Effect of whole-body hyperthermia on the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of lonidamine in dogs

The pharmacokinetics and toxicity of intravenous lonidamine were investigated in dogs receiving four cycles of lonidamine (400 or 800 mg/m2) +/- whole-body hyperthermia (WBH). Clearance and volume of distribution in dogs receiving lonidamine during WBH increased 1.6-2.3 and 1.9-3.5-fold respectively, relative to dogs receiving lonidamine under euthermic conditions (p < 0.02). In dogs receiving lonidamine under euthermic conditions or 400 mg/m2 + WBH, the area under the lonidamine concentration versus time curve (AUC) measured during the fourth treatment was 21-58% lower than the first treatment AUC. However, in dogs receiving 800 mg/m2 + WBH, the fourth treatment AUC was four-fold higher than the first treatment AUC (p < 0.02). This suggests repeated exposure to 800 mg/m2 lonidamine and WBH impairs lonidamine metabolism. Weakness, hypoglycaemia, and elevations in amylase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin were more severe or occurred exclusively in dogs receiving 800 mg/m2 + WBH. Since these changes were attributable to marked AUC increases, which occurred secondary to repeated exposure to 800 mg/m2 lonidamine during WBH, 400 mg/m2 was identified as the maximum tolerable dose to be administered intravenously to dogs during WBH.     

Circulating alpha-actin protein in acute myocardial infarction

7.5% Hypertonic saline-6% Dextran-70 (HSD) is currently being evaluated in our laboratory as a resuscitation solution for the treatment of hypovolemia at a dose of 4 ml kg-1 body weight. A few reports of dextran toxicity, particularly of the kidney, have been cited in the literature, so the present study evaluated the acute and subacute toxicity of HSD administered i.v. to beagle dogs. In the acute toxicity studies animals were infused with a single dose of HSD, or its components of hypertonic saline (HS) or Dextran-70 (D-70), at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD: 20 ml kg-1). Controls received Ringers lactate (RL). In the HSD-infused dogs, transient but significant increases in serum alanine (ala) aminotransferase (AT), aspartate (asp) AT and alkaline phosphatase (AP) were observed for the first 72 h. In most cases this increase was also observed in the HS group. In the subacute studies, dogs were infused daily with the MTD of the above test solutions. Serum ala AT activity was 2-3-fold higher in the HSD than the RL group for the first 3 days. Again, a similar effect was observed in the HS group. Slight, transient increases in asp AT and AP activity were also observed in the HSD group. Higher lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity was only observed at Day 14 in dogs infused with the MTD of HSD or HS. In both studies, no adverse effects on blood urea nitrogen (BUN) or serum creatinine were observed and other transient changes in serum parameters were attributable to hemodilution induced by HSD.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Phase I/II trial of dexverapamil, epirubicin, and granulocyte-macrophage-colony stimulating factor in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of a cytotoxic regimen consisting of the second-generation chemosensitizer dexverapamil (DVPM), high dose epirubicin, and recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in pancreatic carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were studied. Treatment consisted of oral DVPM at a dose of 1000-1200 mg/day for 3 days, epirubicin administered as an intravenous bolus injection on Day 2 with an initial dose of 90 mg/m2, and a dose of GM-CSF of 400 micrograms administered subcutaneously from Day 5s through 14. Epirubicin dose escalation levels were 90, 105, 120 and 135 mg/m2. Consecutive cohorts of four to eight patients were planned at each dose level. Treatment cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Hematologic toxicity, specifically granulocytopenia, constituted the dose-limiting toxicity with an MTD of 120 mg/m2 for epirubicin. Despite routine supportive therapy with GM-CSF, four, two, and five patients experienced Grade 4 granulocytopenia during their first two treatment courses at levels 105, 120, and 135 mg/m2, respectively. Grade 4 granulocytopenia was observed in two, three, and one additional patients during subsequent courses with these levels. Nonhematologic toxicity was uncommon, generally modest, and did not correlate clearly with the anthracycline dose. Dexverapamil-related cardiovascular symptoms occurred frequently, but they never resulted in serious toxicity requiring active medical intervention or permanent discontinuation of therapy. Nine of 28 patients achieved partial responses to this therapy. Stable disease was observed in nine patients, and tumor progress occurred in 10. CONCLUSION: The MTD of epirubicin for this regimen with DVPM and GM-CSF was 120 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Though it remains uncertain whether the encouraging response activity observed in this disease-oriented Phase I study was, in fact, due to successful modulation of multidrug resistance, these results suggest that this regimen is likely to be an effective and tolerable treatment strategy for patients with pancreatic cancer, which should be evaluated further.     

