New miscible blends composed of polysulfone and poly(1-vinylpyrrolidone-co-acrylonitrile) copolymers and their phase behavior

The miscibility of polysulfone, PSf, blend with poly(1-vinylpyrrolidone), PVP, and that of PSf blend with poly(1-vinylpyrrolidone-co-acrylonitrile) copolymers, P(VP-AN), containing various amount of VP were explored. Even though PSf did not formed miscible blends with PVP when both components had high molecular weight, it formed miscible blend with PVP by decreasing molecular weight of PVP. PSf also formed homogeneous mixtures with P(VP-AN) containing AN from 2 to 16 wt%. These miscible blends underwent phase separation on heating caused by LCST-type (lower critical solution temperature-type) phase behavior. The phase separation temperature of miscible blends first increases with AN content, goes through a maximum centered at about 8 wt% AN. Interaction energies of binary pairs involved in blends were evaluated from the observed phase boundaries using the lattice-fluid theory. The decline of the contact angle between water and blend film by increasing P(VP-AN) content in blend indicated that the hydrophobic properties of PSf could be improved by blending with P(VP-AN) copolymers.     

Miscibility of copolycarbonate blends with poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) copolymer and their interaction energies

The phase behavior of dimethyl polycarbonate-tetramethyl polycarbonate (DMPC-TMPC) blends with poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) copolymers (SAN) and the interaction energies of binary pairs involved in blend has been explored. DMPC-TMPC copolycarbonates containing 60 wt% TMPC or more were formed miscible blends with SAN containing limited amounts of AN. The miscibility of copolycarbonate with SAN decreases as the DMPC content increases. The miscible blends showed the LCST-type phase behavior or did not phase separate until thermal degradation. The binary interaction energies involved in the miscible blends were calculated from the phase boundaries using the lattice-fluid theory combined with binary interaction model. The phenyl ring substitution with methyl groups did not lead to interactions that are favorable for miscibility with polyacrylonitrile (PAN). The interaction energies of the polycarbonates blends with SAN copolymers as a function of AN content were obtained. It was revealed that the incline of the number of methyl groups on the phenyl rings of bisphenol-A unit acts favorably for the miscibility with SAN copolymer when SAN contains less than about 30 wt% AN and shifts the most favorable interaction to the low AN content.     

Viscoelastic properties of blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) having various acrylonitrile contents

Dynamic viscoelastic properties of blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) with various AN contents were measured to evaluate the influence of SAN composition, consequently χ parameter, upon the melt rheology. PMMA/SAN blends were miscible and exhibited a terminal flow region characterized by Newtonian flow, when the acrylonitrile (AN) content of SAN ranges from 10 to 27 wt %. Whereas, PMMA/SAN blends were immiscible and exhibited a long time relaxation, when the AN content in SAN is less than several wt % or greater than 30 wt %. Correspondingly, melt rheology of the blends was characterized by the plots of storage modulus G′ against loss modulus G″. Log G′ versus log G″ plots exhibited a straight line of slope 2 for the miscible blends, but did not show a straight line for the immiscible blends because of their long time relaxation mechanism. The plateau modulus, determined as the storage modulus G′ in the plateau zone at the frequency where tan δ is at maximum, varied linearly with the AN content of SAN irrespective of blend miscibility. This result indicates that the additivity rule holds well for the entanglement molecular weights in miscible PMMA/SAN blends. However, the entanglement molecular weights in immiscible blends should have “apparent” values, because the above method to determine the plateau modulus is not applicable for the immiscible blends. Effect of χ parameter on the plateau modulus of the miscible blends could not be found. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Effect of dehydrochlorination of PVC on miscibility and phase separation of binary and ternary blends of poly(vinyl chloride), poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) and poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile)

