was administered with a dose of 18-22 ml 0.5% bupivacaine and spinal anaesthesia with a dose of 11-15 mg 0.5% bupivacaine. Augmentation was carried out in all cases in epidural anaesthesia, initially with 7.5 ml 1% Lidocaine with epinephrine 1:400,000, raised by 1.5 ml per missing segment. The epidural reinjection in CSE was carried out as necessary with 9.5-15 ml 1% lidocaine with epinephrine, depending on the height and difference from the segment Th5. RESULTS: The extension of anaesthesia achieved in epidural anaesthesia after an initial dose of 101.8 mg bupivacaine and augmenting dose of 99 mg lidocaine reached the segment Th5. The primary spinal anaesthesia dose up to 15 mg corresponding to height led to a segmental extension to a maximum of Th3 under CSE. Augmentation was necessary in 13 patients; in 5 cases because of inadequate extent of anaesthesia and 8 cases because of pain resulting from premature reversion. The augmenting dose required was 13.9 ml. Readiness for operation was attained after 19.8 min (aEA) and after 10.5 min (CSE). No patient required analgesics before delivery. The additional analgesic requirement during operation was 63.6% (aEA) and 39.1% (CSE). Taking into account pain in the area of surgery, the requirement of analgesics was 50% (aEA) vs. 17.4% (CSE). Antiemetics were required in 18.2 (aEA) and in 65.2% (CSE). The systolic blood pressure fell by 17.7% (aEA) and in 30.3% (CSE). The minimum systolic pressure was observed after 13.4 min in aEA, and after 9.5 min in CSE. The APGAR score and the umbilical pH did not show any differences. General anaesthesia was not required in any case.     

Increased anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass by prostaglandin E1

We prospectively evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of an epinephrine-containing epidural test dose (EpiTD) as a marker of intravascular injection in 209 unmedicated laboring women. Maternal heart rate (MHR) was continuously monitored and recorded on a strip chart. A tocodynamometer monitored uterine activity. A lumbar epidural catheter was placed and aspirated. If aspiration was positive for blood or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), the catheter was replaced. In uterine diastole and with stable MHR, 198 patients received an EpiTD (epinephrine 15 microg plus lidocaine 45 mg) via the catheter. MHR and the generated HR strip were observed. A positive EpiTD was defined as a sudden increase in MHR of 10 bpm more than the resting MHR, within one minute after the injection, with a fast acceleratory phase of more than 1 bpm. Absence of a tachycardiac response suggested a negative EpiTD. If the tachycardiac response was deemed equivocal or a uterine contraction followed the EpiTD injection within 1 min, the EpiTD was invalidated and repeated. Catheter aspiration was repeated, and the catheter was removed if aspiration was positive. All patients with negative EpiTD and aspiration received 6-12 mL of epidural bupivacaine 0.25% with or without fentanyl 50 microg. Absence of analgesia without signs or symptoms of systemic toxicity after a maximum of bupivacaine 30 mg defined failed epidural analgesia. All patients with positive EpiTD and negative aspiration received 5 mL of lidocaine 2% epidurally as a second test dose (Lido100TD). The presence of tinnitus and/or metallic taste defined a positive Lido100TD. There were 176 true negatives, 0 false negatives, 14 true positives, and 8 false positives. The sensitivity of EpiTD was 100%, the specificity 96%, the negative predictive value 100%, and the positive predictive value 63%. The prevalence of negative tests was 88%, and the prevalence of positive tests was 12%. The overall accuracy of an EpiTD was 95.5%. We conclude that EpiTD is a reliable test to identify i.v. catheters during the performance of lumbar epidural analgesia in laboring patients. Implications: Catheters inserted for epidural analgesia in laboring patients may accidentally enter a blood vessel. Local anesthetics injected through these catheters may cause seizures and cardiac arrest. In this study, we concluded that injecting a small amount of epinephrine before injecting a local anesthetic frequently helps to identify these misplaced catheters. Few catheters may actually be in the correct place even after responses to epinephrine.     