Purification and characterization of human sarcomeric mitochondrial creatine kinase

PURPOSE: A dose-escalation study of irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) combined with fixed-dose cisplatin was conducted to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities, and objective response rate in patients with advanced gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients with or without prior chemotherapy were enrolled. All patients were assessable for toxicities and response. On day 1, CPT-11 was administered as a 90-minute intravenous (I.V.) infusion, which was followed 2 hours later by a 120-minute I.V. infusion of cisplatin 80 mg/m2. CPT-11 alone at the same dose was administered again on day 15. The treatment was repeated every 4 weeks until disease progression was observed. The initial dose of CPT-11 was 60 mg/m2, and was escalated in increments of 10 mg/m2 until severe or life-threatening toxicity was observed. RESULTS: The MTD of this combination was CPT-11 80 mg/m2. At this dose level, 16.7% of patients (two of 12) had leukopenia of less than 1,000/microL, 66.7% (eight of 12) had neutropenia of less than 500/microL, and 16.7% (two of 12) had severe diarrhea of grade 4 during the first course. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia. Ten patients achieved a partial response (PR), and the overall response rate was 41.7% among 24 patients (95% confidence interval, 21.9% to 61.4%). CONCLUSION: The recommended dose and schedule is CPT-11 70 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 every 4 weeks. This combination of CPT-11 and cisplatin, considered to be active against advanced gastric cancer with acceptable toxicity, should be further assessed in a phase II study.     

Increased state of activation of CD4 positive T cells and elevated interferon gamma production in pouchitis

We have compared the therapeutic efficacy as well as the kinetics of treatment-induced apoptosis and necrosis of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of doxorubicin (DOX) or cisplatin (CDDP) combined with long-duration, low-temperature whole-body hyperthermia (LL-WBH, at 40.0 degrees C for 6 hr), with the combination of the MTDs of either DOX or CDDP with short-duration, high-temperature WBH (SH-WBH, at 41.5 degrees C for 2 hr), in a rat mammary adenocarcinoma (MTLn3). The MTD of LL-WBH + DOX resulted in increased therapeutic efficacy, compared with the MTD of DOX alone and SH-WBH + DOX. The MTD of LL-WBH + CDDP, however, did not increase therapeutic efficacy, when compared with the MTD of CDDP alone or SH-WBH + CDDP. The MTD of LL-WBH + DOX caused a significant delay in the development of spontaneous axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis and tended to cause longer mean survival, compared with SH-WBH + DOX. The peak of treatment-induced apoptosis was higher for the MTD of DOX + LL-WBH, compared with SH-WBH + DOX, whereas the apoptosis peak of the MTD of SH-WBH + CDDP was higher than that of LL-WBH + CDDP. The most extensive levels of tumor necrosis appeared to occur earlier with SH-WBH alone and the MTD of SH-WBH + DOX or CDDP than with other groups. Our results suggest that LL-WBH + DOX may be a promising therapy for breast cancer, and the extent of treatment-induced tumor apoptosis appears to correlate with antitumor response for MTDs of LL-WBH + DOX and SH-WBH + DOX, but not for the MTDs of CDDP with SH-WBH or LL-WBH.     

