Inhaler therapy for adults with obstructive lung diseases: powder or aerosol?

When prescribing inhalation medication in the ambulant treatment of patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a choice can be made between dry powder inhaler (DPI) and pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDI). The degree of deposition in the lower airways depends on the dose delivery via the inhaler and the mean diameter of the released particles (MMAD). With a DPI, dose delivery and MMAD depend on the inspiratory flow rate. With a pMDI dose delivery and MMAD do not depend on the inspiratory flow rate but on hand-mouth co-ordination. The main determinants for the choice of a DPI or a pMDI are the degree of co-operation and co-ordination, and the inspiratory flow rate of the patient.     

Clinical trial of two inhalation techniques for pressurized aerosols

The clinical effects of a bronchodilator, terbutaline sulphate, were compared after administration in the beginning of the inhalation by means of a standard inhaler and administration by actuating 2 seconds before starting the inhalation by means of an inhaler furnished with a 32 X 100 mm tube. No differences could be seen in the parameters measured-forced vital capacity (FVC), 1-second forced expiratory volume (FEV1), forced mid-expiratory flow (FMF), and oscillatory resistance (Ros). The results indicate that when attaching a tube to the standard inhaler co-ordination of inhalation and actuation of the aerosol is not of vital importance.     

Influence of temperature on the emitted dose of an oral metered dose inhaler

The performance of metered dose inhalers is critical for the efficient delivery of drugs to the intended site of deposition in the respiratory tract. The temperature at which metered dose inhaler products are used by patients may influence the physicochemical characteristics of the emitted dose. Product performance characteristics of a metered dose inhaler containing beclomethasone dipropionate and oleic acid in a blend of chlorofluorocarbon propellants, Freon-11 and Freon-12, were determined by cascade impaction analysis and dose delivery through the valve after the metering chamber was loaded and actuated at 4 degrees C, 23 degrees C, and 40 degrees C. The dose delivered from the valve was not affected by the temperature at which the metering chamber was loaded and actuated. The mass median aerodynamic particle size of the emitted aerosol decreased and the percentage respirable fraction increased as the temperature was increased. The geometric standard deviation of the particle size distribution was not significantly affected by the temperature at which the metering chamber was loaded and actuated. The temperature at which a metered dose inhaler is used by a patient may influence the amount of drug that is potentially respirable; therefore, the dose expected to be delivered and the corresponding therapeutic effect may also be affected.     

Automatic actuation of a dry powder inhaler into a nonelectrostatic spacer

This article describes a new "automatic spacer" device, which has been developed to improve the delivery of inhaled medication to young children. In the device, a dry powder inhaler (DPI) is mechanically actuated into a nonelectrostatic spacer, producing an aerosol cloud of fine drug particles (aerodynamic diameter, < 4.7 microm) with a long half-life. The new device combines the principal advantages of the conventional spacer and the DPI. It has the potential to provide a high ratio between lung dose and pharyngeal dose, without need for coordination or forced inhalation, and it avoids exposure of the patient to the additives and propellants used in pressurized metered dose inhalers. Studies with the prototype device show a high yield of fine drug particles in the aerosol (mass median aerodynamic diameter, 2.8 microm), a high repeatability of drug delivery owing to the mechanical nature of the actuation (relative standard deviation, 12%), and a prolonged residence time of the fine particle aerosol (half-life of the fallout of the fine particles, 82 s). These features should prove advantageous in the treatment of young children with inhaled medication.     

Inhaler use in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Inhaler technique is a common problem, particularly in the elderly. We have assessed the ability to use seven common inhaler devices in 20 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Techniques were taught in a standard fashion in random order and assessed immediately and one hour later by two observers. Fourteen patients had a fault that would result in no drug delivery at some time during the study, and such a fault occurred at some point for each inhaler device. These faults were most common with the diskhaler. Accuhaler, autohaler and turbohaler scored highest and diskhaler lowest. Overall scores declined by one hour after instruction. Patients ranked the metered dose inhaler and accuhaler highest for ease of use and preference. These results show that it is useful to have a small range of devices for patients with COPD and that it is important to review inhaler technique regularly.     