The enhancement of miscibility at the lower critical solution temperature (LCST) of the blends poly(vinyl chloride)/poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) (PVC/EVA), poly(vinyl chloride)/poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) (PVC/SAN) and poly(vinyl chloride)/poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate)/poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) (PVC/EVA/SAN) was observed at the micron level. Such miscibility is attributed to the dehydrochlorination and formation of hydrogen bonds between blend components. However, macrolevel immiscibility of these blends heated to the LCST was observed. Such microdomain compatibility of these blends gives a synergistic character. Brittle-type failure observed for LCST samples testifies to the synergism in treated blends. ©1997 SCI     

Miscibility windows in ternary polymer blends of a polyester,polymethacrylate and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)

Miscibility, phase diagrams and morphology of poly(ε‐caprolactone) (PCL)/poly(benzyl methacrylate) (PBzMA)/poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) ternary blends were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), optical microscopy (OM), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The miscibility window of PCL/PBzMA/SAN ternary blends is influenced by the acrylonitrile (AN) content in the SAN copolymers. At ambient temperature, the ternary polymer blend is completely miscible within a closed‐loop miscibility window. DSC showed only one glass transition temperature (T_g) for PCL/PBzMA/SAN‐17 and PCL/PBzMA/SAN‐25 ternary blends; furthermore, OM and SEM results showed that PCL/PBzMA/SAN‐17 and PCL/PBzMA/SAN‐25 were homogeneous for any composition of the ternary phase diagram. Hence, it demonstrated that miscibility exists for PCL/PBzMA/SAN‐17 and PCL/PBzMA/SAN‐25 ternary blends, but that the ternary system becomes phase‐separated outside these AN contents. Copyright © 2003 Society of Chemical Industry     

Miscibility behavior of blends of poly(alkyl methacrylate)s with poly(p-methylstyrene-co-methacrylonitrile)

The miscibility behavior of various poly(p-methylstyrene-co-methacrylonitrile) (pMSMAN)/poly(alkyl methacrylate)s blends was studied using differential scanning calorimetry. pMSMAN is miscible with poly(methyl methacrylate), poly(ethyl methacrylate), poly(n-propyl methacrylate), poly(isopropyl methacrylate), and poly(n-butyl methacrylate) over certain copolymer composition ranges, but is immiscible with poly(isobutyl methacrylate) and poly(n-amyl methacrylate). The width of the miscibility window decreases with increasing size of the pendant ester group of the poly(alkyl methacrylate), and is wider than that of the corresponding poly(p-methylstyrene-co-acrylonitrile) blend system. Various segmental interaction parameters are calculated using a binary interaction model. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Elongational viscosity for miscible and immiscible polymer blends. II. Blends with a small amount of UHMW polymer

The effect of miscibility on elongational viscosity of polymer blends was investigated in homogeneous, miscible, and immiscible states by the blend of 1.5 wt % of ultrahigh‐molecular‐weight (UHMW) polymer. The matrix polymer was either poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), or poly(acrylonitrile‐co‐styrene) (AS) that has a comparable elongational viscosity value. The homogeneous blend consisted of 98.5 wt % of PMMA and 1.5 wt % of UHMW–PMMA. The miscible blend was composed of AS and UHMW–PMMA at the same ratio. The immiscible blend was a combination of AS and UHMW–polystyrene (PS) at the same ratio. The strain‐hardening behavior of the different blends were compared with that of pure PMMA. It was demonstrated that 1.5 wt % of UHMW induces a strong strain‐hardening property in the homogeneous and miscible blends but was hardly changed in the immiscible blend. The optical microscope observation of the immiscible blend suggested that the UHMW domains were stretched, but that the degree of domain deformation was less than a given elongational strain. It was concluded that the strain‐hardening property is strongly affected by the miscibility of UHMW chain and matrix. The strong strain‐hardening property is caused by the deformation of the UHMW polymer. UHMW chains are stretched when they are entangled with surrounding polymers. However, UHMW chains in an immiscible state are not so deformed because of viscosity difference and no entanglements between domain and matrix. A smaller degree of UHMW chain deformation in immiscible state results in weaker strain‐hardening property. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 72: 961–969, 1999     

Investigation on the miscibility of the blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)