Peridural anesthesia versus subarachnoid anesthesia in cesarean section. Prospective clinical study

OBJECTIVE: To compare technical and clinical differences between epidural and spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized prospective trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 64 pregnant women at term scheduled for elective cesarean section. Two groups were randomized: A) PD Group (n = 32): continuous epidural anesthesia by administration of bupivacaine 0.5% plus epinephrine 1/400,000 via an epidural catheter. Epidural morphine 3 mg was administered at the end of surgery. B) SP Group (n = 32): "single shot" spinal anesthesia by intrathecal administration of hyperbaric 1% bupivacaine 1-1.4 ml plus morphine 0.2 mg. The pin prick block level reached T2-T6 at incision time. DATA COLLECTION: 1) Time from the beginning of anesthesia to surgical incision. 2) Hypotension episodes. 3) Ephedrine consumption. 4) Intraoperative discomfort at delivery, traction and uterine manipulation, peritoneal toilette. 5) Nausea and vomiting. 6) Apgar score. 7) Postoperative headache. RESULTS: Women in the SP group had more hypotensive episodes (81% vs 53%: p < 0.05) and more ephedrine consumption with a large individual variability (29.12 mg +/- 20.4 vs 12.83 +/- 13.8: p < 0.01) when compared to PD group, without any difference in the Apgar score. The SP group required less time consumption (10.5 min. +/- 6.7 vs 35.9 min. +/- 17.3: p < 0.01) and had less intraoperative discomfort with less analgesic and/or sedative drugs consumption (9.7% vs 29%: p < 0.05) and less vomiting (3% vs 22.5%: p < 0.05). No postoperative headache was noticed in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: With the described pharmacological and technical approach, spinal anesthesia is more suitable than continuous epidural technique for cesarean section, unless contraindicated.     

The optimal test dose of epinephrine for epidural injection with lidocaine solution in awake patients premedicated with oral clonidine

We attempted to determine the optimal test dose of epinephrine for use with epidural anesthesia in awake patients premedicated with clonidine. Eighty-eight adult patients were randomized into two groups [oral premedication with clonidine 5 microg/kg (CLON) or no premedication (CONT)]. Before induction of general anesthesia, heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) were measured for 3 min after the i.v. injection of 3 mL of 1.5% lidocaine containing epinephrine (0, 1.25, 2.5, 5, 7.5, or 15 microg) in a randomized, double-blind manner. We calculated 95% confidence intervals for the peak HR and BP increases induced by each dose of epinephrine. At 7.5 microg, epinephrine induced a significantly greater increase in HR and BP in CLON than in CONT. The 95% confidence interval for the HR change induced by 7.5 microg of epinephrine in CLON was nearly the same as the accepted standard dose of epinephrine (15 microg) in CONT. We conclude that premedication with clonidine enhances HR and BP responses to the i.v. administration of epinephrine-containing epidural test solutions. Consequently, 7.5 microg of epinephrine may be sufficient to enable detection of accidental injection into a blood vessel in awake patients premedicated with clonidine 5 microg/kg. Implications: Clonidine, a commonly used preanesthetic medication, alters patients' cardiovascular responses to drugs such as epinephrine. Our randomized, double-blind study suggests that, in awake patients receiving oral clonidine premedication, 7.5 microg of epinephrine (half the usual dose) is adequate as an indicator of accidental injection into the epidural vessels during epidural anesthesia.     

Reevaluation of spinal anesthesia in elderly people--an evaluation of circulatory changes

Appropriate methods of anesthesia for the elderly people are being discussed as the ratio of elderly people in our society increases. During spinal anesthesia, hypotension was frequently observed in patients with hypertension, arteriosclerosis, coronary deficiency, and so on. It is also difficult to pass the needle between degenerated vertebrae. However, general inhaled anesthesia accompanies the respiratory complications and consciousness derangement after surgical operations more frequently than after spinal anesthesia. In this study, circulatory conditions during spinal anesthesia in elderly people (30-91 years old) were analyzed in 109 cases of spinal anesthesia. Hypotension occurred about 10 minutes and 40-60 minutes after injection of anesthetics and was frequent in patients of high aged group, but tachycardia was not observed among them. In addition, their blood pressure in the recovery room could not recover to the level before anesthesia. It is thought that hypotension during spinal anesthesia was induced by the vascular dilatation caused by sympathetic nerve block and the deficiency of reflective venous constriction in upper extremities and abdominal organs. Tachycardia may also produce hypotension. However, the reflexive vasoconstriction and tachycardia are thought to be poor on account of arteriosclerosis and down regulation of beta-receptor in elderly people. Therefore, during spinal anesthesia in the elderly people, the catecholamine released by the surgical stimulation could not increase blood pressure effectively. To prevent hypotension during spinal anesthesia in elderly people, it is advisable to employ the treatment for upregulation of beta-receptor before anesthesia and the administration of alpha . beta-receptor, epinephrine and dopamine for control of blood pressure during spinal anesthesia.     