Recent developments in respiratory care pharmacology

Bronchoactive inhaled aerosol drugs target the respiratory tract directly and seek to minimize systemic exposure and reduce side effects. Common delivery devices such as the metered dose inhaler, the small volume nebulizer, or the dry powder inhaler each deliver approximately the same fraction of dose (10%) to the lungs, although their dose amounts are not equivalent. Major respiratory drug groups are reviewed, and include the beta-adrenergic and anticholinergic bronchodilators, mucolytic agents, corticosteroids, mediator antagonists, anti-infective agents, and exogenous surfactants. New agents in each group are identified and briefly described, along with the clinical use and most commonly observed side effects for each class of drugs.     

Postmarketing surveillance study of a non-chlorofluorocarbon inhaler according to the safety assessment of marketed medicines guidelines

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of a non-chlorofluorocarbon metered dose salbutamol inhaler. DESIGN: This was a postmarketing surveillance study, conducted under formal guidelines for company sponsored safety assessment of marketed medicines (SAMM). A non-randomised, non-interventional, observational design compared patients prescribed metered doses of salbutamol delivered by inhalers using either hydrofluoroalkane or chlorofluorocarbon as the propellant. Follow up was three months. SETTING: 646 general practices throughout the United Kingdom. SUBJECTS: 6614 patients with obstructive airways disease (1667 patient years of exposure). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportions of patients who were: admitted to hospital for respiratory diseases, reported adverse side effects, or withdrew because of adverse affects. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the hydrofluoroalkane (HFA 134a) and chlorofluorocarbon inhaler groups in relation to the proportions of patients admitted to hospital for respiratory diseases (odds ratio 0.75; 95% confidence interval 0.51 to 1.08) or the proportions who reported adverse events (1.01; 0.88 to 1.17). However, more patients using the hydrofluoroalkane inhaler than the chlorofluorocarbon inhaler withdrew because of adverse events (3.8% and 0.9% respectively). CONCLUSION: The hydrofluoroalkane inhaler was as safe as the chlorofluorocarbon inhaler when judged by hospital admissions and adverse affects. The study design successfully fulfilled the recommendations of the guidelines. Differences between postmarketing surveillance studies and randomised clinical trials in assessing safety were identified. These may lead to difficulties in the design of postmarketing surveillance studies.     

Randomised crossover trial of salbutamol aerosol delivered by metered dose inhaler, jet nebuliser, and ultrasonic nebuliser in chronic lung disease

AIMS: To compare the efficacy of salbutamol delivered by metered dose inhaler (MDI), jet nebuliser, and ultrasonic nebuliser in ventilated infants with chronic lung disease. METHODS: Twenty preterm ventilated infants with chronic lung disease were enrolled in two studies. In study 1 (n = 10), each infant was given 200 micrograms of salbutamol at 4 hour intervals and in random sequence from a metered dose inhaler-spacer device, a jet nebuliser, and an ultrasonic nebuliser with a small medication cup. The infants were monitored for heart rate, transcutaneous pO2, pCO2, and oxygen saturation, respiratory system resistance and compliance before and after each treatment. Infants in study 2 (n = 10) were similarly studied except for the use of a different jet nebuliser. RESULTS: The mean (SEM) maximum percentage decreases in respiratory system resistance, observed at 30 minutes after aerosol delivery were study 1: MDI: 44.3 (4.3)%; jet: 32.3 (3.4)%; ultrasonic: 56.1 (3.2)%; study 2: MDI: 28.6 (1.0)%; jet: 16.9 (1.4)%; ultrasonic: 42.1 (1.6)%. During the first hour after treatment, a significantly faster heart rate and higher transcutaneous pO2 were associated with the use of the ultrasonic nebuliser or MDI than with the jet nebulisers in both studies. The use of the ultrasonic nebuliser but not the other devices also resulted in a lower transcutaneous pCO2 and improved respiratory system compliance in study 2. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that among the devices tested, the delivery of salbutamol aerosol to the lower respiratory tract was greatest using the ultrasonic nebuliser, and least with the jet nebulisers.     