Intrathecal 131I-labeled antitenascin monoclonal antibody 81C6 treatment of patients with leptomeningeal neoplasms or primary brain tumor resection cavities with subarachnoid communication: phase I trial results

We aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 131I-labeled 81C6 in patients with leptomeningeal neoplasms or brain tumor resection cavities with subarachnoid communication and to identify any objective responses. 81C6 is a murine IgG monoclonal antibody that reacts with tenascin in gliomas/carcinomas but does not react with normal adult brain. 131I-labeled 81C6 delivers intrathecal (IT) radiation to these neoplasms. This study was a Phase I trial in which patients were treated with a single IT dose of 131I-labeled 81C6. Cohorts of three to six patients were treated with escalating doses of 131I (starting dose, 40 mCi; 20 mCi escalations) on 10 mg 81C6. MTD is defined as the highest dose resulting in serious toxicity in no more than two of six patients. Serious toxicity is defined as grade III/IV nonhematological toxicity or major hematological toxicity. We treated 31 patients (8 pediatric and 23 adult). Eighteen had glioblastoma multiforme. Patients were treated with 131I doses from 40 to 100 mCi. Hematological toxicity was dose limiting and correlated with the administered 131I dose. No grade III/IV nonhematological toxicities were encountered. A partial response occurred in 1 patient and disease stabilization occurred in 13 (42%) of 31 patients. Twelve patients are alive (median follow-up, > 320 days); five are progression free >409 days median posttreatment. The MTD of a single IT administration of 131I-labeled 81C6 in adults is 80 mCi 131I-labeled 81C6. The MTD in pediatric patients was not reached at 131I doses up to 40 mCi normalized for body surface area.     

Advances in antiviral therapy

The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of etoposide and carboplatin without growth factor support was previously defined by Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) as 200 and 125 mg/m2/day x 3, respectively, given every 28 days to previously untreated patients who have extensive, small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Myelosuppression was dose-limiting. The purpose of this phase I trial was to determine if granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) support allows the dosage of the combination of etoposide and carboplatin to be increased above the previously determined MTD. In this CALGB study of 44 evaluable patients with performance status 0-2, cohorts were treated with etoposide and carboplatin given intravenously on days 1-3 followed by GM-CSF (molgramostim) given subcutaneously on days 4-18. Four dose levels of bacteria-derived recombinant GM-CSF (5, 10, 20 microg/kg/day and 5 microg/kg every 12 h), three dose levels of etoposide (200, 250, and 300 mg/m2/day x 3), and two dose levels of carboplatin (125 and 150 mg/m2/day x 3) were evaluated. There was no chemotherapy dose escalation in individual patients. With 5 microg/kg/d GM-CSF, the first etoposide and carboplatin cycle of 300 and 150 mg/m2/day x 3, respectively, could be administered with acceptable toxicity. However, GM-CSF did not allow repeated administration of this dose-escalated regimen every 21 days, since delayed platelet and/or neutrophil recovery was dose limiting in later cycles. These results demonstrate that GM-CSF alone has limited capability to support the repeated administration of high doses of etoposide and carboplatin. CALGB currently is testing the ability of interleukin (IL)-6 given with GM-CSF to ameliorate the cumulative myelosuppression of this intense regimen.     

Comparative bioavailability of two oral formulations of ipriflavone in healthy volunteers at steady-state. Evaluation of two different dosage schemes

Because of the relative lack of overlapping toxicity, carboplatin (PPL) and cisplatin (CDDP) can be easily combined for treatment of ovarian cancer to increase total platinum dose intensity. Ifosfamide (IFO), one of the most effective single agents in ovarian cancer, has a low hematological toxicity when administered in continuous infusion. From January 1991 to December 1993, 34 patients with advanced ovarian cancer, previously untreated with chemo- or radiotherapy, were enrolled in a phase I-II study with the aim of determining the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of CDDP (on day 8 of a 28-day cycle) in combination with PPL (300 mg/m2 on day 1) and IFO (4,000 mg/m2/24 h by continuous infusion on day 1). The initial dose level of CDDP was 40 mg/m2, which was continuously increased by 10 mg/m2 up to the MTD defined as one dose level below that inducing dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in at least two-thirds of treated patients; no dose escalation was allowed in the same patient. Grade 3-4 leukopenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 54 and 49% of patients, respectively. The DLT was reached at 70 mg/m2 and therefore the dose recommended for the phase II study was 60 mg/m2. Complete (CR) plus partial response was observed in 88% of patients with a 21% pathological CR. With a minimum follow-up of 32 months (median 40 months), median progression-free survival and overall survival were 21 and 39 months, respectively. In conclusion, the combination of CDDP, PPL, and IFO provides an effective regimen for ovarian cancer with an acceptable toxicity profile.     