Spinal anesthesia using hyperbaric 0.75% versus hyperbaric 1% bupivacaine for cesarean section

Although 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine is commonly administered to provide spinal anesthesia for cesarean section in the United States, in some countries, only the 1% hyperbaric solution of spinal bupivacaine is available. The aim of this study was to compare 0.75% with 1% hyperbaric spinal bupivacaine for cesarean section. In this prospective study, 50 patients undergoing elective cesarean section were randomized to receive a spinal anesthetic with either 1.5 mL of 0.75% bupivacaine (n = 25) or 1.125 mL of 1% bupivacaine (n = 25). There were no statistically significant differences in patient demographics, time to onset of block, or intraoperative pain. All patients had a successful block for surgery. The time from injection of the spinal anesthetic to first request for pain medication in the postanesthesia care unit was longer in the women who received 0.75% bupivacaine (4.3 vs 3 h; P < 0.05). Six women (24%) who received 1% bupivacaine versus one woman (4%) who received 0.75% bupivacaine complained of postoperative backache (P < 0.05). In addition, postdural puncture headache occurred in four women, all of whom received 1% bupivacaine (P = 0.04). In conclusion, our data suggest that 0.75% bupivacaine results in fewer postoperative problems and offers several significant benefits compared with the 1% concentration. IMPLICATIONS: Although 0.75% bupivacaine is usually used to provide spinal anesthesia for cesarean section in the United States, a more concentrated solution is popular in Europe. In this study, we compared 0.75% bupivacaine with 1% bupivacaine when administered for cesarean section and found that the 0.75% solution offers several significant benefits.     

Intrathecal fentanyl with small-dose dilute bupivacaine: better anesthesia without prolonging recovery

Recent concern regarding lidocaine neurotoxicity has prompted efforts to find alternatives to lidocaine spinal anesthesia. Small-dose dilute bupivacaine spinal anesthesia yields a comparably rapid recovery profile but may provide insufficient anesthesia. By exploiting the synergism between intrathecal opioids and local anesthetics, it may be possible to augment the spinal anesthesia without prolonging recovery. Fifty patients undergoing ambulatory surgical arthroscopy were randomized into two groups receiving spinal anesthesia with 3 ml 0.17% bupivacaine in 2.66% dextrose without (Group I) or with (Group II) the addition of 10 microg fentanyl. Median block levels reached T7 and T8, respectively (P = not significant [NS]). Mean times to two-segment regression, S2 regression, time out of bed, time to urination, and time to discharge were 53 vs 67 min (P < 0.01), 120 vs 146 min (P < 0.05), 146 vs 163 min (P = NS), 169 vs 177 min (P = NS), and 187 vs 195 min (P = NS) respectively. Motor blockade was similar between groups, but sensory blockade was significantly more intense in Group II (P < 0.01). Six of 25 blocks failed in Group I, whereas none failed in Group II. The addition of 10 microg fentanyl to spinal anesthesia with dilute small-dose bupivacaine intensifies and increases the duration of sensory blockade without increasing the intensity of motor blockade or prolonging recovery to micturition or street fitness. IMPLICATIONS: Concerns about the neurotoxicity of lidocaine have prompted efforts to find alternatives to lidocaine spinal anesthesia. We studied 50 patients undergoing ambulatory surgical arthroscopy and found that although small-dose bupivacaine alone is inadequate for this procedure, the addition of fentanyl makes it reliable.     

Aryl and cycloalkyl analogues of AMPA: synthetic, pharmacological and stereochemical aspects