Inhalation of single vs multiple metered-dose bronchodilator actuations from reservoir devices. An in vitro study

Differences in inhalation technique with reservoir or spacer devices may affect metered-dose inhaler (MDI) dose availability to a patient. PURPOSE: This study examined the effect of single vs multiple actuations of an MDI into reservoir devices on dose delivery of albuterol, with three clinically available reservoir brands. METHODS: An in vitro lung model simulated inspiration from the MDI reservoir system. Albuterol (Proventil; Schering) was delivered by MDI, with the Monaghan Aerochamber, the Diemolding Healthcare Division (DHD) aerosol cloud enhancer (ACE), and the Schering InspirEase, using standardized volumes and inspiratory flows of 30 L min(-1). The MDI was actuated into each brand of reservoir 1, 2, or 3 times in rapid succession, followed by a single inhalation. Aerosol dose at the reservoir mouthpiece was captured on a cotton filter, dissolved in ethanol, and measured with a spectrophotometer at 278 nm. RESULTS: For all three brands of reservoir, less accumulated dose of drug is delivered with multiple actuations than with multiple single actuations each followed by inhalation. The total dose in milligrams increased significantly with two multiple actuations compared with one actuation in the Aerochamber and ACE (p<0.01), but not in the InspirEase (p>0.05). The Aerochamber, ACE, and InspirEase delivered a mean total dose (SD) of 0.0264 mg (0.012), 0.0271 mg (0.007), and 0.0136 mg (0.006), respectively, with one actuation compared to 0.0485 mg (0.011), 0.0453 mg (0.013), and 0.0218 mg (0.009) with two multiple actuations. The increase in total dose with three multiple actuations was not significant compared to two actuations for any of the brands tested (p>0.05). Although total dose increased with multiple actuations, a decline in efficiency was seen with two and three multiple actuations, compared to single actuation. The dose delivered per actuation decreased for the Aerochamber, ACE, and InspirEase from 0.0264 mg (0.012), 0.0271 mg (0.007), and 0.0136 mg (0.006) with one actuation, to 0.0243 mg (0.006), 0.0226 mg (0.006), and 0.0109 mg (0.005), respectively, with two multiple actuations, for losses of 8.0%, 16.6%, and 19.9% in dose per actuation for each brand. A further decline in delivery per actuation to 0.0164 mg (0.001), 0.0184 mg (0.004), and 0.0097 mg (0.005) for the 3 brands, respectively, was found with 3 multiple actuations before inhalation. This was a loss of 37.9%, 32.1%, and 28.7% of the dose per single actuation in each brand. There was no significant difference between the Aerochamber and the ACE in dose availability with 1, 2, or 3 actuations, but both of these brands provided significantly more drug than the InspirEase. CONCLUSION: Maximal aerosol bronchodilator from an MDI reservoir was given by single actuations each followed by a breath. Two rapid actuations followed by a breath will give a significant accumulation of dose with some loss when compared to two single actuations each followed by inhalation. Three multiple actuations led to a loss of approximately one third of the drug dose obtainable with three single actuations each followed by inhalation, for all three brands.     

Cost issues surrounding the use of computerized telemedicine for obstetric ultrasonography

