Effect of Fat Source and Color of Lean on Acceptability of Beef/Pork Patties

Twelve beef/pork meat blends were made from lean of mature beef and dark or mature pork carcasses. Meat blends containing about 20% beef fat were rated higher for appearance scores by a consumer panel than blends made with 20% pork fat. Visual acceptance of beef/pork patties was accomplished via use of all-beef fat and additionally by extending mature beef (MB) with mature pork (MP) or dark pork lean (DP). Agtron calorimetry scores indicate a minimum of 20% MB lean extended with 60% MP was needed to create the appropriate red color attractive to consumers. Use of 60% MP lean with about 20% beef fat resulted in patties acceptable to consumers for visual appearance and eating satisfaction.     

ACCEPTABILITY OF BEEF PATTIES EXTENDED WITH PORK AND/OR TEXTURED SOY PROTEIN1

Four beef or beef/pork ground meat blends were extended with textured soy protein (TSP) at 0, 10, 20 and 30% levels. Ground beef/pork/textured soy protein (TSP) patties with 30% TSP were rated lowest by consumers for raw color and appearance and overall cooked appearance. A beef (50%) and pork (30%) blend containing no TSP was rated highest by consumers for tenderness, flavor and overall desirability and higher by a trained sensory panel for flavor and overall desirability than blends containing TSP. Overall desirability ratings for visual and palatability characteristics of beef/pork meat patties were higher than for beef/pork/TSP blends. Results indicated a distinct advantage for palatability of the beef/pork blend as compared to beef/pork/TSP combinations.     

Sensory Properties and Cooking Losses of Beef/Pork Hamburger Patties

Seventeen beef and pork blends were evaluated for palatability characteristics, color, appearance acceptability and cooking losses. Cooking losses were not significantly different among blends. Both raw patty color and appearance acceptability were significantly affected by fat and lean source. Increasing pork content changed raw patty color from dark red to pale grayish-pink and decreased appearance acceptability. Patties having high pork content appeared fatter although fat content of blends was not different. Increasing pork fat content improved patty tenderness. Juiciness, flavor, and overall acceptability were no significantly affected by lean or fat source. Results indicate beef/pork blends with 50% or more beef equal all-beef patties in palatability traits and cooking losses.     

Palatability and Texture of Ground Meat Patties Made with Varying Amounts of Pork and Turkey

Meat mixtures were prepared containing pork lean and turkey lean in ratios of 0/100, 33/67, 100/0 and a constant fat content. Blends were prepared with and without a commercial seasoning-antioxidant mixture (SA) and evaluated after 0, 3, 6 or 9 days (4°C) storage or 0, 14 or 28 days (-20°C) storage. Flavor intensity scores for blends containing up to 67% turkey were not different (P > 0.05); however, 100% turkey patties had lower flavor intensity scores. Off-flavor and firmness scores were not affected by blend for products containing between 33% and 100% pork lean, while storage had no effect on off-flavor in products containing SA. Juiciness was not affected by blend or storage. Results indicate acceptable patties can be made from blends of pork and turkey containing relatively high levels of turkey.     

A RESEARCH NOTE CHARACTERISTICS OF EXPANDED EXTRUDATES CONTAINING NONMEAT INGREDIENTS AND LAMB, PORK, OR BEEF

This study was conducted to evaluate chemical, physical, nutritional, and sensory properties and storage stability of expanded extrudates produced from blends of nonmeat ingredients and lamb, pork or beef. Raw material blends contained 24.2% lean meat, 22% corn starch, 49.75–50.24% defatted soy flour, 0–0.62% separable meat fat, and 3.40–3.58% added water, and processed at 162C. Total fat contents of dried extrudates containing lamb, pork, and beef (their extrudates designated as L, P, and B) were 4.51, 4.29, and 3.83%, respectively. Bulk density and sensory hardness scores were greater for L, the extrudates with more fat. L and P exhibited less lipid oxidation than B. This difference was not associated with product fat content or fatty acid composition; L and P contained more fat than B and the fat in P was more polyunsaturated.     

Contribution of lean,fat, muscle color and degree of doneness to pork and beef species flavor

Flavor is an important contributor to consumer acceptability of meat, our objective was to characterize the impact of species-specific fat/lean sources, fat level, degree of doneness and muscle color are on pork and beef flavor. Three separate experiments were conducted. Patties were formulated differently for each experiment in order to evaluate the desired variables. Experiment. 1: Flavor from combination patties (same species lean/fat or combination of species lean/fat) was not impacted by degree of doneness (66 °C vs. 71 °C). Beef flavor was highest in samples made with beef lean, regardless of species fat type. Pork flavor was highest in samples made with pork lean and had higher flavor intensity scores. Experiment. 2: Beef flavor was not increased in all-beef patties formulated with higher fat levels. Pork patties formulated with higher fat content increased pork flavor. Experiment. 3: All-beef and all-pork patties formulated with light or dark lean did not impact flavor in either species.     