BACKGROUND: Highly potent toxins such as tetrodotoxin that block sodium channels with great specificity have been studied for many years and can provide prolonged blockade when coadministered with vasoconstrictors or conventional local anesthetics. Their utility has been constrained, however, by systemic toxicity. The authors examined the efficacy of tetrodotoxin with and without epinephrine or bupivacaine for producing prolonged-duration sciatic nerve blockade in the rat, and they assessed the degree of concomitant toxicity. METHODS: Rats received percutaneous sciatic nerve blockade using tetrodotoxin with and without epinephrine or bupivacaine. A subset received subcutaneous injections at the nuchal midline. Nociceptive, proprioceptive, and motor blockade were quantified using contralateral leg responses as controls for systemic effects. RESULTS: Tetrodotoxin without epinephrine produced sciatic nerve blockade, but with considerable toxicity at most effective doses. Epinephrine reduced the median effective concentration of tetrodotoxin for nociception from 37.6 to 11.5 microM and prolonged its duration, such that reversible blocks lasting > 13 h were achieved. Epinephrine reduced measures of systemic distribution and increased the median lethal dose of tetrodotoxin from 40 to 53.6 nmole/kg, thus more than quadrupling the therapeutic index. Bupivacaine increased the local anesthetic potency of tetrodotoxin, reduced its systemic toxicity, and, when coinjected subcutaneously, increased the median lethal dose from 43.7 to 47.7 nmole/kg. The addition of epinephrine did not further improve the effectiveness of the bupivacaine-tetrodotoxin combination. CONCLUSION: Combinations of epinephrine or bupivacaine with tetrodotoxin or with other high-potency toxins active on sodium channels should be examined for the potential to provide clinically useful, prolonged nerve blockade.     

Pharmacology of local anesthetics and clinical aspects of segmental blocking. II. Spinal anesthesia

Clinical picture of development of segmental blocking after subarachnoidal injection of hyperbaric solutions of 0.75% bupivacaine, 5% ultracaine, and isobaric 0.5% bupivacaine is studied. A total of 152 patients operated on the lower part of the body and the lower limbs were examined under conditions of single, prolonged subarachnoidal, and combined spinal epidural anesthesia. Ultracaine and bupivacaine in different concentrations with different barism provided anesthesia equivalent by the efficacy, depth, and dissemination of sensory block. Segmental blocking with 5% ultracaine was characterized by the shortest latent period (3.14 +/- 0.16 min, p < 0.05) but was no shorter (124.1 +/- 3.37 min) than operative analgesia with 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine (120.0 +/- 5.10 min). Isobaric bupivacaine provided the longest effective analgesia (215.0 +/- 45.0 min, p < 0.05). Microcatheter technique improved the safety and control of subarachnoidal anesthesia in comparison with a single injection, and combined spinal epidural anesthesia shortened the latent period of segmental blocking and ensured intraoperative anesthesia and postoperative analgesia at the expense of the epidural component.     

Physiologic and anesthetic alterations on spinal-sciatic evoked responses in swine

Spinal-sciatic evoked responses (ScER) have been used successfully to monitor the integrity of the anterior spinal cord during spinal surgery. To evaluate the effects of hypercarbia, hypocarbia, induced hypotension, and hypothermia on the ScER, ten swine anesthetized with ketamine were subjected to varying levels of PaCO2, hypothermia, and induced hypotension. During variation of one physiologic variable, the other variables were closely regulated. There were no significant changes associated with variations in PaCO2. Decreasing temperature provided a consistent increase in latency (r = -0.78, P < 0.001) with no significant alteration in amplitude. Graded hypotension caused little increase in latency (3.2% at 30 mm Hg). The amplitude decrease averaged 23% at 60 mm Hg with a maximal decrease of 50% at 30 mm Hg. To study inhaled anesthetics, 21 swine anesthetized with ketamine were subjected to nitrous oxide (50% and 70%). After termination of the nitrous oxide, one of the potent inhaled anesthetics (n = 7 each) was administered in 0.25 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) increments. Nitrous oxide caused a significant decrease in amplitude (average 43% and 61% at 50% and 70%) with minimal changes in latency. There was a dose-dependent decrease in amplitude and increase in latency with all inhaled anesthetics. The ScER disappeared at 1.0 MAC with all anesthetics. There were no differences between effects of equipotent concentrations of inhaled anesthetics. These findings may be helpful in the interpretation of the ScER response during anesthesia and surgery.     