Phase I trial of low-dose continuous topotecan infusion in patients with cancer: an active and well-tolerated regimen

PURPOSE: The objective of this trial was to define the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan for a 21-day infusion schedule, repeated every 28 days, in patients with cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cohorts of four patients received continuous ambulatory infusions of topotecan in escalated duration with doses beginning at 0.20 mg/m2/d for 7 days. Forty-four patients with a histologic diagnosis of cancer refractory to standard therapy were treated with infusions of topotecan for a total of 115 cycles and 1,780 patient-days of infusion. The median number of treatment cycles per patient was two (range, one to eight). All patients were heavily pretreated with chemotherapy and/or radiation. RESULTS: The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was myelo-suppression, with thrombocytopenia greater than neutropenia seen at the dose level of 0.70 mg/m2/d for 21 days. At the MTD of 0.53 mg/m2, ten patients were treated for a total of 20 courses, resulting in one episode of grade 4 thrombocytopenia and leukopenia, one grade 3 thrombocytopenia, and two grade 3 leukopenias. This dose regimen was well tolerated, with minimal nonhematologic toxicity. Local infusion port complications developed in two patients and two had bacteremia, including one patient with repeated local skin infections. Objective responses were observed in this heavily pretreated population for patients with ovarian cancer (two partial responses and one mixed response in six patients), breast cancer (one partial response and one mixed response in two patients), and for one patient each with renal and non-small-cell lung cancer (two partial remissions). CONCLUSION: Twenty-one-day topotecan infusion is well tolerated at 0.53 mg/m2, with dose-intensity exceeding other schedules for administration of topotecan. The DLT is hematologic, with thrombocytopenia somewhat exceeding leukopenia. Objective responses were observed in seven patients with breast, ovarian, renal, and non-small-cell lung cancer.     

Five days of oral topotecan (Hycamtin), a phase I and pharmacological study in adult patients with solid tumours

Topotecan is a specific inhibitor to topoisomerase I. An oral formulation of topotecan is available with a bioavailability of 32-44% in humans. A phase I and pharmacological study of the oral formulation of topotecan administered daily for 5 days every 21 days was performed in adult patients with solid tumours to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Adult patients with a WHO performance status < or = 2 adequate haematological, hepatic and renal functions, with malignant solid tumours refractory to standard forms were entered into the study. Pharmacokinetics were performed on days 1 and 4 of the first course using a validated high performance liquid chromatographic assay. 29 patients entered the study, all patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. The doses studied in the 29 patients were 1.2, 1.8, 2.3, 2.7 mg/m2/day and a fixed dose of 4 mg/day without surface area adjustment. A total of 109 courses were given. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was reached at a dose of 2.7 mg/m2/day and consisted of CTC (NCI-Common Toxicity Criteria) grade IV granulocytopenia. The regimen was well tolerated. Non-haematological toxicities were mild, including fatigue, anorexia, nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea. A significant correlation was observed between the percentage decrease in white blood cells versus the area under the curve (AUC(t)) of topotecan lactone (R = 0.76 P < 0.01) which was modelled by a sigmoidal Emax function. The correlation coefficient between the absolute topotecan dose administered and the AUC(t) was R = 0.52 (P = 0.04). Pharmacokinetics of the fixed dose of 4 mg/day were comparable to the 2.3 mg/m2/day dose. DLT in this phase I study of five daily doses of oral topotecan every 21 days was granulocytopenia. The recommended dose for phase II studies is 2.3 mg/m2/day or alternatively, a fixed dose of 4 mg/day.     

5-Fluorouracil prodrug: role of anabolic and catabolic pathway modulation in therapy of colorectal cancer