The miscibility was investigated in blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and styrene‐acrylonitrile (SAN) copolymers with different acrylonitrile (AN) contents. The 50/50 wt % blends of PMMA with the SAN copolymers containing 5, 35, and 50 wt % of AN were immiscible, while the blend with copolymer containing 25 wt % of AN was miscible. The morphologies of PMMA/SAN blends were characterized by virtue of scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. It was found that the miscibility of PMMA/SAN blends were in consistence with the morphologies observed. Moreover, the different morphologies in blends of PMMA and SAN were also observed. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Novel blends of alternating propene-carbon monoxide copolymers and styrenic copolymers

Summary Alternating propene-carbon monoxide copolymers (P-CO) were melt-blended with polystyrene, poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) (SAN), and with poly(styrene-co-maleic anhydride) (SMA). P-CO forms homogeneously miscible blends with SAN containing 25 wt% AN at the investigated blend compositions. The transparent blends have single, intermediate glass transition temperatures that fit the Fox equation. The elastic properties of P-CO at room temperature disappear upon blending with SAN because the T _g is driven above RT. Polystyrene and SMA are not miscible with P-CO and form heterogeneous blends with two glass transitions. This demonstrates that both the polarity of the styrenic copolymer and the nature of the comonomer govern its phase behavior. Received: 14 January 1999/Revised version: 19 April 1999/Accepted: 19 April 1999     

Elongational viscosity for miscible and immiscible polymer blends. I. PMMA and AS with similar elongational viscosity

The effects of miscibility and blend ratio on uniaxial elongational viscosity of polymer blends were studied by preparing miscible and immiscible samples at the same composition by using poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and poly(acrylonitrile-co-styrene) (AS). Miscible polymer blend samples for the elongational viscosity measurement were prepared by using three steps: solvent blends, cast film, and hot press. A phase diagram of blend samples was made by visual observation of cloudiness. Immiscible blend samples were prepared by maintaining the prepared miscible samples at 200°C, which is higher than cloud points using a LCST (lower critical solution temperature) phase diagram. The phase structure of immiscible blends was observed by an optical microscope. The elongational viscosity of all samples was measured at 145°C, which is lower than the cloud-point temperature at all blend ratios. The elongational viscosity of PMMA and AS was similar to each other. The strain-hardening property of miscible blends in the elongational viscosity was only slightly influenced by the blend ratio, and this was also the case with immiscible blends. The strain-hardening property was only slightly influenced, whether it was miscible or immiscible at each blend ratio. Polydispersity in molecular weight for blend samples was not changed by GPC (gel permeation chromatography) analysis. Almost no change in the polydispersity of the molecular weight for blends and the similarity of elongational viscosity between PMMA and AS resulted in little influence of the blend ratio and miscibility on the strain-hardening property. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 73: 757–766, 1999     

Blends of poly(vinyl butyral‐co‐vinyl alcohol) and poly(ethylene terephthalate‐co‐ethylene naphthalate): thermal,mechanical, and morphological properties

The miscibility behavior and morphology of a series of poly(vinyl butyral‐co‐vinyl alcohol) (PVBA) copolymers containing 29, 52, 76, and 88 mol % of vinyl alcohol units with poly(ethylene terephthalate‐co‐ethylene naphthalate) (PETN) was investigated by DSC and SEM. Blends of the PETN with PVBA were prepared by coprecipitation from a chloroform/o‐chlorophenol (20/80 wt %) mixture solvent. It was found that PVBAs with different vinyl alcohol content will form an immiscible phase with the amorphous PETN in the solution‐cast films. Also, PETN and PVBA with 29 mol % vinyl alcohol (PVBA‐29) are not miscible within the whole composition range. The glass‐transition temperatures of the blends were higher than those of the two‐component polymers. The values of the tensile properties of the blend films were also better than those of the original copolymer films. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 80: 2746–2751, 2001     

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic studies of the poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) and poly (vinyl chloride-co-vinyl acetate) blends

The Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopic studies of the poly-(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) (SAN) and poly(vinyl chloride-co-vinyl acetate) (VYHH) blends produced by different blending techniques, viz., solution blending, melt-blending, and also the co-precipitation methods of blending, were performed. In the case of miscible blend systems, substantial band shiftings took place, whereas immiscible blend systems showed slight or no band shifting. The miscible blends showed a substantial residual spectrum which was absent in the case of the immiscible system when a similar subtraction process was carried out. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 63: 991–1000, 1997     

Miscibility of poly(methoxymethyl methacrylate) and poly(methylthiomethyl methacrylate) with poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) and poly(p-methylstyrene-co-acrylonitrile)

The miscibility of poly(methoxymethyl methacrylate) (PMOMA) and poly(methylthiomethyl methacrylate) (PMTMA) with poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) (SAN) and poly(p-methylstyrene-co-acrylonitrile) (pMSAN) was studied by differential scanning calorimetry. PMOMA is miscible with SAN having an acrylonitrile (AN) content around 30 wt %. However, PMOMA is immiscible with any of the pMSAN having AN contents between 9 and 36 wt % and with pMSAN having AN contents between 19 and 34 wt %. The miscibility of the blends enables the evaluation of various segmental interaction parameters.     

Studies of functionalized polystyrene–poly(2, 6-diphenyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) blends

The phase behavior of an immiscible binary component blend and its functionalized analogs were studied. The unfunctionalized blends are composed of polystyrene and poly(2,6-diphenyl-1,4-phenylene oxide), whereas the functionalized versions contain a relatively broad range of ionic content, i.e., sodium sulfonate units. Extensive glass transition (T_g) measurements show that these blends are immiscible over a broad ionic content and molecular weight range. This phenomenon, however, does not inhibit these blends from possessing improved mechanical properties since the associating-type ionic interactions can effectively bridge the two phases. These results are in contrast with blends composed of unfunctionalized but miscible components. In this case, miscibility and immiscibility can be tailored through the precise control of the level of functionalization of one or both components of the blend.     

Effect of bisphenol A on the miscibility,phase morphology,and specific interaction in immiscible biodegradable poly(ε‐caprolactone)/poly(L‐lactide) blends

We have investigated the enhancement in miscibility, upon addition of bisphenol A (BPA) of immiscible binary biodegradable blends of poly(ε‐caprolactone) (PCL) and poly(L ‐lactide) (PLLA). That BPA is miscible with both PCL and PLLA was proven by the single value of T_g observed by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analyses over the entire range of compositions. At various compositions and temperatures, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy confirmed that intermolecular hydrogen bonding existed between the hydroxyl group of BPA and the carbonyl groups of PCL and PLLA. The addition of BPA enhances the miscibility of the immiscible PCL/PLLA binary blend and transforms it into a miscible blend at room temperature when a sufficient quantity of the BPA is present. In addition, optical microscopy (OM) measurements of the phase morphologies of ternary BPA/PCL/PLLA blends at different temperatures indicated an upper critical solution temperature (UCST) phase diagram, since the ΔK effect became smaller at higher temperature (200°C) than at room temperature. An analysis of infrared spectra recorded at different temperatures correlated well with the OM analyses. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 100: 1146–1161, 2006     

Morphology and physical properties of SAN/NBR blends: The effect of AN content and melt viscosity of SAN

To study the effect of dispersed poly(butadiene-co-acrylonitrile) (NBR) rubber size on the physical properties of poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) (SAN)/NBR blends, SANs with various melt viscosities and acrylonitrile (AN) contents were examined. The dispersed size of NBR, whose AN content is 30 wt %, was reduced as the melt viscosity of the SAN matrix was increased or as the AN content of the SAN matrix was reduced in the range of 19–32 wt %. As the melt viscosity of the SAN matrix was increased, the damping peak of the NBR phase moved to a higher temperature, and as the AN content of SAN was reduced, the damping peak of the SAN phase moved to a lower temperature. Higher values of impact strength and elongation at break and reduced yield behavior at a low shear rate were observed at a finer dispersion of NBR. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 73: 935–941, 1999     