The central nervous system and the lymphatic system. Lymphatic drainage of the cerebrospinal fluid

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that transient neurologic symptoms commonly follow lidocaine spinal anesthesia. However, information concerning factors that affect their occurrence is limited. Accordingly, to evaluate many potential risk factors, the authors undertook a prospective, multicenter, epidemiologic study. METHODS: On a voluntary basis, anesthetists at 15 participating centers forwarded a data sheet on patients who had spinal anesthesia to a research nurse blinded to the details of anesthesia and surgery. A subset was randomly selected for follow-up. The pressure [corrected] of transient neurologic symptoms, defined as leg or buttock pain, was the principal outcome variable. Logistic regression was used to control for potential confounders, and adjusted odds ratios and confidence intervals were used to estimate relative risk. RESULTS: During a 14-month period, 1,863 patients were studied, of whom 47% received lidocaine, 40% bupivacaine, and 13% tetracaine. Patients given lidocaine were at higher risk for symptoms compared with those receiving bupivacaine (relative risk, 5.1; 95% CI, 2.5 to 10.2) or tetracaine (relative risk, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.04 to 9.84). For patients who received lidocaine, the relative risk of transient neurologic symptoms was 2.6 (95% CI, 1.5 to 4.5) with the lithotomy position compared with other positions, 3.6 (95% CI, 1.9 to 6.8), for outpatients compared with inpatients, and 1.6 (95% CI, 1 to 2.5) for obese (body mass index >30) compared with nonobese patients. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that transient neurologic symptoms commonly follow lidocaine spinal anesthesia but are relatively uncommon with bupivacaine or tetracaine. The data identify lithotomy position and outpatient status as important risk factors in patients who receive lidocaine. Among other factors postulated to increase risk, obesity had an effect of borderline statistical significance, whereas age, sex, history of back pain, needle type, and lidocaine dose and concentration failed to affect risk.     

Epidural anesthesia for labor in an ambulatory patient

The effectiveness of two epidural analgesic regimens on the ability to ambulate was compared in women in labor by a prospective, randomized, double-blind design. One group of patients received epidural fentanyl, a 75-micrograms bolus and an infusion of fentanyl 2.5 micrograms/mL at 15 mL/h (FENT, n = 53). A second group received ultra low-dose bupivacaine (0.04%), epinephrine (1.7 micrograms/mL), and fentanyl (1.7 micrograms/mL) (BEF, n = 77), a 15-mL bolus followed by an infusion at 15 mL/h. Adequate analgesia was rapidly obtained in 90.6% of patients in the FENT group and 92.2% of patients in the BEF group (P = 0.89). Seventy percent of patients in the FENT group ambulated versus 68% in the other group. The BEF mixture provided analgesia of longer duration (287 +/- 171 min versus 156 +/- 72 min, P = 0.0001). The number of patients delivering during administration of only their study drug (without needing higher doses of local anesthetics) was 52% for BEF and 21% for FENT (P = 0.0005). Hip flexion weakness precluding ambulation occurred in 17% (P = 0.002) of BEF patients and orthostatic hypotension in 9% (P = 0.08). Neither problem occurred in FENT patients. Neonatal outcome was similar in both groups. Approximately 70% of women receiving epidural analgesia with fentanyl or ultra low-dose bupivacaine, epinephrine, and fentanyl may ambulate safely during labor.     

General anesthesia for rhytidectomy: a review of 100 consecutive cases

Although local anesthesia will, and should, continue to be the principal method of anesthesia for most face lift operations, we believe that general endotracheal anesthesia, supplemented by local anesthesia with epinephrine, offers significant advantages in a selected group of patients. We review 100 consecutive rhytidectomies done under this combination of anesthetics. These patients had no significant intraoperative or postoperative problems, and the results compare favorably with the usual technique of local anesthesia plus basal sedation. Good cooperation between surgeon and anesthesiologist, and a thorough understanding of the principles involved in such anesthesia administrations (particularly when relatively large volumes of local anesthesia with epinephrine are going to be used) are necessary for the patient's safe course during the procedure.     

Clonidine added to bupivacaine-epinephrine-sufentanil improves epidural analgesia during childbirth