Following p.o. administration to rats bearing advanced colorectal carcinoma, Ftorafur (FT) is converted to 5-fluorouracil (FUra) by microsomal P450 in the liver. To optimize the therapeutic selectivity of the FUra generated from FT, three approaches were utilized: (a) inhibition of FUra degradation to dihydrofluorouracil by uracil as an alternative substrate for uracil reductase in the molar ratio of 4 uracil:1 FT (UFT); (b) modulation of drug inhibition of thymidylate synthase by leucovorin (LV); and (c) by increasing the level of FUra incorporation into cellular RNA by N-(phosphonacetyl)-L-aspartate (PALA), an inhibitor of aspartate transcarbomylase. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of FT and UFT, administered 3 times a day for 28 days, was 150 mg/kg/day and 60 mg/kg/day, respectively. The MTDs were not significantly modified by LV (150 or 600 mg/kg/day), administered by the p.o. route with the drugs, or by PALA (100 mg/kg) administered weekly by the i.v. route. The dose-limiting toxicity of FT alone and in combination with the modulators was stomatitis. The severe alopecia observed with FT alone was reduced significantly by uracil. At the MTD, the antitumor activity of UFT was superior to those of FT and FUra alone and in combination with LV and/or PALA. The 3-month sustained complete tumor regression for UFT, FT, and FUra was 38%, 0%, and 13% (for the weekly schedule), respectively. Although uracil, LV, and PALA individually increased the antitumor activity of FT at its MTD, the combination of the three modulators produced the highest therapeutic efficacy in rats bearing advanced colorectal carcinoma, in which 100% of the treated animals achieved complete and sustained tumor regression. The therapeutic efficacy observed with FT modulation could not be achieved with FUra administered by different schedules, each at its MTD alone or in combination with either LV or PALA. In brief, modulation of FT produced greater therapeutic efficacy and selectivity than FUra. Furthermore, the combined use of modulators capable of inhibiting the degradation pathway of FUra and potentiating the effects of the anabolic metabolites action appears to offer the greatest therapeutic potential.     

Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of titanocene dichloride in adults with advanced solid tumors

This Phase I dose-escalation clinical trial of a lyophilized formulation of titanocene dichloride (MKT4) was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose, the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and pharmacokinetics of titanium (Ti) after a single i.v. infusion of MKT4. Forty patients with refractory solid malignancies were treated with a total of 78 courses. Using a modified Fibonacci scheme, 15 mg/m2 initial doses of titanocene dichloride were increased in cohorts of three patients up to level 11 (560 mg/m2) if DLT was not observed. The maximum tolerated dose was 315 mg/m2, and nephrotoxicity was DLT. Two minor responses (bladder carcinoma and non-small cell lung cancer) were observed. The pharmacokinetics of plasma Ti were assessed in 14 treatment courses by atomic absorption spectroscopy. The ratio for the area under the curve(0-infinity) in plasma and whole blood was 1.2. The following pharmacokinetic parameters were determined for plasma, as calculated in a two-compartment model: biological half-life t1/2beta in plasma was 22.8+/-11.2 h (xh +/- pseudo-SD), peak plasma concentration cmax approximately 30 microg/ml at a dose of 420 mg/m2, distribution volume Vss= 5.34+/-2.1 L (xa +/- SD), and a total clearance CItotal = 2.58+/-1.23 ml/min (xa +/- SD). There was a linear correlation between the area under the curve(0-infinity) of Ti in plasma and the titanocene dichloride dose administered with a correlation coefficient r2 of 0.8856. Plasma protein binding of Ti was in the 70-80% range. Between 3% and 16% of the total amount of Ti administered were renally excreted during the first 36 h. The recommended dose for Phase II evaluation is 240 mg/m2 given every 3 weeks with i.v. hydration to reduce renal toxicity.     

Phase I/II radioimmunotherapy trial with iodine-131-labeled monoclonal antibody G250 in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

This Phase I/II radioimmunotherapy study was carried out to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and therapeutic potential of 131I-G250. Thirty-three patients with measurable metastatic renal cell carcinoma were treated. Groups of at least three patients received escalating amounts of 1311I (30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 mCi/m2) labeled to 10 mg of mouse monoclonal antibody G250, administered as a single i.v. infusion. Fifteen patients were studied at the MTD of activity. No patient had received prior significant radiotherapy; one had received prior G250. Whole-body scintigrams and single-photon emission computed tomography images were obtained in all patients. There was targeting of radioactivity to all known tumor sites that were > or =2 cm. Reversible liver function test abnormalities were observed in the majority of patients (27 of 33 patients). There was no correlation between the amount of 131I administered or hepatic absorbed radiation dose (median, 0.073 Gy/mCi) and the extent or nature of hepatic toxicity. Two of the first six patients at 90 mCi/m2 had grade > or =3 thrombocytopenia; the MTD was determined to be 90 mCi/m2 131I. Hematological toxicity was correlated with whole-body absorbed radiation dose. All patients developed human antimouse antibodies within 4 weeks posttherapy; retreatment was, therefore, not possible. Seventeen of 33 evaluable patients had stable disease. There were no major responses. On the basis of external imaging, 131I-labeled mouse monoclonal antibody G250 showed excellent localization to all tumors that were > or =2 cm. Seventeen of 33 patients had stable disease, with tumor shrinkage observed in two patients. Antibody immunogenicity restricted therapy to a single infusion. Studies with a nonimmunogenic G250 antibody are warranted.     