Whole-body plethysmography is not included in guidelines from regulatory authorities for the development of treatments or delivery devices for lung disease, despite its potential advantages compared to spirometry. Two separate studies were undertaken to assess the use of specific airway conductance (sGaw) as a pharmacodynamic endpoint for the comparison of two bronchodilator delivery systems (a novel dry powder inhaler and a standard metered dose inhaler). The first pilot study involved delivery of a single dose of salbutamol (200 micrograms) to 12 healthy volunteers and determination of sGaw up to 120 min after treatment. The second study involved delivery of cumulative doses of salbutamol (100, 200 and 400 micrograms) to 19 healthy volunteers with demonstrated reversibility of sGaw to the bronchodilator and measurement of sGaw up to 240 min after treatment. In both studies, increases in sGaw after treatment were significant compared to placebo and larger than the recorded increases in FEV1. Increases in sGaw were similar for both delivery devices and support the therapeutic equivalence of the two products. Power calculations indicated that the second study had appropriate statistical power to discriminate between treatments. It is concluded that the assessment of sGaw in healthy volunteers may be a useful and sensitive pharmacodynamic endpoint for use in the development of bronchodilators and their delivery devices.     

Effect of alginate and alginate-cimetidine combination therapy on stimulated postprandial gastro-oesophageal reflux

This randomized, single-blind cross-over study compared the effectiveness of a conventional alginate reflux barrier formulation (20 mL single dose of Liquid Gaviscon; sodium alginate, sodium bicarbonate, calcium carbonate) with a 20 mL single dose of an alginate-cimetidine combination formulation (Algitec Suspension; sodium alginate, cimetidine) in the suppression of food and acid reflux into the oesophagus after a test meal in 12 healthy volunteers. Subjects were fasted overnight before the study. A pH electrode and gamma detector were accurately positioned 5 cm above the cardia. The volunteers received a 99mTc-labelled meal designed to provoke reflux and then either remained untreated, or 30 min later were given either Algitec Suspension or Liquid Gaviscon. Reflux of both food and acid into the oesophagus was measured for 3 h. There was a seven day wash-out period between each treatment. Food reflux in the control group was 22,878 +/- 14,385 counts x 10(3) and this was significantly suppressed by both Liquid Gaviscon (174 +/- 128 (s.e.) counts x 10(3); P = 0.003); however, although the reduction of food reflux to 3812 +/- 2322 counts x 10(3) observed after Algitec treatment was considerable, this did not reach statistical significance (P > 0.05) due to the large intersubject variation. Liquid Gaviscon was significantly better at reducing food reflux than Algitec (P = 0.001). Gaviscon also significantly reduced acid reflux when compared with the control group (1.08 +/- 0.73 vs 5.87 +/- 3.27% recording time oesophageal pH < 4, respectively) (P = 0.03). The slight reduction in acid reflux after Algitec treatment (3.25 +/- 1.82% recording time oesophageal pH < 4) also did not reach statistical significance. The difference between Algitec and Gaviscon treatment was also not significant.     

Respiratory response to salbutamol (albuterol) in ventilator-dependent infants with chronic lung disease: pressurized aerosol delivery versus intravenous injection

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of intravenously injected with inhaled salbutamol in ventilator dependent infants with chronic lung disease (CLD). DESIGN: Prospective randomized study which each patient served as his/her own control. SETTING: Multidisciplinary neonatal and pediatric ICU. PATIENTS: 8 ventilator dependent premature infants with CLD. INTERVENTIONS: Salbutamol, 10 micrograms/kg was given intravenously, and 10-19 h later, twice 100 micrograms as pressurized aerosol, or vice versa, sequence randomized. The pressurized aerosol was delivered by a metered dose inhaler into a newly developed aerosol holding chamber, integrated into the inspiratory limb of the patient circuit. Respiratory system mechanics were assessed by the single breath occlusion method before and 10 and 60 min after drug administration. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Compliance improved significantly after intravenous injection (0.48 +/- 0.18 to 0.67 +/- 0.16, p < 0.01 and 0.59 +/- 0.23 ml/cmH2O/kg, NS, (mean +/- 1 SD) and after inhalation (0.46 +/- 0.19 to 0.64 +/- 0.32, p < 0.01 and 0.56 +/- 0.31 ml/cmH2O/kg, NS). Resistance decreased after iv. use (0.38 +/- 0.17 to 0.25 +/- 0.11, p < 0.001 and 0.25 +/- 0.10 cmH2O/ml/s, NS) and after inhalation (0.35 +/- 0.12 to 0.27 +/- 0.09, p < 0.01 and 0.28 +/- 0.12 cmH2O/ml/s, NS). Heart rate increased significantly after both routes of application, whereas mean arterial pressure, respirator settings, FIO2, transcutaneous SO2 and capillary PCO2 did not change. CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled and intravenous salbutamol improves pulmonary mechanics to the same extent with comparable side effects, and may therefore be used to facilitate weaning from respirators.     