Effect of Mixture and Storage on the Palatability of Beef-Turkey Patties

Beef and turkey mixtures were formulated to contain 100/0, 80/20, 60/40, 40/60, 20/80 or 0/100% lean beef/lean turkey with a constant fat content. Sensory parameters and physical characteristics were measured to evaluate the product during storage. There were no differences (p>0.05) in beef flavor between 80% and 100% beef products or between 0%, 20%, 40% and 60% beef patties. Juiciness scores were increased by adding turkey while texture scores were decreased. Similarly, 80% and 100% beef patties had greater (p<0.05) hardness than other mixtures. Off-flavor scores were not affected by mixture although malonaldehyde content of cooked patties increased markedly as the percentage of turkey increased. In general, ground beef products containing between 20% to 80% turkey had similar sensory, storage and physical characteristics.     

Properties of Frankfurters Made From Electrically Stimulated Beef

Frankfurters (3 replications of 4.54 kg meat batches) were conventionally made. Paired sides from beef were used for control (NES) and electrically stimulated (ES) meats (clods, flanks and plates). All-beef frankfurters (100% ES beef or 100% NES beef) and beef-pork frankfurters (80% ES beef-20% pork or 80% NES beef-20% pork) were made. The pork was not electrically stimulated. Proximate composition within cut of beef (plate, flank, clod) was not affected (P > 0.05) by ES. However, ES clods had (numerically) greater percentages of expressible juice loss, greater percentages of salt-soluble protein and lower percentages of juice loss during cooking than did NES clods (not statistically different). Use of ES beef alone or in combination with 20% pork did not affect external visual color, off-flavor, overall desirability or processing shrinkage of frankfurters. ES may affect certain properties (raw and cooked muscles) as measured in the laboratory, but when these ES muscles are used to make frankfurters, no real advantages or disadvantages were suggested by this study.     

SELECTED SENSORY AND CHEMICAL ATTRIBUTES OF CHICKEN BREAKFAST SAUSAGES FROM DIFFERENT ANIMAL FAT SOURCES

Four breakfast sausage formulations were prepared to contain: (1) chicken lean + chicken fat (CF), (2) chicken lean + beef fat (BF), (3) chicken lean + pork fat (PF), or (4) chicken lean + high-oleic pork fat (PO). Formulations were targeted to contain 15% fat. Acceptability, tenderness, juiciness and flavor scores for each of the formulations as measured by a consumer taste panel (n = 71), were not different (P> 0.05). Sausages prepared with CF had a higher (P < 0.05) cooking loss and lower fat content than those prepared with BF. Thibarbituric acid (TBA) values for PO were significantly lower than those containing BF, PF, or CF. Sausage products containing chicken fat exhibited the highest TBA values during 9 days of storage at 4°C. These results suggested that chicken, beef, pork or high-oleic fats can be used as the fat source in low-fat chicken breakfast sausages without affecting the product acceptability.     

Acceptance and Species Identification of Turkey Steaks Prepared with Beef, Pork, Lamb, and Turkey Fat

Fabricated extruded steaks were prepared from turkey meat, salt, phosphate, and water plus 15% beef, pork, lamb, or turkey fat. The grilled samples recieved relatively high hedonic scores from a sensory panel. The flavor, juiciness, and overall quality of the samples made with pork, beef, and turkey fat were preferred significantly over the samples made with lamb fat. Panel members tended to consider all samples as being pork flavored. Beef, pork, or turkey fat could be used as the fat in a fabricated, extruded steak without affecting the relative acceptability of the cooked product.     

LOW-FAT, NO ADDED SALT IN RESTRUCTURED BEEF STEAKS WITH VARIOUS BINDERS

This research investigated technology for the development of a low-fat restructured beef steak devoid of added salt with texture similar to intact muscle. Low-fat (10%), low-sodium restructured beef steaks made from closely trimmed, flaked beef round muscles and tumbled with or without a binding agent were compared to boneless top loin steaks (5–6% fat). Boneless top loin steaks had greater (P < .05) shear resistance, cohesiveness, juiciness, overall desirability, percentage moisture (raw) and percentage protein (cooked) than restructured steaks. Steaks made with 3.0% modified potato starch had slightly more juiciness and moisture content (cooked) and lower expressible fluid content than all other restructured samples. Product made with 1.0% microcrystalline cellulose had lower (P < .05) juiciness scores than top loin steaks and restructured steaks made with no additives or modified potato starch. Use of 0.25% kappa-carrageenan or 1.5% surimi increased (P < .05) sensory scores for off-flavor. Steaks made with 1.5% surimi also had lower (P < .05) sensory scores for overall desirability.     