Iodine-131-labeled antitenascin monoclonal antibody 81C6 treatment of patients with recurrent malignant gliomas: phase I trial results

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of iodine 131 (131I)-labeled 81C6 monoclonal antibody (mAb) in brain tumor patients with surgically created resection cavities (SCRCs) and to identify any objective responses to this treatment. METHODS: In this phase I trial, eligible patients were treated with a single injection of 131I-labeled 81C6. Cohorts of three to six patients were treated with escalating dosages of 131I (starting dose of 20 mCi with a 20-mCi escalation in subsequent cohorts) administered through an Ommaya reservoir in the SCRC. Patients were followed up for toxicity and response until death or for a minimum of 1 year after treatment. The SCRC patients, who were previously irradiated, were followed up without additional treatment unless progressive disease was identified. RESULTS: We administered 36 treatments of 131I doses up to 120 mCi to 34 previously irradiated patients with recurrent or metastatic brain tumors. Dose-limiting toxicity was reached at 120 mCi and was limited to neurologic or hematologic toxicity. None of the patients treated with less than 120 mCi developed significant neurologic toxicity; one patient developed major hematologic toxicity (MHT). The estimated median survival for patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and for all patients was 56 and 60 weeks, respectively. CONCLUSION: The MTD for administration of 131I-labeled 81C6 into the SCRCs of previously irradiated patients with recurrent primary or metastatic brain tumors was 100 mCi. The dose-limiting toxicity was neurologic toxicity. We are encouraged by the minimal toxicity and survival in this phase I trial. Radiolabeled mAbs may improve the current therapy for brain tumor patients.     

Side effects of brequinar and brequinar analogues, in combination with cyclosporine, in the rat

Brequinar is an immunosuppressant with the potential to be combined with cyclosporine in synergistic combination therapy. The drug tends to accumulate when given daily per os, and pharmacokinetic interaction with cyclosporine appears to enhance toxicity. Analogues with similar immunosuppressive activity have been identified at Du Pont Merck Pharmaceutical Co., that do not accumulate upon daily oral dosing in rats, and hence could have an improved potential in combination treatment with cyclosporine. We performed a toxicity study with brequinar and two brequinar analogues, administered orally once daily for 4 weeks, either alone or in combination with cyclosporine (Neoral, Novartis Pharma AG). In a first study relatively high doses were evaluated with cyclosporine at non-toxic doses of 5 and 10 mg/kg/d. The maximum tolerated dose of brequinar alone was estimated between 5 and 10 mg/kg/d; that of the analogues was estimated between 10 and 20 mg/kg/d, and above 20 mg/kg/d, respectively. In combination with cyclosporine at 5 and 10 mg/kg/d, approximately a 2-fold reduction in the maximum tolerated dose was observed. In a second study lower doses were evaluated in combination with cyclosporine at 2.5 and 5 mg/kg/d. Also this study revealed increased toxicity of brequinar (analogues) when given in combination with cyclosporine. The side effects observed were typical for drugs in the brequinar class and included leukocytopenia and thrombocytopenia, reduced body weight gain or body weight loss, thymic atrophy, cellular depletion of bone marrow and splenic white pulp, and villous atrophy in jejunum. Concentrations of brequinar (analogues) were determined in blood sampled 4 h after administration at day 1, 14 and 21-28 of the experiment. There was a tendency for drug accumulation in some groups treated with brequinar and cyclosporine. For one of the analogues at a low dose, higher concentrations were measured in groups treated with combinations of this compound and cyclosporine. We conclude that a potential synergism in immunosuppression using combinations of brequinar (analogues) and cyclosporine can be complicated by enhanced toxicity of the compounds. This indicates the need for a careful evaluation of the therapeutic window in a combined treatment together with detailed pharmacokinetics.     