Valproate reduces intake of alcoholic beverage among rats

SETTING: University of Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. OBJECTIVE: To assess the awareness of the ozone layer and the acceptance of the new non-chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) propellant hydrofluoroalkane 134a salbutamol pressurised metered dose inhaler (MDI) Airomir among asthmatic patients. DESIGN: A total of 113 consecutive asthmatic patients aged 12 years and above from the out- and in-patient services of the hospital were interviewed using a questionnaire. RESULTS: Sixty-five per cent of the patients were aware of the existence of the ozone layer, 23% that CFCs play a role in ozone depletion, and only 10% that current MDIs contained CFCs. All the patients felt that pressurised MDIs should be made CFC-free after they had considered the role of CFCs in the destruction of the ozone layer. Eighty-one per cent of 94 patients who preferred the Airomir inhaler over a multi-dose dry powder inhaler for administering bronchodilator medications were willing to switch to the new inhaler once it became available on the market. CONCLUSION: Awareness of the damaging effect of CFCs on the ozone layer among asthmatic patients would encourage them to change to an ozone-friendly, CFC-free pressurised MDI.     

Urinary bacteriology in the elderly in the tropical zone: results of 5 years of activities at the CHU of Fann in Dakar

The distribution pattern of budesonide in the nasal passages and lungs was investigated in 10 healthy subjects after nasal inhalation. The subjects inhaled drug powder, radiolabelled with 99mTc, at maximum flow rate (46.3 +/- 6.8 l/min) and at 29.9 +/- 2.5 l/min via Turbuhaler. At both flows, the majority of the dose was deposited in the anterior part of the nasal cavity on a single, rather localized area, but some particles also penetrated more posteriorly into the main nasal passages and to the lungs. At maximum flow rate the nasal deposition was 65.2% (range 39.5-84.1%) and the lung deposition 4.7% (range 1.4-9.3%) of the metered dose, and at 30 l/min, the nasal deposition was 67.6% (range 49.7-81.6%) and the lung deposition was 4.2% (range 1.7-7.9%). A large fraction of the metered dose was deposited in the nasal adaptor of the inhaler during the administration (mean values 29 and 28%, for the two inhalation flows). Of the dose actually reaching the subject, 91 and 93% (mean values) was deposited in the nose. There were no statistically significant differences in distribution pattern between the two inhalation flows.     

Reduction in post-intubation respiratory resistance by isoflurane and albuterol

PURPOSE: This study examined the bronchodilating effects of 0.6 MAC and 1.1 MAC isoflurane (ISF) on respiratory system resistance (Rrs) following tracheal intubation and determined whether albuterol supplements that effect. METHODS: Sixty-seven adult patients were anaesthetized with 2 micrograms.kg-1 fentanyl and 5 mg.kg-1 thiopentone and their tracheas intubated following administration of 1 mg.kg-1 succinylcholine. Respiratory system resistance was measured following intubation and the patients then randomized to receive either 1.1 MAC ISF in oxygen or 0.6 MAC ISF in 50% nitrous oxide and oxygen. Ten minutes later, Rrs was again measured. Patients were then further randomized to receive albuterol or a placebo using incremental doses of 2, 5, and 10 puffs (albuterol puff = 90 micrograms) delivered via a metered dose inhaler at ten minute intervals. RESULTS: Isoflurane at 1.1 MAC decreased post-intubation Rrs by 23 +/- 5% (mean +/- sem) whereas the decrease was only 7 +/- 5% for 0.6 MAC ISF (P < 0.01). Two puffs of albuterol resulted in a further decrease of 12 +/- 3% (mean +/- sem) in Rrs compared with a 2 +/- 4% decrease in the placebo groups (P < 0.05). Additional puffs of albuterol resulted in no further changes in Rrs. CONCLUSION: We conclude that following tracheal intubation the reduction in Rrs produced by ISF is highly concentration dependent. Albuterol results in a small further reduction in Rrs.     