Tenderness and Retail Display Characteristics of Beef Tenderloin Steaks Comparing Kidney Fat Removal Times Under Different Processing and Storage Systems

The effects of electrical stimulation, kidney fat removal time, tenderloin removal time, and storage and packaging treatment on tenderness and retail display characteristics of beef tenderloin steaks were studied. Electrical stimulation increased overall desirability scores on days 2 through 4 of retail display. Steaks from sides that had kidney and pelvic fat removed prior to chilling had higher Warner-Bratzler shear force values, darker muscle color and higher retail evaluations for overall desirability on days 2 through 4 of display than did steaks from conventionally dressed sides. Tenderloin steaks that were vacuum packaged and stored 14 days had higher bacterial counts, more uniform lean color and less visual purge in the retail package than did steaks retail displayed immediately after tenderloin removal.     

A Comparison of Growth of Individual Meat Bacteria on the Lean and Fatty Tissue of Beef, Pork and Lamb

Growth of Hafnia alvei, Serratia liquefaciens, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus curvatus and Leuconostoc mesenteroides on inoculated lean and fat tissue of beef, pork and lamb was investigated. Increases in H. alvei, S. liquefaciens and L. plantarum counts on refrigerated beef and pork fat usually were greater (P<0.05) than on comparable lean samples. On dark-firm-dry (DFD) beef, these differences in counts between lean and fat samples were smaller or disappeared. Increases in L. mesenteroides and L. curvatus counts on fat were either smaller than or did not differ from those on lean samples. Sour, buttermilk-like off-odors were the most common defect on stored samples.     

PROCESSING, CHEMICAL, SENSORY AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF BACON-CHOPPED AND FORMED, MADE FROM PORK, BEEF, MUTTON AND CHEVON

By extruding alternating layers of chopped lean and fat tissue, bacon-chopped and formed (CF) products were processed from pork, beef, mutton and chevon lean and beef fat. Slabs processed from beef materials had less weight loss and changes in width and thickness during smoking than the other formulations. Various sensory and consumer panels found pork-bacon-CF product to rate highest among the four formulations for tenderness, flavor and overall satisfaction. This formulation was rated as being closest in sensory traits to commercial bacon. Chevon and mutton bacon-CF products were found to be less desirable in flavor. Inclusion of pork lean and fat with chevon and mutton lean can potentially improve the acceptability of bacon-CF processed with lean from these two species. However, this process and product appears promising as methods of increasing consumption of underutilized meat animal species.     

ACCEPTABILITY OF VARIOUS GROUND BEEF AND PORK PRODUCTS EXTENDED WITH MECHANICALLY SEPARATED BEEF

Six blends of ground beef and six blends of ground pork containing 0, 15, 30, 45, 60 or 75% mechanically separated beef (MSB) were prepared. Also five batches of fermented sausage and spiced luncheon loaf containing 0, 5, 10, 15 and 20% MSB were formulated. Level of MSB was not related to juiciness rating or mealiness scores of cooked beef/MSB or pork/MSB patties. The level of MSB significantly affected overall eating satisfaction ratings for each blend of MSB patties. MSB at levels of 15% or more had a negative effect on flavor acceptability of cooked ground beef or pork. Fermented sausage products could be extended with only 5% MSB without creating defects in visual appearance or sensory properties. However, the inclusion of 20% MSB yielded a spiced luncheon loaf which was higher in eating quality than an all-beef control. The beef/MSB patties, fermented sausage, and spiced luncheon loaves containing 15% MSB were acceptable for visual appearance. Based on this study, MSB produced from a press type machine, can be blended up to 15% with ground beef, ground pork and sausage products without significantly decreasing raw appearance, sensory properties or storage life. Since MSB is a red meat product available at a similar low cost as textured vegetable protein, the red meat industry would benefit from expanded use of this high protein extender.     

Acceptability and Sensory Analysis of Pork Summer Sausage from Pigs Administered Porcine Somatotropin

Summer sausages were formulated to contain 20% fat from the following raw meat sources: (1) pork and beef blend, (2) 100% pork from control pigs, and (3) 100% pork from pigs administered 4 mg/ day porcine somatotropin (pSt). Sausages were evaluated by a trained sensory panel and by 1192 consumers. Summer sausage from the pSt-treated pigs and the pork/beef blend was firmer and more chewy than that made from 100% control pork. The beef/pork blend sausage was darker, more red and less yellow when compared with sausage made with 100% pork. Sausage from pSt-treated pigs received greater acceptability scores and was preferred by 62% of consumers when compared with sausage from control pigs.     