Vinorelbine and epirubicin in metastatic breast cancer. A dose finding study

The aim of the study was to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of vinorelbine given as one or two weekly doses in combination with epirubicin 60 mg/m2 every third week. The MTD was defined as the dose resulting in a WHO grade III or IV leucopenia exceeding 50% of patients. Patients were treated in groups of 10 at escalating doses of vinorelbine. The number of patients at the final dose level was expanded to 20. The dose of epirubicin was kept constant at 60 mg/m2 every third week. At dose level 1, 15 mg/m2 vinorelbine was given on day 1 at level 2, 20 mg/m2 was given on day 1 and at level 3, 20 mg/m2 was given on days 1 and 8. The MTD was reached at dose level 3. WHO haematological toxicity grade IV occurred in 0, 10 and 45% and grade III at 60, 30 and 30% of patients at dose levels 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Despite the common occurrence of grade IV haematological toxicity, only two serious infections were noted. Non-haematological toxicity of vinorelbine included neurotoxicity, manifesting as muscle weakness, constipation and paresthesias in the majority of patients. Neurotoxicity was usually mild and did not require treatment discontinuation. Phlebitis at the injection site was troublesome in many patients. Alopecia and nausea, probably due to epirubicin, occurred in most patients. The response rates were 22% (95% CI (confidence interval) 3-60%), 40% (12-74%) and 60% (36-81%) at levels 1, 2 and 3, respectively (non-significant).     

p53 autoantibodies in the sera, cyst and ascitic fluids of patients with ovarian cancer

LY231514 is a novel antifolate that principally inhibits thymidylate synthase, but with additional folate-dependent enzyme targets. A Phase I study of single-agent LY231514 administered as a daily i.v. infusion over 10 minutes for 5 days, repeated every 3 weeks, was conducted to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose, pharmacokinetic profile, and antitumor activity of the drug using this schedule. Thirty-eight patients with advanced malignancies that were refractory or not amenable to standard therapy were treated with a total of 116 courses of LY231514, escalating treatment doses through 10 dose levels, from 0.2-5.2 mg/m2/day. No objective clinical responses were observed, although minor antitumor activity not fulfilling the response criteria was seen in three patients. A maximum tolerated dose of 4.0 mg/m2/day was determined, with neutropenia as the predominant dose-limiting toxicity. Reversible disturbances of liver biochemistry, fulfilling the protocol definitions of dose-limiting toxicity, were also observed. Other toxicities included diarrhea, mucositis, skin rash, and fatigue. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed at all treatment levels. Analysis showed a linear relation between administered dose and both maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration/time curve. The drug was cleared with a day 1 total body clearance of 108.9 +/- 38.8 ml/min/m2, with plasma concentrations declining with a mean harmonic terminal half-life of 1.4 +/- 0.98 h. When given by this schedule, LY231514 is tolerable, and Phase II studies are in progress.     

Prescription and use of analgesics in dogs and cats in a veterinary teaching hospital: 258 cases (1983-1989)

The frequency of prescribing analgesics and administering them for the treatment of apparent postoperative pain in 243 dogs and 15 cats was evaluated. Surgeries performed on the animals evaluated included limb amputations, limb-sparing bone cancer resection, thoracotomy, cervical vertebral instability repair, and humeral fracture repair. Only 1 cat was treated once with an analgesic after surgery, and cats were not evaluated statistically. Dogs undergoing amputation, limb salvage procedure, or thoracotomy were more likely to be treated than dogs undergoing the other surgeries. Ninety-six (40%) of the 243 dogs were under the influence of an analgesic at any time during their postoperative hospital stay, and 69 dogs (28%) received 1 or more doses of an analgesic after recovery from general anesthesia. One hundred thirty-three dogs were cared for in the intensive care unit (ICU) immediately after surgery. Written instructions for treatment with an analgesic were given for 61 of those dogs, and 50 were given at least 1 dose of the prescribed analgesic. Dogs cared for in the ICU were twice as likely to be given an analgesic as dogs cared for in the surgery ward. The estimated duration of analgesic effect exceeded 8 hours in 46 (19%) of 243 dogs. Small and juvenile dogs were least likely to be treated. Interns and residents were twice as likely as faculty to administer analgesics. Most written interpretations of pain behavior observed in the ICU were made on the basis of vocalizations. Half of the dogs for which medical record comments suggested moderate to severe pain were not given an analgesic. The most frequently administered analgesic immediately following surgery was oxymorphone, followed by butorphanol and morphine. Aspirin was never administered to dogs in the ICU, but was used in 10 dogs that were in the surgery ward for > 74 hours.     