Efficacy and safety of salmeterol in childhood asthma

In children with asthma, twice daily administration of salmeterol 25 micrograms, salmeterol 50 micrograms and salbutamol 200 micrograms were compared in two, 3-month, double-blind, parallel group studies, one using metered dose inhalers (MDIs), the other using dry powder inhalers (Diskhaler, DPIs). Both studies were continued for a further 9 months during which time exacerbation rates, lung function at the clinic and adverse events were monitored. Similarities in design and methodology of the two studies justified a combined analysis. Eight hundred and forty-seven asthmatic children aged between 4 and 16 (mean 10.1) years, requiring inhaled beta 2-agonist treatment were randomised to treatment. After a 2 week run-in when all bronchodilator therapy was withdrawn, 279 patients received salmeterol 25 micrograms bd, 290 patients salmeterol 50 micrograms bd and 278 patients salbutamol 200 micrograms bd. After 3 months' treatment the change from baseline in daily morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) was significantly greater with salmeterol 50 micrograms bd than with salbutamol 200 micrograms bd (P < 0.001). Salmeterol 50 micrograms bd was also significantly better than salmeterol 25 micrograms bd at improving mean morning PEF (P = 0.017) but both treatments had a similar effect on evening PEF. Analysis of variance showed an interaction between baseline PEF less than 100% predicted normal value and treatment outcome. Analysis of this sub-set of patients with lower lung function revealed similar results to the total population although the improvements in PEF from baseline were greater. Data from both studies, showed that the improvement in lung function was maintained throughout 12 months' treatment. Patients receiving salmeterol 50 micrograms bd had significantly more symptom-free nights (P < 0.01) and a higher percentage of rescue bronchodilator-free days (P = 0.01). The incidence of asthma exacerbations was evenly distributed between the three treatment groups and there was no evidence of any change in the rate of occurrence of exacerbations over the 12 month period. Adverse events were no different across treatment groups or across age groups and were primarily related to the patients' disease state. CONCLUSION: Salmeterol 50 micrograms bd is the appropriate dose for the treatment of children with mild to moderate asthma.     

The detection of cytochrome P450 2E1 and its catalytic activity in rat testis

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of 100 micrograms of salbutamol inhaled from a new metered-dose powder inhaler (MDPI, Leiras Taifun, Finland) with that of a same dose of salbutamol inhaled from a conventional pressurized metered-dose inhaler with a large volume spacer (pMDI + S) in protecting against methacholine (Mch) induced bronchoconstriction. This was a 3 day, randomized, cross-over, partly blinded, placebo-controlled multicentre study where the pMDI + S was used as an open control. Twenty-six asthmatic outpatients with a baseline FEV1 > or = 60% of predicted and with bronchial hyperreactivity (PD20 FEV1 < or = 890 micrograms of Mch) were studied. On each study day the patients underwent an Mch provocation 30 min after inhaling placebo from the MDPI or a dose of 100 micrograms of salbutamol from the MDPI and from the pMDI + S. PD20 FEV1 and dose-response slope [DRS; maximal change in FEV1 (%)/dose of Mch (mumol)] were used to evaluate efficacy. The median values of PD20 FEV1 were 250, 622 and 1737 micrograms after placebo MDPI, salbutamol pMDI + S and salbutamol MDPI, respectively. The corresponding DRS values were -11.0%, -4.5% and -2.0% mumol-1. With both parameters, all differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). In conclusion, 100 micrograms of salbutamol inhaled from Leiras Taifun MDPI offers better protection against Mch-induced bronchoconstriction than 100 micrograms of salbutamol from a pMDI connected to a large volume spacer device.     