INSTITUTIONAL COOKERY OF RESTRUCTURED BEEF STEAKS

Restructured beef steaks were cooked under four institutional cooking methodologies: oven roasting, grill frying, deep fat frying and broiling. The samples were evaluated for fat and moisture contents, cooking loss and texture. Sensory panels evaluated the steaks for texture desirability, flavor desirability, appearance and overall palat-ability. Evaluations were repeated using breaded, restructured beef steaks cooked by the four institutional methods, with grilled unbreaded steaks included for comparison. Deep fat fried, breaded and unbreaded steaks were significantly lower in moisture and higher in fat than those cooked by any other methodology. No significant differences in juiciness, flavor desirability or overall palatability were found between the unbreaded broiled, oven roasted or grilled samples. Broiled and grilled steaks were preferred for texture in the unbreaded and breaded samples. The unbreaded, deep fat fried samples received the lowest scores for all sensory attributes. Breading significantly improved the juiciness, texture and overall palatability of the deep fat fried steaks. For both breaded and unbreaded samples, grill frying was the preferred method of preparation.     

Effect of Chloride Salts and Antioxidants on Sensory and Storage Traits of Restructured Beef Steaks

The effects of antioxidants (0.01 or 0.02% of total fat), salt level (0.375 or 0.750%) and salt type (NaCl, KCl or a 65% NaCl + 35% KCl combination) in a 2 × 2 × 3 factorial arrangement on the quality of restructured beef steaks were determined. Meat blends with 0.02% antioxidant had lower thiobarbituric acid (TBA) values than those with 0.01% after 85 to 155 days of frozen storage. Steaks with no salt (pooled across antioxidant levels) had lower TBA values than steaks with any salt type after 85 days storage or either level of salt after 155 days storage. Steaks with either level of added salt resulted in higher ratings for juiciness, saltiness and overall palatability than steaks with no added salt. Juiciness, flavor desirability, saltiness and overall palatability ratings generally were higher for restructured steaks made with NaCl or NaCl + KCl compared to those made with KCl. KCl at 35% of total salt could serve as a NaCl substitute in restructured beef steaks.     

Organoleptic Identification of Roasted Beef, Veal, Lamb and Pork as Affected by Fat

SUMMARY— A taste panel was used to study the identification of roasted beef, pork, lamb and veal by flavor alone and the effect of fat on identification. Only about one-third of the panel could identify correctly all four meats by memory of the flavors. There was an increase in the total number of correct identifications made by comparison of the unknown roasted meat samples with known standards but this was not significantly greater than the total correct responses by memory of the flavor alone. Beef and lamb, but not pork and veal, were identified significantly less often when lean ground roasts were tested than when normal ground roasts (containing fat) were used. Texture, color, mouth feel, and other factors may be important in the identification of meat. Beef, lamb and pork fat, as well as these fats after extraction with chloroform: methanol, were added to lean veal prior to roasting. Addition of beef fat did not increase recognition of veal as beef. Pork fat contained a factor increasing identification of veal as pork, but this factor was water-soluble and could be removed. Lamb fat contained a component, or a fat-soluble component, that significantly increased the identification of veal as lamb.     

Effect of extra virgin olive oil substitution for fat on quality of pork patty

BACKGROUND: Extra virgin olive oil (EVOO) is well known for its beneficial effects on human health. Thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of EVOO substitution for backfat on qualities of pork patty to avoid high consumption of animal‐originated fat, because it is closely related to development of cardiovascular disease and obesity. RESULT: Water‐holding capacity was higher in control (lean pork + 10% backfat) and T3 (lean pork + 5% backfat + 5% EVOO + 0.5% isolated soy protein + 0.5% carrageenan + 0.5% maltodextrin) than T1 (lean pork + 5% backfat + 5% EVOO + 0.5% isolated soy protein) and T2 (lean pork + 5% backfat + 5% EVOO + 0.5% isolated soy protein + 0.5% carrageenan). Hardness was higher in EVOO substitution for backfat patty samples than control. In sensory evaluation, the control was significantly higher in overall acceptability compared with EVOO substitution for backfat pork patty samples. CONCLUSION: The physical properties of pork patty made by EVOO substitution for backfat were stable as a commercial pork patty (control). However, sensory evaluation scores were higher in control compared to EVOO‐substituted pork patty samples. Copyright © 2008 Society of Chemical Industry