Trying to control MRSA causes more problems than it solves

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of recombinant canine somatotropin (STH) on radiographic, densitometric, and biomechanical aspects of bone healing using an unstable ostectomy gap model. STUDY DESIGN: After an ostectomy of the midshaft radius, bone healing was evaluated over an 8-week period in control dogs (n = 4) and dogs receiving recombinant canine STH (n = 4). ANIMALS OR SAMPLE POPULATION: Eight sexually intact female Beagle dogs, 4 to 5 years old. METHODS: Bone healing was evaluated by qualitative and quantitative evaluation of serial radiographs every 2 weeks. Terminal dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and three-point bending biomechanical testing were also performed. RESULTS: Dogs receiving STH had more advanced radiographic healing of ostectomy sites. Bone area, bone mineral content, and bone density were two to five times greater at the ostectomy sites of treated dogs. Ultimate load at failure and stiffness were three and five times greater in dogs receiving STH. CONCLUSIONS: Using the ostectomy gap model, recombinant canine STH enhanced the radiographic, densitometric, and biomechanical aspects of bone healing in dogs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Dogs at risk for delayed healing of fractures may benefit from treatment with recombinant canine STH.     

Oviposition and incubation environmental effects on embryonic diapause in a ground cricket

PURPOSE: Recent studies document the value of early combined modality therapy of small cell lung cancer, but also indicate that early thoracic radiation adds to myelosuppression and can complicate further chemotherapy. Other studies indicate that simultaneous use of growth factors with thoracic radiation may be deleterious. However, temporal separation of growth factor use from cytotoxic therapy may allow dose intensity to be maintained/enhanced during combined modality treatment. We sought to integrate filgrastim into a novel chemoradiation regimen for patients with limited small cell lung cancer using an approach that separated growth factor administration from both chemotherapy and thoracic radiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-seven patients with limited disease small cell lung cancer were enrolled in a Phase I trial of cisplatin, ifosfamide/mesna, oral etoposide, and thoracic radiation (1.5 Gy b.i.d. x 30 fractions days 1-19 cycle 1) +/- filgrastim (5 microg/kg/day). Filgrastim was given on days 20-25 of cycle 1 after completion of radiation and following completion of oral etoposide in subsequent cycles. The primary end point was determination of maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of chemotherapy. Serial cohorts were treated with and without filgrastim. RESULTS: Because of dose-limiting thrombocytopenia, primarily, and nonhematologic toxicity, the MTDs with and without filgrastim were identical (cisplatin 20 mg/m2 i.v. and ifosfamide 1200 mg/m2 i.v., both given days 1-3, and etoposide 40 mg/m2 p.o. days 1-14). Filgrastim use shortened the duration of neutropenia at the MTD (median 4 vs. 7 days), but was not associated with a reduction in febrile neutropenia. Although growth factor administration did not allow dose escalation of this regimen, it did allow chemotherapy doses to be maintained at the MTD more frequently through four cycles of therapy. In the 24 evaluable patients, the overall response rate was 100% (71% partial and 29% complete). CONCLUSIONS: Despite careful attention to the timing of growth factor with chemoradiation, the administration of filgrastim with this regimen did not allow dose escalation. As in many other recent studies of hematopoietic growth factors given prophylactically with chemotherapy, the duration of neutropenia at the MTD was shortened and the need for dose reduction throughout treatment was reduced in patients receiving filgrastim at the MTD.