Estimating the cost of lost productivity in dyspepsia

In a two-day, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, cross-over multicenter study, the bronchodilating effect of 100 micrograms of salbutamol (CAS 18559-94-9) inhaled from a new metered dose powder inhaler (MDPI; Taifun) was compared with that of an identical dose of salbutamol inhaled from a conventional pressurised metered dose inhaler connected to a spacer (pMDI + S). Thirty-six non-smoking, adult asthmatic outpatients with a baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) between 35 and 70% of the predicted value participated in the study. After inhalation of the study medication pulmonary function, FEV1 and airway resistance (R(aw)), blood pressure (BP), and heart rate (HR) were measured up to 6 h. Area under the FEV1 vs. time curve (AUCFEV1) was used as the primary efficacy parameter, and the 90% confidence intervals (CI) were used to judge clinical equivalence. Other efficacy parameters were used in supportive analyses as secondary parameters. Both treatments produced a clear improvement in pulmonary function. The mean +/- SD AUCFEV1 were 893 +/- 281 and 889 +/- 2761.min after MDPI and pMDI + S, respectively. The 90% CI for the relative efficacy of the MDPI is from 98 to 103% of that of the pMDI + S. Also the other efficacy parameters gave similar results without significant differences: the mean +/- SD values of percent increase in FEV1 were 47.2 +/- 19.3 and 44.7 +/- 20.8, the maximum absolute value of FEV1 were 2.87 +/- 0.77 and 2.86 +/- 0.77, the maximum percent decrease in R(aw) 53.2 +/- 20.5 and 55.0 +/- 19.1, and the minimum absolute value of R(aw) 0.27 +/- 0.11 and 0.30 +/- 0.12 kPa.s.l-1 for the MDPI and pMDI + S, respectively. The salbutamol doses had no significant effect on BP or HR, and were equally well tolerated. Furthermore, 57.5% of the patients preferred the MDPI, 35% the pMDI + S, and 7.5% considered that there was no difference between the devices. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that the new MDPI is as effective and safe a device as a conventional pMDI connected to a spacer in administering inhaled salbutamol for asthmatic patients. Further, most patients considered the MDPI easier to handle, and preferred it over the pMDI + S.     

Cytokine and cytotoxic pathways of NK cell rejection of class I-deficient bone marrow grafts: influence of mouse colony environment

OBJECTIVE: To identify biochemical and dietary factors which may play a role in the low incidence of stone formation in the black South African population. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The study included 31 semiurbanized black and 29 urbanized white subjects. The protocol and modern laboratory techniques used to assess recurrent stone formers were followed. Urinary sodium, potassium, creatinine, calcium, phosphate and urate levels were measured, and urinary citrate, oxalate and cystine assessed. RESULTS: Black subjects ate a diet significantly higher in sodium (P < 0.04); there was no difference in serum levels but urinary sodium was significantly higher (P < 0.001) in black than in white subjects. Urinary potassium, calcium, citrate, phosphate and cystine were all significantly lower in black than in white subjects (P < 0.001 for the first four and P < 0.03 for cystine). CONCLUSION: Certain intrinsic factors in South African black subjects may account for their lower frequency of stone formation than in white subjects. Of these, the very low urinary calcium, decreased urinary cystine and different interactions between sodium and calcium/cystine are probably important.     

Comparison of the protective effects of cromolyn sodium and nedocromil sodium in the treatment of exercise-induced asthma in children

Seventeen children with asthma were studied in a double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled study designed to compare the efficacy of cromolyn sodium with that of nedocromil sodium in preventing exercise-induced asthma. All drugs were delivered through a metered-dose inhaler (cromolyn sodium, 10 mg; nedocromil sodium, 4 mg; placebo, two puffs). Nedocromil sodium and cromolyn sodium provided significant, comparable protection from exercise-induced asthma, and both drugs were better than placebo. We conclude that nedocromil sodium and cromolyn sodium administered by a pressurized aerosol provide equal protection against exercise-induced asthma in children.