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A double-blind study was conducted to assess the efficacy and the side effects of a low dose of clonidine added to an epidural injection of bupivacaine and epinephrine, with or without sufentanil. METHODS: One hundred healthy parturients (ASA 1) were randomly allocated into four groups according to the type of epidural analgesia administered. The bupivacaine/epinephrine (BE) group received a 10-mL standard injection of bupivacaine (B) 1.25 mg/mL and epinephrine (E) 1.25 microg/mL. In the bupivacaine/epinephrine/sufentanil (BES) group, 7.5 microg sufentanil (S) was added to the BE mixture. For the bupivacaine/ epinephrine/clonidine (BEC) group, 50 microg clonidine (C) was added to the BE mixture, whereas for the bupivacaine/epinephrine/sufentanil/clonidine (BESC) group, both sufentanil and clonidine were added to BE. Fetal heart rate was monitored by continuous cardiotocography. Duration of analgesia, method of delivery, and neonatal outcome (measured using APGAR score, peripheral oxygen saturation, and neurologic adaptive capacity score) and side effects of clonidine were observed. The parturients were routinely asked for their global appreciation of the epidural analgesia technique by visual analog score, 2 hours postpartum. RESULTS: The overall quality and duration of analgesia were superior in the BESC group compared with the other groups, as was the global appreciation by the parturient. The frequency of side effects in the clonidine groups was comparable, with the exception of hypotension and sedation. Hypotension was easily treated by fluids or ephedrine and caused no fetal distress. The level of sedation was mild, and all parturients aroused immediately after verbal commands. CONCLUSION: The addition of a low dose of clonidine to an epidural injection of bupivacaine with epinephrine and sufentanil provides better analgesia during labor, while keeping the side effects minimal and of minor clinical importance.     

Concept of stress ulcer prevention. Is re-thinking necessary?

BACKGROUND: Continuous spinal anesthesia (CSA) has been considered to be better in temporal and dose flexibility, as well as hemodynamic stability than single dose spinal anesthesia. However, the failure of spinal anesthesia is not a rare experience for anesthesiologists. Here we present our experience in solving the problem and discuss the possible causes for the failure. METHODS: 236 cases were studied retrospectively from January to December in 1996. All were over 65 years old, ASA III, scheduled for transurethral procedures or orthopedic operation. CSA was performed with 0.2% bupivacaine. Failed CSA was confirmed by positive pin-prick test at T10 dermatome(umbilicus) 30 minutes after 20 mg bupivacaine was injected. For failed cases, 5 mL 1% lidocaine was injected intrathecally for rescue. The failure rate, sensory and motor blockade, success rate by changing to lidocaine and its dosage were recorded. RESULTS: Eleven of 236 cases (4.7%) were considered spinal failure since the initial 20 mg bupivacaine could not provide adequate T10 anesthesia in 30 minutes. Addition of 5 mL 1% lidocaine produced a profound sensory and motor blockade in 9 cases, while further lidocaine injection was required in two cases. The success rate by rescuing lidocaine was 100% with an average lidocaine consumption by 52.5 +/- 4.5 mg. DISCUSSION: Factors contributed to failure spinal anesthesia including failure of technique, errors of judgment, maldistribution and failure of local anesthetic itself. However, we thought that change of pH value of local anesthetic in CSF may play a great part in these failed CSAs. Despite the reasons for failure, we demonstrate that failure of continuous spinal anesthesia by 0.2% bupivacaine can be readily resolved by 1% lidocaine.     

Deliberate hypotensive epidural anesthesia for patients with normal and low cardiac output

The use of hypotensive anesthesia is contraindicated in patients with ventricular dysfunction, even though afterload reduction often improves ventricular performance. The purpose of this study was to prospectively assess systemic hemodynamic responses to deliberate hypotension with epidural anesthesia in patients with chronic left ventricular dysfunction. Hemodynamic measurements were performed in 29 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty under deliberate hypotensive epidural anesthesia using low-dose intravenous epinephrine infusion to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) at 50-60 mm Hg. Intraoperative MAP decreased from 100 +/- 16 to 56 +/- 9 mm Hg by 30 min after epidural injection (P < 0.0005). Concurrently, cardiac index (CI) increased from a preanesthetic baseline value of 2.9 +/- 0.5 to 3.3 +/- 0.9 L.min-1.m-2 at 30 min (P < 0.005) after epidural injection and stroke volume index (SVI) increased from 41 +/- 8 to 50 +/- 14 mL.beat-1.m-2 30 min after epidural injection (P < 0.005). Heart rate and central venous and pulmonary artery diastolic pressures were maintained under hypotension with epidural anesthesia in all patients. During deliberate hypotension with epidural anesthesia, patients with a history of congestive heart failure or low preanesthetic CI (< or = 2.5 L.kg-1.m-2) increased their CI and SVI into the normal range. There were no significant perioperative complications in either of these groups. Hypotensive epidural anesthesia can be used successfully in patients with low cardiac output from ventricular dysfunction undergoing total hip arthroplasty.