Compatibility enhancement of ABS/PVC blends

The compatibilizing effect of poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) (SAN) whose acrylonitrile (AN) content is 25 wt % (SAN 25) in poly(acrylonitrile-co-butadiene-co-styrene) (ABS)/poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) blend was studied when the AN content of the matrix SAN in ABS was 35 wt % (SAN 35). When some amount of matrix SAN 35 was replaced by SAN 25 in a ABS/PVC (50/50 by weight) blend, the mixed phase of SAN and PVC at the interface was thickened, and about a twofold increase of impact strength was observed. The changes in morphology, dynamic mechanical properties, and rheological properties by the compatibilizing effect of SAN 25 were observed. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 70: 705–709, 1998     

Biodegradable polyester blends for biomedical application

A new family of bioabsorbable materials suitable for biomedical applications was designed and prepared by means of blending of some available polyesters to develop new biodegradable materials tailored for different requirements. Multiphase polymer blends containing poly(d, l-lactide) (PLA), poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL), poly(d, l)-lactide-co-poly(ethylene glycol) (PELA), poly(ε-caprolactone) -co-poly(ethylene glycol) (PECL), and poly(ß-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), PLA/PCL, PELA/PECL, PHB/PLA, PHB/PELA, PHB/PCL, and PHB/PECL blends were respectively investigated. It was found that PLA/PCL, PHB, and PHB/PLA and PHB/PCL blends were seemingly immiscible, with their morphology and hydrolytic behavior were determined by the composition of the blends. On the other hand, the miscibility of PELA/PECL, PHB/PELA, and PHB/PECL blends was improved by using PELA and/or PECL block copolymers that contained poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) as compatibilizer. The blends showed to a certain extent miscibility, fine phase morphology, and fast hydrolysis. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Binary and ternary polymer blends containing poly(vinylidene chloride‐co‐acrylonitrile)

Poly(vinylidene chloride‐co‐acrylonitrile) (Saran F), poly(hydroxy ether of bisphenol A) (phenoxy), poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (PSAN), and poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) all have the same characteristic: miscibility with atactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (aPMMA). However, the miscibility of Saran F with the other polymer (phenoxy, PSAN, or PVPh) is not guaranteed and was thus investigated. Saran F was found to be miscible only with PSAN but not miscible with phenoxy and PVPh. Because Saran F and PVPh are not miscible, although they are both miscible with aPMMA, aPMMA can thus be used as a potential cosolvent to homogenize PVPh/Saran F. The second part of this report focused on the miscibility of a ternary blend consisting of Saran F, PVPh, and aPMMA to investigate the cosolvent effect of aPMMA. Factors affecting the miscibility were studied. The established phase diagram indicated that the ternary blends with high PVPh/Saran F weight ratio were found to be mostly immiscible. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 91: 3068–3073, 2004     

Compatibility of poly(ϵ-caprolactone) (PCL) and poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) (SAN) blends. II. The influence of the AN content in SAN copolymer upon blend compatibility

The compatibility of polymer blends of poly(?-caprolactone) (PCL) and poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) (SAN) containing various acrylonitrile (AN) contents was studied to evaluate the influences of copolymer composition and PCL concentration upon blend compatibility. Blend compatibility was characterized by the occurence of a single glass transition intermediate between the transitions of the respective pure components. The glass transitions were determined by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and dynamic mechanical measurement (Rheovibron). It was found that SAN and PCL form compatible blends when the AN content of SAN ranges from 8% to 28% by weight. These blends are compatible in all proportions except for SAN 28 (AN wt % = 28) and PCL blends containing 70 or 85 wt % PCL. Blends of PCL and SAN were found to be incompatible when the AN content in SAN is greater than 30 wt % or less than 6 wt %. Lower critical solution temperature (LCST) behavior, which can be attributed to phase separation, was found to occur when these blends were heated to elevated temperatures. The cloud point, or phase separation, was found to vary with AN content in SAN and the concentration of SAN in the blend.